locked Re: Minutes for March 2, 2019 Meeting Posted
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
That is an interesting approach. At some point, we likely need to define and agree on what constitutes good use of the spectrum. I’ve got repeater owners that try to keep the chatter down on their machines so they are ‘available’ if needed. On the other hand, we’ve got ARES folks who have permission to use the repeater for 30 minutes a week so they conduct their net, then read articles from scientific America for the balance of the 30 minutes to make sure that the repeater is ‘in use’. Add the ability to link to a busy reflector, and your repeater can be ‘active’ a large portion of the time…yet not really providing much of a service.
What actually constitutes good use of the spectrum? Is it better to have one repeater that blankets a coverage area, or 6 lower level repeaters that border on each other and overlap slightly? Is it better to have 20 very good repeaters for a region, or is it better to allow everyone who wants to build a repeater and have 40 overlapping, struggling repeaters in the same region? Is it better to wedge the 80% analog users on to narrow channels and deal with the overlap so that 20% can operate DMR/Dstar without being affected?
I guess, we need to evaluate a bit what is the best use of the spectrum. I’m not quite sold on narrower channels and more repeaters just because someone wants their own repeater. However, I do understand that if we don’t find a way to try the new modes and systems, we won’t grow.
Again I think we need a clear definition of what we consider the good use of the spectrum to be so we can strive towards a goal.
From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of Randy Neals
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2019 12:01 AM
Subject: Re: [wwara] Minutes for March 2, 2019 Meeting Posted