|
Re: Audio input decoding
Hello Rob,
that is great to hear!
A few more details on my setup:
I am using a QCX connected to a very cheap USB soundcard connected to a raspberry pi 3B.
The loopback device is just software created
Hello Rob,
that is great to hear!
A few more details on my setup:
I am using a QCX connected to a very cheap USB soundcard connected to a raspberry pi 3B.
The loopback device is just software created
|
By
Martin
·
#474
·
|
|
Re: Audio input decoding
Hi Martin,
Your use of the AUDIO input feature has stimulated me to raise its priority in debugging of WD 3.0.
Also, have you tried using a virtual audio channel as input to WD?
Thanks,
Rob
--
Rob
Hi Martin,
Your use of the AUDIO input feature has stimulated me to raise its priority in debugging of WD 3.0.
Also, have you tried using a virtual audio channel as input to WD?
Thanks,
Rob
--
Rob
|
By
Rob Robinett
·
#473
·
|
|
Re: Audio input decoding
Great, thank you for providing and maintaining wsprdaemon!
It is a very nice standalone solution.
Great, thank you for providing and maintaining wsprdaemon!
It is a very nice standalone solution.
|
By
Martin
·
#472
·
|
|
Re: Audio input decoding
Hi Martin,
Thanks for that welcome report. In WD 3.0 I will study how to incorporate your fixes.
Rob
Hi Martin,
Thanks for that welcome report. In WD 3.0 I will study how to incorporate your fixes.
Rob
|
By
Rob Robinett
·
#471
·
|
|
Re: Audio input decoding
Hello,
baseband audio is working for me, however, two things needed tweaking beforehand:
1. the name of my soundcard is "plughw:CARD=Loopback,DEV=1" which does not fit into the naming scheme of
Hello,
baseband audio is working for me, however, two things needed tweaking beforehand:
1. the name of my soundcard is "plughw:CARD=Loopback,DEV=1" which does not fit into the naming scheme of
|
By
Martin
·
#470
·
|
|
Re: Radio "limbo"
OK, after 24 hours run time at -20 dBm output, the clear "winner" was W4HOD in Alabama (USA), spotting me twice in 24 hours. My setup is still running, and at 1742 UTC today another station in the
OK, after 24 hours run time at -20 dBm output, the clear "winner" was W4HOD in Alabama (USA), spotting me twice in 24 hours. My setup is still running, and at 1742 UTC today another station in the
|
By
Bruce KX4AZ
·
#469
·
|
|
Re: Radio "limbo"
Ouch, I hate to bombard this group yet again with a post, but my UTC timing was off off today too! I commenced transmitting at 10 microwatts 1506 UTC today (October 6). Promise this will be the last
Ouch, I hate to bombard this group yet again with a post, but my UTC timing was off off today too! I commenced transmitting at 10 microwatts 1506 UTC today (October 6). Promise this will be the last
|
By
Bruce KX4AZ
·
#468
·
|
|
Re: Radio "limbo"
Correction and an oops...I hit the wrong button on the step attenuator when changing power a few minutes before 1600 UTC, and so had the power running 10 dB too high, at 0.1 mW, and K9AN "snuck in"
Correction and an oops...I hit the wrong button on the step attenuator when changing power a few minutes before 1600 UTC, and so had the power running 10 dB too high, at 0.1 mW, and K9AN "snuck in"
|
By
Bruce KX4AZ
·
#467
·
|
|
Re: Radio "limbo"
After nearly 24 hours running at 50 microwatts (-13 dBm), there were still 8 stations who heard me, though the total spot count and geographical diversity is narrowing. And some stations were hanging
After nearly 24 hours running at 50 microwatts (-13 dBm), there were still 8 stations who heard me, though the total spot count and geographical diversity is narrowing. And some stations were hanging
|
By
Bruce KX4AZ
·
#466
·
|
|
Re: Radio "limbo"
Hi Bruce,
well, we sure have to believe the statements on power sent :-). I myself on TX am using the WSPRlight flexi and I checked the power with a spectrum analyser. The settings seem to be about
Hi Bruce,
well, we sure have to believe the statements on power sent :-). I myself on TX am using the WSPRlight flexi and I checked the power with a spectrum analyser. The settings seem to be about
|
By
Gerhard, OE3GBB
·
#465
·
|
|
Re: Radio "limbo"
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 02:50 PM, Jim Lill wrote:
If you did a NEC model of your EFHW (or most any EFHW) you'd be shocked by how lossy they usually are. Knowing that loss, band per band, you could
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 02:50 PM, Jim Lill wrote:
If you did a NEC model of your EFHW (or most any EFHW) you'd be shocked by how lossy they usually are. Knowing that loss, band per band, you could
|
By
Bruce KX4AZ
·
#464
·
|
|
Re: Radio "limbo"
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 01:40 PM, @OE3GBB wrote:
For info, just checked WSPR:
I could receive at OE3XOE several DX stations using powers of 5 and 10 mW:
Gerhard,
Thanks for posting that - it's
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 01:40 PM, @OE3GBB wrote:
For info, just checked WSPR:
I could receive at OE3XOE several DX stations using powers of 5 and 10 mW:
Gerhard,
Thanks for posting that - it's
|
By
Bruce KX4AZ
·
#463
·
|
|
Re: Radio "limbo"
This is a pretty good article on EFHW
https://vu2nsb.com/antenna/wire-antennas/multiband-efhw-antenna/
On 10/5/21 2:49 PM, Jim Lill wrote:
This is a pretty good article on EFHW
https://vu2nsb.com/antenna/wire-antennas/multiband-efhw-antenna/
On 10/5/21 2:49 PM, Jim Lill wrote:
|
By
Jim Lill
·
#462
·
|
|
Re: Radio "limbo"
If you did a NEC model of your EFHW (or most any EFHW) you'd be shocked by how lossy they usually are. Knowing that loss, band per band, you could further reduce your actual ERP.
If you did a NEC model of your EFHW (or most any EFHW) you'd be shocked by how lossy they usually are. Knowing that loss, band per band, you could further reduce your actual ERP.
|
By
Jim Lill
·
#461
·
|
|
Re: Radio "limbo"
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 02:09 PM, Jim Lill wrote:
what type antenna do you use on 40M?For transmitting I am using an EFHW that covers 40-10 meters, so about 65 feet long, straight horizontal line at
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 02:09 PM, Jim Lill wrote:
what type antenna do you use on 40M?For transmitting I am using an EFHW that covers 40-10 meters, so about 65 feet long, straight horizontal line at
|
By
Bruce KX4AZ
·
#460
·
|
|
Re: Radio "limbo"
what type antenna do you use on 40M?
-Jim
WA2ZKD
On 10/4/21 11:08 PM, Bruce KX4AZ wrote:
what type antenna do you use on 40M?
-Jim
WA2ZKD
On 10/4/21 11:08 PM, Bruce KX4AZ wrote:
|
By
Jim Lill
·
#459
·
|
|
Re: Radio "limbo"
For info, just checked WSPR:
I could receive at OE3XOE several DX stations using powers of 5 and 10 mW:
73 de Gerhard OE3GBB
Am 05.10.2021 05:08, schrieb Bruce KX4AZ:
For info, just checked WSPR:
I could receive at OE3XOE several DX stations using powers of 5 and 10 mW:
73 de Gerhard OE3GBB
Am 05.10.2021 05:08, schrieb Bruce KX4AZ:
|
By
Gerhard, OE3GBB
·
#458
·
|
|
Re: Radio "limbo"
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 08:01 AM, Gwyn Griffiths wrote:
...attachment is a screenshot of three plots from the WsprDaemon Grafana site showing time series of a) your SNR at N6GN/K (specifically at
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 08:01 AM, Gwyn Griffiths wrote:
...attachment is a screenshot of three plots from the WsprDaemon Grafana site showing time series of a) your SNR at N6GN/K (specifically at
|
By
Bruce KX4AZ
·
#457
·
|
|
Re: Radio "limbo"
Hi Bruce,
that is a great idea! Will have to try this also.
I once have done a similar test to see the minimal power to reach a DX station. That would be an indication on how good the antenna is at
Hi Bruce,
that is a great idea! Will have to try this also.
I once have done a similar test to see the minimal power to reach a DX station. That would be an indication on how good the antenna is at
|
By
Gerhard, OE3GBB
·
#456
·
|
|
Re: Radio "limbo"
Hello Bruce
Nice to read of your experiments, and I look forward to seeing the results of your 50 microwatts and below transmissions.
The attachment is a screenshot of three plots from the WsprDaemon
Hello Bruce
Nice to read of your experiments, and I look forward to seeing the results of your 50 microwatts and below transmissions.
The attachment is a screenshot of three plots from the WsprDaemon
|
By
Gwyn Griffiths
·
#455
·
|