Re: Master Clock contact spark quenching
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
A wee bit off-topic, but.......
It should perhaps be remembered that, as Malcom has said, a reverse current is induced in the coil by the collapsing magnetic field when the circuit is broken. When using a diode to quench this (which it does very effectively) the effective short circuit delays the collapse of the magnetic field in the magnet. With the electric clocks with which we are all familiar, this is not usually a problem. However, in the pipe organ field (of which I wrote a couple of days ago) this can be a problem as when a key is released there can be an noticeable lag before the valve closes - one reason why purists insist on purely mechanical actions in organs.
From: Malcolm Rix <malcolmrix@...>
Sent: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 16:43
Subject: Re: [synchronomeelectricclock] Master Clock contact spark quenching
When the switch breaks, current is still flowing in the magnet coil, as the magnetic field collapses in the iron core, reverse current is induced. Since the circuit is broken the voltage rises very high and a spark may jump the gap. When synchronomes were in service a resistor was used to drain the current and avoid the voltage reaching a level that would spark. The modern way is to use a silicon power diode (e.g. 1N4001) mounted in reverse across the switch. These were not available in the clock’s heyday, hence the resistor. A capacitor might delay the rise of the peak, but either a resistor or diode is really the way to go.
On Jan 6, 2021, at 23:23, Andrew Nahum <andrew.nahum@...> wrote:
I have often wondered why spark quenching can’t be done better with a capacitor as used across the breaker points in all older style automotive ignitions. Can anyone explain why we stick with the Synchronome resistor?
On 5 Jan 2021, at 09:40, John Haine <john.haine@...> wrote: