They didn't have Silicon diodes in
Strowger days, only Selenium, which devices were
leaky and bulky. R/C was the appropriate tech. Now, Si.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On 1/7/2021 3:03 PM, Ian Richardson via groups.io wrote:
Hi Darren,
You are quite correct, but there are also other ways to
minimise the voltage across the contacts as they open. One is
to put a capacitor in series with the power supply such that
it is the capacitor charging current which drives the
solenoid, then blocks any further current flow. This approach
works well with clocks whose impulse is prolonged, eg Brillié,
but may not work for the very short impulse of a Synchronome.
Another is to use make-before-break contacts arranged such
that the coil is shunted before the supply contacts open.
This is used on GPO Type 36 clocks. A less familiar approach
was used by Matheus Hipp whereby the make-before-break switch
actually short circuits both the coils and the supply! In
that case, a resistor was put in series with the power supply
to avoid the direct short.
I made full use of the capacitor blocking approach in my
electrically reset gravity escapement clock (of which I have
written before) wherein the gravity arms form the poles of a
reversing switch, but the driving current comes from charging
and discharging capacitors so arranged that the operating
current is applied via the capacitors on making contact, but
when the contact is broken there is no current flowing.
While on this subject, it is worth remembering that
Strowger type telephone exchanges used hundreds if not
thousands of relays and other electromagnetic switching
devices and they nearly always used the R/C type of snubber
across the contacts - so they must have reckoned it to be a
good solution to the sparking issue!
Best regards,
Ian R
Auvergne,
France
-----Original
Message-----
From: Darren Conway <darren.conway@...>
To: synchronome1@groups.io
Sent: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 20:52
Subject: Re: [synchronomeelectricclock] Master Clock contact
spark quenching
Hi
There are two parts to this problem.
One is to reduce the back emf from the coil that
generates the voltage to arc across the opening
contacts. A diode across the coil will achieve this.
Two is to maintain a near zero voltage across the
contacts as they open, for long enough to open far
enough to prevent an arc forming. This is solved with
an RC snubber across the contacts.
Regards
Darren Conway
36 Orr Crescent
Lower Hutt
New Zealand
ph +64 (0)4 569 1963
On 7.01.21
11:33 pm, Ian Richardson via groups.io wrote:
In the pipe
organ world, the use of diodes in direct electric
actions is standard practice. I have just fitted up a
direct action unit extension organ with about 200
electromagnetic valves, each runs on 15 vdc. and
carries a current of about 250mA. Each coil is
shunted with 1N400X diodes or equivalent. There is no
sparking - imagine if there was, the organ woiuld
break down every day as the coils are activated
hundreds of times with each performance! The diodes
cost about €1 per 100.
The point about polarity is, of course, valid but
simply solved by using a high current silicon diode
in series with the power supply. If connected the
correct way round, all works well; if the wrong way
round, it doesn't work at all, so it "fails safe".
Ian R
Auvergne,
France
-----Original
Message-----
From: John Hubert <jfphubert@...>
To: synchronome1@groups.io
Sent: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 11:17
Subject: Re: [synchronomeelectricclock] Master
Clock contact spark quenching
I do just as you suggest on all my dials
and masters. 1N400X series diodes. The
maintaining of current is minimal (looked some
years ago with an oscilloscope and it was
insignificant). There is typically some
variation of impulse length dependant on the
master anyway (Gents tend to be longer and
early Synchronome clocks rather short -
lighter parts?). Typically, the coil carries
about 300 mA and has a resistance of about 5
Ohms, with a parallel resistor of about 50
Ohms.
Diodes work well -
but of course you have to have the right
polarity.
John
Surely now we
have cheap reliable silicon diodes the
best approach is the now-standard
practice of connecting a diode across
the coil so that when the contact
opens the diode shorts out the
inductive kick? The diode should be
reverse biased when the coil is
energised. The only snag with this is
that the diode maintains the current
when the contact opens for a period
which may cause a problem. That can
be made shorter by putting a resistor
in series with the diode to dissipate
the stored energy more quickly at the
expense of a higher voltage. For
example, if the coil carried 1 amp
when the contact was closed, and the
resistor was 100 ohms, the peak
backswing voltage would be 100 volts,
quite a lot but probably not enough to
cause breakdown in the gap.
|