Topics

FW: [CALBIRDS] CBRC review and request for documentation


Tom Edell
 

This is a reminder to anyone that saw the Common Ringed Plover and may wish to send documentation to the CBRC. Details on how to and what to provide are detailed below.

 

Tom Edell

Cayucos, CA

 

From: CALBIRDS@groups.io <CALBIRDS@groups.io> On Behalf Of Thomas Benson
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2020 2:05 PM
To: calbirds@groups.io
Subject: [CALBIRDS] CBRC review and request for documentation

 

California birders,

 

In early November, the California Bird Records Committee (CBRC) will begin reviewing the following records. If you have any documentation to submit for these records, please do so as soon as possible. Feel free to forward this request to local listservs as appropriate. Thank you.

 

Tom

 

Thomas A. Benson

Secretary, California Bird Records Committee

 

 

2020-085 Ruby-throated Hummingbird, 5-10 Sep 20, Tomales, MRN (documentation from 4 observers)

2020-072 Common Crane, 26 Jul-20 Sep 20, Davis Creek (town), MOD (documentation from 7 observers)

2020-110 Common Ringed Plover, 1-7 Oct 20, Morro Bay, SLO (documentation from 5 observers)

2020-097 Slaty-backed Gull, 16 Sep 20, Ten Mile Beach, MEN (documentation from 2 observers)

2020-070 Wood Stork, 18 Jul-25 Sep 20, Perris, Lake Elsinore, and Mystic Lake, RIV (documentation from 1 observer)

2020-116 Wood Stork, 3-7 Oct 20, San Diego Zoo and Safari Park, SD (documentation from 1 observer)

2020-086 Mississippi Kite, 9 Sep 20, Chula Vista, Mission Bay, and Pacific Beach, SD (documentation from 1 observer)

 

 

What kind of documentation should one submit to the CBRC? Following are some guidelines for submitting media and written descriptions that will be useful for helping the CBRC evaluate records and archive documentation. Documentation may be submitted directly to the secretary via email (secretary@...), or by using the online submission form (http://www.californiabirds.org/report_sighting.html).

 

Media: This includes photos, audio recordings, and video. Photographs are usually the most useful documentation for evaluating records. If you have reasonably good (=identifiable) photos, please submit them. If possible, please crop the photos before submission so that the bird fills most of the frame. Also, please send originals whenever possible, and not screenshots or back-of-camera photos. How many photos should you submit? That really depends on the record. If it is a long-staying rarity that is easily identifiable and seen by dozens of people, then a few photos (1-3 per person) are sufficient. If it is a mega-rarity that is difficult to identify and only seen by one or few people, then send as many photos as possible that show the bird at different angles, postures, lighting, etc. Sometimes it is also useful to submit audio and/or video recordings of the bird, as some birds are more easily identified by their vocalizations. If relatively short, most audio recordings are small enough to be submitted via email; please submit those along with a brief note indicating the date and location of the recording. Large audio files and video files can be submitted by using a file sharing service; please contact the secretary if you need to submit a file that is too large for email.

 

Written descriptions: Some written details should always be provided – even the best photos should be accompanied by the name of the observer, the date, and the location, at a minimum. Sometimes a photo can’t be obtained or vocalizations can’t be recorded. In some cases, behaviors might be noted in the field that aren’t preserved well by photos. In these cases, it is helpful to submit a written description of the bird. Ideally, this description should be written as soon after observing the bird as possible; it is often helpful to make written notes in the field, or even dictate notes into the voice recorder on your smartphone while observing the bird, from which you can later generate a written description. The most important aspect of a written description is that you report only what you observed, and not a general description of the bird from a field guide. At a minimum, your description should include the date and location of the observation, and a description of the bird (size and structure, plumage, vocalizations, behavior). A brief discussion of how the bird was identified, and how similar species were eliminated is also helpful. Other useful information you might report includes optics used, distance from bird, lighting or weather conditions, length of time viewed, and other observers present.

 


--

Tom Edell
Cayucos, CA


Thomas Slater
 

Will they Use ebird  reports?




On Thursday, October 15, 2020, 3:25 PM, Tom Edell via groups.io <TEdell@...> wrote:

This is a reminder to anyone that saw the Common Ringed Plover and may wish to send documentation to the CBRC. Details on how to and what to provide are detailed below.

 

Tom Edell

Cayucos, CA

 

From: CALBIRDS@groups.io <CALBIRDS@groups.io> On Behalf Of Thomas Benson
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2020 2:05 PM
To: calbirds@groups.io
Subject: [CALBIRDS] CBRC review and request for documentation

 

California birders,

 

In early November, the California Bird Records Committee (CBRC) will begin reviewing the following records. If you have any documentation to submit for these records, please do so as soon as possible. Feel free to forward this request to local listservs as appropriate. Thank you.

 

Tom

 

Thomas A. Benson

Secretary, California Bird Records Committee

 

 

2020-085 Ruby-throated Hummingbird, 5-10 Sep 20, Tomales, MRN (documentation from 4 observers)

2020-072 Common Crane, 26 Jul-20 Sep 20, Davis Creek (town), MOD (documentation from 7 observers)

2020-110 Common Ringed Plover, 1-7 Oct 20, Morro Bay, SLO (documentation from 5 observers)

2020-097 Slaty-backed Gull, 16 Sep 20, Ten Mile Beach, MEN (documentation from 2 observers)

2020-070 Wood Stork, 18 Jul-25 Sep 20, Perris, Lake Elsinore, and Mystic Lake, RIV (documentation from 1 observer)

2020-116 Wood Stork, 3-7 Oct 20, San Diego Zoo and Safari Park, SD (documentation from 1 observer)

2020-086 Mississippi Kite, 9 Sep 20, Chula Vista, Mission Bay, and Pacific Beach, SD (documentation from 1 observer)

 

 

What kind of documentation should one submit to the CBRC? Following are some guidelines for submitting media and written descriptions that will be useful for helping the CBRC evaluate records and archive documentation. Documentation may be submitted directly to the secretary via email (secretary@...), or by using the online submission form (http://www.californiabirds.org/report_sighting.html).

 

Media: This includes photos, audio recordings, and video. Photographs are usually the most useful documentation for evaluating records. If you have reasonably good (=identifiable) photos, please submit them. If possible, please crop the photos before submission so that the bird fills most of the frame. Also, please send originals whenever possible, and not screenshots or back-of-camera photos. How many photos should you submit? That really depends on the record. If it is a long-staying rarity that is easily identifiable and seen by dozens of people, then a few photos (1-3 per person) are sufficient. If it is a mega-rarity that is difficult to identify and only seen by one or few people, then send as many photos as possible that show the bird at different angles, postures, lighting, etc. Sometimes it is also useful to submit audio and/or video recordings of the bird, as some birds are more easily identified by their vocalizations. If relatively short, most audio recordings are small enough to be submitted via email; please submit those along with a brief note indicating the date and location of the recording. Large audio files and video files can be submitted by using a file sharing service; please contact the secretary if you need to submit a file that is too large for email.

 

Written descriptions: Some written details should always be provided – even the best photos should be accompanied by the name of the observer, the date, and the location, at a minimum. Sometimes a photo can’t be obtained or vocalizations can’t be recorded. In some cases, behaviors might be noted in the field that aren’t preserved well by photos. In these cases, it is helpful to submit a written description of the bird. Ideally, this description should be written as soon after observing the bird as possible; it is often helpful to make written notes in the field, or even dictate notes into the voice recorder on your smartphone while observing the bird, from which you can later generate a written description. The most important aspect of a written description is that you report only what you observed, and not a general description of the bird from a field guide. At a minimum, your description should include the date and location of the observation, and a description of the bird (size and structure, plumage, vocalizations, behavior). A brief discussion of how the bird was identified, and how similar species were eliminated is also helpful. Other useful information you might report includes optics used, distance from bird, lighting or weather conditions, length of time viewed, and other observers present.

 


--

Tom Edell
Cayucos, CA


Joe Morlan
 

On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 01:49:10 +0000 (UTC), "Thomas Slater via groups.io"
<tomslaterphotography=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote:

Will they Use ebird reports?
Not unless they have to. It's always best to submit directly. They have an
online form or you can email your photos and descriptions to the secretary.

https://www.californiabirds.org/
--
Joseph Morlan, Pacifica, CA