Re: lologs and ilologs

Andreas Poschinger

Hi Rod,

I did not look into the old messages (due to time restriction...); this
may however senseful to solve the puzzle in order to know what Bob has
triggert to write this.

May Bobs sentence mean something like:

Seeing the current interest in log(arithm)s and co(-)logarithms [i.e.
logarithms of inverse numbersĀ  1/x], it might be that some readers would
be interested in a short (50k pdf) paper that I have written on
lo(g?)logs and i(inverse?)lo(g)logs.


Best regards


Join to automatically receive all group messages.