Date
1 - 7 of 7
SWL QSL
rudy i3vwk
load qso on hamlog with no rprt
73
Rudy
Il giorno mer 29 mar 2023 alle ore 10:55 daniel lavocat <F6FLU@...> ha scritto:
Good morning
how do you respond to a QSL from a SWL on Hamlog?
THANKS
Andy - DL1DXX
You might make a manually entry and confirm a "QSO" with the SWL.
You may write into comment field somthing like:
I cfm my QSO with xxxxx for SWL R9J-104. 100 %. Tnx SWL rprt! 73, Daniel
But I do not know, if this text will appear on HQSL.
But anyway, it should be no problem as R9J-104 will surely indicate, that it is a SWL - so no problem :-)
73, Andy - DL1DXX
Am 29.03.2023 um 10:55 schrieb daniel
lavocat:
Good morning
how do you respond to a QSL from a SWL on Hamlog?
THANKS
peter.klocko
Thank you Andy for the quick, understandable and helpful explanation.
73! de Peter OE3PKU
Von meinem/meiner Galaxy gesendet
-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
Von: Andy - DL1DXX <DL1DXX@...>
Datum: 29.03.23 12:11 (GMT+01:00)
An: rdaworld@groups.io
Betreff: Re: [rdaworld] SWL QSL
You might make a manually entry and confirm a "QSO" with the SWL.
You may write into comment field somthing like:
I cfm my QSO with xxxxx for SWL R9J-104. 100 %. Tnx SWL rprt! 73, Daniel
But I do not know, if this text will appear on HQSL.
But anyway, it should be no problem as R9J-104 will surely indicate, that it is a SWL - so no problem :-)
73, Andy - DL1DXX
Am 29.03.2023 um 10:55 schrieb daniel
lavocat:
Good morning
how do you respond to a QSL from a SWL on Hamlog?
THANKS
Mike ZooLoo
I create them in Hamlog with RST as "0"
I wish there were a button to click for SWL so the words on the QSL said "Confirm SWL" rather than "Confirm QSO"
The different call signs of SWL should be apparent, I guess. I also put comments which I hope appear on the QSL they receive.
Jim (AA0MZ)
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 7:12 AM daniel lavocat <F6FLU@...> wrote:
Thank you Andy
but that means I have to create a QSO with the SWL callsign as call and then send to Hamlog?
I thought it was just possible from Hamlog
I will not create QSOs with SWLs in my Log...
so i leave it like this
Thanks again for your comment
Andy - DL1DXX
I wish there were a button to click for SWL so the words on the QSL said "Confirm SWL" rather than "Confirm QSO"
Yes, it would be clearrer. But anyway: SWL callsigns are often very different from Ham calls and have the letters SWL are included.
I have, e.g. 4L1004SWL, UA3492SWL, IZ2010SWL, PY2604SWL.... and everyone should now, that R9J-104, R4H-20,
YL-RS-01 or OK2-9329 are *NEVER* Hamcalls. So no need (for me) for that button.
I'm (was in the past) DE1DXX. That "could be" seen as a Hamcall. But a closer look will tell you, that all german DE-"callsigns"
are SWLs. There are international rules for Ham calls.
I answer only QSL-cards or eQSLs from SWLs. RST is simply " - - - " and my confirmation text is like:
I cfm my QSO with RC3KR for SWL UA3400SWL. 100 %. Tnx SWL rprt! 73, Andy
I always include the callsign I have worked.
vy 73, Andy
Am 30.03.2023 um 14:22 schrieb Mike
ZooLoo:
I create them in Hamlog with RST as "0"
I wish there were a button to click for SWL so the words on the QSL said "Confirm SWL" rather than "Confirm QSO"
The different call signs of SWL should be apparent, I guess. I also put comments which I hope appear on the QSL they receive.
Jim (AA0MZ)
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 7:12 AM daniel lavocat <F6FLU@...> wrote:
Thank you Andy
but that means I have to create a QSO with the SWL callsign as call and then send to Hamlog?
I thought it was just possible from Hamlog
I will not create QSOs with SWLs in my Log...
so i leave it like this
Thanks again for your comment
