Recommendations for uploading HQSL scans to RDA Autocfm


ra3r
 

Recommendations for uploading HQSL scans to RDA Autocfm:
http://rdaward.ru/index.php?p=qsl_upl
1. Only HQSL correctly executed and confirmed by your correspondent are accepted for Autocfm (the time column indicates the time, not "no match")
2. The RDA number in the lower right corner must correspond to the spelling in the list of RDA districts http://rdaward.org/rda_eng.txt (i.e. TB-02 is correct, TB02, TB 02, TB-02/Tambov or no number at all is not correct).
3. HQSL with two or three RDA numbers are not accepted for Autocfm, according to the Rules of the RDA diploma, all logs for activation from the border of districts must necessarily be uploaded to the RDA Autocfm. In the absence of logs, none of the activated areas are counted.
4. For radio amateurs living on the border of districts, a similar rule applies, only loading logs for work from the border, HQSL with double numbers are not counted.
5. HQSL moderation within one day.
6. In case of rejection of HQSL, you can hover the cursor over the entry "Rejected" and see for what reason the scan was rejected.
7. In case of inaccuracy in call signs, RDA numbers and QSO data, scans are rejected with the corresponding entry in the comments (hover the cursor over the word "Rejected").
Simple and clear rules allow you not to fall into chaos, but to streamline the reception of properly designed HQSL.
We will try to solve the issue of automatic synchronization with Hamlog with Eugene R4AS in the near future. So far, everything is only in manual mode.

73! RA3R

Roman

RDA manager


Savas Pavlidis
 

Dear Roman,

Could you please give us an answer with a YES or a NO if the ACTIVATORS were able to upload their logbooks to your system from July 15th, 2022 till Jan 2023?

Thank you

73 Savas SV2AEL


On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 08:36, ra3r <rdaward@...> wrote:
Recommendations for uploading HQSL scans to RDA Autocfm:
http://rdaward.ru/index.php?p=qsl_upl
1. Only HQSL correctly executed and confirmed by your correspondent are
accepted for Autocfm (the time column indicates the time, not "no match")
2. The RDA number in the lower right corner must correspond to the
spelling in the list of RDA districts http://rdaward.org/rda_eng.txt
(i.e. TB-02 is correct, TB02, TB 02, TB-02/Tambov or no number at all is
not correct).
3. HQSL with two or three RDA numbers are not accepted for Autocfm,
according to the Rules of the RDA diploma, all logs for activation from
the border of districts must necessarily be uploaded to the RDA Autocfm.
In the absence of logs, none of the activated areas are counted.
4. For radio amateurs living on the border of districts, a similar rule
applies, only loading logs for work from the border, HQSL with double
numbers are not counted.
5. HQSL moderation within one day.
6. In case of rejection of HQSL, you can hover the cursor over the entry
"Rejected" and see for what reason the scan was rejected.
7. In case of inaccuracy in call signs, RDA numbers and QSO data, scans
are rejected with the corresponding entry in the comments (hover the
cursor over the word "Rejected").
Simple and clear rules allow you not to fall into chaos, but to
streamline the reception of properly designed HQSL.
We will try to solve the issue of automatic synchronization with Hamlog
with Eugene R4AS in the near future. So far, everything is only in
manual mode.

73! RA3R

Roman

RDA manager







ra3r
 

Dear Savas!
I don't understand your question. Any Russian amateur radio operator can upload his log at any time to the Autocfm system.
There are no restrictions.
To work from the border of two or three RDA districts, loading the log is a prerequisite for setting off activation.
73! RA3R
Roman




23.02.2023 23:33, Savas Pavlidis пишет:

Dear Roman,

Could you please give us an answer with a YES or a NO if the ACTIVATORS were able to upload their logbooks to your system from July 15th, 2022 till Jan 2023?

Thank you

73 Savas SV2AEL

On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 08:36, ra3r <rdaward@...> wrote:
Recommendations for uploading HQSL scans to RDA Autocfm:
http://rdaward.ru/index.php?p=qsl_upl
1. Only HQSL correctly executed and confirmed by your correspondent are
accepted for Autocfm (the time column indicates the time, not "no match")
2. The RDA number in the lower right corner must correspond to the
spelling in the list of RDA districts http://rdaward.org/rda_eng.txt
(i.e. TB-02 is correct, TB02, TB 02, TB-02/Tambov or no number at all is
not correct).
3. HQSL with two or three RDA numbers are not accepted for Autocfm,
according to the Rules of the RDA diploma, all logs for activation from
the border of districts must necessarily be uploaded to the RDA Autocfm.
In the absence of logs, none of the activated areas are counted.
4. For radio amateurs living on the border of districts, a similar rule
applies, only loading logs for work from the border, HQSL with double
numbers are not counted.
5. HQSL moderation within one day.
6. In case of rejection of HQSL, you can hover the cursor over the entry
"Rejected" and see for what reason the scan was rejected.
7. In case of inaccuracy in call signs, RDA numbers and QSO data, scans
are rejected with the corresponding entry in the comments (hover the
cursor over the word "Rejected").
Simple and clear rules allow you not to fall into chaos, but to
streamline the reception of properly designed HQSL.
We will try to solve the issue of automatic synchronization with Hamlog
with Eugene R4AS in the near future. So far, everything is only in
manual mode.

73! RA3R

Roman

RDA manager








Savas Pavlidis
 

Dear Roman,
Trust me, I can't explain to you such a simple question with more details.
I do not know Russian and moreover, I don't want to come back to the same topic.
Since you are ''unambiguous'', there is no point to continue the conversation anymore.

Some voices here in the forum tried to help you to find a good solution. Not for us. It's not a big deal to have 5 or 10 RDAs more in our accounts.

It seems that you don't want any help or any other approach/opinion. Οr you don't understand this issue regarding ''county line-log only'' for the period June 2022 till Jan 2023 really exists as a ''problem'' for the hunters, because it was not their responsibility as it was created.

Hope you will have the same opinion when you are forced to answer everyday in same questions again and again, in the upcoming weeks -even months-  because too many hunters have not yet uploaded HQSLs and they will have the same issues.

Wish to you and to your classic RDA program the best of luck with your decisions.

Vy 73 de SV2AEL Savas


SM6LRR
 

Roman, please explain the difference between accepting Single-RDA HQSL and multiple-RDA HQSL?

And i don't expect references to "rules that have existed ten years".

Maybe I am stupid, but I see ZERO difference between accepting single-RDA versus multiple-RDA HQSL.

Please explain this difference to us RDA hunters.

73 de Mats RM2D 

On Fri, Feb 24, 2023, 08:40 ra3r <rdaward@...> wrote:
Dear Savas!
I don't understand your question. Any Russian amateur radio operator can upload his log at any time to the Autocfm system.
There are no restrictions.
To work from the border of two or three RDA districts, loading the log is a prerequisite for setting off activation.
73! RA3R
Roman




23.02.2023 23:33, Savas Pavlidis пишет:
Dear Roman,

Could you please give us an answer with a YES or a NO if the ACTIVATORS were able to upload their logbooks to your system from July 15th, 2022 till Jan 2023?

Thank you

73 Savas SV2AEL

On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 08:36, ra3r <rdaward@...> wrote:
Recommendations for uploading HQSL scans to RDA Autocfm:
http://rdaward.ru/index.php?p=qsl_upl
1. Only HQSL correctly executed and confirmed by your correspondent are
accepted for Autocfm (the time column indicates the time, not "no match")
2. The RDA number in the lower right corner must correspond to the
spelling in the list of RDA districts http://rdaward.org/rda_eng.txt
(i.e. TB-02 is correct, TB02, TB 02, TB-02/Tambov or no number at all is
not correct).
3. HQSL with two or three RDA numbers are not accepted for Autocfm,
according to the Rules of the RDA diploma, all logs for activation from
the border of districts must necessarily be uploaded to the RDA Autocfm.
In the absence of logs, none of the activated areas are counted.
4. For radio amateurs living on the border of districts, a similar rule
applies, only loading logs for work from the border, HQSL with double
numbers are not counted.
5. HQSL moderation within one day.
6. In case of rejection of HQSL, you can hover the cursor over the entry
"Rejected" and see for what reason the scan was rejected.
7. In case of inaccuracy in call signs, RDA numbers and QSO data, scans
are rejected with the corresponding entry in the comments (hover the
cursor over the word "Rejected").
Simple and clear rules allow you not to fall into chaos, but to
streamline the reception of properly designed HQSL.
We will try to solve the issue of automatic synchronization with Hamlog
with Eugene R4AS in the near future. So far, everything is only in
manual mode.

73! RA3R

Roman

RDA manager








ra3r
 

Dear friends!
It's very simple, HQSL for working from one RDA allows any activity, islands, mountains, rivers, churches.
And this does not apply to RDA, a person may not know about the existence of RDA.
If an amateur radio operator purposefully finds the border of two or three RDA districts, that person must already comply with the RDA rules.
One of the rules, in addition to confirming his presence at the border, obliges him to UPLOAD THE LOG TO THE RDA AUTOCFM. It used to be mydx.eu, now it is rdaward.ru So it was 10 years ago, so it was 20 years ago. Now we are preparing with Andrey R1 CF a tool that requires mandatory download of supporting documents.
My opinion is that violating the RDA rules allows me not to count such expeditions, regardless of when they were conducted.
If someone likes chaos, then the RDA program is not for you.
All Rules will be met 100%.
73! RA3R
Roman
RDA manager

P.S. Sorry, my English is not very good.




24.02.2023 18:40, SM6LRR пишет:

Roman, please explain the difference between accepting Single-RDA HQSL and multiple-RDA HQSL?

And i don't expect references to "rules that have existed ten years".

Maybe I am stupid, but I see ZERO difference between accepting single-RDA versus multiple-RDA HQSL.

Please explain this difference to us RDA hunters.

73 de Mats RM2D 

On Fri, Feb 24, 2023, 08:40 ra3r <rdaward@...> wrote:
Dear Savas!
I don't understand your question. Any Russian amateur radio operator can upload his log at any time to the Autocfm system.
There are no restrictions.
To work from the border of two or three RDA districts, loading the log is a prerequisite for setting off activation.
73! RA3R
Roman




23.02.2023 23:33, Savas Pavlidis пишет:
Dear Roman,

Could you please give us an answer with a YES or a NO if the ACTIVATORS were able to upload their logbooks to your system from July 15th, 2022 till Jan 2023?

Thank you

73 Savas SV2AEL

On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 08:36, ra3r <rdaward@...> wrote:
Recommendations for uploading HQSL scans to RDA Autocfm:
http://rdaward.ru/index.php?p=qsl_upl
1. Only HQSL correctly executed and confirmed by your correspondent are
accepted for Autocfm (the time column indicates the time, not "no match")
2. The RDA number in the lower right corner must correspond to the
spelling in the list of RDA districts http://rdaward.org/rda_eng.txt
(i.e. TB-02 is correct, TB02, TB 02, TB-02/Tambov or no number at all is
not correct).
3. HQSL with two or three RDA numbers are not accepted for Autocfm,
according to the Rules of the RDA diploma, all logs for activation from
the border of districts must necessarily be uploaded to the RDA Autocfm.
In the absence of logs, none of the activated areas are counted.
4. For radio amateurs living on the border of districts, a similar rule
applies, only loading logs for work from the border, HQSL with double
numbers are not counted.
5. HQSL moderation within one day.
6. In case of rejection of HQSL, you can hover the cursor over the entry
"Rejected" and see for what reason the scan was rejected.
7. In case of inaccuracy in call signs, RDA numbers and QSO data, scans
are rejected with the corresponding entry in the comments (hover the
cursor over the word "Rejected").
Simple and clear rules allow you not to fall into chaos, but to
streamline the reception of properly designed HQSL.
We will try to solve the issue of automatic synchronization with Hamlog
with Eugene R4AS in the near future. So far, everything is only in
manual mode.

73! RA3R

Roman

RDA manager









SM6LRR
 

Roman,

What do you mean with this statement?

"If someone likes chaos, then the RDA program is not for you"

Noone wants chaos. 

You approve Single-RDA HQSL, but you refuse double RDA HQSL.

This is полный бред.

I asked you a direct simple question why you accept Single-RDA HQSL, but refuse Dual-RDA HQSL? 

You simply avoid that question. 

If I activate border RDA MO-75 and KG-09, and avoid to upload logs to rdaward.ru, but only decide to upload logs to CFMRDA and Hamlog, I will bypass your "rules" easily....

I just will divide the double-RDA MO-75/KG-09 into two separate Single-RDA logs (MO-75 & KG-09).

Hunters will download two Single-RDA HQSL, and get credits in compliance with your "20 years old rules".

If I would have uploaded MO-75/KG-09 as "Double RDA", you would have disqualified this HQSL and hunters would have been unable to count them.

I know you are smart enough to understand that your "logics" about non-compliant double-RDAs is totally wrong.

It has NOTHING to do with ""If someone likes chaos, then the RDA program is not for you"

73 de Mats RM2D 

On Fri, Feb 24, 2023, 23:01 ra3r <rdaward@...> wrote:
Dear friends!
It's very simple, HQSL for working from one RDA allows any activity, islands, mountains, rivers, churches.
And this does not apply to RDA, a person may not know about the existence of RDA.
If an amateur radio operator purposefully finds the border of two or three RDA districts, that person must already comply with the RDA rules.
One of the rules, in addition to confirming his presence at the border, obliges him to UPLOAD THE LOG TO THE RDA AUTOCFM. It used to be mydx.eu, now it is rdaward.ru So it was 10 years ago, so it was 20 years ago. Now we are preparing with Andrey R1 CF a tool that requires mandatory download of supporting documents.
My opinion is that violating the RDA rules allows me not to count such expeditions, regardless of when they were conducted.
If someone likes chaos, then the RDA program is not for you.
All Rules will be met 100%.
73! RA3R
Roman
RDA manager

P.S. Sorry, my English is not very good.




24.02.2023 18:40, SM6LRR пишет:
Roman, please explain the difference between accepting Single-RDA HQSL and multiple-RDA HQSL?

And i don't expect references to "rules that have existed ten years".

Maybe I am stupid, but I see ZERO difference between accepting single-RDA versus multiple-RDA HQSL.

Please explain this difference to us RDA hunters.

73 de Mats RM2D 

On Fri, Feb 24, 2023, 08:40 ra3r <rdaward@...> wrote:
Dear Savas!
I don't understand your question. Any Russian amateur radio operator can upload his log at any time to the Autocfm system.
There are no restrictions.
To work from the border of two or three RDA districts, loading the log is a prerequisite for setting off activation.
73! RA3R
Roman




23.02.2023 23:33, Savas Pavlidis пишет:
Dear Roman,

Could you please give us an answer with a YES or a NO if the ACTIVATORS were able to upload their logbooks to your system from July 15th, 2022 till Jan 2023?

Thank you

73 Savas SV2AEL

On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 08:36, ra3r <rdaward@...> wrote:
Recommendations for uploading HQSL scans to RDA Autocfm:
http://rdaward.ru/index.php?p=qsl_upl
1. Only HQSL correctly executed and confirmed by your correspondent are
accepted for Autocfm (the time column indicates the time, not "no match")
2. The RDA number in the lower right corner must correspond to the
spelling in the list of RDA districts http://rdaward.org/rda_eng.txt
(i.e. TB-02 is correct, TB02, TB 02, TB-02/Tambov or no number at all is
not correct).
3. HQSL with two or three RDA numbers are not accepted for Autocfm,
according to the Rules of the RDA diploma, all logs for activation from
the border of districts must necessarily be uploaded to the RDA Autocfm.
In the absence of logs, none of the activated areas are counted.
4. For radio amateurs living on the border of districts, a similar rule
applies, only loading logs for work from the border, HQSL with double
numbers are not counted.
5. HQSL moderation within one day.
6. In case of rejection of HQSL, you can hover the cursor over the entry
"Rejected" and see for what reason the scan was rejected.
7. In case of inaccuracy in call signs, RDA numbers and QSO data, scans
are rejected with the corresponding entry in the comments (hover the
cursor over the word "Rejected").
Simple and clear rules allow you not to fall into chaos, but to
streamline the reception of properly designed HQSL.
We will try to solve the issue of automatic synchronization with Hamlog
with Eugene R4AS in the near future. So far, everything is only in
manual mode.

73! RA3R

Roman

RDA manager









ra3r
 

Mats!
You are very much mistaken, we have also provided for this moment, an attempt to upload a scan for the same call sign and date will lead to its rejection.
No need to be cunning. You're trying to create chaos again.
73! RA3R
Roman




24.02.2023 22:28, SM6LRR пишет:

Roman,

What do you mean with this statement?

"If someone likes chaos, then the RDA program is not for you"

Noone wants chaos. 

You approve Single-RDA HQSL, but you refuse double RDA HQSL.

This is полный бред.

I asked you a direct simple question why you accept Single-RDA HQSL, but refuse Dual-RDA HQSL? 

You simply avoid that question. 

If I activate border RDA MO-75 and KG-09, and avoid to upload logs to rdaward.ru, but only decide to upload logs to CFMRDA and Hamlog, I will bypass your "rules" easily....

I just will divide the double-RDA MO-75/KG-09 into two separate Single-RDA logs (MO-75 & KG-09).

Hunters will download two Single-RDA HQSL, and get credits in compliance with your "20 years old rules".

If I would have uploaded MO-75/KG-09 as "Double RDA", you would have disqualified this HQSL and hunters would have been unable to count them.

I know you are smart enough to understand that your "logics" about non-compliant double-RDAs is totally wrong.

It has NOTHING to do with ""If someone likes chaos, then the RDA program is not for you"

73 de Mats RM2D 

On Fri, Feb 24, 2023, 23:01 ra3r <rdaward@...> wrote:
Dear friends!
It's very simple, HQSL for working from one RDA allows any activity, islands, mountains, rivers, churches.
And this does not apply to RDA, a person may not know about the existence of RDA.
If an amateur radio operator purposefully finds the border of two or three RDA districts, that person must already comply with the RDA rules.
One of the rules, in addition to confirming his presence at the border, obliges him to UPLOAD THE LOG TO THE RDA AUTOCFM. It used to be mydx.eu, now it is rdaward.ru So it was 10 years ago, so it was 20 years ago. Now we are preparing with Andrey R1 CF a tool that requires mandatory download of supporting documents.
My opinion is that violating the RDA rules allows me not to count such expeditions, regardless of when they were conducted.
If someone likes chaos, then the RDA program is not for you.
All Rules will be met 100%.
73! RA3R
Roman
RDA manager

P.S. Sorry, my English is not very good.




24.02.2023 18:40, SM6LRR пишет:
Roman, please explain the difference between accepting Single-RDA HQSL and multiple-RDA HQSL?

And i don't expect references to "rules that have existed ten years".

Maybe I am stupid, but I see ZERO difference between accepting single-RDA versus multiple-RDA HQSL.

Please explain this difference to us RDA hunters.

73 de Mats RM2D 

On Fri, Feb 24, 2023, 08:40 ra3r <rdaward@...> wrote:
Dear Savas!
I don't understand your question. Any Russian amateur radio operator can upload his log at any time to the Autocfm system.
There are no restrictions.
To work from the border of two or three RDA districts, loading the log is a prerequisite for setting off activation.
73! RA3R
Roman




23.02.2023 23:33, Savas Pavlidis пишет:
Dear Roman,

Could you please give us an answer with a YES or a NO if the ACTIVATORS were able to upload their logbooks to your system from July 15th, 2022 till Jan 2023?

Thank you

73 Savas SV2AEL

On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 08:36, ra3r <rdaward@...> wrote:
Recommendations for uploading HQSL scans to RDA Autocfm:
http://rdaward.ru/index.php?p=qsl_upl
1. Only HQSL correctly executed and confirmed by your correspondent are
accepted for Autocfm (the time column indicates the time, not "no match")
2. The RDA number in the lower right corner must correspond to the
spelling in the list of RDA districts http://rdaward.org/rda_eng.txt
(i.e. TB-02 is correct, TB02, TB 02, TB-02/Tambov or no number at all is
not correct).
3. HQSL with two or three RDA numbers are not accepted for Autocfm,
according to the Rules of the RDA diploma, all logs for activation from
the border of districts must necessarily be uploaded to the RDA Autocfm.
In the absence of logs, none of the activated areas are counted.
4. For radio amateurs living on the border of districts, a similar rule
applies, only loading logs for work from the border, HQSL with double
numbers are not counted.
5. HQSL moderation within one day.
6. In case of rejection of HQSL, you can hover the cursor over the entry
"Rejected" and see for what reason the scan was rejected.
7. In case of inaccuracy in call signs, RDA numbers and QSO data, scans
are rejected with the corresponding entry in the comments (hover the
cursor over the word "Rejected").
Simple and clear rules allow you not to fall into chaos, but to
streamline the reception of properly designed HQSL.
We will try to solve the issue of automatic synchronization with Hamlog
with Eugene R4AS in the near future. So far, everything is only in
manual mode.

73! RA3R

Roman

RDA manager










SM6LRR
 

I can decide to reject uploading to rdaward.ru and just upload to CFMRDA.

Is that what you desire with your stubborn approach?

I know hams who used Photoshop to remove one RDA from a Double RDA HQSL.... And you swallowed that modification. 

Happy about such tricks?

Roman, stop your stubborn non-flexible approach please. It is getting too funny. 

73 de Mats RM2D 

On Fri, Feb 24, 2023, 23:41 ra3r <rdaward@...> wrote:
Mats!
You are very much mistaken, we have also provided for this moment, an attempt to upload a scan for the same call sign and date will lead to its rejection.
No need to be cunning. You're trying to create chaos again.
73! RA3R
Roman




24.02.2023 22:28, SM6LRR пишет:
Roman,

What do you mean with this statement?

"If someone likes chaos, then the RDA program is not for you"

Noone wants chaos. 

You approve Single-RDA HQSL, but you refuse double RDA HQSL.

This is полный бред.

I asked you a direct simple question why you accept Single-RDA HQSL, but refuse Dual-RDA HQSL? 

You simply avoid that question. 

If I activate border RDA MO-75 and KG-09, and avoid to upload logs to rdaward.ru, but only decide to upload logs to CFMRDA and Hamlog, I will bypass your "rules" easily....

I just will divide the double-RDA MO-75/KG-09 into two separate Single-RDA logs (MO-75 & KG-09).

Hunters will download two Single-RDA HQSL, and get credits in compliance with your "20 years old rules".

If I would have uploaded MO-75/KG-09 as "Double RDA", you would have disqualified this HQSL and hunters would have been unable to count them.

I know you are smart enough to understand that your "logics" about non-compliant double-RDAs is totally wrong.

It has NOTHING to do with ""If someone likes chaos, then the RDA program is not for you"

73 de Mats RM2D 

On Fri, Feb 24, 2023, 23:01 ra3r <rdaward@...> wrote:
Dear friends!
It's very simple, HQSL for working from one RDA allows any activity, islands, mountains, rivers, churches.
And this does not apply to RDA, a person may not know about the existence of RDA.
If an amateur radio operator purposefully finds the border of two or three RDA districts, that person must already comply with the RDA rules.
One of the rules, in addition to confirming his presence at the border, obliges him to UPLOAD THE LOG TO THE RDA AUTOCFM. It used to be mydx.eu, now it is rdaward.ru So it was 10 years ago, so it was 20 years ago. Now we are preparing with Andrey R1 CF a tool that requires mandatory download of supporting documents.
My opinion is that violating the RDA rules allows me not to count such expeditions, regardless of when they were conducted.
If someone likes chaos, then the RDA program is not for you.
All Rules will be met 100%.
73! RA3R
Roman
RDA manager

P.S. Sorry, my English is not very good.




24.02.2023 18:40, SM6LRR пишет:
Roman, please explain the difference between accepting Single-RDA HQSL and multiple-RDA HQSL?

And i don't expect references to "rules that have existed ten years".

Maybe I am stupid, but I see ZERO difference between accepting single-RDA versus multiple-RDA HQSL.

Please explain this difference to us RDA hunters.

73 de Mats RM2D 

On Fri, Feb 24, 2023, 08:40 ra3r <rdaward@...> wrote:
Dear Savas!
I don't understand your question. Any Russian amateur radio operator can upload his log at any time to the Autocfm system.
There are no restrictions.
To work from the border of two or three RDA districts, loading the log is a prerequisite for setting off activation.
73! RA3R
Roman




23.02.2023 23:33, Savas Pavlidis пишет:
Dear Roman,

Could you please give us an answer with a YES or a NO if the ACTIVATORS were able to upload their logbooks to your system from July 15th, 2022 till Jan 2023?

Thank you

73 Savas SV2AEL

On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 08:36, ra3r <rdaward@...> wrote:
Recommendations for uploading HQSL scans to RDA Autocfm:
http://rdaward.ru/index.php?p=qsl_upl
1. Only HQSL correctly executed and confirmed by your correspondent are
accepted for Autocfm (the time column indicates the time, not "no match")
2. The RDA number in the lower right corner must correspond to the
spelling in the list of RDA districts http://rdaward.org/rda_eng.txt
(i.e. TB-02 is correct, TB02, TB 02, TB-02/Tambov or no number at all is
not correct).
3. HQSL with two or three RDA numbers are not accepted for Autocfm,
according to the Rules of the RDA diploma, all logs for activation from
the border of districts must necessarily be uploaded to the RDA Autocfm.
In the absence of logs, none of the activated areas are counted.
4. For radio amateurs living on the border of districts, a similar rule
applies, only loading logs for work from the border, HQSL with double
numbers are not counted.
5. HQSL moderation within one day.
6. In case of rejection of HQSL, you can hover the cursor over the entry
"Rejected" and see for what reason the scan was rejected.
7. In case of inaccuracy in call signs, RDA numbers and QSO data, scans
are rejected with the corresponding entry in the comments (hover the
cursor over the word "Rejected").
Simple and clear rules allow you not to fall into chaos, but to
streamline the reception of properly designed HQSL.
We will try to solve the issue of automatic synchronization with Hamlog
with Eugene R4AS in the near future. So far, everything is only in
manual mode.

73! RA3R

Roman

RDA manager










ra3r
 

Sorry, the correspondence is too long and meaningless for me.



24.02.2023 22:50, SM6LRR пишет:

I can decide to reject uploading to rdaward.ru and just upload to CFMRDA.

Is that what you desire with your stubborn approach?

I know hams who used Photoshop to remove one RDA from a Double RDA HQSL.... And you swallowed that modification. 

Happy about such tricks?

Roman, stop your stubborn non-flexible approach please. It is getting too funny. 

73 de Mats RM2D 

On Fri, Feb 24, 2023, 23:41 ra3r <rdaward@...> wrote:
Mats!
You are very much mistaken, we have also provided for this moment, an attempt to upload a scan for the same call sign and date will lead to its rejection.
No need to be cunning. You're trying to create chaos again.
73! RA3R
Roman




24.02.2023 22:28, SM6LRR пишет:
Roman,

What do you mean with this statement?

"If someone likes chaos, then the RDA program is not for you"

Noone wants chaos. 

You approve Single-RDA HQSL, but you refuse double RDA HQSL.

This is полный бред.

I asked you a direct simple question why you accept Single-RDA HQSL, but refuse Dual-RDA HQSL? 

You simply avoid that question. 

If I activate border RDA MO-75 and KG-09, and avoid to upload logs to rdaward.ru, but only decide to upload logs to CFMRDA and Hamlog, I will bypass your "rules" easily....

I just will divide the double-RDA MO-75/KG-09 into two separate Single-RDA logs (MO-75 & KG-09).

Hunters will download two Single-RDA HQSL, and get credits in compliance with your "20 years old rules".

If I would have uploaded MO-75/KG-09 as "Double RDA", you would have disqualified this HQSL and hunters would have been unable to count them.

I know you are smart enough to understand that your "logics" about non-compliant double-RDAs is totally wrong.

It has NOTHING to do with ""If someone likes chaos, then the RDA program is not for you"

73 de Mats RM2D 

On Fri, Feb 24, 2023, 23:01 ra3r <rdaward@...> wrote:
Dear friends!
It's very simple, HQSL for working from one RDA allows any activity, islands, mountains, rivers, churches.
And this does not apply to RDA, a person may not know about the existence of RDA.
If an amateur radio operator purposefully finds the border of two or three RDA districts, that person must already comply with the RDA rules.
One of the rules, in addition to confirming his presence at the border, obliges him to UPLOAD THE LOG TO THE RDA AUTOCFM. It used to be mydx.eu, now it is rdaward.ru So it was 10 years ago, so it was 20 years ago. Now we are preparing with Andrey R1 CF a tool that requires mandatory download of supporting documents.
My opinion is that violating the RDA rules allows me not to count such expeditions, regardless of when they were conducted.
If someone likes chaos, then the RDA program is not for you.
All Rules will be met 100%.
73! RA3R
Roman
RDA manager

P.S. Sorry, my English is not very good.




24.02.2023 18:40, SM6LRR пишет:
Roman, please explain the difference between accepting Single-RDA HQSL and multiple-RDA HQSL?

And i don't expect references to "rules that have existed ten years".

Maybe I am stupid, but I see ZERO difference between accepting single-RDA versus multiple-RDA HQSL.

Please explain this difference to us RDA hunters.

73 de Mats RM2D 

On Fri, Feb 24, 2023, 08:40 ra3r <rdaward@...> wrote:
Dear Savas!
I don't understand your question. Any Russian amateur radio operator can upload his log at any time to the Autocfm system.
There are no restrictions.
To work from the border of two or three RDA districts, loading the log is a prerequisite for setting off activation.
73! RA3R
Roman




23.02.2023 23:33, Savas Pavlidis пишет:
Dear Roman,

Could you please give us an answer with a YES or a NO if the ACTIVATORS were able to upload their logbooks to your system from July 15th, 2022 till Jan 2023?

Thank you

73 Savas SV2AEL

On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 08:36, ra3r <rdaward@...> wrote:
Recommendations for uploading HQSL scans to RDA Autocfm:
http://rdaward.ru/index.php?p=qsl_upl
1. Only HQSL correctly executed and confirmed by your correspondent are
accepted for Autocfm (the time column indicates the time, not "no match")
2. The RDA number in the lower right corner must correspond to the
spelling in the list of RDA districts http://rdaward.org/rda_eng.txt
(i.e. TB-02 is correct, TB02, TB 02, TB-02/Tambov or no number at all is
not correct).
3. HQSL with two or three RDA numbers are not accepted for Autocfm,
according to the Rules of the RDA diploma, all logs for activation from
the border of districts must necessarily be uploaded to the RDA Autocfm.
In the absence of logs, none of the activated areas are counted.
4. For radio amateurs living on the border of districts, a similar rule
applies, only loading logs for work from the border, HQSL with double
numbers are not counted.
5. HQSL moderation within one day.
6. In case of rejection of HQSL, you can hover the cursor over the entry
"Rejected" and see for what reason the scan was rejected.
7. In case of inaccuracy in call signs, RDA numbers and QSO data, scans
are rejected with the corresponding entry in the comments (hover the
cursor over the word "Rejected").
Simple and clear rules allow you not to fall into chaos, but to
streamline the reception of properly designed HQSL.
We will try to solve the issue of automatic synchronization with Hamlog
with Eugene R4AS in the near future. So far, everything is only in
manual mode.

73! RA3R

Roman

RDA manager











SM6LRR
 

Sorry to bother you with too complicated topics. Good luck! :) 


On Fri, Feb 24, 2023, 23:52 ra3r <rdaward@...> wrote:
Sorry, the correspondence is too long and meaningless for me.



24.02.2023 22:50, SM6LRR пишет:
I can decide to reject uploading to rdaward.ru and just upload to CFMRDA.

Is that what you desire with your stubborn approach?

I know hams who used Photoshop to remove one RDA from a Double RDA HQSL.... And you swallowed that modification. 

Happy about such tricks?

Roman, stop your stubborn non-flexible approach please. It is getting too funny. 

73 de Mats RM2D 

On Fri, Feb 24, 2023, 23:41 ra3r <rdaward@...> wrote:
Mats!
You are very much mistaken, we have also provided for this moment, an attempt to upload a scan for the same call sign and date will lead to its rejection.
No need to be cunning. You're trying to create chaos again.
73! RA3R
Roman




24.02.2023 22:28, SM6LRR пишет:
Roman,

What do you mean with this statement?

"If someone likes chaos, then the RDA program is not for you"

Noone wants chaos. 

You approve Single-RDA HQSL, but you refuse double RDA HQSL.

This is полный бред.

I asked you a direct simple question why you accept Single-RDA HQSL, but refuse Dual-RDA HQSL? 

You simply avoid that question. 

If I activate border RDA MO-75 and KG-09, and avoid to upload logs to rdaward.ru, but only decide to upload logs to CFMRDA and Hamlog, I will bypass your "rules" easily....

I just will divide the double-RDA MO-75/KG-09 into two separate Single-RDA logs (MO-75 & KG-09).

Hunters will download two Single-RDA HQSL, and get credits in compliance with your "20 years old rules".

If I would have uploaded MO-75/KG-09 as "Double RDA", you would have disqualified this HQSL and hunters would have been unable to count them.

I know you are smart enough to understand that your "logics" about non-compliant double-RDAs is totally wrong.

It has NOTHING to do with ""If someone likes chaos, then the RDA program is not for you"

73 de Mats RM2D 

On Fri, Feb 24, 2023, 23:01 ra3r <rdaward@...> wrote:
Dear friends!
It's very simple, HQSL for working from one RDA allows any activity, islands, mountains, rivers, churches.
And this does not apply to RDA, a person may not know about the existence of RDA.
If an amateur radio operator purposefully finds the border of two or three RDA districts, that person must already comply with the RDA rules.
One of the rules, in addition to confirming his presence at the border, obliges him to UPLOAD THE LOG TO THE RDA AUTOCFM. It used to be mydx.eu, now it is rdaward.ru So it was 10 years ago, so it was 20 years ago. Now we are preparing with Andrey R1 CF a tool that requires mandatory download of supporting documents.
My opinion is that violating the RDA rules allows me not to count such expeditions, regardless of when they were conducted.
If someone likes chaos, then the RDA program is not for you.
All Rules will be met 100%.
73! RA3R
Roman
RDA manager

P.S. Sorry, my English is not very good.




24.02.2023 18:40, SM6LRR пишет:
Roman, please explain the difference between accepting Single-RDA HQSL and multiple-RDA HQSL?

And i don't expect references to "rules that have existed ten years".

Maybe I am stupid, but I see ZERO difference between accepting single-RDA versus multiple-RDA HQSL.

Please explain this difference to us RDA hunters.

73 de Mats RM2D 

On Fri, Feb 24, 2023, 08:40 ra3r <rdaward@...> wrote:
Dear Savas!
I don't understand your question. Any Russian amateur radio operator can upload his log at any time to the Autocfm system.
There are no restrictions.
To work from the border of two or three RDA districts, loading the log is a prerequisite for setting off activation.
73! RA3R
Roman




23.02.2023 23:33, Savas Pavlidis пишет:
Dear Roman,

Could you please give us an answer with a YES or a NO if the ACTIVATORS were able to upload their logbooks to your system from July 15th, 2022 till Jan 2023?

Thank you

73 Savas SV2AEL

On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 08:36, ra3r <rdaward@...> wrote:
Recommendations for uploading HQSL scans to RDA Autocfm:
http://rdaward.ru/index.php?p=qsl_upl
1. Only HQSL correctly executed and confirmed by your correspondent are
accepted for Autocfm (the time column indicates the time, not "no match")
2. The RDA number in the lower right corner must correspond to the
spelling in the list of RDA districts http://rdaward.org/rda_eng.txt
(i.e. TB-02 is correct, TB02, TB 02, TB-02/Tambov or no number at all is
not correct).
3. HQSL with two or three RDA numbers are not accepted for Autocfm,
according to the Rules of the RDA diploma, all logs for activation from
the border of districts must necessarily be uploaded to the RDA Autocfm.
In the absence of logs, none of the activated areas are counted.
4. For radio amateurs living on the border of districts, a similar rule
applies, only loading logs for work from the border, HQSL with double
numbers are not counted.
5. HQSL moderation within one day.
6. In case of rejection of HQSL, you can hover the cursor over the entry
"Rejected" and see for what reason the scan was rejected.
7. In case of inaccuracy in call signs, RDA numbers and QSO data, scans
are rejected with the corresponding entry in the comments (hover the
cursor over the word "Rejected").
Simple and clear rules allow you not to fall into chaos, but to
streamline the reception of properly designed HQSL.
We will try to solve the issue of automatic synchronization with Hamlog
with Eugene R4AS in the near future. So far, everything is only in
manual mode.

73! RA3R

Roman

RDA manager