He Aadu! Is it possible to limit how long RDA spots will be visibly in mydx.eu / Station online. It is not good to see morning spots in the evening or evening spots next day... Wast ot space. And too

Yuri UA9JLL will be active 07.Aug.2021 as UA9JLL/m from RDA: start 03:00 UTC ± TN-19 next county line TN-16/KN-04 73! RA3R Roman

Thank you Roman J Yes, I have got interest for RDA recently. I enjoy if very much! Lots of excellent operations from different districts and nice pileups! Will have a lot of fun forward chasing

Dear Morten! I have combined the statistics for your call signs. The main call sign is LB8DC. I perfectly remember your former call sign LA9DFA and your expeditions. I hope you will also

Hi. Is it allowed to merge all my personal calls from Norway? Today I am LB8DC, but I have also worked as LA9DFA and LI9DFA 73 de Morten Kvernmoen LB8DC

Roman! Thanks for clarifying. Your standpoint is accepted. Myself I have never been into e-QSL before, until recently whilegetting more seriously chasing RDA’s 73’s de Tord – SM3EVR

Hi! There are two reasons why I do RDA: good OPs running nice pileups, and mydx.eu SW support. Recently we had some RDA activators who got lost with pileup, people get nervous and QSO rate was very

Iztok! I left only the eQSL, which were counted by me for the previous degrees of RDA diplomas. For example, RA3R declared in 2010 eQSL TB-02 and the call sign RX3RC, this area was

Tord! I stopped accepting eQSL for one reason, I am not satisfied with the QSO offset algorithm, when you can easily confirm the RDA without even conducting a QSO, but send

Rudy! There is a strict rule for HQSL, the correct RDA number must be specified in the corresponding HQSL field. In this case, the area is counted automatically when the databases

Roman, while answering this topic, please comment on this as well. EQSL used to be accepted, together with cmfrda database. I tried to upload old eqsl (QSO before August 1st, 2020) and it was

Yes Christian, I’m aware of that message regarding e-QSL’s forRDA. Now since a while e-QSL service offer users a special labelingof Authorization Guaranteed on their QSL’s. That is after

hello i have few hamlog qsl with no rda number printed, i have tried to get confirmation sending scan qsl and scan cfmrda page with rda number, as done with lotw. rejected, invalid scan , why ?? is

Hi Tord, see: http://rdaward.org/press19_eng.htm on the very last text line you will find: ---> eQSLs are not accepted for credit, scans are

Hi Roman, Not even accepting e-QSL’s with the ”AG” (Authorization Guaranteed)label? Is that going to happen in the future? Sent one yesterday and got in rejected. 73’s Tord –

Dear Chris! Yes, if the second column is empty, it means that this call sign was in one RDA all the time, different options and different dates are indicated in the second column,

http://rdaward.org/press19_eng.htm This is the tutorial page I was looking for !! Thank you !!. Regarding the RDA callsign data base @ https://cfmrda.ru/#/callsignsRda

Hi, Iztok! I understand, but I would not be sure about correct info... LotW and Clublog mostly use data from QRZ.com and many of them are wrong. QTH loc, County... Only relevant data for RDA is

Hi! Dino, I was refering to LotW export of data for RDA award like DXCC and WPX etc. There is some work on TQSL/LotW to implement RDA properly. I assume it gets higher priority if there is some extra

Just in LotW open details of confirmed QSO, push "Print Screen" / copy/past- open Irfan view -> paste and you have picture. LotW does not charge to see your own log and charge nothing untill you ask