Date   

Re: INVITATION / REQUEST / APPLICATION = RDA 2021

Mike ZooLoo
 

VERY true. I have MANY unconfirmed Russian stations via online or bureau. I imagine the Russian stations not confirmed online have limited access to internet.  Maybe encouragement to send logs to RA3R via email or to someone who can input logs into RDA for them.

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year !
Jim (AA0MZ)

On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 2:32 AM ok1vk@... <ok1vk@...> wrote:

ENG:

Is there any way/website/other channel to

ENCOURAGE/REQUEST/CHALLENGE Russian stations

to UPLOAD THEIR LOGS before the end of the year ????

I think all of us RDA HUNTERS have many ATNO/ATNO-2021 in NOT-UPLOAD LOGS.

Thank you very much in advance for your help.

---------------------------

Russian:

Есть ли способ/веб-сайт/другой канал для подачи заявки/запроса/звонка на российские станции,
выкладывать свои журналы до конца года?
Я думаю, что у всех нас, охотников за RDA, есть много ATNO/ATNO-2021 в журналах NOT-UPLOAD LOGS.

Заранее большое спасибо за помощь.

Pavel Slavíček
OK1VK / OK3X / OK1WWJ
E-mail : ok1vk@...



Re: INVITATION / REQUEST / APPLICATION = RDA 2021

Dino
 

Hi!
I would like that too, but I think it is not possible.
Every russian  ( or/and any ) station choose where to send their log. LotW, Hamlog, mydx.eu ...or paper QSL.. You can not force anyone...
If no other way send paper QSL card, I do that.

Good thing might be for mydx.eu... no green background colour field for any station which do not send logs to mydx.eu  6 months.

Well, Merry Christmas and Happy new year, be safe, many new RDA and be happy, RDA is nice

73 Dino, 9A2NO

On 22.12.21. 09:31, ok1vk@... wrote:
ENG:

Is there any way/website/other channel to

ENCOURAGE/REQUEST/CHALLENGE Russian stations

to UPLOAD THEIR LOGS before the end of the year ????

I think all of us RDA HUNTERS have many ATNO/ATNO-2021 in NOT-UPLOAD LOGS.

_Thank you very much in advance for your help._

---------------------------_
_

Russian:

Есть ли способ/веб-сайт/другой канал для подачи заявки/запроса/звонка на российские станции,
выкладывать свои журналы до конца года?
Я думаю, что у всех нас, охотников за RDA, есть много ATNO/ATNO-2021 в журналах NOT-UPLOAD LOGS.

_Заранее большое спасибо за помощь._

*Pavel Slavíček OK1VK*  / OK3X / OK1WWJ
E-mail :ok1vk@...






INVITATION / REQUEST / APPLICATION = RDA 2021

ok1vk@volny.cz
 

ENG:

Is there any way/website/other channel to

ENCOURAGE/REQUEST/CHALLENGE Russian stations

to UPLOAD THEIR LOGS before the end of the year ????

I think all of us RDA HUNTERS have many ATNO/ATNO-2021 in NOT-UPLOAD LOGS.

Thank you very much in advance for your help.

---------------------------

Russian:

Есть ли способ/веб-сайт/другой канал для подачи заявки/запроса/звонка на российские станции,
выкладывать свои журналы до конца года?
Я думаю, что у всех нас, охотников за RDA, есть много ATNO/ATNO-2021 в журналах NOT-UPLOAD LOGS.

Заранее большое спасибо за помощь.

Pavel Slavíček
OK1VK / OK3X / OK1WWJ
E-mail : ok1vk@...



RDA 2500 in one year

Iztok Saje
 

Hi!

Today we passed 2500 RDAs confirmed in the year 2021.
(as seen on Regions page of mydx.eu)
RA9AJ missed only 86 RDAs out of 2502 possible.

Last RDAs confirmed are:

BU-04 by R0OAA
NN-44 by UB8S
RA-14 by RL6M
TV-28 by RK3AW
TV-45 by RK3AW

and more are on the way.

Good hunting, thanks to activators
73 gl, DSW

Iztok, S52D


Re: RDA-2500 HR #145 - F6GCP

daniel lavocat
 

Hello
Sorry for the French ...

Bravo Patrice , on arrose ça quand tu veux :)
73


ra3r a écrit le 17/12/2021 à 15:55 :

Good day!

We congratulate Patrice F6GCP on performance of conditions of RDA-2500HR and receiving a plaquette of RDA-2500 #145 at the number of the confirmed RDA areas - 2502.

73! RA3R

Roman



Re: RDA-2500 HR #145 - F6GCP

David Quental
 

Congratulations to him.

Best 73.

CT1DRB/OK8RB
David Quental



No dia 17/12/2021, às 14:55, ra3r <rdaward@...> escreveu:

Good day!

We congratulate Patrice F6GCP on performance of conditions of RDA-2500HR and receiving a plaquette of RDA-2500 #145 at the number of the confirmed RDA areas - 2502.

73! RA3R

Roman



RDA-2500 HR #145 - F6GCP

ra3r
 

Good day!

We congratulate Patrice F6GCP on performance of conditions of RDA-2500HR and receiving a plaquette of RDA-2500 #145 at the number of the confirmed RDA areas - 2502.

73! RA3R

Roman


Congrats!

Giuseppe Giunta
 

Ciao,
sifting through some old QSL cards and checking the RDA I saw that I hadn't uploaded it to "mydx.eu" and so I made some screenshots and sent them via "send scan from PC" ... A real trick, confirmed within a couple of days! I would really like to congratulate Roman and everyone involved in the "RDA program" for their dedication!
Grazie de Giu, IT9VDQ


Congrats!

Giuseppe Giunta
 

Ciao,
sifting through some old QSL cards and checking the RDA I saw that I hadn't uploaded it to "mydx.eu" and so I made some screenshots and sent them via "send scan from PC" ... A real trick, confirmed within a couple of days! I would really like to congratulate Roman and everyone involved in the "RDA program" for their dedication!
Grazie de Giu, IT9VDQ


RDA-2500 HR #144 - UA1OIW

ra3r
 

Good day!

We congratulate Anatoly UA1OIW on performance of conditions of RDA-2500HR and receiving a plaquette of RDA-2500 #144 at the number of the confirmed RDA areas - 2500.

73! RA3R

Roman


Re: How to confirm districts with HQSL without RDA written

Iztok Saje
 

Hi Thierry,

as Romain said: when LotW team make RDA available in TQSL and display it in LotW, it will be mandatory.
So treat it as exception based on tradition. I have not looked at it, but I guess LotW accpetance predates both mydx.eu and hamlog.

On the other hand, mandatory rule on RDA entry in HAMLOG helps people pay more atention on entering it.

Back in 2018 I've run in International Grid Chase. 12 one month long contests, and only LotW confirmed QSOs with UL vere valid.
Some 5% do not have UL entry. Similar story. Quite an effort to tell people how to fill up location in TQSL.
Years later there is much less LotW entries without UL.

Best 73, DSW
Iztok, s52d


Re: How to confirm districts with HQSL without RDA written

F4GVO
 

GE Iztok,

Thanks for sharing your point of view.
I am agree with you that "life is not perfect, errors are made, etc..." and all you wrote.
Rules are rules and I am not the one who made it. If I am not agree, I have just not to chase RDA, and the topic is closed
Anyway, and your wrote it well "Lotw for some reason are accepted without RDA" when HQSL are not, when cfmrda database could be use for both system. For me this is a big inconsistency. And I am not the only one thinking that. That's all.

73 de Thierry, F4GVO


Le 02/12/2021 à 18:15, Iztok Saje a écrit :

Hi!

QSL cards must indicate RDA.
HQSL card must indicate RDA.
LotW, for some reason, are accepted withoud RDA: RDA is taken from cfmrda database.
Roman explained this few times.
E-qsl etc is not accepted at all.

Life is not perfect. HAMs are live people.
Some simply do not care. Some hate RDA program, because they have pileups form us hunters.
Some just put something (wrong RDA on hamlog). Some move around and do not update RDA.
Some use old QSL cards with wrong RDA. Some upload withoud /P, /M, /QRP, /0 etc.
(I got few hamlog HQSLs rejected with "operator put wrong RDA on hamlog" exxplanation).

WIth hundreds of russian hunters, inlcuding cfmrda challenge, I hope they will take care.

Sollution for me is simple: work another station from RDA. And another.

As a bonus: LOG uploading opens possibility to have RDA confirmed without QSO. LOGging error etc.
I found few QSOs at time/band when I was not QRV.

73 gl, DSW
Iztok, s52d


























Re: How to confirm districts with HQSL without RDA written

Iztok Saje
 

Hi!

QSL cards must indicate RDA.
HQSL card must indicate RDA.
LotW, for some reason, are accepted withoud RDA: RDA is taken from cfmrda database.
Roman explained this few times.
E-qsl etc is not accepted at all.

Life is not perfect. HAMs are live people.
Some simply do not care. Some hate RDA program, because they have pileups form us hunters.
Some just put something (wrong RDA on hamlog). Some move around and do not update RDA.
Some use old QSL cards with wrong RDA. Some upload withoud /P, /M, /QRP, /0 etc.
(I got few hamlog HQSLs rejected with "operator put wrong RDA on hamlog" exxplanation).

WIth hundreds of russian hunters, inlcuding cfmrda challenge, I hope they will take care.

Sollution for me is simple: work another station from RDA. And another.

As a bonus: LOG uploading opens possibility to have RDA confirmed without QSO. LOGging error etc.
I found few QSOs at time/band when I was not QRV.

73 gl, DSW
Iztok, s52d


























Re: How to confirm districts with HQSL without RDA written

F4GVO
 

The "problem" is only QSL card (paper one) or Hamlog.online QSL i.e HQSL card from Russian stations are accepted if the RDA is indicated. I can understand that because how can you prove that you contacted this RDA ? But there are for me two problem: the first one is that some Russians operator don't fill their RDA on their Hamlog.online account so when a contact is confirmed, these precious info are missing. In my case, I have several RDA worked but I can't confirm because this information is missing. The second problem which more an inconsistency is that LOTW confirmation are accepted to validate RDA but so far, there is NO RDA number on LOTW QSL. So my question is very simple: if there is a possibility to know for the RDA worked (using QRZ.ru or https://cfmrda.ru/#/callsignsRda database) why HQSL with no RDA are not allow to send HQSL card on mydx.eu ? I can't see the difference between HQSL and LOTW ... maybe there is something I miss but without a clearly explanation or point of view, it is .. frustrating !

73 de Thierry, F4GVO

Le 01/12/2021 à 03:09, Mike ZooLoo a écrit :

Note, I am not talking about getting RDA credit from QRZ.com just that they have a space in detail page for Russian amateurs to put their RDA number.

On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 4:07 PM Mike ZooLoo via groups.io <aa0mz.usa=gmail.com@groups.io> wrote:
Are you also working with QRZ.com to allow an operator to input their RDA number in the "detail" tab much like grid, county and IOTA number are included? QRZ.ru is very good at having RDA numbers posted.  Merry Christmas ! Jim (AA0MZ)

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 2:44 PM ra3r <rdaward@...> wrote:
Thierry!

This is my position, if it is possible to specify the RDA number on HQSL, then it must be specified correctly and correctly. As soon as we get the LoTW team to specify the RDA number, LoTW scans will also be accepted exclusively with the correct RDA number.

73! RA3R

Roman



29.11.2021 23:39, F4GVO via groups.io пишет:

For info, just checked and all my HQSL which where under review have been flagged as INVALID SCAN.......
So
Jim, G3ZQQ was wrong and as I expected at the beginning, this way is not accepted..... I can NOT understand what is the difference with LOTW "qsls" which have not and never had RDA included as Aadu wrote a few hours ago......... anyway........  back to square one....

Thierry, F4GVO

Le 29/11/2021 à 10:51, F4GVO via groups.io a écrit :

Hi Iztok,

Yes it was my understanding that HQSL card without RDA information are not accepted, which for my point of view, shouldn't be if the QSO range is compatible with the RDA information found on https://cfmrda.ru/#/callsignsRda, because it is the same thing when you confirm RDA using LOTW "qsl card", RDA is (still) not displayed so what is the difference between the two system. Both are enough robust to avoid cheating !

Right now, I have 6 HQSL in review, I hope it will be ok.

73 de Thierry, F4GVO

Le 29/11/2021 à 09:49, Iztok Saje a écrit :
Have you tried?

I got it rejected: cfmrda database is accepted only with LotW.
So, for HAMLOG only records with  RDA defined are accepted.

But it was some time ago...

73 gl, DSW
Iztok, S52D



Re: How to confirm districts with HQSL without RDA written

Mike ZooLoo
 

Note, I am not talking about getting RDA credit from QRZ.com just that they have a space in detail page for Russian amateurs to put their RDA number.


On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 4:07 PM Mike ZooLoo via groups.io <aa0mz.usa=gmail.com@groups.io> wrote:
Are you also working with QRZ.com to allow an operator to input their RDA number in the "detail" tab much like grid, county and IOTA number are included? QRZ.ru is very good at having RDA numbers posted.  Merry Christmas ! Jim (AA0MZ)

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 2:44 PM ra3r <rdaward@...> wrote:
Thierry!

This is my position, if it is possible to specify the RDA number on HQSL, then it must be specified correctly and correctly. As soon as we get the LoTW team to specify the RDA number, LoTW scans will also be accepted exclusively with the correct RDA number.

73! RA3R

Roman



29.11.2021 23:39, F4GVO via groups.io пишет:

For info, just checked and all my HQSL which where under review have been flagged as INVALID SCAN.......
So
Jim, G3ZQQ was wrong and as I expected at the beginning, this way is not accepted..... I can NOT understand what is the difference with LOTW "qsls" which have not and never had RDA included as Aadu wrote a few hours ago......... anyway........  back to square one....

Thierry, F4GVO

Le 29/11/2021 à 10:51, F4GVO via groups.io a écrit :

Hi Iztok,

Yes it was my understanding that HQSL card without RDA information are not accepted, which for my point of view, shouldn't be if the QSO range is compatible with the RDA information found on https://cfmrda.ru/#/callsignsRda, because it is the same thing when you confirm RDA using LOTW "qsl card", RDA is (still) not displayed so what is the difference between the two system. Both are enough robust to avoid cheating !

Right now, I have 6 HQSL in review, I hope it will be ok.

73 de Thierry, F4GVO

Le 29/11/2021 à 09:49, Iztok Saje a écrit :
Have you tried?

I got it rejected: cfmrda database is accepted only with LotW.
So, for HAMLOG only records with  RDA defined are accepted.

But it was some time ago...

73 gl, DSW
Iztok, S52D



Re: How to confirm districts with HQSL without RDA written

Mike ZooLoo
 

Are you also working with QRZ.com to allow an operator to input their RDA number in the "detail" tab much like grid, county and IOTA number are included? QRZ.ru is very good at having RDA numbers posted.  Merry Christmas ! Jim (AA0MZ)


On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 2:44 PM ra3r <rdaward@...> wrote:
Thierry!

This is my position, if it is possible to specify the RDA number on HQSL, then it must be specified correctly and correctly. As soon as we get the LoTW team to specify the RDA number, LoTW scans will also be accepted exclusively with the correct RDA number.

73! RA3R

Roman



29.11.2021 23:39, F4GVO via groups.io пишет:

For info, just checked and all my HQSL which where under review have been flagged as INVALID SCAN.......
So
Jim, G3ZQQ was wrong and as I expected at the beginning, this way is not accepted..... I can NOT understand what is the difference with LOTW "qsls" which have not and never had RDA included as Aadu wrote a few hours ago......... anyway........  back to square one....

Thierry, F4GVO

Le 29/11/2021 à 10:51, F4GVO via groups.io a écrit :

Hi Iztok,

Yes it was my understanding that HQSL card without RDA information are not accepted, which for my point of view, shouldn't be if the QSO range is compatible with the RDA information found on https://cfmrda.ru/#/callsignsRda, because it is the same thing when you confirm RDA using LOTW "qsl card", RDA is (still) not displayed so what is the difference between the two system. Both are enough robust to avoid cheating !

Right now, I have 6 HQSL in review, I hope it will be ok.

73 de Thierry, F4GVO

Le 29/11/2021 à 09:49, Iztok Saje a écrit :
Have you tried?

I got it rejected: cfmrda database is accepted only with LotW.
So, for HAMLOG only records with  RDA defined are accepted.

But it was some time ago...

73 gl, DSW
Iztok, S52D



Re: How to confirm districts with HQSL without RDA written

F4GVO
 

Good point Rudy !

I checked the HQSL I sent to review, only two of them are their grid square, so for me, it must be enough to accept them to validate a corresponding RDA !
Hope Roman will be able to give his light about that.

73 de Thierry, F4GVO

Le 30/11/2021 à 13:54, rudy a écrit :
Thierry  F4GVO wrote;
 
For info, just checked and all my HQSL which where under review have been flagged as INVALID SCAN.......
So Jim, G3ZQQ was wrong and as I expected at the beginning, this way is not accepted..... I can NOT understand what is the difference with LOTW "qsls" which have not and never had RDA included as Aadu wrote a few hours ago.........
 
 
Maybe LoTW shows the gridsquare for RDA  and HQSL not? 
 
73, Rudy – PD5SS


Re: FT4 mode problem on HAMLOG.ONLINE

rudy
 

Thierry  F4GVO wrote;
 
For info, just checked and all my HQSL which where under review have been flagged as INVALID SCAN.......
So Jim, G3ZQQ was wrong and as I expected at the beginning, this way is not accepted..... I can NOT understand what is the difference with LOTW "qsls" which have not and never had RDA included as Aadu wrote a few hours ago.........
 
 
Maybe LoTW shows the gridsquare for RDA  and HQSL not? 
 
73, Rudy – PD5SS


FT4 mode problem on HAMLOG.ONLINE

F4GVO
 

Hi folks,

First of all, I do apologize for my following request, I know that this is NOT an HAMLOG.ONLINE  forum but as it is impossible, at least for me, to reach people behind hamlog.online and as many of us, use this online logbook, maybe one of us had the same problem and found a solution.

For a long time ago, I noticed that I have a bunch of QSOs made in FT4 mode who are not HQSL confirmed by the system.
As there are all FT4 QSOs, I notice that all QSO with MFSK (FT4) mode have NO problem but the one with only FT4 have. But it is more complicated, as looking on my HQSL received, I noticed that I have FT4 and MFSK (FT4) QSO confirmed and other FT4 not !
Of course the QSO are uploaded and date, band, time etc.. are a match but not for the system. I don't know where is the problem is and what I can do, if I can do something on my side... maybe the problem is on the worked station and how is logbook deal with FT4 QSO mode ?....

Well any suggestion are really welcome !
Thanks in advance,

73 de Thierry, F4GVO


Re: How to confirm districts with HQSL without RDA written

F4GVO
 

Thanks Roman for your input.

I do understand and I agree with you. For example, in my paper QSL card, my French department  number is well indicated with the mention "DDFM" which is the award name for French departments award BUT I have also added on my HAMLOG profile in the County/Province field. Doing that,  my HQSL card is ok for this specified award. 

I do think, as Rubens wrote about Hamlog.online, the RDA field should be obligatory to fill with their districts for all  Russians stations using Hamlog.

73 de Thierry, F4GVO

Le 29/11/2021 à 21:44, ra3r a écrit :
Thierry!

This is my position, if it is possible to specify the RDA number on HQSL, then it must be specified correctly and correctly. As soon as we get the LoTW team to specify the RDA number, LoTW scans will also be accepted exclusively with the correct RDA number.

73! RA3R

Roman



29.11.2021 23:39, F4GVO via groups.io пишет:

For info, just checked and all my HQSL which where under review have been flagged as INVALID SCAN.......
So
Jim, G3ZQQ was wrong and as I expected at the beginning, this way is not accepted..... I can NOT understand what is the difference with LOTW "qsls" which have not and never had RDA included as Aadu wrote a few hours ago......... anyway........  back to square one....

Thierry, F4GVO

Le 29/11/2021 à 10:51, F4GVO via groups.io a écrit :

Hi Iztok,

Yes it was my understanding that HQSL card without RDA information are not accepted, which for my point of view, shouldn't be if the QSO range is compatible with the RDA information found on https://cfmrda.ru/#/callsignsRda, because it is the same thing when you confirm RDA using LOTW "qsl card", RDA is (still) not displayed so what is the difference between the two system. Both are enough robust to avoid cheating !

Right now, I have 6 HQSL in review, I hope it will be ok.

73 de Thierry, F4GVO

Le 29/11/2021 à 09:49, Iztok Saje a écrit :
Have you tried?

I got it rejected: cfmrda database is accepted only with LotW.
So, for HAMLOG only records with  RDA defined are accepted.

But it was some time ago...

73 gl, DSW
Iztok, S52D


401 - 420 of 1170