Date   

Re: How to confirm districts with HQSL without RDA written

Mike ZooLoo
 

Note, I am not talking about getting RDA credit from QRZ.com just that they have a space in detail page for Russian amateurs to put their RDA number.


On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 4:07 PM Mike ZooLoo via groups.io <aa0mz.usa=gmail.com@groups.io> wrote:
Are you also working with QRZ.com to allow an operator to input their RDA number in the "detail" tab much like grid, county and IOTA number are included? QRZ.ru is very good at having RDA numbers posted.  Merry Christmas ! Jim (AA0MZ)

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 2:44 PM ra3r <rdaward@...> wrote:
Thierry!

This is my position, if it is possible to specify the RDA number on HQSL, then it must be specified correctly and correctly. As soon as we get the LoTW team to specify the RDA number, LoTW scans will also be accepted exclusively with the correct RDA number.

73! RA3R

Roman



29.11.2021 23:39, F4GVO via groups.io пишет:

For info, just checked and all my HQSL which where under review have been flagged as INVALID SCAN.......
So
Jim, G3ZQQ was wrong and as I expected at the beginning, this way is not accepted..... I can NOT understand what is the difference with LOTW "qsls" which have not and never had RDA included as Aadu wrote a few hours ago......... anyway........  back to square one....

Thierry, F4GVO

Le 29/11/2021 à 10:51, F4GVO via groups.io a écrit :

Hi Iztok,

Yes it was my understanding that HQSL card without RDA information are not accepted, which for my point of view, shouldn't be if the QSO range is compatible with the RDA information found on https://cfmrda.ru/#/callsignsRda, because it is the same thing when you confirm RDA using LOTW "qsl card", RDA is (still) not displayed so what is the difference between the two system. Both are enough robust to avoid cheating !

Right now, I have 6 HQSL in review, I hope it will be ok.

73 de Thierry, F4GVO

Le 29/11/2021 à 09:49, Iztok Saje a écrit :
Have you tried?

I got it rejected: cfmrda database is accepted only with LotW.
So, for HAMLOG only records with  RDA defined are accepted.

But it was some time ago...

73 gl, DSW
Iztok, S52D



Re: How to confirm districts with HQSL without RDA written

Mike ZooLoo
 

Are you also working with QRZ.com to allow an operator to input their RDA number in the "detail" tab much like grid, county and IOTA number are included? QRZ.ru is very good at having RDA numbers posted.  Merry Christmas ! Jim (AA0MZ)


On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 2:44 PM ra3r <rdaward@...> wrote:
Thierry!

This is my position, if it is possible to specify the RDA number on HQSL, then it must be specified correctly and correctly. As soon as we get the LoTW team to specify the RDA number, LoTW scans will also be accepted exclusively with the correct RDA number.

73! RA3R

Roman



29.11.2021 23:39, F4GVO via groups.io пишет:

For info, just checked and all my HQSL which where under review have been flagged as INVALID SCAN.......
So
Jim, G3ZQQ was wrong and as I expected at the beginning, this way is not accepted..... I can NOT understand what is the difference with LOTW "qsls" which have not and never had RDA included as Aadu wrote a few hours ago......... anyway........  back to square one....

Thierry, F4GVO

Le 29/11/2021 à 10:51, F4GVO via groups.io a écrit :

Hi Iztok,

Yes it was my understanding that HQSL card without RDA information are not accepted, which for my point of view, shouldn't be if the QSO range is compatible with the RDA information found on https://cfmrda.ru/#/callsignsRda, because it is the same thing when you confirm RDA using LOTW "qsl card", RDA is (still) not displayed so what is the difference between the two system. Both are enough robust to avoid cheating !

Right now, I have 6 HQSL in review, I hope it will be ok.

73 de Thierry, F4GVO

Le 29/11/2021 à 09:49, Iztok Saje a écrit :
Have you tried?

I got it rejected: cfmrda database is accepted only with LotW.
So, for HAMLOG only records with  RDA defined are accepted.

But it was some time ago...

73 gl, DSW
Iztok, S52D



Re: How to confirm districts with HQSL without RDA written

F4GVO
 

Good point Rudy !

I checked the HQSL I sent to review, only two of them are their grid square, so for me, it must be enough to accept them to validate a corresponding RDA !
Hope Roman will be able to give his light about that.

73 de Thierry, F4GVO

Le 30/11/2021 à 13:54, rudy a écrit :
Thierry  F4GVO wrote;
 
For info, just checked and all my HQSL which where under review have been flagged as INVALID SCAN.......
So Jim, G3ZQQ was wrong and as I expected at the beginning, this way is not accepted..... I can NOT understand what is the difference with LOTW "qsls" which have not and never had RDA included as Aadu wrote a few hours ago.........
 
 
Maybe LoTW shows the gridsquare for RDA  and HQSL not? 
 
73, Rudy – PD5SS


Re: FT4 mode problem on HAMLOG.ONLINE

rudy
 

Thierry  F4GVO wrote;
 
For info, just checked and all my HQSL which where under review have been flagged as INVALID SCAN.......
So Jim, G3ZQQ was wrong and as I expected at the beginning, this way is not accepted..... I can NOT understand what is the difference with LOTW "qsls" which have not and never had RDA included as Aadu wrote a few hours ago.........
 
 
Maybe LoTW shows the gridsquare for RDA  and HQSL not? 
 
73, Rudy – PD5SS


FT4 mode problem on HAMLOG.ONLINE

F4GVO
 

Hi folks,

First of all, I do apologize for my following request, I know that this is NOT an HAMLOG.ONLINE  forum but as it is impossible, at least for me, to reach people behind hamlog.online and as many of us, use this online logbook, maybe one of us had the same problem and found a solution.

For a long time ago, I noticed that I have a bunch of QSOs made in FT4 mode who are not HQSL confirmed by the system.
As there are all FT4 QSOs, I notice that all QSO with MFSK (FT4) mode have NO problem but the one with only FT4 have. But it is more complicated, as looking on my HQSL received, I noticed that I have FT4 and MFSK (FT4) QSO confirmed and other FT4 not !
Of course the QSO are uploaded and date, band, time etc.. are a match but not for the system. I don't know where is the problem is and what I can do, if I can do something on my side... maybe the problem is on the worked station and how is logbook deal with FT4 QSO mode ?....

Well any suggestion are really welcome !
Thanks in advance,

73 de Thierry, F4GVO


Re: How to confirm districts with HQSL without RDA written

F4GVO
 

Thanks Roman for your input.

I do understand and I agree with you. For example, in my paper QSL card, my French department  number is well indicated with the mention "DDFM" which is the award name for French departments award BUT I have also added on my HAMLOG profile in the County/Province field. Doing that,  my HQSL card is ok for this specified award. 

I do think, as Rubens wrote about Hamlog.online, the RDA field should be obligatory to fill with their districts for all  Russians stations using Hamlog.

73 de Thierry, F4GVO

Le 29/11/2021 à 21:44, ra3r a écrit :
Thierry!

This is my position, if it is possible to specify the RDA number on HQSL, then it must be specified correctly and correctly. As soon as we get the LoTW team to specify the RDA number, LoTW scans will also be accepted exclusively with the correct RDA number.

73! RA3R

Roman



29.11.2021 23:39, F4GVO via groups.io пишет:

For info, just checked and all my HQSL which where under review have been flagged as INVALID SCAN.......
So
Jim, G3ZQQ was wrong and as I expected at the beginning, this way is not accepted..... I can NOT understand what is the difference with LOTW "qsls" which have not and never had RDA included as Aadu wrote a few hours ago......... anyway........  back to square one....

Thierry, F4GVO

Le 29/11/2021 à 10:51, F4GVO via groups.io a écrit :

Hi Iztok,

Yes it was my understanding that HQSL card without RDA information are not accepted, which for my point of view, shouldn't be if the QSO range is compatible with the RDA information found on https://cfmrda.ru/#/callsignsRda, because it is the same thing when you confirm RDA using LOTW "qsl card", RDA is (still) not displayed so what is the difference between the two system. Both are enough robust to avoid cheating !

Right now, I have 6 HQSL in review, I hope it will be ok.

73 de Thierry, F4GVO

Le 29/11/2021 à 09:49, Iztok Saje a écrit :
Have you tried?

I got it rejected: cfmrda database is accepted only with LotW.
So, for HAMLOG only records with  RDA defined are accepted.

But it was some time ago...

73 gl, DSW
Iztok, S52D



Re: How to confirm districts with HQSL without RDA written

ra3r
 

Thierry!

This is my position, if it is possible to specify the RDA number on HQSL, then it must be specified correctly and correctly. As soon as we get the LoTW team to specify the RDA number, LoTW scans will also be accepted exclusively with the correct RDA number.

73! RA3R

Roman



29.11.2021 23:39, F4GVO via groups.io пишет:

For info, just checked and all my HQSL which where under review have been flagged as INVALID SCAN.......
So
Jim, G3ZQQ was wrong and as I expected at the beginning, this way is not accepted..... I can NOT understand what is the difference with LOTW "qsls" which have not and never had RDA included as Aadu wrote a few hours ago......... anyway........  back to square one....

Thierry, F4GVO

Le 29/11/2021 à 10:51, F4GVO via groups.io a écrit :

Hi Iztok,

Yes it was my understanding that HQSL card without RDA information are not accepted, which for my point of view, shouldn't be if the QSO range is compatible with the RDA information found on https://cfmrda.ru/#/callsignsRda, because it is the same thing when you confirm RDA using LOTW "qsl card", RDA is (still) not displayed so what is the difference between the two system. Both are enough robust to avoid cheating !

Right now, I have 6 HQSL in review, I hope it will be ok.

73 de Thierry, F4GVO

Le 29/11/2021 à 09:49, Iztok Saje a écrit :
Have you tried?

I got it rejected: cfmrda database is accepted only with LotW.
So, for HAMLOG only records with  RDA defined are accepted.

But it was some time ago...

73 gl, DSW
Iztok, S52D



Re: How to confirm districts with HQSL without RDA written

F4GVO
 

For info, just checked and all my HQSL which where under review have been flagged as INVALID SCAN.......
So
Jim, G3ZQQ was wrong and as I expected at the beginning, this way is not accepted..... I can NOT understand what is the difference with LOTW "qsls" which have not and never had RDA included as Aadu wrote a few hours ago......... anyway........  back to square one....

Thierry, F4GVO

Le 29/11/2021 à 10:51, F4GVO via groups.io a écrit :

Hi Iztok,

Yes it was my understanding that HQSL card without RDA information are not accepted, which for my point of view, shouldn't be if the QSO range is compatible with the RDA information found on https://cfmrda.ru/#/callsignsRda, because it is the same thing when you confirm RDA using LOTW "qsl card", RDA is (still) not displayed so what is the difference between the two system. Both are enough robust to avoid cheating !

Right now, I have 6 HQSL in review, I hope it will be ok.

73 de Thierry, F4GVO

Le 29/11/2021 à 09:49, Iztok Saje a écrit :
Have you tried?

I got it rejected: cfmrda database is accepted only with LotW.
So, for HAMLOG only records with  RDA defined are accepted.

But it was some time ago...

73 gl, DSW
Iztok, S52D


Re: How to confirm districts with HQSL without RDA written

aadu.adok
 

Thanks guys for sharing tips and tricks with others here (I never used
LOTW, this is why I never said anything)

Unfortunately LOTW developers were not willing to integrate RDA into
their system, so the only way is through manual labor, sending QSL
screenshots to mydx.eu

73 and happy upcoming Christmas season!
Aadu
ES1TU

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 7:11 PM F4GVO via groups.io
<f4gvo@...> wrote:

Hi Ken,

Rudy was quicker than me and explain well the procedure. Thanks Rudy !

Here is just my to cents to get your "screenshot" from LOTW:
when connected to your LOWT account you go to YOUR QSO. Then on "Call Sign Worked", you put the Russian station you are looking for. Then, click on Submit.
You will have a table with the QSO information. Check the last column named "QSL". Click on the name of the DXCC and when the QSL is displayed on your screen, you must take screenshot, as Rudy wrote, of this QSL. This is file file you must upload then as explained by Rudy.

73 de Thierry, F4GVO

Le 29/11/2021 à 16:28, rudy a écrit :

I think that is the quickest way. But tell me, please, how to ”upload screenshot” of LOTW verifications. I’ve asked several people about this but I have, so far , got no answer.

73

Ken/SM4EMO



Hi Ken,



It’s very easy, go to mydx.eu and check on your page ”Send scans from PC”.

You will see; RDA - - -> insert the RDA you want to confirm and upload the file from your PC.

You have to download a screenshot on your PC first from the QSL on LoTW.



73, Rudy – PD5SS


Re: How to confirm districts with HQSL without RDA written

F4GVO
 

Hi Ken,

Rudy was quicker than me and explain well the procedure. Thanks Rudy !

Here is just my to cents to get your "screenshot" from LOTW:
when connected to your LOWT account you go to YOUR QSO. Then on "Call Sign Worked", you put the Russian station you are looking for. Then, click on Submit.
You will have a table with the QSO information. Check the last column named "QSL". Click on the name of the DXCC and when the QSL is displayed on your screen, you must take screenshot, as Rudy wrote, of this QSL. This is file file you must upload then as explained by Rudy.

73 de Thierry, F4GVO

Le 29/11/2021 à 16:28, rudy a écrit :

I think that is the quickest way. But tell me, please, how to ”upload screenshot” of LOTW verifications. I’ve asked several people about this but I have, so far , got no answer.

73

Ken/SM4EMO

 

Hi Ken,

 

It’s very easy, go to mydx.eu and check on your page ”Send scans from PC”.

You will see; RDA    - - -> insert the RDA you want to confirm and upload the file from your PC.

You have to download a screenshot on your PC first from the QSL on LoTW.

 

73, Rudy – PD5SS


Re: How to confirm districts with HQSL without RDA written

rudy
 

image


Re: How to confirm districts with HQSL without RDA written

rudy
 

image


Re: How to confirm districts with HQSL without RDA written

rudy
 

I think that is the quickest way. But tell me, please, how to ”upload screenshot” of LOTW verifications. I’ve asked several people about this but I have, so far , got no answer.

73

Ken/SM4EMO

 

Hi Ken,

 

It’s very easy, go to mydx.eu and check on your page ”Send scans from PC”.

You will see; RDA    - - -> insert the RDA you want to confirm and upload the file from your PC.

You have to download a screenshot on your PC first from the QSL on LoTW.

 

73, Rudy – PD5SS


Re: How to confirm districts with HQSL without RDA written

Kenneth Johansson <kenjohan@...>
 

Hi Thierry,

Occasionally hams have sent me scans of their QSL, filled in with all the QSO details. Then I send it to MyDX.eu and Aadu will take care of the rest. I think that is the quickest way. But tell me, please, how to ”upload screenshot” of LOTW verifications. I’ve asked several people about this but I have, so far , got no answer.

73

Ken/SM4EMO

 

Skickades från E-post för Windows

 

Från: F4GVO via groups.io
Skickat: den 29 november 2021 09:06
Till: rdaworld@groups.io
Ämne: Re: [rdaworld] How to confirm districts with HQSL without RDA written

 

Many thanks Ken, I will try this way, hoping it will work.

Nevertheless, I don't understand why it is not possible to upload screenshot, as we may do with LOTW confirmation , our HQSL card to mydx.eu ?
Like every award, all is about good faith and we "fixed station", I can't see where it maybe a problem to validate these QSL..
Maybe, Aadu may give us his lights about that subject

73 de Thierry, F4GVO

 

Le 29/11/2021 à 06:58, Kenneth Johansson a écrit :

Hi Thierry!

The same thing has happened to me several times. I use to send an e-mail and politely ask if the operator would be so kind and upload a new QSL to Hamlog.ru with the RDA on the card. It usually helps. Good Luck!

73

Ken/SM4EMO

 

Skickades från E-post för Windows

 

Från: F4GVO via groups.io
Skickat: den 28 november 2021 20:39
Till: rdaworld@groups.io
Ämne: [rdaworld] How to confirm districts with HQSL without RDA written

 

Hi Aadu, hi folks

Checking my HQSL confirmation, I found several Russians QSOs confirmed but WITHOUT any RDA information on the HQSL.
I then checked on https://cfmrda.ru/#/ and of course I found the missing information.

ALL this HQSL are new RDA for me

It is my understanding that all Russians stations are living necessarily in, at least, one district, like for us, French stations, we necessarily live in a French department but also in a "canton" (administrative district)...

That said,  how can I validated these QSO to increase my numbers ?

Thanks in advance,

73 de Thierry

P.S. thanks Aadu for having review and confirmed my miswritten callsign on some logs a few days ago.

 

 

 


Re: How to confirm districts with HQSL without RDA written

rubens1960@...
 

Hi aadu , can you upload autoconfirm database on hamlog? an option for this problem.tnx  and good  job! 73 rubens


you


Re: How to confirm districts with HQSL without RDA written

F4GVO
 

Hi Rubens,

Thanks for your input.
I do agree, it should be an obligatory option for all Russians stations.

73 de Thierry, F4GVO

Le 29/11/2021 à 12:33, rubens1960 via groups.io a écrit :
hi thierry, for me same problem, hamlog must oblige all ham operator to write rda in profilpage and qsl. 73 rubens


Re: How to confirm districts with HQSL without RDA written

rubens1960@...
 

hi thierry, for me same problem, hamlog must oblige all ham operator to write rda in profilpage and qsl. 73 rubens


Re: How to confirm districts with HQSL without RDA written

F4GVO
 

Hi Iztok,

Yes it was my understanding that HQSL card without RDA information are not accepted, which for my point of view, shouldn't be if the QSO range is compatible with the RDA information found on https://cfmrda.ru/#/callsignsRda, because it is the same thing when you confirm RDA using LOTW "qsl card", RDA is (still) not displayed so what is the difference between the two system. Both are enough robust to avoid cheating !

Right now, I have 6 HQSL in review, I hope it will be ok.

73 de Thierry, F4GVO

Le 29/11/2021 à 09:49, Iztok Saje a écrit :

Have you tried?

I got it rejected: cfmrda database is accepted only with LotW.
So, for HAMLOG only records with  RDA defined are accepted.

But it was some time ago...

73 gl, DSW
Iztok, S52D


Re: How to confirm districts with HQSL without RDA written

Iztok Saje
 

Have you tried?

I got it rejected: cfmrda database is accepted only with LotW.
So, for HAMLOG only records with  RDA defined are accepted.

But it was some time ago...

73 gl, DSW
Iztok, S52D


Re: How to confirm districts with HQSL without RDA written

F4GVO
 

Oh many thanks Jim for the tips ! It will be easier

73 de Thierry, F4GVO

Le 29/11/2021 à 09:26, Jim Peden via groups.io a écrit :
Thierry,

if the QSO is within the dates shown on cfm.rda, just scan the QSL and upload.


Jim, G3ZQQ

341 - 360 of 1096