Hi!

It is common for some special CALL to use different QTH. One FT8, one CW, one SSB for example.
Or one for  each of the bands. Thus, several RDAs might be reported for same CALL on the same day.
So, HAMLOG entry is more valid as cfmrda entry.

Sometimes  OPs make mistakes: I've seen different RDA for mydx and hamlog for the same QSO.

73 gl
Iztok

No dia 16/10/2021, às 08:11, ra3r <rdaward@...> escreveu:

Good day!

We congratulate Mike RA1OHX on performance of conditions of RDA-2500HR and receiving a plaquette of RDA-2500 #138 at the number of the confirmed RDA areas - 2500.

73! RA3R

Roman

@RA3R Roman can you comment please.

73,

Aadu

ES1TU

On Fri, Oct 15, 2021, 6:36 PM rudy i3vwk <rudygub@...> wrote:

I think all we need is an evidence for valid QSO data and a credible source which RDA was worked at that time. When I send a screen shot of LotW's "QSO-Details" and a screen shot of "CFMRDA call database" with the fitting RDA, all works well ... I get the QSO confirmed. But when I sent a screen shot of "HQSL hamlog" + "CFMRDA database" I get "Invalid Scan". I see no difference between both methods  ... 

is also my opinion that  hamlog-qsl + CFMRDA screen  must be accepted.

73  Rudy  I3VWK

Il giorno ven 15 ott 2021 alle ore 15:13 Christian Proehl <dl6jan@...> ha scritto:

Hi Aadu and all,

A view weeks ago we have discussed RDA import from hamlog.ru to mydx.eu.

Concerning the correction of wrong RDA entries my last information was:

"We are hardworking on this issue and in near future there will be a new correct version for this confirmation."

I don't know, if this software improvement is already finished now or still under developement?  anyway ... making software is a difficult job !

My problem at the moment is that I have a few QSOs @Hamlog which are not imported by mydx.eu. They all are showing up as confirmed (green) in the hamlog "HQSL" menu.

In some cases I have asked the OPs to add their RDA to hamlog. Some have done this, all looks correct, but no success, no import to "mydx". Possibly they have to delete it and make a new entry of the QSO to obtain a result.

I think all we need is an evidence for valid QSO data and a credible source which RDA was worked at that time. When I send a screen shot of LotW's "QSO-Details" and a screen shot of "CFMRDA call database" with the fitting RDA, all works well ... I get the QSO confirmed. But when I sent a screen shot of "HQSL hamlog" + "CFMRDA database" I get "Invalid Scan". I see no difference between both methods  ... 

Example: R7MH --> see appendix (no entry in County/Loc)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Another problem ...

On the page mydx.eu --> "Stations Online" I often see new RDAs scrolling by, which seem to be not correct.

Examples:
RT5T is displayed as NN-15, but mostly he is in NN-33.
RM8W is often displayed as BA-05, but "RDAsearch" says:

-----------------------------------
BA-05        RM8W 2019-10-17    
BA-42        QRZ.ru 2021-07-02
-----------------------------------
I got it confirmed as BA-42 but I need BA-05 !!!! what is correct ??
 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Champs of the Year 2021:
-------------------------
I find it not a good idea to encourage OMs to make dupes in order to get points for this "kind of contest".

The chance for newcomers obtaining a new RDA is decreased this way. I'm now on place Nr. 98 in the "Champs of the year list" without making dupes intentionally.

Have a nice weekend and good hunting.

Christian, DL6JAN

--
Gesendet mit Ubuntu 20.04 64-Bit

Hello!
Regions page on mydx.eu was looked a bit, to get some stats.
For each Rayon, there is date and call for last confirmed QSO.
This QSO is either uploaded to mydx, hamlog or LotW,
as well as direct QSLs scanned (maybe even some via buro).
Now, assume some necommer starts RDA, and never miss one.
2500 since August 5th, 2020. 14 months of activity.
2000 since Jully 17th, 2021 (3 months)
1500 since September 6th, 2021 (1 month and 1 week)
1000 since October 2nd, 2021.
So far, 2425 RDAs were QRV and confirmed in 2021.
RA9AJ with 2268 is close: he only missed  157 RDAs in this year.
We wait Gena (and some others) to upload more LOGs, there are RDAC contest LOGs waiting, and three months of activity.
That would indicate RDA 2500 can theoretically be done in one year.
And on my side: I started  RDA hunting after RA3R spam in November 2020 with standing of some 700.
After checking paper QSLs, LotW, registering to HAMLOG and making QSOs, I come to:
2067 confirmed. 1957 confirmed in 2021.
I have 18 RDAs not QRV in 2021: 4 out of 100 rarest.
376 RDAs were missed in 2021: 4 weeks of vacations in 9A, QRL, sleeping, bad CONDX, QRL. Hunters excuses ...
Thanks to activators and authors of excellent support software, RDA program is fun every day.
73 gl, CU in the next pileup
Iztok, S52D

Hi RDA friends

Already from my youth I'm interested in Russia. (My final thesis at school was "The Russian Revolution" !)
I'm still very interested in the daily life, nature, people of Russia. When working remote RDA's trying to figure out where and how they operate (Google Earth and Wikepedia are a good help)
I wonder if there are any (Russian) Facebook pages where activations reports etc are published? I'm seeing some photos on Tnxqso but so far that's all.

And is there any interest to start up an English speaking Facebook group for RDA chasers and activators ?  

73 DSW ON4VT aka OT4V

No dia 11/10/2021, às 10:03, ra3r <rdaward@...> escreveu:

Good day!

We congratulate Vlad R7FC on performance of conditions of RDA-2500HR and receiving a plaquette of RDA-2500 #137 at the number of the confirmed RDA areas - 2502.

73! RA3R

Roman