toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Note, I am not talking about getting RDA credit from QRZ.com just that they have a space in detail page for Russian amateurs to put their RDA number.
Are you also working with QRZ.com to allow an operator to input their RDA number in the "detail" tab much like grid, county and IOTA number are included? QRZ.ru is very good at having RDA numbers posted. Merry Christmas ! Jim (AA0MZ)
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 2:44 PM ra3r <rdaward@...
This is my position, if it is possible to specify the RDA number
on HQSL, then it must be specified correctly and correctly. As
soon as we get the LoTW team to specify the RDA number, LoTW scans
will also be accepted exclusively with the correct RDA number.
For info, just checked and all my HQSL
which where under review have been flagged as INVALID
So Jim, G3ZQQ was wrong and as I expected at the
beginning, this way is not accepted..... I can NOT understand
what is the difference with LOTW "qsls" which have not and never
had RDA included as Aadu wrote a few hours ago.........
anyway........ back to square one....
Le 29/11/2021 à 10:51, F4GVO via
a écrit :
Yes it was my understanding that HQSL
card without RDA information are not accepted, which for my
point of view, shouldn't be if the QSO range is compatible
with the RDA information found on https://cfmrda.ru/#/callsignsRda,
because it is the same thing when you confirm RDA using LOTW
"qsl card", RDA is (still) not displayed so what is the
difference between the two system. Both are enough robust to
avoid cheating !
Right now, I have 6 HQSL in review, I
hope it will be ok.
73 de Thierry, F4GVO
Le 29/11/2021 à 09:49, Iztok Saje a
Have you tried?
I got it rejected: cfmrda database is accepted only with LotW.
So, for HAMLOG only records with RDA defined are accepted.
But it was some time ago...
73 gl, DSW