toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Well said and I agree.
Thank you Jim and Diane for all you have done to inform us on
Life's biggest decision is what you do
I read this mail in total disbelief, it implies a friction
existed, something I never experienced in the old group, it is
also totally inappropriate to advertise another group on a
successfully running platform that fulfils the needs of its
membership and owner. Quite frankly I'm appalled by your mail,
it shows a lack of group etiquette on your part, and implies
this groups owner lacks the expertise and skill set to run a
group. 2 attributes Jim and Diane have continuously shown they
both have in abundance.
Jim quite sensibly portaged the old group to this platform
after discovering Yahoo had removed support for Yahoo groups
back in 2014, something they never advised group owners about.
One thing beyond his control was members whose mails were
bouncing, Groups.io. do not transfer members who are bouncing
mails back to senders, they class them as removed. Had the group
remained with Yahoo/Verizon/Oath it would have been left to
decay to the point of destruction, a point many Yahoo groups
have found themselves in.
This group has two very important assets, three if I include
Jim's lovely sense of humour, those assets are Jim and Diane
Stutsman, it would be a very foolish move to leave the known
tried and tested knowledge of the owners of this group to follow
an untried, untested group that appears by the first mail in
this thread, to be a group of disaffected, dare I say drama
queens, perhaps not, but certainly people who are maybe
disappointed that Jim and Diane chose not to use perhaps the
worse group provider on the web, FaceBook.