Given our circumstances, it is doubtful that all
recipients will have
FLMSG running, but it can be installed fairly quickly, or
else at least
read by common text editors.
I recently received an NTS radiogram destined for a new
ham in the area
via a regional SSB net on 40M. Took the message, typed it
into FLMSG,
then printed out on paper (html report I believe) and hand
delivered it
to that individual at a meeting we were both attending at
an EOC. The
professional look of the message was well received, and I
believe worth
the effort.
By the way, I had not handled any NTS traffic in years
prior to that
meeting.
I do appreciate the hard work that W1HKJ and crew put into
the FLDIGI
software!
73,
Dave N
On 5/10/2015 7:14 AM, Steve shansen@... [NBEMSham]
wrote:
>
>
> Thanks for your reply Dave.
>
> Is it your expectation that all message recipients
will have flmsg
> available?
>
> I think that the NTS folks are looking at some sort
of forms solution
> but I'm not quite sure what it might be. We use flmsg
for radiograms
> on our Maine digital nets. Our NTS liason moves
out-of-area traffic
> via the statewide voice net and I cut and paste to
the Airmail NTSD
> format.
>
> 73, Steve KB1TCE
>
>
> On 05/09/2015 10:37 AM, Dave Newmyer
dnewmye@... [NBEMSham] wrote:
>>
>> Our state ARES digital group uses FLMSG with both
RMS-EXPRESS and
>> AIRMAIL software. Also, we have used it with
tnc-based mailboxes. In
>> some cases we rename the .213 extension to .txt
for sending as file
>> attachments, then rename the extension back to
.213 .
>>
>> Have also used FLMSG with voice ARRL Radiogram
messages. Like the word
>> number check feature, as well as being able to
archive the message plus
>> being able to print out in a professional looking
format.
>>
>> On 5/8/2015 1:33 PM, shansen@...
[NBEMSham] wrote:
>> >
>> > Question: Are other NBEMS users using flmsg
with applications other
>> > than fldigi?
>> >
>> >
>> > Flmsg's flexibility is noted at the start of
the Help file, I'm
>> > curious about how others are using flmsg in
addition to its use within
>> > NBEMS.
>> >
>> >
>> > <>
>> >
>> > POSITION:
>> >
>> >
>> > (The only thing missing is a way to get the
text back into flmsg.)
>> >
>> >
>> > The other option is to use flmsg's html
output and then send the html
>> > file. The file is larger than with the other
methods but is not overly
>> > large (say 1k for a flmsg file, 3k for the
html). Certainly far better
>> > than sending a scanned document.
>> >
>> >
>> > Bottom line, a lot of versatility.
>> >
>> >
>> > So – are others using flmsg with more than
NBEMS? If so, how and what
>> > might be some current limitations or
opportunities for enhancement?
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks and 73,
>> >
>> > Steve KB1TCE
>> >
>> >
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast
antivirus software.
>> http://www.avast.com
>>
>
>
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
software.
http://www.avast.com