Hello. Thank you. We agree on that, of course. There was no need to claim this belief, because this was yet another paper of calculations, far distanced from VNA reality, which is most unpleasant in t

. Hello - Regarding the paper: "A Study of the Radiation Efficiency of a Half Wavelength Dipole", we have to notice the absence of any quantitative justification of the claim: "with reasonable accurac

to whom it may concern - we still make the required manipulation and graphics of the valuable NanoVNA multi output raw data (with its initial, already one year old firmware version, of course) using r

#109 : reply to a newcomer = | From: "******* ********" <***********@gmail.com> | Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2020 08:43 | Subject: Re: S-Parameter Uncertainties in Network Analyzer Measurements = |

REF: https://groups.io/g/nanovna-users/message/13681 Hello, again. Well, after the Special Interest shown here, we would like to inform you that, in direct contrast with what Gary O'Neil, N3GO believe

#applications #calibration #measurement

Hello. Let us ask, please, two "rhetorical" questions, which are addressed to all readers of this thread: - Is there anyone, ever, wondered, in any similar to this, under discussion, case - that is bo

#applications #calibration #measurement

#108 : A Proposed Pre-Virtual 2-Port of NanoVNA-0.6.0 Hello, Allow us, please, to propose--FACUPOV in our SOW--the following 4-port as - - - - - - - - - - - - - (c) gin&pez@arg (cc-by-4.0) 2019 : star

#107': On the Missing Terms in NanoVNA firmware - ERRATUM Dear Erik, Thank you very much indeed for your valuable comment, since you forced us to recheck the related code. No, we can not explain that,

#107 : On the Missing Terms in NanoVNA firmware Hello, Allow us, please, to propose the following modifications remarked by "//" : https://www.op4.eu/nvu/2020.02.20/modifs.to.nanovna.0.6.0.gpa.cc.by.4

Hello, - - - - - - - - - - - - - (c) gin&pez@arg (cc-by-4.0) 2019 : start - - - - - - - - - - - Well, after all that said at [1], [2], [3], allow us, please, to conclude that, FACUPOV the [NanoVNA Sys

... with a waretype of : https://web.archive.org/web/20121011020827/http://antennas.ee.duth.gr/ooo/classificationofwaretypes/classificationofwaretypes.htm

It is NOT free : "Extended free license to July 1st, 2020" etc : https://www.atyune.com/news/

Dear Jeff, Thank you, very much indeed, for this; we much appreciate it! Well, we will try sometime to reproduce your MatLab code in Maxima. By the way, allow us, please, to publicly express our admir

Instead of the wrong: G = S(L-O)(gs+lo) + L(O-S)(gl+os) + O(S-L)(go+sl) / / [ (L-O)(gs+lo) + (O-S)(gl+os) + (S-L)(go+sl) ] the correct one: G = [ S(L-O)(gs+lo) + L(O-S)(gl+os) + O(S-L)(go+sl) ] / / [

Hello, Allow us, please, to present a Capsule Summary of the Crystal Clear Nature of the Scientific Nonfictional VNA Measurements. Well, we bought a VNA with 3 standard loads, which their manufacturer

#106": More On The Fourth Load VNA Trick @Jeff Anderson - 4 January 2020 - https://groups.io/g/nanovna-users/message/9158 Dear Jeff, Thank you very much for your most valuable information, by which yo

@Gary O’Neil, N3GO https://groups.io/g/nanovna-users/message/9132 Dear Gary, Well, allow us, please, to remind you that we would not arrive at this - most spectacular, indeed ! - conclusion, if you di

#106': On The Fourth Load VNA Trick @Jeff Anderson - 4 January 2020 https://groups.io/g/nanovna-users/message/9153 Hello, Thank you very much for interest in our work, and especially for quoting this

#106: On The Fourth Load VNA Trick @Erik, PD0EK - 4 January 2020 - https://groups.io/g/nanovna-users/message/9131 Dear Erik, We would like to thank you very much because you revealed at last your Subj

#105: On the Absurdness of the Identicalness of All Standard Loads in this World... @Gary O'Neil , N3GO - 4 January 2020 Dear Gary, Thank you for your time you spend all these months to comment on our