|
Dipole length/ Carter Paper
Hello. Thank you. We agree on that, of course. There was no need to claim this belief, because this was yet another paper of calculations, far distanced from VNA reality, which is most unpleasant in t
Hello. Thank you. We agree on that, of course. There was no need to claim this belief, because this was yet another paper of calculations, far distanced from VNA reality, which is most unpleasant in t
|
By
gin&pez@arg
· #17503
·
|
|
Dipole length/ Carter Paper
. Hello - Regarding the paper: "A Study of the Radiation Efficiency of a Half Wavelength Dipole", we have to notice the absence of any quantitative justification of the claim: "with reasonable accurac
. Hello - Regarding the paper: "A Study of the Radiation Efficiency of a Half Wavelength Dipole", we have to notice the absence of any quantitative justification of the claim: "with reasonable accurac
|
By
gin&pez@arg
· #17497
·
|
|
our way of use
to whom it may concern - we still make the required manipulation and graphics of the valuable NanoVNA multi output raw data (with its initial, already one year old firmware version, of course) using r
to whom it may concern - we still make the required manipulation and graphics of the valuable NanoVNA multi output raw data (with its initial, already one year old firmware version, of course) using r
|
By
gin&pez@arg
· #17484
·
|
|
errors of "error" models
#109 : reply to a newcomer = | From: "******* ********" <***********@gmail.com> | Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2020 08:43 | Subject: Re: S-Parameter Uncertainties in Network Analyzer Measurements = |
#109 : reply to a newcomer = | From: "******* ********" <***********@gmail.com> | Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2020 08:43 | Subject: Re: S-Parameter Uncertainties in Network Analyzer Measurements = |
|
By
gin&pez@arg
· #17132
·
|
|
Calibrating to a long coax?
#applications
#calibration
#measurement
REF: https://groups.io/g/nanovna-users/message/13681 Hello, again. Well, after the Special Interest shown here, we would like to inform you that, in direct contrast with what Gary O'Neil, N3GO believe
REF: https://groups.io/g/nanovna-users/message/13681 Hello, again. Well, after the Special Interest shown here, we would like to inform you that, in direct contrast with what Gary O'Neil, N3GO believe
|
By
gin&pez@arg
· #13699
·
|
|
Calibrating to a long coax?
#applications
#calibration
#measurement
Hello. Let us ask, please, two "rhetorical" questions, which are addressed to all readers of this thread: - Is there anyone, ever, wondered, in any similar to this, under discussion, case - that is bo
Hello. Let us ask, please, two "rhetorical" questions, which are addressed to all readers of this thread: - Is there anyone, ever, wondered, in any similar to this, under discussion, case - that is bo
|
By
gin&pez@arg
· #13681
·
|
|
errors of "error" models
#108 : A Proposed Pre-Virtual 2-Port of NanoVNA-0.6.0 Hello, Allow us, please, to propose--FACUPOV in our SOW--the following 4-port as - - - - - - - - - - - - - (c) gin&pez@arg (cc-by-4.0) 2019 : star
#108 : A Proposed Pre-Virtual 2-Port of NanoVNA-0.6.0 Hello, Allow us, please, to propose--FACUPOV in our SOW--the following 4-port as - - - - - - - - - - - - - (c) gin&pez@arg (cc-by-4.0) 2019 : star
|
By
gin&pez@arg
· #11185
·
|
|
errors of "error" models
#107': On the Missing Terms in NanoVNA firmware - ERRATUM Dear Erik, Thank you very much indeed for your valuable comment, since you forced us to recheck the related code. No, we can not explain that,
#107': On the Missing Terms in NanoVNA firmware - ERRATUM Dear Erik, Thank you very much indeed for your valuable comment, since you forced us to recheck the related code. No, we can not explain that,
|
By
gin&pez@arg
· #11125
·
|
|
errors of "error" models
#107 : On the Missing Terms in NanoVNA firmware Hello, Allow us, please, to propose the following modifications remarked by "//" : https://www.op4.eu/nvu/2020.02.20/modifs.to.nanovna.0.6.0.gpa.cc.by.4
#107 : On the Missing Terms in NanoVNA firmware Hello, Allow us, please, to propose the following modifications remarked by "//" : https://www.op4.eu/nvu/2020.02.20/modifs.to.nanovna.0.6.0.gpa.cc.by.4
|
By
gin&pez@arg
· #11113
·
|
|
On the Classification of [NanoVNA System] - It Belongs Exactly to that Class of VNAs which Measure the -101-Nominal Value of the Loads
Hello, - - - - - - - - - - - - - (c) gin&pez@arg (cc-by-4.0) 2019 : start - - - - - - - - - - - Well, after all that said at [1], [2], [3], allow us, please, to conclude that, FACUPOV the [NanoVNA Sys
Hello, - - - - - - - - - - - - - (c) gin&pez@arg (cc-by-4.0) 2019 : start - - - - - - - - - - - Well, after all that said at [1], [2], [3], allow us, please, to conclude that, FACUPOV the [NanoVNA Sys
|
By
gin&pez@arg
· #10540
·
|
|
Free Matching software that may be of interest
... with a waretype of : https://web.archive.org/web/20121011020827/http://antennas.ee.duth.gr/ooo/classificationofwaretypes/classificationofwaretypes.htm
... with a waretype of : https://web.archive.org/web/20121011020827/http://antennas.ee.duth.gr/ooo/classificationofwaretypes/classificationofwaretypes.htm
|
By
gin&pez@arg
· #10463
·
|
|
Free Matching software that may be of interest
It is NOT free : "Extended free license to July 1st, 2020" etc : https://www.atyune.com/news/
It is NOT free : "Extended free license to July 1st, 2020" etc : https://www.atyune.com/news/
|
By
gin&pez@arg
· #10461
·
|
|
A Capsule Summary of Nonfictional VNA Measurements
Dear Jeff, Thank you, very much indeed, for this; we much appreciate it! Well, we will try sometime to reproduce your MatLab code in Maxima. By the way, allow us, please, to publicly express our admir
Dear Jeff, Thank you, very much indeed, for this; we much appreciate it! Well, we will try sometime to reproduce your MatLab code in Maxima. By the way, allow us, please, to publicly express our admir
|
By
gin&pez@arg
· #10031
·
|
|
A Capsule Summary of Nonfictional VNA Measurements - ERRATUM
Instead of the wrong: G = S(L-O)(gs+lo) + L(O-S)(gl+os) + O(S-L)(go+sl) / / [ (L-O)(gs+lo) + (O-S)(gl+os) + (S-L)(go+sl) ] the correct one: G = [ S(L-O)(gs+lo) + L(O-S)(gl+os) + O(S-L)(go+sl) ] / / [
Instead of the wrong: G = S(L-O)(gs+lo) + L(O-S)(gl+os) + O(S-L)(go+sl) / / [ (L-O)(gs+lo) + (O-S)(gl+os) + (S-L)(go+sl) ] the correct one: G = [ S(L-O)(gs+lo) + L(O-S)(gl+os) + O(S-L)(go+sl) ] / / [
|
By
gin&pez@arg
· #10029
·
|
|
A Capsule Summary of Nonfictional VNA Measurements
Hello, Allow us, please, to present a Capsule Summary of the Crystal Clear Nature of the Scientific Nonfictional VNA Measurements. Well, we bought a VNA with 3 standard loads, which their manufacturer
Hello, Allow us, please, to present a Capsule Summary of the Crystal Clear Nature of the Scientific Nonfictional VNA Measurements. Well, we bought a VNA with 3 standard loads, which their manufacturer
|
By
gin&pez@arg
· #10009
·
|
|
errors of "error" models
#106": More On The Fourth Load VNA Trick @Jeff Anderson - 4 January 2020 - https://groups.io/g/nanovna-users/message/9158 Dear Jeff, Thank you very much for your most valuable information, by which yo
#106": More On The Fourth Load VNA Trick @Jeff Anderson - 4 January 2020 - https://groups.io/g/nanovna-users/message/9158 Dear Jeff, Thank you very much for your most valuable information, by which yo
|
By
gin&pez@arg
· #9161
·
|
|
errors of "error" models
@Gary O’Neil, N3GO https://groups.io/g/nanovna-users/message/9132 Dear Gary, Well, allow us, please, to remind you that we would not arrive at this - most spectacular, indeed ! - conclusion, if you di
@Gary O’Neil, N3GO https://groups.io/g/nanovna-users/message/9132 Dear Gary, Well, allow us, please, to remind you that we would not arrive at this - most spectacular, indeed ! - conclusion, if you di
|
By
gin&pez@arg
· #9157
·
|
|
errors of "error" models
#106': On The Fourth Load VNA Trick @Jeff Anderson - 4 January 2020 https://groups.io/g/nanovna-users/message/9153 Hello, Thank you very much for interest in our work, and especially for quoting this
#106': On The Fourth Load VNA Trick @Jeff Anderson - 4 January 2020 https://groups.io/g/nanovna-users/message/9153 Hello, Thank you very much for interest in our work, and especially for quoting this
|
By
gin&pez@arg
· #9155
·
|
|
errors of "error" models
#106: On The Fourth Load VNA Trick @Erik, PD0EK - 4 January 2020 - https://groups.io/g/nanovna-users/message/9131 Dear Erik, We would like to thank you very much because you revealed at last your Subj
#106: On The Fourth Load VNA Trick @Erik, PD0EK - 4 January 2020 - https://groups.io/g/nanovna-users/message/9131 Dear Erik, We would like to thank you very much because you revealed at last your Subj
|
By
gin&pez@arg
· #9152
·
|
|
errors of "error" models
#105: On the Absurdness of the Identicalness of All Standard Loads in this World... @Gary O'Neil , N3GO - 4 January 2020 Dear Gary, Thank you for your time you spend all these months to comment on our
#105: On the Absurdness of the Identicalness of All Standard Loads in this World... @Gary O'Neil , N3GO - 4 January 2020 Dear Gary, Thank you for your time you spend all these months to comment on our
|
By
gin&pez@arg
· #9130
·
|