#108 : A Proposed Pre-Virtual 2-Port of NanoVNA-0.6.0 Hello, Allow us, please, to propose--FACUPOV in our SOW--the following 4-port as - - - - - - - - - - - - - (c) gin&pez@arg (cc-by-4.0) 2019 : star

#107': On the Missing Terms in NanoVNA firmware - ERRATUM Dear Erik, Thank you very much indeed for your valuable comment, since you forced us to recheck the related code. No, we can not explain that,

#107 : On the Missing Terms in NanoVNA firmware Hello, Allow us, please, to propose the following modifications remarked by "//" : https://www.op4.eu/nvu/2020.02.20/modifs.to.nanovna.0.6.0.gpa.cc.by.4

Hello, - - - - - - - - - - - - - (c) gin&pez@arg (cc-by-4.0) 2019 : start - - - - - - - - - - - Well, after all that said at [1], [2], [3], allow us, please, to conclude that, FACUPOV the [NanoVNA Sys

... with a waretype of : https://web.archive.org/web/20121011020827/http://antennas.ee.duth.gr/ooo/classificationofwaretypes/classificationofwaretypes.htm

It is NOT free : "Extended free license to July 1st, 2020" etc : https://www.atyune.com/news/

Dear Jeff, Thank you, very much indeed, for this; we much appreciate it! Well, we will try sometime to reproduce your MatLab code in Maxima. By the way, allow us, please, to publicly express our admir

Instead of the wrong: G = S(L-O)(gs+lo) + L(O-S)(gl+os) + O(S-L)(go+sl) / / [ (L-O)(gs+lo) + (O-S)(gl+os) + (S-L)(go+sl) ] the correct one: G = [ S(L-O)(gs+lo) + L(O-S)(gl+os) + O(S-L)(go+sl) ] / / [

Hello, Allow us, please, to present a Capsule Summary of the Crystal Clear Nature of the Scientific Nonfictional VNA Measurements. Well, we bought a VNA with 3 standard loads, which their manufacturer

#106": More On The Fourth Load VNA Trick @Jeff Anderson - 4 January 2020 - https://groups.io/g/nanovna-users/message/9158 Dear Jeff, Thank you very much for your most valuable information, by which yo

@Gary O’Neil, N3GO https://groups.io/g/nanovna-users/message/9132 Dear Gary, Well, allow us, please, to remind you that we would not arrive at this - most spectacular, indeed ! - conclusion, if you di

#106': On The Fourth Load VNA Trick @Jeff Anderson - 4 January 2020 https://groups.io/g/nanovna-users/message/9153 Hello, Thank you very much for interest in our work, and especially for quoting this

#106: On The Fourth Load VNA Trick @Erik, PD0EK - 4 January 2020 - https://groups.io/g/nanovna-users/message/9131 Dear Erik, We would like to thank you very much because you revealed at last your Subj

#105: On the Absurdness of the Identicalness of All Standard Loads in this World... @Gary O'Neil , N3GO - 4 January 2020 Dear Gary, Thank you for your time you spend all these months to comment on our

#104': On the Criterion of Cross-Ratios - Errata Section 1 - In 3rd line from below, instead of the wrong : "Thus there is by any chance possible", the correct : "So, there is not by any chance possib

@Gary O'Neil , N3GO - 3 January 2020 https://groups.io/g/nanovna-users/message/9087 Dear Gary, Yes, it is. Happy New Year 2020 ! gin&pez@arg

#104: On the Criterion of Cross-Ratios @Erik, PD0EK - 2 January 2020 - https://groups.io/g/nanovna-users/message/9074 Dear Erik, Thank you, very much indeed, for your time spent on these questions. 1

#103 : The Fourth Load * Dear all, Yes, indeed ! - - - - - - - - - - - - - (c) gin&pez@arg (cc-by-4.0) 2019 : start - - - - - - - - - - - It seems that the ratio of these two cross-ratios, the one of

#102: The Complete "Demystification" of the "VNA Measurements" Kind - Farewell Hello, Well, we arrived at last at The End of a rather long Road. The VNA gives to The Common User the Value: (g - o)*(l

#101 : A Mechanical Proof of the Invariability of the Cross-Ratio Under the Moebius Transformation of G to g of a Two-Port Hello, Allow us, please, to inform you that we just uploaded a Mechanical Pro