wrote: From all four S-parameters it is possible to work out the Rollett Stability Factor K https://www.microwaves101.com/encyclopedias/stability-factor which will allow you to determine if the

Yeah, sorry about the window link, I was half asleep at the time. DMR has mentioned a Linux how-to in this thread. https://groups.io/g/nanovna-users/topic/33072199#1507 I think it's about the 4th

If you are modifying the FW *please* maintain a file in the Firmware folder with release notes and version information along with the location of the source repository. If you make comments such as

Aha. That's what are for. It works now, Thank you.

Today I received my third Nanovna. This one, I believe, is one of the "better" quality, completing the triad of better, worse, worst. The construction is noticeably higher quality with full, soldered

Hi, check for the "Smith.png" and "Admittance.png" file. They should be in the same direcory as the "NanoVNA.exe" File. 73 Harald OE3HBS

The NanoVna seems to work but when I look at results on the PC screen I can't see the Smith chart. I see results plotted on the screen, probably on the Smith chart but Smith chart itself is not

Ok Larry, its a starting point that I never knew about. I've not investigated anything to do with the terminal stuff yet. 73 de Andy

Greetings Mr. QRP, Thanks for the analysis! Gosh it is amazing how close my DIY 50 Ohm BNC load with adapter combination match the SMA 50 Ohm reference load that came with my nanoVNA! I don't know

Interesting!!

6 dB is too small, the output level may be very high for LNA and may overload it, so you may get incorrect measurement. I'm using 30-60 dB attenuator on the LNA input for measurement.

Thanks. Just what I wanted.

Hi Nick, please try putting the full path to the file in the field, not just the file name. It may be a matter of which folder the software sees as its working folder (generally controlled by your

I agree and was going to put forth the same request as Rudi just did: Due to an ever-increasing number of NanoVNA firmware developers providing binaries on this forum (I think it's up to 5 now) and

Hi Rune thank you so much for this application which I have been using to good effect this past week with the nanoVNA. I think there may be a problem with saving and loading calibrations. Yesterday

Hello Erik, Thank you for adding your extension to the Hugen nanoVNA version 0.1.1. It would be nice to fill out in the "version window" the version number, e.g.: 0.1.1 + scan, 1500MHz Then you

Some clarification from my earlier measurement. The Measurement output from CH0 ranges from -13 dBm at 55 kHz to -36 dBm at 900 MHz..... a more than 23 dB variance. Beginning at the first increment

Hi hwalker.Very thanks for answering my post & i read before your procedure. So the S11 isn't interesting in the LNA Performance. Regards.

The output power of the SI5351 is automatic set depending the requested sweep frequency, 2mA below 300MHz, 8mA above 300MHz Similar for a manually set fixed output frequency using the freq

Hi, Andy, we had the same idea, I measured the output and the frequency accuracy on the weekend. It is very bad if there are 5 kHz difference, e.g. on LF...the band is < 2kHz wide. I have set the