toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Wow, am I responding late to this post!
I have been going through my e-mails, and saved this one, as I do have something to say.
I spent 16 years of elected service for the ARRL, first as Section Manager, then Vice Director and finally a Director. I have had exposure to many clubs along my tenure. . I have seen clubs in various times of development, from start, to stability, crisis, dissolution and reformation. I have visited clubs where the president was stressed during a bickering session, had a heart attack, and after he was carried away by the EMT’s, the bickering continued! Perhaps my favorite was the one who submitted their constitution that included a position on the board called a “Sergeant at Arms” , who had the charge and responsibility of removing anyone from the meeting “by all means necessary” if so ordered by the board. Spoiler note-their club did not get approved by the ARRL, at least not until they totally changed their constitution.
We really need to be proud of our club. As far as our school support, I asked one of the (several) past ARRL CEO’s (Gallagher) to send a note to our club in appreciation for the youth involvement efforts. Unfortunately, I don’t think that happened. We do have an excellent club, and once this Covid crisis is over, I hope those of us in the “at risk” group can congregate once again.
Thanks for being part of NABRC!
’73 de JIM N2ZZ
From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com] On Behalf Of Jerry Crawford via groups.io
Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2020 11:13 AM
Subject: Re: [nabrc] ARRL Recommended new Band Plan
Thanks for your perspective
You brought up something I had not considered as I have not had the same exposure. I have almost given up on repeaters because I was either not in range or not getting anything useful except for DSTAR. However I have heard far too much disgusting behavior on 75M so I quit using that band. So I can’t disagree with your concerns.
Regarding the broader issue of encouraging more participation in Ham radio I think NABRC does a great job. The combination of school support, meetings with a program, Field Day, and community support for both activities and emergencies is a good mix. If more clubs were to be so involved it would be a great step forward.
Another activity that I think would be a great incentive is radiosport. Not enough people get to operate during Field Day and some are intimidated. It would be good to have some radiosport activities for beginners. School Club roundup is great for the students and a similar activity for beginners would be interesting.
On Aug 4, 2020, at 7:30 AM, Kevan Nason <knason00@...> wrote:
Good points Jim.
Although I have been critical of the ARRL in the past, I find it easy to support this plan. The big thing about earlier proposals that I found objectionable was the push for allowing automated traffic handling stations unfettered access to the bands. It is clear to me that expanding the use of those stations is essential to maintaining Amateur Radio's relevance in the modern age, but the word that has recently become the embodiment of evil - compromise -- is needed to satisfy the needs/wants of the ham community. The frequencies available to those types of stations should be limited. This proposal seems to be a good compromise. Encouraging entry level licensee's to upgrade by giving them a taste by expanding HF privileges seems an overall good thing too.
Here's an old curmudgeons viewpoint against expanded HF access though. It's a variation of "A No-Code or Multiple Guess earned license will destroy Ham Radio", which by the way I did not believe to be true back then when those were being discussed. However, I've been listening quite a bit to VHF/UHF FM communications and there truly has been an increase in activities reminiscent of "operating" styles from other radio services in the past couple years. Perhaps this is more of a comment about how society has changed, but the amount of disrespect towards other people and ham radio traditions that I hear on a daily basis (primarily from newer licensees) has risen to the level that I have begun to follow Riley Hollingsworth's advice to exercise the big VFO knob. Only in this case I have begun blocking certain repeaters from my FM radio's scanning list. Sometimes I can't help myself and voice my opinion to them, but usually the response from the other stations is... let's say not very accommodating towards the wishes of others. I am finding myself becoming so disgusted with what I hear that I often turn the 2 meter rig off and retreat to HF or a non-radio activity. I'm afraid that allowing a larger number of less committed people expanded access to the HF bands will only encourage even more poor HF operation than already exists. I envision that happening in the same way that Facebook, Twitter, CNN/MSNBC or Fox News cliques has divided our society. By "less committed" I am not referring to everyone. I am talking about those people did the minimum amount of work necessary to get a license, but not enough work to strain themselves by learning enough to pass a multiple guess General or Extra class test AND that seem to enjoy talking for hours trashing other people rather than encouraging the Amateur Radio principle of promoting good will Greater audience area (HF propagation geographies vs. VHF localized repeater networks) means the few folks who are instigators can band together easier and cause more problems than are already happening. I'm selfish enough to wish that old time values can hold on for a few more years, but it doesn't appear like that is going to happen -- so I am a bit cautious about broad expansion of entry level licensees' HF privileges