Date
1 - 20 of 30
Sticky Moderators Note: What should be done with the Marxism List?
jhwilliams1920@...
Dear Comrades, (Hi Les!)
Have followed daily and sometimes contributed since 2001. Did not agree with Louis at all turns (who could?!) but always wished to emulate his intellectual vigor. And learned to laugh rather than get truly silly and double-down. So very many worldwide, historical, temporal, human things that Louis caught or connected -- in a frisson with this audience -- that could not be found elsewhere. For me that was the heart and soul of the list -- and propelled the discourse and invited others to join in that vital project, from philosophical grounds all the way to tactical actions. Death of people I have gotten to know intervenes in most of my days. That said, Louis' death impacted me so much. I miss him. Acknowledge here that Michael Yates' online remembrance/eulogy was beautiful. But I especially miss what Louis might say about current posts on the Marxmail list! My work commitment has me once again basically politically underground, with a long stretch of 7-day weeks (a couple of recent years and then some since. Personally I do have beginnings of re-discovering what they revealingly call a "work-life balance." Not that I'm complaining! I have enormous social privilege and am contributing my best efforts to others). But practically speaking it would be folly for me to offer a commitment to advance this project -- although I believe Marxmail should survive and succeed. Have long suspected (by spotting key stories in the NYT/WaPo) that Marxmail had a much larger 'mainstream imprint' than anyone can prove (= a direct translation into bourgeois discourse) mainly because academic and journalist lurkers could find the connections no one else - except the list participants, preeminently Louis - saw/made. Also, the technical challenges (internet archive/Utah/what have you) that Les dealt with, in the technical struggle to keep the list alive, might be presented as evidence that real world (not virtual) forces would extinguish the light of this list if they could. With respect to the future of class conscious workers and intellectuals here in the belly of the beast -- finding a way toward a heterodox and nonsectarian discourse might make all of the difference. Therefore, will do what I can to support the continuance of Marxmail. Mostly what I've said is perhaps not that useful to the purpose of this discussion. Thank you for the indulgence! (Hiya Hari!) My 2 cents on the topic would be to support the idea of cultivating a collective of people with a division of labor that leads to Marxmail as a repository of philosophical/scientific (writ large ala Christopher Caudewell!)/social scientific/cultural/civil rights/women's rights/class struggle/bourgeois politics/union politics/etc. -- with informed commentary - in other words task our comrades with covering the fields they have already tilled for years -- but that the task is to not assume that someone else has done it. (If so please repeat it.) For example I still can't get over "Birth Strike" by Jenny Brown. The reason I suggest this is that many on this list (Hello Gary) have so very much wisdom in every post. (For example Gary could be asked to post/crosspost on his present political passions.) Yes to using technology to solve the language problem -- almost within reach? Not sure that the details of what electronic platform (listserv and email for grandparents yeah) matters at this particular moment. An internet presence matters -- and the specific form might change but only if the list survives the coming months/years, -- so the present form seems workable, if not growing. Keep on Don |
|
Mark Baugher
On Mar 11, 2023, at 7:46 PM, michael a. lebowitz <mlebowit@...> wrote:Thanks Michael. I think our foray into non-English languages might be as simple as giving instructions on the marxmail main page that describes how to enable translation to non-English languages in a standard browser like Chrome. Mark |
|
michael a. lebowitz
Comrades,
I don't feel that I am myself able to contribute as a member of a working group but I look forward to be able to participate on topics when possible. I am happy with the way you are proposing to resuscitate the list in Lou's spirit. I think, though, we should stick to English for now. At some point when we have a vigorous discussion list going, we can explore other languages and the possibility of using online translations. in solidarity, michael |
|
William Quimby
Because I have guilt
feelings about my poor performance in high school French, I have
been
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
subscribed for a while to several newsletters from French sources. When my self-translation fails I resort to (I should have inserted that I use Mozilla Thunderbird) the add-on called "Web Translate". For French it works beautifully, but I can not testify to Ukrainian, or an Asian or Arabic language. Point being, I think that the day when we can easily machine translate from language X to language Y is - if not here - fast approaching. Thus I support allowing postings in other languages - or investigating the potential. A second thought - I'd be willing to bet that Marxist posters from other countries will have some acquaintance with English - it seems to have become a fad after WWII. Suggest to them that a short summery - "en englais" - of their contribution would be welcome. - Bill On 03/07/23 05:31 PM, Mark Baugher
wrote:
On Jan 31, 2023, at 8:43 AM, Les Schaffer <les.schaffer@...> wrote: Here are some challenges. 1. The list is English only. Only very rarely does anyone contribute anything in any other language. This limits not only who reads the list and who writes for the list, but the topics and takes on those topics.This was one of Anthony's ideas in the document that Les posted. I personally resonated with it. Since we are all presumably internationalists, this idea should be worthy of support or at least comment. But it presents a few challenges starting with how to do such a thing. There are at least four different ways to do it: Translation can be done by humans or by machine translation, and either of these two options can implement a translation from English to multiple languages or from multiple languages to multiple languages. So that makes 4 alternative designs in total. We cut the alternatives in half by eliminating human translation since we don't have the people to do that, among other problems. And if we can't make this work for translating mail that's posted in English to other languages, then we won't be able to take mail posted in multiple languages and then translate it to different languages. The simplified problem, therefore, is to continue using English as a posting language and show that machine translation to other languages works. There are a couple of ways to do that: We can translate at the mail server or the mail client. Machine translation at the mail server will incur costs in licensing translation software and integrating it with groups.io. Mail translation at the client avoids those costs. It has the added advantage of already existing in the Chrome browser and gmail and by integrating some other (presumably better) machine translation software in the browser or mail program of your choice. So, one proposal for realizing Anthony's vision is to try out just translating in Chrome for mail that is received in English, as is the policy today, but translated on a subscriber's mail app to the languages of their choice. We could document how to do it for subscribers who wish to read marxmail in a different language than English, and then evaluate how good it is. This will require some volunteers Mark |
|
Mark Baugher
On Jan 31, 2023, at 8:43 AM, Les Schaffer <les.schaffer@...> wrote:This was one of Anthony's ideas in the document that Les posted. I personally resonated with it. Since we are all presumably internationalists, this idea should be worthy of support or at least comment. But it presents a few challenges starting with how to do such a thing. There are at least four different ways to do it: Translation can be done by humans or by machine translation, and either of these two options can implement a translation from English to multiple languages or from multiple languages to multiple languages. So that makes 4 alternative designs in total. We cut the alternatives in half by eliminating human translation since we don't have the people to do that, among other problems. And if we can't make this work for translating mail that's posted in English to other languages, then we won't be able to take mail posted in multiple languages and then translate it to different languages. The simplified problem, therefore, is to continue using English as a posting language and show that machine translation to other languages works. There are a couple of ways to do that: We can translate at the mail server or the mail client. Machine translation at the mail server will incur costs in licensing translation software and integrating it with groups.io. Mail translation at the client avoids those costs. It has the added advantage of already existing in the Chrome browser and gmail and by integrating some other (presumably better) machine translation software in the browser or mail program of your choice. So, one proposal for realizing Anthony's vision is to try out just translating in Chrome for mail that is received in English, as is the policy today, but translated on a subscriber's mail app to the languages of their choice. We could document how to do it for subscribers who wish to read marxmail in a different language than English, and then evaluate how good it is. This will require some volunteers Mark |
|
Mark Baugher
We've had a couple of people volunteer. Although that is not enough to accomplish the proposal that Les posted, we may propose to do more, just not as much more as some of us think we need.
There was little discussion of a topic that I found interesting, and that is the governance of the list. Louis governed the list with Les's help. Those tasks included technical administration, moderation, curation of list content, and recruiting people who would add to the quality of list content. The upside is that Louis did a good job and nobody else besides Les had to do any work related to the list. The downside may have been an arbitrariness in moderation that comes with having just one person set and execute policy. So the governance issue is how to replace one-person (really 1+ including Les), with a self-managing mailing list of very broad topic (Marxism) with lots of branches that results in a lot of splintering along with diverse, sometimes contradictory, ideas. I find that an interesting puzzle. For instance, holding some kind of election to select a committee to run the list will likely encourage more sectarianism and could trigger competition for control, which would likely undermine the stated mission of the list to be of Marxism rather than one tendency of it. In addition to governance, there is also content: Some people have said that the quality of list content has gone down since Louis left. I think there's something to that. The range of topics is small and apart from a couple of hot-button topics, there's little discussion in depth. These are the issues that I think motivate the Moderators' Note. Hopefully we can execute on a couple of them in the coming months. Those of us in or seventh, eighth, ninth or tenth decades usually don't have much time to commit to new undertakings. But sharing ideas on this topic is still needed and very much appreciated. Thanks, Mark |
|
Mark Baugher
On Jan 31, 2023, at 7:43 AM, Les Schaffer <les.schaffer@...> wrote:We might want an admin group to manage email and other social media, if subscribers volunteer to expand to other social media. Regarding subscribers, I'd like to know how many bots are on this list, since I assume we have some, and with several hundred subscribers, we might be a target for intelligence services and nefarious actors. If we add other platforms like TikTok, etcetera, then the fraud problem doubles or quadruples. The alternative is to allow organized misinformation to proliferate and the bad postings will eventually drive out the good. Properly considered, this might be considered a Moderators' problem, but Moderators have to devote attention to dealing with real people. Mark |
|
Anthony Boynton
Thank you for your offer to volunteer Baba. We should talk/chat about this more. On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 6:11 PM Baba Aye <baba.aye@...> wrote:
|
|
Baba Aye
Hi Les, Mark, David & Anthony, Many thanks for this Note. I think it is timely and poses a "What is To Be Done?" Marxmail moment question (pardon the cliché). I have been more of a lurker here for most of the about 15 years I've been here (largely because there's little of me left to keep up with the tempo of discussion between the time for my work and the political commitments). But I'm happy to contribute to repositioning this salon (which I've found quite helpful in a a number of ways). The social media bit is somewhere I could be useful (I'm not as active in Twitter as I used to be as well - the back and forth debates also take so much time). Facebook moderation is however something I have reasonable experience about. With streamlined (not necessarily in a strait jacketed manner) of topics is something I would also welcome and that could spur me (& I suspect a few other lurkers like me) to be a bit more active in discourse on this good old list serve legacy dimension of where the Note could lead us to. ![]() Global Policy Officer Health and Social Sector Public Services International Follow on twitter @BabaAye _____________________________________ Author: Era of Crises & Revolts: Perspectives for Workers & Youth ********************************************* *"Only struggle educates the exploited class. Only struggle discloses to it the magnitude of its own power, widens its horizon, enhances its abilities, clarifies its mind, forges its will." - V.I. Lenin* |
|
Mark Baugher
On Feb 3, 2023, at 7:01 AM, Roger Kulp <leucovorinsaves@...> wrote:A gross overstatement IMO. The people who design and engineer the web continue to do most of that work over email. It's as true today as it was in the 1970s, and there are plenty of young engineers who use it. And there are plenty of other examples of the ongoing vital use of email. email is just no longer alone in how people communicate using the Internet. Email is better suited to presenting more complex ideas and making an argument; it's longer form than chat, facebook, WhatsApp, Mastodon, etc., and that form is needed for network-based discussions whereas short-form social-media apps are better suited to short comments, annotations, video, images, and non-textual media. What the moderators have proposed is to use other social media as appropriate to cast a wider net but not to end the list because it has somehow been superseded. Mark |
|
Marv Gandall
On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 07:01 AM, Roger Kulp wrote:
It is not the content and subject matter of the topics on this list that is irrelevant to younger Marxists, it's the nature of this list itself.Curious to know what you mean by the "nature" of the list... I am a very active member of one of the larger Marxist-Leninist parties in the USA.Your group has a very good line on Ukraine war and other issues, but unfortunately the claim that it is "one of the larger" far left organizations mostly serves to draw attention to how marginal the Marxist left, Leninist and otherwise, has become in relation to the 165 million strong US working class. The decline is also unfortunately reflected in the size of the antiwar movement relative to what it was during the Vietnam and Iraq wars. One of the virtues or vices - take your pick - of the tiny vanguard groups is that they are able to convince their members that they are playing an historical role much larger than their meagre numbers would suggest. |
|
Mark Lause
"Can we play?" I suspect you need to know the secret handshake and the password. :-) On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 10:06 AM Bobby MacVeety <bobbymacveety@...> wrote:
|
|
Bobby MacVeety
Thanks for your analysis
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
When you say that the rest of the net has moved on, do you mean social media? How are young socialists connecting? Can we play? On Feb 3, 2023, at 10:01 AM, Roger Kulp <leucovorinsaves@...> wrote:
|
|
This is in resonse to Marv Gandall,and his comment about "the decline and demise of its aging constituency of Marxists" . It is not the content and subject matter of the topics on this list that is irrelevant to younger Marxists, it's the nature of this list itself.
I am a very active member of one of the larger Marxist-Leninist parties in the USA. It isn't the DSA, that's all I will say. I am a member of one of the largest branches of the party outside of DC, and NYC. We are appproaching 100 active members in our branch, and even more semiactive members,and friends of the party. Like a lot of radical political organizations, we have large bursts, and upticks in our membership numbers, and periods where our membership remains relatively stable, all based on the external political circumstances. We have also made allies with communist parties around the world, and have sent regular delegations to Cuba, and Venezuela. A brief summary of the demographics of our branch breaks down like this. We have two members over 70, a retired health care worker, and a semiretired college professor, the only other person in our branch who has heard of Marxmail, myself in my 60s, three members in their 40s a genuine Marxist attorney, a rare treasure, a high school history teacher, and a primary care physician at a low income health clinic. The rest of our membership is made of people under 35. Millennials, and older Generation Z people. They mostly seem to be a mix of graduate students, and workers in low income jobs, although there is one guy who is both the son of Central American immigrants, and a head of a local of a carpenters union. Our party has what might be called a subparty at high schools,and universities, called Students For Socialism. These are people from the downwardly mobile generations hurt by the neoliberal US policies of the last fifty years, and have personally experienced the lies, fraud and oppression of the US capitalist system. These people are too busy with both party work, and the struggles of their daily lives to be reading, and posting, at an old school email/ bulletin board, like Marxmail. While lists like Marxmail have their good points, and educational benefits, they are pretty much a relic of the early years ofthe internet. The rest of the web has long since moved on. |
|
Mark Lause
I am grateful the moderators have sketched out a number of courses we can take to improve the prospects of the list.
I think the discussion of the situation in Ukraine--which coincided with my retirement and moving hundreds of miles to a new home--has left me focused on finishing some book work that has been left up in the air for several years. This has not made me less interested in the list. I've just said what I had to say and saw no point in further discussing whether I am a running dog lacking of imperialism so I've tended to focus on accomplishing what I could accomplish.
Part of this process should be publicizing the existence of the
list through those other venues. There are downsides to this, as
Facebook, Twitter, etc. are heavily populated by trolls . . . which is
fitting since they're owned by them. Cheers, Mark L. |
|
Marv Gandall
I join my friend Hari and others in thanking the moderators for their efforts and hope they will carry on for as long as they have the time and energy to do so.
In my opinion, the decline of the Marxmail essentially reflects the decline and demise of its aging constituency of Marxists who became politically active before the downturn in the 80’s. Those of us who remain are either no longer active, or where we are, don’t exercise the same influence, with rare exceptions, in the younger and more diverse milieus of the contemporary Left as many of us did when we were younger. When I go into these new milieus, I’m reminded of how I used to regard the older CP veterans I ran across back in the day - with much respect, certainly, but also aware that their time had passed, replaced by a new political generation.
If I didn’t think the list still worthwhile, I wouldn’t subscribe and contribute to it. Others have mentioned how it keeps us informed of developments of particular interest to the Left. I would add that Marxmail and other online sites like it also keep me connected to my closest political kin, some of whom I've know for most of my adult life, others who I’ve happily met and befriended on the internet. Families, of course, can be notoriously quarrelsome. :)
Politically, the ideological debates on the list may not seem particularly relevant to younger Marxist and radical intellectuals since many of these debates harken back a century or more ago when when they were urgently important to the advancing international workers movement. Should the present crisis continue to deepen and result in a revival of mass socialist organizations where the question of power is again posed in many countries, I expect the strategic and tactical discussions on this list which now seem esoteric to many would gain a much wider appeal. For this reason alone, the list and other repositories of those discussions like the Marxist Internet Archive are worth preserving. |
|
hari kumar
Dear Moderator Group:
Thank you for this and your efforts. At the outset I should make my own apologies, I cannot assist you in an active way. It really comes for me about 3 years too late, as I am now embroiled in some rather time-consuming party type activities. In a way, what you are actually proposing is a parallel information type of organisation shorn of any 'party' affiliations. From the outside I would support it. In actual fact, to paraphrase a former MList - whom i am sure many of you will quickly spot - we have at most 5-10 years. To be able to resist hue attacks on the international toilers movements. For it is very clear that there is a massive imperialist re-jigging going on. I doubt it will end up short of a series of wars. So I certainly support your efforts. As to other languages, that seems a pretty daunting goal. Can you elaborate on what you mean- how you see that? Kind Regards, hari |
|
Marla Vijaya kumar
No doubt a lot of Marxist discussion groups have come up in numerous local languages on Whatsapp. From that perspective, our Marxmail is old fashioned, but not without relevance. WE should continue this group. Vijaya Kumar Marla
On Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 07:42:16 AM GMT+5:30, Barry Brooks <durable@...> wrote:
>There is a reason both Yahoo and Google have shut down their email groups that followed the same format as this group. The main reason Y&G shut it down was probably because of money, but unlike Y&G the goal of Marxmail was never to make money. Why follow a bad example? So popular wins over thoughtful? Small is beautiful. So long as there are at least two subscribers active on Marxmail it will be an un-holy relic still worth a futile quest. Be thankful that its small flaws mean Marxmail is not either too good to last or bad enough to win by any means. Barry |
|
Marla Vijaya kumar
Mark, I was just clarifying on David's remark. I do not intend to start a new topic. Vijaya Kumar Marla
On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 08:47:08 PM GMT+5:30, Mark Baugher <mark@...> wrote:
> > David, > Both CPI and CPIM together have more than 1.4 million members, not counting the various mass > > organization, which together will be in many millions. This is not the intended subject of this thread. Les and other moderators want to have a discussion on the future of marxmail. Please change the subject line if you want to go off topic. Mark |
|
Bobby MacVeety
I am happy to have discovered marxmail with opinions analysis and links that have given me an education I could not easily find elsewhere. I am humbled to be in the company of committed scholars and activists who still yearn for and work for a socialist future
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Feb 1, 2023, at 9:12 PM, Barry Brooks <durable@...> wrote: |
|