I would add to Michael's reply. For sure Kagarlitsky for now presents himself as a person against war and Putin's invasion. No doubt going with war support is a political suicide for any opposition in

Huh. It sounds like the Democratic party is totally different from GOP. Interesting for ruling party for a century (where other laws against community also being so controversial for DEMs? Rhetoric qu

Sachs is a political corpse walking and spewing nonsense from his mouth and trying to cover his past sins with "peace talks" with quite pro-Russian camp sentiment. Let's go following: 1) Sachs was an

Progressive International and aligned with its groups and people like Corbyn and Varorufakis (who made this statement and framework), not anti-capitalists but rather a pro-reform status quo. Moreover,

yes and no Usually, Russia is using combined artillery barrage attacks with some probing attacks which cause a lot of own casualties but also checks enemies' defense before making flattening of area.

He is a clown. He does it to get click baits and earn money on social media via tv-show like cultural environment at the moralistic Anglo-Saxon political sphere. That it. Similarly various token conse

Thank for your comment. I am mostly looking and sitting in telegram with sometimes trying to get info from Discord OSINT communities. Situation is a big fog of war with both sides downplaying damage a

Oh yeah Sergey Movchan is a decent person However, his brother in Barcelona is a known pro-Russian Borot'bist and an agent of Kremlin.

It is obvious that the current political situation is going to a big war in the following years. From rapid remilitarization of the Western countries to the aggressive and growing military power of Ru

John, you are correct on this statement. However, I have encountered the real words of their member Pawel Wargan a hardcore Stalinist who openly seeks to ally with Russia against NATO. On the surface,

In my opinion, you misread Kisinger because you suspect he is placing the last ace on the table. You see his text already speaks of some land concession. It is a starting point for diplomacy to get fr

It is obvious from the trajectory, make small pushes to accept concessions of the Russian advances in Ukraine and then freeze them to redirect in other directions. I don't see his other goal than tryi

I think you are correct on this about 2/24. But think also from the position that he bringing to the table. Now he is telling that concessions of the Ukrainian land are possible even after some agreem