|
As Trump and Iran square off on Venezuelan oil shipments, will US go full pirate of the Gulf? (Juan Cole)
Chris Slee
"Trita Parsi...wonders if the Trump administration is planning to widen its piracy against Iranian vessels on the high seas as part of an October surprise.
"Trump had four Iranian oil tankers seized in August, alleging that they were heading for Venezuela".
|
|
|
|
Re: Trans activists hate Rowling because she’s a woman
Gary MacLennan
Well said.
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 8:10 AM Louis Proyect <lnp3@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
The Hoarder: critique of logistical capitalism
R.O.
(Holland's most leftish sociologist Willem Schinkel (1979, Erasmus University) brings an ode to the hoarder because this figure highlights the internal contradictory nature of logistical capitalism)
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
In Dutch: https://www.trouw.nl/religie-filosofie/een-eyeopener-over-de-logistiek-van-het-kapitalisme~b5c4b0b2/ De hamsteraar. Kritiek van het logistiek kapitalisme Willem Schinkel Boom 255 blz.; € 22, 50 ★★★☆☆ 16 september 2020, 23:00 Conclusion Instead of applying spatial resources, logistics capitalism plays with short delivery times: just-in-time production and distribution. Raw materials and components are only fully assembled at the end of a product. Because of the just-in-time logistics in production and distribution of food a permanent sword of Damocles hangs above our heads. The hoarder shows the precariousness of system: he hoards greater resources than required by the logistic calculus. This makes the hoarder a figure that highlights the internal contradictory nature of capitalism.
De conclusie In plaats van ruimtelijke voorraden aan te leggen, speelt het logistieke kapitalisme met korte toevoertijden: just-in-time productie en distributie. Grondstoffen en onderdelen worden pas helemaal op het einde samengevoegd tot een product. Door de just-in-time logistiek in de productie en distributie van levensmiddelen hangt er permanent een zwaard van Damocles boven ons hoofd. De hamsteraar toont het precaire van het systeem: hij legt grotere voorraden aan dan de logistieke calculus voorschrijft. Dat maakt de hamsteraar tot een figuur die het intern tegenstrijdige karakter van het kapitalisme aan het licht brengt.
|
|
|
|
Re: Modertor's note
Ken Hiebert
This article from 2014 documents a troll campaign against Common Dreams. The perpetrator was eventually exposed.
ken hhttps://www.commondreams.org/hambaconeggs
|
|
|
|
Burial blues for 'Radical Jack' Lieberman, who left big footprint at FSU
Louis Proyect
|
|
|
|
Re: The binary weirdness that is Real Clear Politics
Michael Gregory
Sort of like how PETA praising Peter Singer and Robert Byrd makes me want to eat more meat.
From: Michael Gregory <mo_tzu4444@...>
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 6:08:37 PM To: marxmail@groups.io <marxmail@groups.io> Subject: Re: [marxmail] The binary weirdness that is Real Clear Politics
Of course anything that cites Charles Murray without qualification is garbage.
From: marxmail@groups.io <marxmail@groups.io> on behalf of David Walters <dwaltersmia@...>
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 2:40:47 PM To: marxmail@groups.io <marxmail@groups.io> Subject: [marxmail] The binary weirdness that is Real Clear Politics The moderators have accurately noted the right-wing (and alt-right wing if such a thing exists) character of the news feeds at real clear politics. I go to real clear politics everything single day for their
polling. They list all the major polling organizations and their results for the upcoming elections. Naturally, most or all of them show Biden trouncing Trump, even now as the date closes in on election day. They list these polls totally
without comment. So on the one hand, the fascinating results of the polling for the upcoming capitalist democratic elections are shown along with a news feed that expounds on every conspiracy theory about Biden one has ever heard about.
David
|
|
|
|
Re: The binary weirdness that is Real Clear Politics
Michael Gregory
Of course anything that cites Charles Murray without qualification is garbage.
From: marxmail@groups.io <marxmail@groups.io> on behalf of David Walters <dwaltersmia@...>
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 2:40:47 PM To: marxmail@groups.io <marxmail@groups.io> Subject: [marxmail] The binary weirdness that is Real Clear Politics The moderators have accurately noted the right-wing (and alt-right wing if such a thing exists) character of the news feeds at real clear politics. I go to real clear politics everything single day for their
polling. They list all the major polling organizations and their results for the upcoming elections. Naturally, most or all of them show Biden trouncing Trump, even now as the date closes in on election day. They list these polls totally
without comment. So on the one hand, the fascinating results of the polling for the upcoming capitalist democratic elections are shown along with a news feed that expounds on every conspiracy theory about Biden one has ever heard about.
David
|
|
|
|
Re: Trans activists hate Rowling because she’s a woman
Yeah I’m not here for TERF bigotry.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
—Ryan
On Sep 16, 2020, at 3:10 PM, Louis Proyect <lnp3@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Trump’s ABC town hall: “Herd mentality” comments reveal a president disconnected from reality - Vox
Louis Proyect
|
|
|
|
H-Net Review [H-Africa]: Reid on Van Klinken, 'Kenyan, Christian, Queer: Religion, LGBT Activism, and Arts of Resistance in Africa'
Andrew Stewart
---------- Forwarded message --------- From: H-Net Staff via H-REVIEW <h-review@...> Date: Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 7:38 PM Subject: H-Net Review [H-Africa]: Reid on Van Klinken, 'Kenyan, Christian, Queer: Religion, LGBT Activism, and Arts of Resistance in Africa' To: <h-review@...> Cc: H-Net Staff <revhelp@...> Adriaan Van Klinken. Kenyan, Christian, Queer: Religion, LGBT Activism, and Arts of Resistance in Africa. Africana Religions Series. University Park Penn State University Press, 2019. xiv + 232 pp. $89.95 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-271-08380-3. Reviewed by Graeme Reid (Human Rights Watch and Yale University) Published on H-Africa (September, 2020) Commissioned by David D. Hurlbut It Is Complicated: Being Christian and Queer in Kenya Adriaan van Klinken has written an innovative and ambitious book that sets out to do a lot: taunt the secular orthodoxy of queer scholarship with a hint of Pentecostal fervor, complicate religious studies with a dose of queer theology, and mobilize African perspectives to provincialize queer theory. The book is as theoretically versatile as it is methodologically varied. No wonder "scavenger methodology" is van Klinken's self-descriptor of choice, drawn from Jack Halberstam. The author describes his approach as "a somewhat eclectic array" of data and method (p. 19). This is both its strength and its weakness. What holds these disparate elements of theory and method together? My conclusion is that it is essentially the author himself, his fieldwork experience, his perspectives, beliefs and interest in various forms of cultural production. Of course, that could be said about almost any book, but the author of _Kenyan, Christian, Queer_ places particular emphasis on the power of storytelling and inserts his own experiences as a kind of cartilage between chapters. The scaffolding of the book consists of four chapters--case studies--separated by these self-reflective interludes. But despite the discrete containment of the author's research experiences in the interludes, his theological perspective permeates the whole book. It is a kind of magpie combination of elements that is both provocative and distracting. In the first chapter van Klinken sets the tone by introducing themes that recur throughout the book, including his theological framing, a focus on public representations of subjective lgbt experience (van Klinken uses lowercase for the acronym throughout to signal the provisional nature of identity categories), and his treatment of literary and social text as archive. The chapter begins with a coming out narrative by Binyavanga Wainaina, written in the form of a lost chapter of a previously published memoir. Van Klinken then explores Wainaina's oeuvres, especially his critique of homophobia and one of its driving forces--Christian dogma. He reframes Wainaina's critique as visionary and anoints him "prophet," notwithstanding Wainaina's own skepticism about the title. Is "prophet," then, an appropriate characterization? While it fits uncomfortably with Wainaina's disavowal, it resonates with van Klinken's overarching thesis that sites of possibility are to be found in unexpected, subaltern spaces, and that these may usefully--if optimistically--be thought of as prophetic. "I am a homosexual, mum," is the simple truth revealed in Wainaina's creative nonfiction. It caused a stir, amplified by a subsequent tweet in which he confirmed: "I am, for anybody confused or in doubt, a homsexual [sic]. Gay, and quite happy." Van Klinken sees Wainaina's coming out as a political intervention that creates new, open-ended possibilities, a leitmotif in his book. The "lost chapter" concept employed by Wainaina echoes van Klinken's interest in the value of personal narrative as well as silence, absence, and the archive. By restoring the missing segment of his autobiography Wainaina defies the imperative for discrete silence, conjures the figure of the homosexual in the space of its absence, and contributes to an ever-expanding archive of queer experience. Indeed, the concept of archive is reinforced by the work spawned in the wake of Wainaina's disclosure. In a similar vein, in _R__eclaiming Afrikan: Queer Perspectives on Sexual and Gender Identities_ (2014), Zethu Matebeni expanded "queer African archives" by riffing off Wainaina's satirical essay, "How to Write about Africa" to reflect ironically on outsider perspectives in her piece "How NOT to Write about Queer South Africa" (pp. 17, 35). Archive runs like a red thread through the book but is under-theorized and stands as almost self-evident. Further interrogation of the concept of "archive" would enable the reader to understand better the production, reception, and preservation of certain forms of knowledge, rather than assume the artifacts of "arts of resistance" as given. Wainaina's coming out story was published in January 2014, in which there was an intensification of the political use of homophobia, culminating in pernicious legislation in Uganda and Nigeria. Wainaina had strong connections to both countries through family and affectional bonds. Wainaina's story echoes the feminist adage the "personal is political," to which van Klinken adds his interest in the "body as a site of struggle," referencing Wainaina's disclosure of his HIV status, some three years after coming out as gay (echoing the author's self-disclosure in the interlude "Positive"). Wainaina's narratives are prime examples, says van Klinken, of what Achille Mbembe calls "African modes of self-writing" through which he is--perhaps unwittingly--catapulted into the role of spokesperson (a role for which he is subsequently criticized by some activists for not being representative, inclusive, or consistent enough) (p. 35). The second chapter interprets a music video by Art Attack, a Nairobi-based group, featuring the song "Same Love (Remix)" (2016), which was restricted by the Kenyan Film Classification Board (KFCB), in part because it went "against the moral values of the country" (p. 61). The lyrics, imagery, reception, and statements made by the musicians combine to build an argument echoed in the opening lines of the song to the backdrop of a South African flag: "This song goes out to the new slaves, the new blacks, the new Jews, the new minorities for whom we need a civil rights movement, maybe a sex rights movement. Especially in Africa. Everywhere. This goes out to you. I feel you" (p. 68). The language of civil rights and minorities replicates a US-centric playbook as does the original song. The complication of this intertwining and cultural borrowing deserves further exploration. The in-depth theological reading of the video seems like a stretch, given that the religious references are quite sparse, unless one approaches theology as an analytic tool. Van Klinken anticipates and pushes back against the expectation that queer is synonymous with transgressing norms. Through a contextual reading of the video, and in particular the social and political significance of the Nairobi Arboretum, he argues that vanilla, in context, has the potential to be the new queer vanguard. The setting of the video--in the shadow of the presidential residence and a site of religious observance--symbolically reclaims space and is filmed without official permission, one of the technical reasons cited by the KFCB for restricting the distribution of the video. The author nods approvingly at the depiction in the video of egalitarian same-sex relations as a rejection of heteronormativity, effectively rendering relations based on a dyad of power differentials top/bottom, butch/femme (which he suggests are economically determined) as a form of false consciousness. But downplaying difference could equally be read as an aspiration toward modernity and a rejection of relationship patterns that may well be subjectively experienced by the participants in unexpected ways. This remains unexamined in the text and speaks to a broader limitation in his analysis; the images and lyrics are taken as given and not treated as cultural artifacts worthy of analysis in and of themselves. More attention to the elements of the video as bricolage would give further insight into the global circulation of some ideas over others and the Kenyan appropriation of specifically US styles and identity-based consciousness. The throwaway line about "gay vague"--the mainstream incorporation of gay sartorial register into everyday style--could be further developed as a way of highlighting ideas about urbanity, masculinity, modernity, and the complicated relationship with class and cosmopolitan style, which makes certain forms of queer expression palatable, even fashionable, to a certain social milieu (p. 71). While Audrey Mbugua, founder of Transgender Education and Advocacy (TEA), has earned a name for herself as provocateur and a thorn in the side of the lgbt movement, her support of the KFCB and rejection of trans-inclusivity is an interesting counter-narrative, if strategically misguided, that resists the global hegemony of lgbt, exposing these as unstable and contested categories. As a voice in the wilderness, might she be considered a prophet, of sorts? The third chapter is about a collection of 250 life stories, curated by The Nest, an arts collective based in Nairobi, with the intention of providing a counter-narrative to populist rhetoric that homosexuality is "un-African." Some of the stories were published in an anthology, _Stories of Our Lives _(2015) edited by the NEST Collective, and five of these were dramatized in a film by the same name, banned by the KFCB. The author engages the stories as unmediated texts, authentic personal narratives, that can be treated as an archive of alternative knowledge, located in time and space. The stories are set in Nairobi, Mombasa, and small towns in Kenya, but van Klinken makes the point that they also speak to Kenya in Africa and are located within a global queer imaginary. The author treats the recurring themes as evidence, taken at face value. I was left wanting to know more about the archival project, in order to better understand the production of particular narratives. This again speaks to the limitations of a theological reading of text, in which the author appears to take the material almost for granted, rather than focusing more explicitly on how stories both reflect and produce subjectivities. It seems interesting to me to focus on how certain themes and narratives are reproduced, how those echo a political reality for a specific class of people in Kenya, and how that resonates with global discourses around lgbt rights. The stories themselves are bricolage, imagined interiorities that draw on multiple competing discourses. The stories tell interesting meta-narratives about the construction of identities, drawing on a wide range of resources, fast tracked by instant global communication. The fourth, and last, chapter is the most methodologically grounded, not only for my anthropological bias. It is about a queer affirming church, and his research includes some participant observation, supplemented by ongoing exchanges in a WhatsApp group. The links to the US are very direct, notwithstanding the obvious reluctance of The Fellowship Global to be seen as the initiator and sustainer for what clearly is a Kenyan project. It is Joseph Tolton of the US-based Fellowship of Affirming Ministries who confers authority on the leaders of the Kenyan church community. It seems to me that the very reason for the need to assert the localness of the church, in the face of its strong US connections, is interesting in and of itself and would have been a point of tension to interrogate, rather than explain. In this sense, it does seem that van Klinken takes on the mantle of "research as advocacy," the subject of his closing interlude in which he grapples with the discomfort and veracity of that role (p. 187). Van Klinken's willingness to innovate through his embrace of "scavenger methodology" and his close attention to sites of possibility, to prophetic vision, have produced a creative hybrid, a bricolage, that will stimulate further engagement between disparate fields, especially between queer studies and religious studies (p. 19). The book also provides new perspectives in the burgeoning field of queer African studies. Van Klinken is alert to the discordant notes, personal stories at odds with social norms, acts of defiance small and large, which he sees as signs of potential for change. In this way, slivers of subjective experience or events like small, barely noticed church services emerge as good omens. And that is the hopeful, optimistic message of his book--van Klinken's version of "cruising utopia" (p. 138). His use of theology as an interpretive tool reads, at times, like an uncomfortable overlay. But, simultaneously, it is radically disruptive of religious orthodoxies. His turn to feminist (and a smaller body of queer) theology, which reinterprets "fruitfulness," outside the narrow confines of reproduction, and the body as a site of connection and pleasure, stands out (p. 135). The provocation to queer studies to be less secure in a secular space and pay more attention to religion and faith is powerful and overdue. His frank appraisal of his fieldwork experiences and the ways these shape his work make for refreshing interludes. His approach to religion and queer studies is fruitful academically and--no matter how reluctant he is to accept the "researcher as advocate" mantle--also useful in providing necessary counter-narratives to the homosexuality is "un-Christian" and "un-African" argument, which has been central to the rhetoric of political homophobia on the continent since the mid-1990s. By blurring boundaries, this book makes a valuable contribution to many fields. Citation: Graeme Reid. Review of Van Klinken, Adriaan, _Kenyan, Christian, Queer: Religion, LGBT Activism, and Arts of Resistance in Africa_. H-Africa, H-Net Reviews. September, 2020. URL: https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=55344 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. -- Best regards, Andrew Stewart
|
|
|
|
Moderator's note
Louis Proyect
Comrades should remember to clip extraneous text. It was a rule we established in the early days of Marxmail when people were using phone modems and bandwidth was at a premium. Please only include text that is essential to your post as indicated by my example below.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On 9/16/20 8:10 PM, Warren wrote:
I read recently that one third of Biden supporters said they would not accept the results of the election if Trump won.
|
|
|
|
Re: Hold Your Fire!: A Warning to the Left - COSMONAUT
Warren <warren.edwards@...>
I read recently that one third of Biden supporters said they would not accept the results of the election if Trump won.
One third is a popular fraction, it seems.
Warren
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 at 7:08 PM
From: "Louis Proyect" <lnp3@...> To: marxmail@groups.io Subject: [marxmail] Hold Your Fire!: A Warning to the Left - COSMONAUT American society has polarized in a way that is extraordinarily
one-sided. Roughly one-third of the population has joined a paranoid right-wing lynch mob. Its champion is Trump, his family dynasty, and his court of lackeys and bootlickers. Hunting like a pack of wolves, the mob finds enemies around every corner and lumps all of them together. As socialists, we resent Biden and Trump, the Democratic Party and the Republicans. The Right does not perceive these divisions. It sees a united terrorist conspiracy of Antifa-Biden-Atheist-Communist-Muslim-illegal-Democrats, funded by Jewish bankers and Satanic pedophiles. MAGA loyalism has become a permanent political identity in the United States. Its hats may be red and it may “back the blue,” but it’s true color has always been the fiery orange of Donald Trump. It is armed to the teeth and thirsty for blood. MAGA loyalists are dreaming of a savage civil war, but there will be no civil war. The vast majority of leftists understand this, but the point cannot be emphasized enough. There is no army interested in fighting such a war. The police may firmly support Trump, but they are schoolyard bullies with no capacity to fight a real army. Their armored cars would be flattened in ten seconds by the tanks of the U.S. military. https://cosmonaut.blog/2020/09/16/hold-your-fire-a-warning-to-the-left/
|
|
|
|
Re: Whistleblower Says Facebook Ignored Global Political Manipulation
Warren <warren.edwards@...>
It's hard to know where to stand with online censorship. When platforms like Twitter or Reddit ban groups, it's usually the left that suffers. WSWS has written a great deal about this. But if there's a platform that doesn't censor its content, they get pilloried as well.
Warren
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 at 7:19 PM
From: "Louis Proyect" <lnp3@...> To: marxmail@groups.io Subject: [marxmail] Whistleblower Says Facebook Ignored Global Political Manipulation
|
|
|
|
Whistleblower Says Facebook Ignored Global Political Manipulation
Louis Proyect
|
|
|
|
Hold Your Fire!: A Warning to the Left - COSMONAUT
Louis Proyect
American society has polarized in a way that is extraordinarily one-sided. Roughly one-third of the population has joined a paranoid right-wing lynch mob. Its champion is Trump, his family dynasty, and his court of lackeys and bootlickers. Hunting like a pack of wolves, the mob finds enemies around every corner and lumps all of them together. As socialists, we resent Biden and Trump, the Democratic Party and the Republicans. The Right does not perceive these divisions. It sees a united terrorist conspiracy of Antifa-Biden-Atheist-Communist-Muslim-illegal-Democrats, funded by Jewish bankers and Satanic pedophiles. MAGA loyalism has become a permanent political identity in the United States. Its hats may be red and it may “back the blue,” but it’s true color has always been the fiery orange of Donald Trump. It is armed to the teeth and thirsty for blood.
MAGA loyalists are dreaming of a savage civil war, but there will be no civil war. The vast majority of leftists understand this, but the point cannot be emphasized enough. There is no army interested in fighting such a war. The police may firmly support Trump, but they are schoolyard bullies with no capacity to fight a real army. Their armored cars would be flattened in ten seconds by the tanks of the U.S. military. https://cosmonaut.blog/2020/09/16/hold-your-fire-a-warning-to-the-left/
|
|
|
|
In Bob Woodward’s ‘Rage,’ a Reporter and a President From Different Universes
Louis Proyect
(NYT is not exactly wowed.) NY Times, Sept. 16, 2020 Rage What would it take at this
point, amid the crush of books about the Trump White House —
after the Mueller report and an impeachment trial and now the
coronavirus pandemic — for a revelation about the president to
be truly surprising? Would it be to learn that he hates money
and harbors dreams of retiring to an ascetic, monk-like
existence? That he loves to read and is intimately familiar with
the works of Elena Ferrante? Readers who pick up Bob Woodward’s
new book, “Rage,” and are tantalized by the promise on its dust
jacket of “an utterly vivid window into Trump’s mind,” will
quickly get schooled in a lesson that apartment hunters in New
York often have to learn: A window can be only so vivid if it
looks out onto an air shaft.
|
|
|
|
Re: Trans activists hate Rowling because she’s a woman
Louis Proyect
On 9/16/20 5:51 PM, Carol Stokes wrote:
Not a great idea to post openly rightwing bullshit to a Marxism
list. There are some people who I respect who have put forward
critiques of trans people from what they believe is a feminist
perspective but this is not the place for posting links to the
Murdoch press sans your own comments. I booted Max Power and all
his sock puppet avatars for that. If you want to post links to
Tucker Carlson, Glenn Beck or the Murdoch press, find some other
place to do it. Like Twitter or write it on the wall next to a
toilet in a public restroom where it belongs.
|
|
|
|
Re: Trans activists hate Rowling because she’s a woman
Andrew Stewart
Kirkup is a centrist with conservative leanings who has written more about trans issues than most sensible people:
https://www.spectator.co.uk/writer/james-kirkup Rowling is a bigot and asshole who also was all about calling Corbyn and Labour antisemitic. Onwards to the proletarian revolution!
|
|
|
|
Re: Modertor's note
Louis Proyect
On 9/16/20 5:42 PM, Carol Stokes wrote:
Racialist politics? What kind of tripe is that? The dictionary defines racialism as "a theory that race determines human traits and capacities". Is that what Project 1619 is about? Have you read Project 1619? Or is your reading limited to the back of cereal boxes?
|
|
|
|
‘A Brief History of Commercial Capitalism’ by Jairus Banaji reviewed by Morteza Samanpour – Marx
Louis Proyect
|
|
|
