Date   

Re: On the Future of Aviation

muckypups
 
Edited

Quantas are doing the same.
https://edition.cnn.com/travel/amp/flights-to-nowhere-qantas/index.html
As a passenger carrying service air travel has an excuse. As pure entertainment it's a crime. Reports say that contrails are worse for global warming than co2.
https://insideclimatenews.org/news/17092020/aviation-emissions-climate-change-greenhouse-gas


Re: presidential election: Roger Stone urges Trump to declare martial law if election stolen by Dems

Jacob Miller <jmiller1982@...>
 

What's needed is for someone from the Democrats to make a similar pronouncement. Someone like James Carville, who has ties to an actual campaign and to the media. He can say that if Trump wins, the army should mobilize and remove him from the White House immediately.

The Democrats need to meet this head-on.


Jacob


More on a world rate of profit – Michael Roberts Blog

Louis Proyect
 

Back in July, I wrote a post on a new approach to a world rate of profit and how to measure it.  I won’t go over the arguments again as you can read that post and previous ones on the subject.  But in that July post, I said I would follow up on the decomposition of the world rate of profit and the factors driving it.  And I would try to relate the change in the rate of profit to the regularity and intensity of crises in the capitalist mode of production. And I would consider the question of whether, if there is a tendency for the rate of profit to fall as Marx argued, it could reach zero eventually; and what does that tell us about capitalism itself?  I am not sure I can answer all those points in this post, but here goes.

https://thenextrecession.wordpress.com/2020/09/20/more-on-a-world-rate-of-profit/


Re: War Clouds in Eastern Mediterranean

Chris Slee
 

RKOB acknowledges that "Turkey is oppressing the Kurds", but downplays this by saying that the oppression of the Kurds is "an important issue but not the only one in this region".  Of course it is not the "only" issue, but since it is "important" then we should express our solidarity with those fighting for Kurdish rights against the Turkish state - including the PKK and YPG/YPJ.  But RKOB does not do so.

He claims that the YPG is "circling around US imperialism".  I assume he is referring to the cooperation between the Syrian Democratic Forces and the US in fighting against ISIS.

But RKOB seems to have a double standard.  In 2011 the Libyan rebels were allied with NATO in the campaign to overthrow Gaddafi.  Yet RKOB does not denounce them as pro-imperialist.

RKOB denies that the Libyan rebels were racist.  They included a diverse mixture of political ideologies, so I will not generalise about the whole rebel movement.  But certainly a powerful section of the rebel movement was extremely racist.

The rebel militia from the city of Misrata ethnically cleansed the black population of the nearby town of Tawergha, destroying their homes and driving them away, causing them to flee to refugee camps in other cities.  Even after the war against Gaddafi was over, the Misrata militia refused to allow the refugees to return for more than 6 years.  In 2018 an agreement was reached that they would no longer be blocked from returning, but as far as I know few have done so, because of the devastated condition of the town, and because of continuing fear of the Misrata militia.

In judging whether the Turkish-backed Government of National Accord is better than the Haftar forces, their attitude towards black people, including the refugees from Tawergha, would be one criterion (not the only one, of course).  I have not studied this question sufficiently to form a definite opinion on this.

Chris Slee
 


From: marxmail@groups.io <marxmail@groups.io> on behalf of RKOB <aktiv@...>
Sent: Saturday, 19 September 2020 4:38 PM
To: marxmail@groups.io <marxmail@groups.io>
Subject: Re: [marxmail] War Clouds in Eastern Mediterranean
 

In my opinion, there are the following problems in your argument.

1) You say, rightly, that Turkey is oppressing the Kurds. This is surely true and has to be opposed by all socialists and democrats. But in contrast to the perception of you and other supporters of the YPG, politics in the Middle East does not circle around the Kurdish question. It is rather the YPG which is circling around U.S. imperialism (and sometimes other holders of power like Assad).

You can not and should not judge all states and forces primarily by what they say on the Kurdish issue. It is an important issue but not the only one in this region.

2) You say: “Erdogan's desire to make Turkey more influential in the Middle East - to make it more like an imperialist power.” We can discuss about Erdoğan’s “desire”. But this is not decisive for Marxists. It is the objective role of different forces in a given conflict. There have been national liberation movements in history fighting under the banner of Islam which might have “desired” to create a “global caliphate”. However, objectively they were fighting the occupation by British, French or US imperialism. Apologists of imperialism took this ideological mantle as a pretext to denounce such struggles. Communists don’t do this.

It is necessary to have not an impressionistic characterization of a state (“the desire of its head is …”) but an objective class analysis of its political and economic position. A brief summary of our analysis of Turkey can be read in chapter V of this book: https://www.thecommunists.net/theory/world-perspectives-2018/

3) The difference between the Libyan GNA government and General Haftar is similar to the difference between Morsi and General Sisi in Egypt. Or, to give another analogy, between the Erdoğan government and the Turkish military dictatorships from 1980 onwards. Yes, they are all bourgeois. Yes, they all collaborate in one way or another with this or that Great Power. But if you are blind to recognize the difference between a semi-democratic bourgeois parliamentary system and a full-blown dictatorship, you repeat the nonsense of the Stalinist “social-fascism” theory of the late 1920s and early 1930s.

It is because you are incapable to recognize this difference that you put the foreign intervention of Saudi Arabia/UAE on the same level as Turkey’s. One attempts to bloody crush a liberation struggle. The other tries to exploit and manipulate it (in order to finally liquidate it). “In the end” it is all the same. Likewise, “in the end” we will be all dead. But in the meantime we can do a few things if we are not instantly killed! Serious political people must not ignore this difference!

4) It is a well-known slander of pro-Gaddafi people to denounce the Libyan Revolution as “anti-Black racist”. Behind this is the claim that the Gaddafi dictatorship had been somehow better for Black people. There is no doubt, that there exist (and always existed) anti-Black chauvinist trends in the Arab world. But the Libyan Revolution did not centre around the issue of Black people and did not follow an agenda of “anti-Black racism”. This is Gaddafian slander of the revolutionary process and a cheap excuse for refusing to take sides in the civil war (see only this e.g. the second half of our essay: https://www.thecommunists.net/theory/liberation-struggle-and-imperialism/).

-- 
Revolutionär-Kommunistische Organisation BEFREIUNG
(Österreichische Sektion der RCIT, www.thecommunists.net)
www.rkob.net
aktiv@...
Tel./SMS/WhatsApp/Telegram: +43-650-4068314

Virenfrei. www.avast.com


On the Future of Aviation

R.O.
 

(Just as I was listening to Jerry Goodman's "On the Future of Aviation" I read the article below. Airlines should revert to balloons and zeppelins instead or else go bankrupt)

https://simpleflying.com/singapore-airlines-flights-to-nowhere/

Singapore Airlines Could Launch Flights To Nowhere Next Month

By the end of October, we may see Singapore Airlines take to the skies once again on commercial flights. These flights aim to ferry around domestic passengers on no-destination trips. Dubbed ‘flights to nowhere’, these are slated to take off from Changi Airport and land back there three hours later.

 

With borders still closed for leisure travel, such flights will help generate revenue for the ailing airline, especially after reporting an SG $1 billion loss for the financial year’s first quarter. Passenger carrier numbers had also dropped 99.5% for the flag carrier.

[...]




Re: FYI - Syria

mkaradjis .
 

Obviously Beeley is just a hack for tyrants (and, not surprisingly perhaps, a Covid conspiracy theorist today), but she was hardly the first to be wooed by the "charms" of tyrants' wives:

In December 2010, the French first lady Carla Bruni sat down to lunch under the gold chandeliers of the Elysee palace with Asma al-Assad, wife of the Syrian leader Bashar. As they sat demurely with their husbands around a butterfly-print tablecloth dominated by a pastel flower-arrangement, a photographer was ushered in to grab a picture for French celebrity magazines. After all, this was a communion of fashion’s high priestesses: a former Italian supermodel turned folk-singer entertaining a Chanel-loving, London-raised, former banker and conveniently westernised Middle Eastern first lady.

French Elle had recently voted Asma ‘‘the most stylish woman in world politics’’, Paris Match called her ‘‘an eastern Diana’’, a ‘‘ray of light in a country full of shadow zones’’. Only days after the lunch, a desperate Tunisian vegetable seller would set himself alight, sparking the first revolution of the Arab spring.

Already, as the Sarkozys’ butlers served the Assads crystal glasses of freshly squeezed juice from silver platters, there was unease among certain diplomats about the French president schmoozing the ruler of an oppressive dictatorship known for torture, brutality and political prisoners. But Nicolas Sarkozy, an expert on the importance of photogenic wives in politics, saw Asma as his insurance policy.

‘‘When we explained that this was the worst kind of tyrant, Sarkozy would say: 'Bashar protects Christians, and with a wife as modern as his, he can’t be completely bad,’’’ the former French foreign minister Bernard Kouchner later confided to journalists.

https://www.smh.com.au/world/dictators-wives-how-the-west-is-wooed-by-the-pretty-faces-of-tyranny-20120229-1u26z.html


On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 9:55 AM Louis Proyect <lnp3@...> wrote:
On 9/19/20 7:18 PM, Ken Hiebert wrote:
> Impressions from an informal meeting with Asma al-Assad, Syria’s First
> Lady
>
> https://ingaza.wordpress.com/2020/07/29/impressions-from-an-informal-meeting-with-asma-al-assad-syrias-first-lady/




Re: presidential election: Roger Stone urges Trump to declare martial law if election stolen by Dems

Mark Lause
 

Neither party has the kind of attention span for anything like that kind of a deal.  The sharpest of them hardly think past the next election.


On Sat, Sep 19, 2020, 7:36 PM Dayne Goodwin <daynegoodwin@...> wrote:
I doubt there is any truth to a claim that there was a literal quid
pro quo between Republican and Democrats regarding the 1960 and 2000
presidential elections.  I don't think that the 1960 corruption (i.e.
evidence Louis just provided) would be adequate leverage to effect
Democrat behavior forty years later in 2000.  I think the
Gore/Democrat campaign just caved - probably for social stability and
'the good of the country.'  The Democrats did put their loss to good
use by blaming the Nader/Green Party campaign and fortifying the
capitalists' two-party political system.  That Nader cost Gore the
2000 election has become one of those major false "facts" (i.e. U.S.
intervened in Vietnam to protect democracy in South Vietnam) regularly
reported in the 'news' media.

On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 9:09 AM Ken Hiebert <knhiebert@...> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 08:57 PM, Dayne Goodwin wrote:
> An alarming part of that whole episode is that Gore and the Democrats basically surrendered to the Republican use of force, apparently choosing 'stability' over democratic process.
>
> Is there any truth to the claim that this was a quid pro quo for the Republican acceptance of the election of Kennedy in 1960?  It was widely claimed that voter fraud in Illinois swung the election for Kennedy.
> I do not recall where I read these claims.
>            ken h






Re: Eric Topol on vaccines and the election

Jacob Miller <jmiller1982@...>
 

Democrats who seek to delay a potentially viable vaccine put themselves in the same position as Republicans back in the Spring — they’re putting peoples lives at risk. Not with the intention of benefitting their candidate, but based on the idea that a vaccine approved before the election would benefit their opponent.

This sounds like so much of the rest of the hysteria surrounding the election. I’m sure between now and November 3, someone will claim that daylight savings time benefits Trump.

Jacob


Eric Topol on vaccines and the election

Louis Proyect
 

Eric Topol is one of the most respected epidemiologists in the USA. My FB friend Greg Gelembuk, who is involved in the field himself, always forwards his Tweets. Topol just posted a very interesting and worrisome series of Tweets about how Trump might conspire with big pharma to hype a vaccine prematurely to help him get elected. Read the Tweets here:

https://tinysubversions.com/spooler/?url=https://twitter.com/EricTopol/status/1307419462744682496


Re: FYI - Syria

Louis Proyect
 

On 9/19/20 7:18 PM, Ken Hiebert wrote:
Impressions from an informal meeting with Asma al-Assad, Syria’s First Lady

https://ingaza.wordpress.com/2020/07/29/impressions-from-an-informal-meeting-with-asma-al-assad-syrias-first-lady/

This tripe is from Eva Bartlett's blog. She and Jeff Mackler are best friends. Some people in Socialist Action got so fed up with this bullshit that they split, leaving Mackler with half the membership. You can read their reasons for walking away from this self-described Trotskyist in this document written by Michael Schreiber who I remember from 40 years ago or so. Glad to see he got Syria right.

https://socialistresurgence.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/syria-resolution-for-2018-socialist-action-convention.pdf


Re: presidential election: Roger Stone urges Trump to declare martial law if election stolen by Dems

Dayne Goodwin
 

I doubt there is any truth to a claim that there was a literal quid
pro quo between Republican and Democrats regarding the 1960 and 2000
presidential elections. I don't think that the 1960 corruption (i.e.
evidence Louis just provided) would be adequate leverage to effect
Democrat behavior forty years later in 2000. I think the
Gore/Democrat campaign just caved - probably for social stability and
'the good of the country.' The Democrats did put their loss to good
use by blaming the Nader/Green Party campaign and fortifying the
capitalists' two-party political system. That Nader cost Gore the
2000 election has become one of those major false "facts" (i.e. U.S.
intervened in Vietnam to protect democracy in South Vietnam) regularly
reported in the 'news' media.

On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 9:09 AM Ken Hiebert <knhiebert@...> wrote:

On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 08:57 PM, Dayne Goodwin wrote:
An alarming part of that whole episode is that Gore and the Democrats basically surrendered to the Republican use of force, apparently choosing 'stability' over democratic process.

Is there any truth to the claim that this was a quid pro quo for the Republican acceptance of the election of Kennedy in 1960? It was widely claimed that voter fraud in Illinois swung the election for Kennedy.
I do not recall where I read these claims.
ken h


FYI - Syria

Ken Hiebert
 


Impressions from an informal meeting with Asma al-Assad, Syria’s First Lady

https://ingaza.wordpress.com/2020/07/29/impressions-from-an-informal-meeting-with-asma-al-assad-syrias-first-lady/


Love, hate and revolution

Philip Ferguson
 

"Che Guevara said that a true revolutionary is motivated by love i.e. love of the oppressed, the poor, the children dying from preventable illnesses. This phrase of his is true but has been used by reformists and their more hippy wing have taken advantage of it to sell the falsehood that the revolution is an act of hugs, candlelit vigils and respect for our enemies.

"Nothing could be further from the truth and the thinking of Che.

"First we should be clear that it is love that motivates us, we fight for a better world, for a love towards our fellow human beings and against capitalism that knows no love but rather the price it can place on any feeling. Now following the murder of 13 people in Bogotá at the hands of the police, the usual suspects come out talking about love, forgiveness / pardon and how hate has no place in our struggle. Is it true that we can’t hate?




H-Net Review [H-Diplo]: Haefner on Ghodsee, 'Second World, Second Sex: Socialist Women's Activism and Global Solidarity during the Cold War'

Andrew Stewart
 



Best regards,
Andrew Stewart 
- - -
Subscribe to the Washington Babylon newsletter via https://washingtonbabylon.com/newsletter/

Begin forwarded message:

From: H-Net Staff via H-REVIEW <h-review@...>
Date: September 19, 2020 at 11:45:27 AM EDT
To: h-review@...
Cc: H-Net Staff <revhelp@...>
Subject: H-Net Review [H-Diplo]:  Haefner on Ghodsee, 'Second World, Second Sex: Socialist Women's Activism and Global Solidarity during the Cold War'
Reply-To: h-review@...

Kristen Ghodsee.  Second World, Second Sex: Socialist Women's
Activism and Global Solidarity during the Cold War.  Durham  Duke
University Press, 2019.  Illustrations. 328 pp.  $27.95 (paper), ISBN
978-1-4780-0181-2; $104.95 (cloth), ISBN 978-1-4780-0139-3.

Reviewed by Julianne H. Haefner (Central Michigan University)
Published on H-Diplo (September, 2020)
Commissioned by Seth Offenbach

In June and July of 1975, over two thousand participants from 133
United Nations member states descended on Mexico City for the First
World Conference on Women. Participants from the First World and the
Second/Third World primarily differed on whether the conference was
supposed to only discuss women's issues or whether the activists
present should also discuss other matters, including issues like
South African apartheid or the peace process in the Middle East. The
activists from the Second and Third World argued that women should in
fact discuss all matters that their male counterparts were discussing
at the UN. This meeting in Mexico City was not the only one during
the 1970s and 1980s that drew participants from First, Second, and
Third World nations. Kristen Ghodsee's book Second World, Second Sex:
Socialist Women's Activism and Global Solidarity during the Cold War
examines the activism of women in two Second World nations, Bulgaria
and Zambia, and their contributions to a range of meetings of women
activists during the Decade for Women (1976-85). Her main argument is
that in the writing of history the contributions of the women from
Eastern Europe and socialist-leaning African nations have been
largely obscured by giving credit to women from the West in advancing
women's rights throughout the Decade for Women. Ghodsee's main
purpose in writing this book is to uncover this forgotten history of
the Cold War to show how women from the Second World championed
women's rights much earlier than some of their Western counterparts.

_Second World, Second Sex_ is divided into two main parts. In the
first part of the book, Ghodsee discusses some of the context of the
Cold War and feminism. In this part she also presents two case
studies of women activists: Bulgaria and Zambia. She examines the
contributions Zambian and Bulgarian women made to the advancing of
women's rights in their respective countries. For example, the
Women's Brigade in Zambia organized classes to fight against infant
mortality and taught women how to use the decimal-based currency, an
important precursor to become economically involved in Zambian
society.

The second part of the book focuses on some of the individual events
throughout the Decade for Women. Throughout the Decade for Women
female activists from across the world convened in multiple places,
from training courses to workshops to conferences, allowing many of
these women activists to cross paths. While the activists displayed
solidarity for their shared causes, tensions still developed between
representatives from different nations, and in particular between
First World and Second/Third World nations.

Geopolitical issues and topics contributed to tensions between the
activists from different parts of the world. This is evident, for
example, in the debates about whether or not to include the word
"Zionism" in the final conference document of the 1985 World
Conference on Women in Nairobi. The US delegation threatened that it
would leave the conference if Zionism was to be included. Some
nations concurred with this sentiment, but Eastern bloc nations and
some of their allies tried to purposely antagonize the United States
on this matter and advocated for the inclusion of the term. On the
final day of the conference several delegations, among them the US,
the Soviet, and the Palestinian, met up in private to discuss the
matter. Finally, under pressure from the Kenyan government a
compromise was reached and the following statement was included in
the final conference document: "all forms of racial discrimination"
(p. 213). This compromise was largely considered a victory for the
US.

Of course, relations between the Eastern bloc countries and the
African nations were not without tensions either. Racism, for
example, was persistent in the Eastern bloc and many African women
spoke of the racism they encountered at some of the events. For
example, one Zambian woman recalled instances of segregation and
discrimination when she attended a training course in the German
Democratic Republic. Despite proclamations of solidarity from the
Eastern European activists, stereotypes about Africa and African
culture persisted.   

Throughout her work Ghodsee continues to make connections between the
story of Zambian and Bulgarian women activism and today's feminist
movement. She remains critical of today's liberal feminism and its
connections to capitalism. Ghodsee closes the book by pointing toward
the future of feminism, expressing her hope that "this book
contributes to building a future in which feminism is no longer the
handmaiden of neoliberal capitalism but a broad-based social movement
that fights ignorance, prejudice, and injustice in all its form" (p.
243). One can interpret part of Ghodsee's work also as a call for
action, challenging today's feminist movement.

Ghodsee draws her evidence from a variety of sources: Bulgarian and
Zambian government archival sources, personal archives, and oral
interviews with many of the activists conducted by the author
herself. She skillfully weaves the different sources together to
provide a cohesive narrative. Methodologically _Second World, Second
Sex_ can serve as a building block to merge oral interviews and
archival sources, providing a nuanced and human-centered
understanding of historical developments.

The book has multiple strengths, among them centering the narrative
on women and their activism, and secondly focusing on women from
Second World nations. The book adds layers to multiple histories and
can be beneficial for a number of historians. Often the story of the
Cold War is told from the perspective of the United States, its
European allies, and the Soviet Union. But Ghodsee's focus on Zambia
and Bulgaria provides a different understanding of the events
surrounding the Decade for Women, one in which the Cold War
superpowers remain side actors. Thus, the book makes valuable
contributions to the study of the Global South, and placing the women
in Zambia and Bulgaria as main actors shows their agency in the
larger narrative of women's rights and the Cold War. In addition,
Ghodsee's work also illuminates the global networks and connections
between women's rights activists throughout the Cold War.[1]

Additionally, the book is very readable; Ghodsee's writing style of
incorporating oral interviews with secondary sources and archival
sources makes for an enjoyable read. The author does at times discuss
her personal recollections surrounding some of the interviews, but
this does not take away from the overall objectiveness and academic
rigor. On the contrary, Ghodsee's personal recollections add
positively to understanding the craft of oral history. Obviously, any
kind of oral history can have its pitfalls, something the author
readily acknowledges. It is helpful for the reader that Ghodsee did
not just rely on the oral interviews but also supplemented the
personal memories with other sources to verify and fact-check.

For the most part the book is a well-rounded account of the events.
However, it would have been helpful if the author had engaged more
with news coverage of the events during the Decade for Women. Did any
major news outlets report on the events? How were these reports
framed and presented? Did news media outlets report on the events as
being just focused on domestic matters, or did they include reports
about the above-mentioned debates regarding the term "Zionism"? This
would have added another dimension to the story and would have given
an impression of how this kind of activism had been viewed outside of
the activist circles.

Overall, _Second World, Second Sex_ is an excellent account of
women's activism in Bulgaria and Zambia throughout the Decade for
Women. Using oral history and archival sources, the author skillfully
examines this forgotten Cold War history. Her work makes meaningful
contributions to a range of historiographies, from activism, to
feminism, to the Cold War. Her work is particularly meaningful
because it places women in these Second World nations at the
forefront of the narrative.

Note

[1]. Other works that discuss women's rights, global developments,
and the Cold War include Karen Garner, _Shaping a Global Women's
Agenda: Women's NGOs and Global Governance, 1925-1985_ (Manchester:
University of Manchester Press, 2010); Yulia Gradskova, "Women's
International Democratic Federation, the 'Third World' and the Global
Cold War from the late 1950s to the mid-1960s," _Women's History
Review_ 29, no. 2 (2020): 270-88; Bonnie Smith, _Women's History in
Global Perspective_ (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2004); and
Lucy Delap, _Feminisms: A Global History_ (Chicago: The University of
Chicago Press, 2020).

_Julianne Haefner is a doctoral candidate in Central Michigan
University's transnational and comparative history PhD program. She
is currently working on her dissertation exploring US foreign policy
toward Angola under the Gerald R. Ford administration (1974-77)._

Citation: Julianne H. Haefner. Review of Ghodsee, Kristen, _Second
World, Second Sex: Socialist Women's Activism and Global Solidarity
during the Cold War_. H-Diplo, H-Net Reviews. September, 2020.
URL: https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=55334

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States
License.



President Higgins says British must face up to their history of reprisals

Ken Hiebert
 


Reprisal-based violence was a key element of the military imperialist strategy throughout the British Empire, President Michael D Higgins has said.
Writing on the centenary of the sack of Balbriggan, which occurred 100 years ago this weekend, President Higgins said reprisals by British forces were not unique to Ireland.


Re: disregard: testing Lou's procmail script

Les Schaffer
 

fixed regexp... i hope


disregard: testing Lou's procmail script

Les Schaffer
 

this is with filter on the entire To: line. this should go to the Latest 100 messages. notifications should go to Lou's regular email.


The Green Party's Howie Hawkins Is No Kanye West - The Atlantic

Louis Proyect
 


ICE doctor performing hysterectomies is not board certified - Business Insider

Louis Proyect
 


Ginsburg dies: What comes next?

John Reimann
 

"The death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg will probably decisively end an entire era in the role of the US Supreme Court and how it is seen by the great majority of Americans. As we will see, it could also have a very immediate and direct effect on the outcome of November’s elections. That’s true because the most likely outcome is that the in-person voting on Nov. 3 won’t settle who wins, the decision is delayed for days or even weeks as mail-in votes are counted, widespread open conflict over attempts to get mail-in votes discounted ensues and the whole mess ends up in the Supreme Court, which by then could have a 5-3 decisive Trump majority with one swing vote (John Roberts)....."

--
“Science and socialism go hand-in-hand.” Felicity Dowling
Check out:https:http://oaklandsocialist.com also on Facebook