|
Deportation Nation | by Julia Preston | The New York Review of Books
Louis Proyect
Reviews of: by Adam Goodman
Princeton University Press, 322 pp., $29.95
The Battle to Stay in America: Immigration’s Hidden Front Lineby Michael Kagan
University of Nevada Press, 200 pp., $27.95
https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2020/10/08/deportation-nation/
|
|
|
|
The Cults of Wagner | by Jed Perl | The New York Review of Books
Louis Proyect
New book defends Wagner from the charge of prefiguring Nazism.
Review finds fault with the thesis. Wagnerism: Art and Politics in the Shadow of Musicby Alex Ross
Farrar, Straus and
Giroux, 769 pp., $40.00
https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2020/10/08/the-cults-of-wagner/
|
|
|
|
Must read Atlantic Article: "What if Trump refuses to concede?"
John Reimann
This is really a "must read" article on the upcoming electoral crisis. It is most likely that the election will not be determined on election night, due to mail-in ballot counting. A "Constitutional crisis" is likely to ensue, one in which the sitting president will hold almost all the trump cards (no pun intended). This article explains the different scenarios in which that crisis can be played out. What it mentions but doesn't stress sufficiently, in my opinion, is how that battle will be played out in the streets - complete with violent clashes. Further, if Trump is returned to office through the means outlined in the article, he will be driven - or drive - far further down the road he's already taken. Completely absent from the article is any sort of class analysis, or more precisely, any thought to the role of at least a sector of the working class as a class. As far as I can see, given the general failure of the left - including all the various protest movements of recent years - to really seek to build an explicitly working class force, the only way that the working class can start to play an independent role is through the unions. Through a huge struggle within the unions, overtly political strikes can be called, leading up to a national general strike. That would completely transform the present balance of forces. Here is the link to the article: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2020/11/what-if-trump-refuses-concede/616424/ “Science and socialism go hand-in-hand.” Felicity Dowling Check out:https:http://oaklandsocialist.com also on Facebook
|
|
|
|
Global Warming Burps, Bubbles, Simmers and Sours On - CounterPunch.org
Louis Proyect
|
|
|
|
'My friends were lied to': will coalminers stand by Trump as jobs disappear? | US news | The Guardian
Louis Proyect
Art Sullivan is considered something of a political heretic by other coalminers in south-western Pennsylvania, where a wave of support for Donald Trump based upon his flamboyant promises of a resurgence in coal helped propel the Republican to the US presidency. “Many of my coalminer friends voted for him,” said Sullivan, who has spent 54 years as a coalminer and, more latterly, consultant to a struggling industry. “They were deceived. Trump had no plan, no concept of how to resurrect the coal industry. My friends were lied to.” Sullivan’s friends may disagree with this assessment but the coal comeback promised by Trump in the 2016 election campaign has failed to materialize, with his first term studded with bankruptcies and closures of mines and coal-fired power plants. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/sep/24/donald-trump-coal-miners-us-election
|
|
|
|
#NotHimUS
#nothimus
Louis Proyect
Norman Solomon, long time shill for the Democratic Party, created a website meant to convince the left to back Biden. There's a sense of desperation that is almost palpable.
https://www.nothimus.org/
|
|
|
|
Re: After praising Nordic "genes," Trump slams Jewish Americans and Muslim Americans
Patrick Bond
On 9/24/2020 1:39 PM, Louis Proyect
wrote:
https://www.juancole.com/2020/09/praising-americans-foreign.html But then - for reasons I cannot grasp - he ruins his column by paying respect to U.S. imperialism's most wicked recent military gaffes?:
|
|
|
|
Trends in Income From 1975 to 2018 | RAND
Louis Proyect
From 1975 to 2018, the difference between the aggregate taxable income for those below the 90th percentile and the equitable growth counterfactual totals $47 trillion. We further explore trends in inequality by applying this metric within and across business cycles from 1975 to 2018 and also by demographic group.
|
|
|
|
Patriot Coalition: Leaked Messages Show Far-Right Group's Plans for Portland Violence - bellingcat
Louis Proyect
|
|
|
|
After praising Nordic "genes," Trump slams Jewish Americans and Muslim Americans
Louis Proyect
|
|
|
|
Re: Joe Biden Torpedoes Bernie Sanders: 'I Beat the Socialist'
Dayne Goodwin,
I never knew Bernie in the 70s or 80s,but a few years ago,there was a web page,in an obscure corner of the internet,that had every speech Bernie gave as mayor,as well as a couple of from when he was running.I watched them all.The Bernie I saw in these grainy videos is very different from the Bernie we saw running for president.Bernie clearly sold his soul when he went to Congress.This may be what you have to do to get along in Washington.As someone who read both Counterpunch,and Black Agenda Report in the years leading up to 2016,I was never taken in by Bernie's shill game for the DNC.
|
|
|
|
Re: Open Letter: Dump Trump, Then Battle Biden
Louis Proyect
On 9/23/20 11:49 PM, John Obrien wrote:
I doubt that O'Brien has the slightest clue about the role of the Social Democrats in the Weimar Republic that was just as culpable for the rise of Hitler. Too bad he interjects his crude insults into this discussion with so little knowledge behind it. Here's my take on the role of the German SP: https://louisproyect.org/2016/07/14/misusing-german-history-to-scare-up-votes-for-hillary-clinton/
|
|
|
|
Re: » Open Letter: Dump Trump, Then Battle Biden
Dayne Goodwin
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 6:34 PM Jim Brash via groups.io
<jimmy.brash=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote: One of my mentors, the late Peter Camejo, used to say "The Republicans frankly assert what the capitalists want and the Democrats say 'vote for us we'll be 5% nicer.'" Persuading people to take an empirical "lesser evil" stance is intrinsic to the functioning of the capitalists' two party system. Those who think in those capitalist-system-accepting terms are unlikely to be able to change and pursue the interest of workers and oppressed peoples in socialist revolution (imo revolutionary strategy requires politically independent working class organization). I think that's why the same 'radical stars' in the capitalist firmament repetitively argue election after election that "this time" the priority is to defeat the Republican capitalists and therefore we must give our support to the Democrat capitalists. This kind of 'pragmatic' justification for class collaboration has dominated the U.S. left; look around at putrefying capitalism and you can see where this has gotten working people. Jim Obrien does not provide the evidence that Jim Brash asked for, Obrien has a two-prong strategy for defeating fascism: click your computer AND vote for Biden. Dayne On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 6:34 PM Jim Brash via groups.io <jimmy.brash=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Open Letter: Dump Trump, Then Battle Biden
John Obrien
Dan,
Thank you for dealing with reality - it is also clear to me that the U. S. Left, is unorganized and incapable
of physical fighting the fascists. They are mostly comfortable academics and students - and the only
thing, is to urge people to vote for Biden in those Swing States.
Sure Biden is a Wall Street servant and militarist, but the isolated sectarians on this list are no different
than the liberals and reformists, offering nothing to do in the period ahead - NOTHING!
They sound like the Germany CP in the early 1930's, calling the social democrats: "social fascists" and
not uniting with them to stop the Nazis.
So the Trump fascists are mobilizing - and the so radically pure - are clicking their computer offering
NOTHING to proclaim they are "revolutionaries".
I never before in my entire life, supported a corporate democratic party presidential candidate in the
November presidential elections, since able to vote in 1972. But I can clearly see what the relations
of power are - and agree with your sane assessment of where things truly are.
Thank you for adding your name to those thinking. Ignore the badly isolated sectarians representing
NOTHING - in actual reality. They will just bravely sit before their computers to stop fascism!
The Trumpsters are more serious than these "revolutionary" computer keyboard clickers.
I suggest to those who claim to be "so revolutionary" to abstain from struggle -
that they might want to read: The Struggle Against Fascism in Germany by Leon Trotsky
when he addresses "the overestimation of ones own forces - as adventurism"
And Vladimir Lenin had some words about the same most "revolutionary" academics who sat in the
Paris cafes criticizing - far from struggle and reality.
- and they also surprise, did NOTHING!
Time is too short to bicker and criticize - yet do NOTHING.
Get off your comfortable consumerist couches and do something about reality.
Dan has - if you do not like his analysis about objective conditions - so where is
the left militias that you "revolutionary critics" are organizing instead, as an alternative?
Surely you are not going to suggest just voting for some third party candidate, is sufficient
to stop fascists?
From: marxmail@groups.io <marxmail@groups.io> on behalf of Dan La Botz <danlabotz@...>
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 7:55 PM To: Marxism List <marxmail@groups.io> Subject: Re: [marxmail] » Open Letter: Dump Trump, Then Battle Biden Thanks for your thoughtful remark, Jim.
These people appreciate it.
Dan
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 10:29 PM Dayne Goodwin <daynegoodwin@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Re: The New York Times and Nikole Hannah-Jones abandon key claims of the 1619 Project
fkalosar101@...
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 11:53 AM, Andrew Stewart wrote:
Andrew Stewart's information re indenture and chattel slavery in the broader European picture seems terrifically apposite and worth studying in detail. With all due respect, however, this particular passage seems to reflect the historian's "easter-egg hunt," hermetic, or tin-eared approach to the interpretation of literary texts, which perhaps ill serves the main thrust of Stewart's post. Iago equates not only Othello but Desdemona herself with a farm animal--a white ewe. Indeed, by using this metaphor, Iago includes her father, Brabantio, himself in the category of farm animals, since only a ram can beget a ewe, although it may be that he is only meant to represent the man who owns the woman and the animals. In fact, Iago equates Iago's blackness with that of the Devil and that is what lends force to the comparison. Equations of the color black to the Devil occur elsewhere in Shakespeare. eg "the Devil damn thee black, thou cream-faced loon" in MacBeth. What is missing in Shakespeare's discourse is any developed conception of "white people"--in its fully developed racist ideological form, a product of the United States and one that cannot be understood in the absence of fully developed US black chattel slavery and its racist aftermath following the civil war. There is a play back and forth on Othello's color that has nothing immediately to do with the particular social pathology on display in Breitbart and currently vying for dictatorial power in the US. "Renaissance racism" is another topic, but what this passage actually conveys is an aspect of medieval christian iconography that no doubt eventually found its way into the iconography of the Ku Klux clan, but did so through a process of adaptation and repurposing. To see it full-fledged in this speech is like eg seeing the romano-hellenistic architectural motifs of Petra as proof that the Nabateans were greco-roman, which--except for certain aspects of their architecture--they were not. So, at most proto-racism. Any other conclusion from this passage is IMO circular reasoning that begs the question.
|
|
|
|
Re: » Open Letter: Dump Trump, Then Battle Biden
Dan La Botz
Thanks for your thoughtful remark, Jim. These people appreciate it. Dan
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 10:29 PM Dayne Goodwin <daynegoodwin@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Re: » Open Letter: Dump Trump, Then Battle Biden
Dayne Goodwin
I wonder if these people realize that joining the Biden camp they'll be closing the door on independent politics. You sheepdog once you usually herd the sheep forever. They all keep saying that Biden can be pushed left. Where's the evidence? Joe Biden Torpedoes Bernie Sanders: 'I Beat the Socialist' https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/1830
|
|
|
|
Re: Trump plan to hi-jack election
David Walters
There is also a concise article on this in Forbes: https://www.forbes.com/sites/tommybeer/2020/09/23/report-trump-campaign-actively-discussing-radical-measures-to-bypass-election-results/
|
|
|
|
Trump plan to hi-jack election
Dayne Goodwin
[There are also recent articles on this in Forbes and in The Atlantic which i don't have access to] The Legal Fight Awaiting Us After the Election The aftermath of November’s vote has the potential to make 2000 look like a mere skirmish. by Jeffrey Toobin, New Yorker, Sept. 28 issue https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2020/09/28/the-legal-fight-awaiting-us-after-the-election The Trump Campaign Is Reportedly Plotting an Election Coup to “Bypass” a Biden Win How Republican-controlled state legislatures could be used to circumvent the results of the election and ensure a Trump victory. by Eric Lutz, Vanity Fair, September 23 https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/09/trump-campaign-election-coup-bypass-biden-win see also my 9/15 marxmail messages: Roger Stone urges Trump to declare martial law if election stolen by Demshttps://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/1623
|
|
|
|
H-Net Review [H-Maps]: Mingus on Wampuszyc, 'Mapping Warsaw: The Spatial Poetics of a Postwar City'
Andrew Stewart
---------- Forwarded message --------- From: H-Net Staff via H-REVIEW <h-review@...> Date: Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 6:32 AM Subject: H-Net Review [H-Maps]: Mingus on Wampuszyc, 'Mapping Warsaw: The Spatial Poetics of a Postwar City' To: <h-review@...> Cc: H-Net Staff <revhelp@...> Ewa Wampuszyc. Mapping Warsaw: The Spatial Poetics of a Postwar City. Chicago Northwestern University Press, 2018. 240 pp. $34.95 (paper), ISBN 978-0-8101-3789-9. Reviewed by Matthew D. Mingus (University of New Mexico-Gallup) Published on H-Maps (September, 2020) Commissioned by Katherine Parker Mapping Warsaw: The Spatial Poetics of a Postwar City In recent months, the contentiousness of space--and the ideological narratives reflected in our spaces/places--has come to the forefront of our contemporary political discussions. In the wake of the murders of George Floyd and Jacob Blake, and the subsequent waves of Black Lives Matter demonstrations throughout the United States (and much of the world), serious and important questions have been raised about to whom society should build its monuments and after whom society should name its streets and buildings. These, of course, are not new questions. And while Ewa Wampuszyc's _Mapping Warsaw: The Spatial Poetics of a Postwar City_ could have never anticipated the political moment in which we currently find ourselves, her book's excellent treatment of Warsaw's spatial reconstruction after the Second World War can certainly remind of us that the "spatiality of place is ever-changing" (p. 173), as well as offer us a fantastic historical example of how ideology constantly informs the creation and evolution of a city's topography. After a brief prologue and theory-heavy introduction, Wampuszyc's _Mapping Warsaw_ is presented in four chapters. Each chapter deals with a particular medium through which the space and geography of Warsaw was presented and represented to its residents. Chapter 1 focuses on the portrayal of Warsaw in photobooks after the Second World War with special emphasis on the 1949 publication of _Warsaw, the Capital of Poland--_the first photobook published under Poland's communist government. Wampuszyc convincingly argues that Warsaw's postwar space was reimagined through the production of selective photo-imagery that emphasized communist activism and resistance during World War II, and then also used that historical legacy to promote an idealized communist future for the city. For decades after the war, photobooks of Warsaw, in both image and text, followed the same standard narrative: from Soviet liberation to the triumphant return of Varsovians to the reconstruction and rebuilding of Poland's capital city. This transition from bombed-out city to a thriving urban center, rejuvenated by the ideological power of communism, is maybe made most clear in Wampuszyc's treatment of newsreels, the subject of _Mapping Warsaw_'s second chapter. In it, she focuses primarily on the Polish Film Chronicle's (PKF) treatment of Warsaw's physical transformation during the first postwar decade. Informed by socialist realism, and clearly understanding their role as propagandists and ideologues, the filmmakers of the PKF worked to legitimize both Poland's communist leadership and Warsaw as Poland's communist capital. News reports featured important events and building projects in Warsaw (filmed to make it clear that that space--being _in Warsaw--_made the projects and events all the more important). The PKF's cinematography worked to often ignore images of postwar rubble, or use that rubble as a symbol of a past that had been overcome by Polish workers in tandem with the communist government. Only after the 1956 "thaw," when the Polish government became less interested in perpetuating direct propaganda, did the "carefully controlled language" of Varsovian newsreel narratives evolve out of its postwar "rhythmic predictability" and "socialist realist aesthetic" (p. 95). As with the rubble and building projects presented in newsreels featuring Warsaw, Wampuszyc argues that movies, too, built a kind of "spatial iconography" (p. 97) that helped map out a collective identity for postwar Varsovians. In her third chapter, the author highlights four Polish films that take Warsaw as their setting: _Treasure_ (1948), _Adventure in Mariensztat_ (1953), _A Matter to Settle _(1953), and _Irene, Go Home!_ (1955). All of these films took seriously the many challenges of rebuilding a Warsaw committed to communism (e.g., lack of adequate housing, women's equality, traditional vs. progressive values, etc.), but all four also couched the tension that arose from these challenges in humor. Moreover, Wampuszyc gives detailed explanations as to how each movie worked Warsaw's topography into its respective storyline, explicitly assisting in the creation of the city's socialist spatiality. The final--and, arguably, best--chapter of _Mapping Warsaw_ examines Warsaw's Palace of Culture as a palimpsest of competing narratives "superimposed on one another" (p. 139). From its origins as a glorified gift from Stalin to its later presentation (through the short film _Warsaw 1956_) as an out-of-touch juxtaposition to the everyday life of typical Varsovians, the Palace of Culture has come to represent many different ideas to many different Poles. This final chapter ends with a fascinating discussion of author and film director Tadeusz Konwicki's influential attempts to shift discourses centered on the Palace of Culture toward broader critiques of "communism, messianism, and ideology (in general)" (p. 169). Through the examples of his films _Ascension _(1967) and _Lava_ (1989), as well as his literary work _A Minor Apocalypse _(1979), Wampuszyc brilliantly exhibits how the meaning of a space--and the buildings meant to occupy and shape that space--can be coopted and redefined. While many images are incorporated into the text of _Mapping Warsaw--_including some very helpful original visual aids created by the data services librarian Lorin Bruckner--at times I could not help but wish for more, particularly when a photograph or painting was discussed in detail. I realize, of course, that the negotiations between an author and publisher regarding the use of and permissions related to imagery are fraught with many considerations. But the discussions of Aleksander Kobzdej's painting _Pass the Brick_ (p. 27) and the photospread from _Warsaw 1945-1970_ (p. 42) could have perhaps been more effective had those images been allowed to accompany the text. In her fterword, Wampuszyc acknowledges that, still today, Warsaw struggles with the "de-socialization of [its] landscape" (p. 171). As I alluded to at the beginning of this review, it was impossible for me to read this book without being constantly reminded of the current effort by antiracist and anti-imperialist activists to remove statues, flags, and other icons meant to glorify the American Confederacy, slave owners, and purveyors of genocide. _Mapping Warsaw_ makes clear the importance of spatial narratives in shaping collective identity and the enormous effort required, in Poland and elsewhere, to reclaim and reorient those narratives. In this sense, then, while Wampuszyc's work is a welcome contribution to the interdisciplinary "spatial turn," it also offers broadly applicable historical lessons for our current political moment. Citation: Matthew D. Mingus. Review of Wampuszyc, Ewa, _Mapping Warsaw: The Spatial Poetics of a Postwar City_. H-Maps, H-Net Reviews. September, 2020. URL: https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=55378 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. -- Best regards, Andrew Stewart
|
|
|

