Date   

How systemic racism shaped Floyd’s life and hobbled his ambition

Louis Proyect
 

How systemic racism shaped Floyd’s life and hobbled his ambition
By Toluse Olorunnipa and Griff Witte Ho
Washington Post, Oct. 8, 2020

His life began as the last embers of the civil rights movement were flickering out. Its horrific, videotaped end ignited the largest anti-racism movement since, with demonstrators the world over marching for racial justice in his name.

During the 46 years in between, George Perry Floyd came of age as the strictures of Jim Crow discrimination in America gave way to an insidious form of systemic racism, one that continually undercut his ambitions.

Early in life, he wanted to be a Supreme Court justice. Then, a pro athlete. At the end, he just longed for a little stability, training to be a commercial truck driver.

All were bigger dreams than he was able to achieve in his version of America. While his death was the catalyst for global protests against racial inequality, the eight-minutes and 46 seconds Floyd spent suffocating under the knee of a White police officer were hardly the first time he faced oppression.

Throughout his lifetime, Floyd’s identity as a Black man exposed him to a gantlet of injustices that derailed, diminished and ultimately destroyed him, according to an extensive review of his life based on hundreds of documents and interviews with more than 150 people, including his siblings, extended family members, friends, colleagues, public officials and scholars.

The picture that emerges is one that underscores how systemic racism has calcified within many of America’s institutions, creating sharply disparate outcomes in housing, education, the economy, law enforcement and health care.

While Floyd’s life span coincided with many advancements for Black Americans — some of them dramatic — his personal path highlights just how much those hard-fought gains remain out of reach for millions like him.

“My mom, she used to always tell us that growing up in America, you already have two strikes,” as a Black man, Floyd’s younger brother Philonise said in an interview. “And you’re going to have to work three times as hard as everybody else, if you want to make it in this world.”

Like many Black Americans, Floyd was behind long before he was born.

A descendant of enslaved people and sharecroppers, he was raised by a single mother in a predominantly Black Houston neighborhood where White flight, underinvestment and mass incarceration fostered a crucible of inequality.

In the crumbling Houston public housing complex where Floyd grew up — known as “The Bricks” — kids were accustomed to police jumping from cars to harass and detain them. His underfunded and underperforming public high school in the city’s historically Black Third Ward left him unprepared for college.

When Floyd was a young man, minor offenses on his record yielded significant jail time and, once released, kept him from finding work. One conviction — a $10 drug deal that earned him 10 months behind bars — is now under review because the arresting officer is suspected of fabricating evidence in dozens of low-level drug cases.

Floyd spent a quarter of his adult life incarcerated, cycling through a criminal justice system that studies show unjustly targets Blacks. His longest stint was at a private prison in a predominantly White town where the jail housing mostly minority inmates generated a third of the town’s budget.

A survivor of covid-19, he struggled with several ailments that disproportionately cut short Black lives.

Floyd made many mistakes of his own doing. His choices landed him in jail on drug and robbery charges, while also leaving him without a college degree and with limited career prospects. He acknowledged many of his poor decisions and tried to warn others against making them too. But for him, each misstep further narrowed his opportunities.

“I got my shortcomings and my flaws,” he said in a video he posted on social media aimed at convincing young people in his neighborhood to put away their guns. “I ain’t better than nobody else.”

But he also didn’t get the benefits that others might have.

“If you are a Black man in America, you’re going to get stopped and if there’s some basis to detain you, that’s probably going to happen,” said Alex Bunin, chief public defender in Harris County, which includes Houston. “If you have means, you can get out. But if you’re poor and you’re Black, you’re not going to get those breaks.”

“George Floyd,” he said, “wasn’t getting those breaks.”

When Floyd stumbled, he fell far, ultimately battling drugs, hypertension, claustrophobia and depression.

Former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin and three of his colleagues are set to stand trial in Floyd’s killing. But his death on Memorial Day has prompted millions of Americans to probe the broader question of whether the systems that limited Floyd’s prospects and contributed to his downfall also need to be cross-examined.

A nation ‘weary of the struggle’

Floyd was born in Fayetteville, N.C., in 1973, a time when Whites-only service at restaurants and segregated seating in movie theaters were fresh wounds.

Five years had passed since the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr., and the drive for equal rights for Americans of different races lacked a clear leader. Groups that had once united in common cause were feuding and much of the country appeared to have lost interest in the plight of its Black citizens.

“The nation seems weary of the struggle,” bemoaned the then-executive director of the National Urban League, Vernon Jordan Jr.

But there was still a cause for optimism.

When Floyd was two days old, Maynard Jackson was elected mayor of Atlanta. It was the first time a major Southern city would have a Black leader. Detroit and Los Angeles also elected Black mayors that year. Representation within the system — not just activism on the streets — was the order of the day.

“Politics is the civil rights movement of the seventies,” Jackson declared.

It is a view that largely held for decades and culminated with the 2008 election of a Black president, Barack Obama. But it wasn’t enough. The shooting death of Michael Brown in 2014 in Ferguson, Mo. — along with a spate of other deaths of Black men and women at the hands of the police — put to rest any notions of a post-racial America.

The cellphone video of Floyd screaming “I can’t breathe” before expiring under the knee of a White police officer came during a presidency that has employed the rhetoric of White nationalism and a pandemic that has been especially deadly for minorities. It sparked a fiery summer of activism and unrest unlike any the nation has seen, with peaceful protests sometimes erupting into violent clashes. The demonstrations have continued this fall, most notably after the officers who shot 26-year-old Breonna Taylor to death at her Louisville apartment were cleared of wrongdoing.

“There but for the grace of God go I,” Christopher Lehman remembers thinking when he saw the video of Floyd’s killing. “That was a wake-up call for people still thinking that politics is the movement.”

Over the last half-century, the gap in Black and White life expectancy substantially narrowed, from seven years to three and a half. The ranks of the Black middle class swelled, while the Black-White poverty gap shrank. Long-standing disparities in education have been reduced as high school graduation rates converge.

Yet, Black families also have just over one-tenth the wealth of the typical White household, a gap that has persisted for decades. The Black unemployment rate has consistently been double that of Whites, putting African Americans in recessionary territory even when other Americans are experiencing a boom. And the gap in homeownership is wider than it was a half-century ago.

In recent years, unequal treatment in the criminal justice system has stirred the most passion. Black citizens are incarcerated at six times the rate of Whites. They are also more than twice as likely to be killed during interactions with police, according to a Washington Post database.

“There seem to be two justice systems in America,” said Ben Crump, attorney for the Floyd and Taylor families, as protesters took to the streets in Louisville last month. “One for Black America, and one for White America.”

Injustice endured through generations

The systemic racism that shaped Floyd’s life began more than 100 years before he was born.

Floyd’s great-great-grandfather, Hillery Thomas Stewart Sr., spent the first eight years of his life enslaved in North Carolina, where tobacco fields financed American dynasties — and perpetuated inequality — that endured from the 19th century until today.

Stewart was freed in the mid-1860s, the result of a bloody Civil War that led to the emancipation of nearly 4 million Black Americans who had toiled under a brutal system of chattel slavery.

Despite having no formal education — teaching enslaved people to read and write was deemed illegal by the North Carolina General Assembly in 1830 — Stewart acquired 500 acres of land by the time he reached his 20s, according to Angela Harrelson, Floyd’s aunt.

[Sign up for the About US newsletter, an initiative by The Washington Post to explore issues of identity in the United States]

Stewart lost it all when White farmers seized the land, using legally questionable maneuvers that were common in the postwar South, said Harrelson, who has helped preserve the family’s history through photographs, letters and other records.

Stewart’s state-mandated illiteracy left him powerless to Mount a legal defense.

“The land was stolen from him,” Harrelson said, adding that her great-grandfather was “targeted” by White usurpers due to his relative wealth. “They used to call him the rich nigger.”

It was not an uncommon occurrence, according to a 1982 report by the United States Commission on Civil Rights that documented the steep decline of Black-owned farms from the Civil War through the 20th century.

“The frequent pattern is for land to remain in minority hands only so long as it is economically marginal, and then to be acquired by whites when its value begins to increase,” the report said.

Floyd’s grandparents were North Carolina sharecroppers, working farms owned by White landowners in exchange for a portion of the crop. They too fell victim to state-sanctioned discrimination and wage theft, according to Harrelson and other family members.

As they raised their 14 children — including Floyd’s mother, Larcenia — they were repeatedly forced out of the shacks they rented with their labor, and regularly cheated out of their pay, Harrelson said. It was a familiar experience for Black sharecroppers, who worked under a predatory system and often had no recourse other than to move to another farm and start again.

By the time Floyd was born, his family had spent more than a century toiling under the unforgiving Carolina sun — with little to show for it.

That dynamic is at the core of the 10-to-1 wealth disparity between Whites and Blacks that has persisted since the civil rights movement, said Melvin Oliver, co-author of “Black Wealth/White Wealth: A New Perspective on Racial Inequality.”

The economic gap only widened during the course of Floyd’s life, a phenomenon many scholars find damning but unsurprising.

“That's what structural racism is. It's built into a system that continually advantages one group and systematically disadvantages another over time,” said Oliver, who now serves as president of Pitzer College in Southern California. “And as long as you don't do anything about it, it's going to continue to create those outcomes.”

While unable to bequeath financial wealth to their descendants, Floyd’s grandparents passed down an ethic of hard work, a reverence for education and a deep familial bond borne out of shared perseverance, family members said. Larcenia and her 12 surviving siblings all graduated from high school, a source of pride for their sharecropper parents who never attended.

But a more ominous sentiment also filtered down through the generations, ultimately reaching Floyd: An unshakable fear of White exploitation, and a skepticism toward a system that had treated the family’s dark skin as a permission slip for oppression.

“That’s the thing about this whole systemic mess — it’s tiresome, it’s frustrating ” said Harrelson, who became a nurse and settled in Minneapolis years before her nephew moved there. “And you’re always working two and three times as hard.”

Recalling the racial profiling he and his siblings experienced regularly in their Third Ward neighborhood, George Floyd’s younger brother put it more succinctly: “Your skin,” Rodney Floyd said, “is your sin.”

Larcenia “Cissy” Floyd arrived in Houston in 1977, a single mother of three hoping to put North Carolina’s tobacco fields behind her and start a new life in Texas.

She didn’t have much money and settled in Cuney Homes, the city’s oldest public housing complex.

The low-slung development in Houston’s Third Ward is a place where generations of neighbors watch each other’s children and an empty lot beneath a pecan tree served as both a community gathering place and gossip hub.

It’s also a sand trap of entrenched poverty and a symbol of enduring racial segregation in the middle of the country’s most diverse metropolis. With a median household income of less than $20,000 and a poverty rate above 60 percent, according to Census figures, the predominantly Black residents of the “The Bricks” were surrounded by signs of struggle.

Against that backdrop, Floyd had what family members described as a happy if resource-deprived childhood. His brothers remember eating mayonnaise and banana sandwiches, washing their clothes in the kitchen sink and sleeping hip-to-hip in a house whose population constantly stretched the capacity of its square footage.

“One thing about Floyd is it’s always family. That’s in the heart. He’s our mother’s child so he’s going to be family, family, family,” said, Rodney Floyd, recalling his older brother’s efforts to be a breadwinner in a multigenerational household.

“One roof, one family,” added Philonise Floyd.

“Yeah, that was his saying.” Rodney laughed, his voice trailing off in remembrance. “Yes … That’s Floyd.”

Larcenia Floyd worked at a neighborhood fast-food joint and, despite her low wages, was quick to extend hospitality to visitors to her home. Neighborhood children would often show up unannounced and hungry. They would stay for a meal — longer if they had nowhere safe to go.

During the civil rights movement, securing economic opportunity and fair housing for Blacks was a key pillar in the fight for equality. Martin Luther King Jr. was met by an angry mob and struck by a rock in 1966 while marching through a White Chicago neighborhood to demand access to integrated housing after years of discrimination. King said the march was part of a campaign “to eradicate a vicious system which seeks to further colonize thousands of Negroes within a slum environment.”

A half-century later, racially segregated housing in America’s cities remains as common as rush-hour traffic.

The concentration of minorities in places like Cuney Homes can be directly linked to government policies — both well-intentioned and prejudiced — that created racialized ghettos in Houston and across the country.

Redlining — the practice of banks either denying mortgages to people in minority neighborhoods or charging those borrowers more — limited Black home buyers’ options through much of the 20th century. Local housing authorities in Houston and elsewhere built projects that quickly became racially segregated. States like Texas have passed laws allowing landlords to continue discriminating against people with low-income housing vouchers, blocking many Black renters from accessing certain neighborhoods.

While the passage of the 1968 Fair Housing Act and other policies have facilitated integration in many neighborhoods, Black Americans have remained the most segregated ethnic group in the country.

Attempts to integrate housing continue to be blocked at the highest levels of government. In July, President Trump eliminated a housing regulation designed to reduce racial disparities in neighborhoods, claiming without evidence that such desegregation would lead to more crime. His reelection campaign has used the same kind of racist tropes that White homeowners and legislators employed to resist King’s push for integration in the years before Floyd was born.

School desegregation didn’t begin in Houston until 1970 — it was the nation’s largest segregated district at the time — following more than a decade of resistance. Schools remained deeply unequal as Floyd moved through predominantly Black classrooms in the 1980s and early 1990s. At Yates, a former “colored” school named for a minister who was born enslaved, test scores were low and dropout rates high, with the 1989 valedictorian — who was seven months pregnant at the time — noting in her graduation speech that more than half of freshmen had failed to graduate.


After a generation of reform efforts, poor and mostly Black school districts continue to suffer from chronic underfunding; a 2019 study showed that state support shifts away from schools as they become more concentrated with Black students.

By the time Floyd left high school in 1993, he wasn’t academically prepared to go to college. But his athletic skills earned him a place at a two-year program in South Florida before he transferred closer to home — to Texas A&M University-Kingsville, a small, mostly Latino school known as a pipeline to the NFL.

“Big Floyd was always talking about going to the league,” said his close friend Demetrius Lott, who also was on the football team and lived in the same apartment complex. “It was what we all wanted.”

The Black students stuck together and supported one another. The red tile-roofed Spanish Mission architecture of the campus, with its rustling palm trees lining quiet streets, was a world away from Third Ward projects. Adjusting to college life wasn’t always easy for him, his friends said, but it was a happy, triumphant time because few from his neighborhood had made it that far. Floyd fired up the grill for frequent barbecues and stayed up all night playing video games.

“I would always tease him because he would eat all my food,” Deron “Smoke” Rutledge said. “He was a gentle giant who never got into any trouble or had any confrontations. He was a humble guy who came from a poverty-stricken neighborhood. I had a little more, but we all shared everything. We were all the same. We were like brothers.”

Floyd, a tight end, went to practice every day, but he wasn’t making the grades or completing the credits that would have allowed him to get on the field. Many of Floyd’s friends also fell short, unable to finish college or make it to the pros.

Other students, particularly White ones, had “a better foundation, a better support system,” said college roommate Marcus Williams. “Me and Floyd didn’t have that.”

For many Black undergraduates, the same is true today. The gap in high school graduation rates has narrowed dramatically in recent decades. But it has persisted at the college level, with only 41 percent of Black students completing their degrees, compared with two-thirds of Whites, according to the National Student Clearinghouse Research Center.

A lack of both preparation and financial support help explain why. The disparity, according to a bipartisan Congressional report released this year, represents “a powerful determinant of economic outcomes, undermining the notion that every American has roughly the same chance of achieving economic success.”

While Floyd was away at school, he would send money and clothes back to his siblings regularly, family members said. He felt an even stronger responsibility to provide when his mother’s health started to wane even as her home swelled with grandchildren to feed.

Harrelson, Floyd’s aunt, said her nephew was “torn” between trying to better his life and help out his family back in Cuney Homes, complicating each of his attempts to move on.

Floyd’s time in college ended with neither a degree nor a draft into professional sports. With his two planned routes out of Third Ward blocked, he moved back to Cuney Homes in 1997.

Unequal under the law

It didn’t take much time before he was in trouble with the law.

Police — described by residents as an omnipresent force around Cuney Homes — arrested him in August 1997 for delivering less than a gram of cocaine. A judge sentenced him to six months in jail. It was the first of at least nine arrests in Harris County over the course of a decade, mostly for low-level drug crimes or theft.

The nation’s incarceration rate soared during that period, with Texas leading the way, and people fitting Floyd’s description — young, Black, poor, male — disproportionately targeted.

A 2018 study published in the Boston University Law Review found “profound racial disparity in the misdemeanor arrest rate” for offenses like drug possession, theft and simple assault.

The arrest rate for Blacks was more than double that for Whites for such crimes, and the disparities have “remained remarkably constant” for nearly 40 years, the study found.

Arrests for drug possession soared in the 1990s, peaking just as Floyd was cycling through the criminal justice system and facing many of the very charges with the highest racial disparities.

While federal data shows that Blacks and Whites use drugs at similar rates, public policies ranging from the war on drugs to the 1994 crime bill have contributed to widely disparate rates of prosecution. Policymakers from across the political spectrum have since expressed regret about the far-reaching consequences of the tough-on-crime push.

As police amassed in inner-city ghettos with a mandate to lock up those selling or using drugs, Floyd joined a fast-growing generation of young Black males trapped in a seemingly never-ending cycle of incarceration and deepening poverty with legal fees accruing and job opportunities dwindling. The number of Americans in prison jumped from 200,000 in 1973 to more than 1.4 million today, a sevenfold increase over the course of Floyd’s life, according to Justice Department statistics.

It would take 30 years of mass incarceration — and the arrival of an opioid epidemic in White suburban neighborhoods — before public policy shifted to treat addiction as a public health issue.

In the meantime, police cars continued speeding through the Cuney Homes projects, with officers jumping out and seemingly arresting men indiscriminately, Floyd’s family members said.

Floyd’s 2004 conviction for selling less than a gram of cocaine is under review by Harris County District Attorney Kim Ogg, who charged the arresting officer Gerald M. Goines and five other Houston officers with regularly falsifying evidence in drug cases.

“The lion’s share of arrests made by this squad were minority men for low-level drug crimes.” Ogg said as she announced the charges in July. Goines’s attorney has denied the accusations against him.

The most serious charge that Floyd faced was in 2007, for aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon. Prosecutors said the then-33-year-old and four others forced their way into a private home and that Floyd had held a woman at gunpoint while others ransacked the place, looking for drugs and money.

After a plea deal, Floyd would spend four years at a privately run prison nearly three hours northwest of Houston. There, he largely languished, without access to vocational training or substance abuse treatment. Once jovial and confident, Floyd left prison deflated, introspective and terrified at the prospect of being locked up again, according to family members and friends.

At the urging of a local pastor, Floyd left Houston in 2017. The move was a chance to leave his troubles behind — the constant harassment by police, the discrimination against felons in the labor market, the downward pull of his old neighborhood.

After arriving in Minneapolis, he enrolled in a rehabilitation program, began training to become a commercial truck driver and took up jobs working security at the Salvation Army and a Latin nightclub.

Floyd kept a list of goals in his house to make sure he was living a meaningful life, according to his close friends. “Staying clean,” was one of them.

This spring, Floyd contracted the coronavirus and lost his security job when the pandemic forced the nightclub to close.

Over Memorial Day weekend, just before his death, Floyd ran into some of his old Houston friends for the first time in weeks. He felt better, he told them, but they could see he was anxious about money.

That Monday, Floyd talked on the phone with his childhood friend, Aubrey Rhodes. Floyd told him he was going to run out for cigarettes and promised to call later.

By the next day, the world was waking up to images of a man gasping for breath as an officer — who had been called to the scene after a convenience store customer allegedly paid for cigarettes with a counterfeit $20 bill — pressed mercilessly into his neck.

Floyd called out for his deceased mother in his final moments, and body camera footage later showed that her son had heeded her warning to be respectful of the police. “Mr. Officer, please don’t shoot me,” Floyd implored repeatedly.

A mass movement was about to be born, the streets in cities across America soon to be filled, a name poised to echo as a cry against injustice.

The people who had known George Floyd best had to watch with everyone else and try to make sense of how their friend’s death fit with his life.

“I was just looking to see if he had done anything that might have been a little out of character,” said Rutledge, Floyd’s college friend, who watched the video at least 50 times.

“But he didn’t. He was the same guy he had always been.”

Julie Tate, Jennifer Jenkins, and Tracy Jan in Washington; Mary Lee Grant in Kingsville, Tex.; Cleve R. Wootson Jr. in Bartlett, Tex.; Arelis R. Hernández and Laura Meckler in Houston; and Robert Samuels and Holly Bailey in Minneapolis contributed to this report.


Cliff Willmeng and Kieran Knutson: Two working class fighters run for union office

John Reimann
 

Cliff Willmeng and Kieran Knutson are two long time working class fighters living in Minneapolis. Kieran is running for president of CWA Local 2750 and Cliff is running for Minnesota Nurses Association Board of Directors. Here is a videotape interview with the two of them:

John Reimann

--
“Science and socialism go hand-in-hand.” Felicity Dowling
Check out:https:http://oaklandsocialist.com also on Facebook


Re: Why Degrowth Is the Worst Idea on the Planet

Biibi R <becausetheworldisrou@...>
 

Again, you do not have to agree with him on everything. I will leave this mailing list since you on more than one occasion have been a very hostile person to others on the mailing list. 


On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 3:13 PM Louis Proyect <lnp3@...> wrote:
On 10/8/20 3:55 PM, Biibi R wrote:
Oftentimes believers in capitalism have great ideas. There are, for example, many capitalist scientists. Let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater. 

What the hell are you talking about? You linked to an article written by some jerk at MIT who believes that capitalism can produce Green growth. Don't you read the shit you forward to the list?

"For several of the world's richest countries, including Germany, Italy, France, the UK, and the US, graphs of consumption-based carbon emissions follow the familiar EKC. The US, for example, has reduced its total (not per capita) consumption-based CO2 emissions by more than 13 percent since 2007. These reductions are not mainly due to enhanced regulation. Instead, they've come about because of a combination of tech progress and market forces."

Do I have to explain to you what "market forces" means? If so, what are you doing here?


Re: Unprecedented closing of ranks of 'NEJM' and 'Science"

fkalosar101@...
 

It appears that a solid section of the US ruling class are for Trump or nothing.  These are perhaps people who, unlike their counterparts in eg Western Europe, cannot conceive of needing to buy class peace. This faction may be scotched but, like Arnold S., "will be back" and will prevent any new wave of neo-FDR reformism.

Under bidenharris, the war on the environment will accelerate with a few gestures to "the community of Green entrepreneurs," or whatever.  Trump's abortive national/local Gestapo initiative will be revived under the rubric of "police reform" with a new name, a friendlier uniform, and a layer of touchy-feely crap about "inclusiveness."  The Dems will "pivot to reconciliation"  (Cuomo's phrase) with their beloved "colleagues across the aisle" and will commission a palatial monument to Ronald Reagan bang in the middle of the National Mall, etc etc etc etc. The R-scum, as always, will not be deterred but emboldened. 

Donald Trump will be encouraged to leave office with a full pardon for all crimes past and future, and the bidenharris Justice Department will go to war to protect T. from any state or local prosecution for any crime. 

Will it be possible to extirpate the current of what Michael Meeropol calls "fascism"?  I don't see how this can happen without some form of left dictatorship, complete with drumhead tribunals, firing squads and prison camps.  That is something that obviously can't happen under bidenharris--indeed that virtually nobody in this country, including the post-Occupy vulgar Graeberites, would ever countenance. 

Nevertheless, IMO, the absence of a controlling antifascist faction in the ruling class makes the lesser evil vote in this case more rather than less dismally preferable.

For at least two years of lesser evil (until the possible "fascist" groundswell in the midterm elections), we can look forward to a competent response to the coronavirus, being able to send a postcard in the mail, some form of Social Security and Medicare, more-or-less accurate employment statistics, and other statistic, a somewhat renewed EPA, and many other basic governance functions, now disrupted, that were never significantly out of play until Trump. 

As others have said, a general strike or national strike wave or series of waves, if the Very Superior vulgar Graeberites could be arsed to take part, seems the one mass tactic that could be employed to some effect under a Bidenharris regime. Once begun, this would be difficult to put down. 

Two years might be enough time to get it going. I don't see it happening under a Trump-tatorship.  


Re: Why Degrowth Is the Worst Idea on the Planet

Louis Proyect
 

On 10/8/20 3:55 PM, Biibi R wrote:
Oftentimes believers in capitalism have great ideas. There are, for example, many capitalist scientists. Let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater. 

What the hell are you talking about? You linked to an article written by some jerk at MIT who believes that capitalism can produce Green growth. Don't you read the shit you forward to the list?

"For several of the world's richest countries, including Germany, Italy, France, the UK, and the US, graphs of consumption-based carbon emissions follow the familiar EKC. The US, for example, has reduced its total (not per capita) consumption-based CO2 emissions by more than 13 percent since 2007. These reductions are not mainly due to enhanced regulation. Instead, they've come about because of a combination of tech progress and market forces."

Do I have to explain to you what "market forces" means? If so, what are you doing here?


Re: Why Degrowth Is the Worst Idea on the Planet

Biibi R <becausetheworldisrou@...>
 

Oftentimes believers in capitalism have great ideas. There are, for example, many capitalist scientists. Let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater. 


On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 6:36 AM Louis Proyect <lnp3@...> wrote:
On 10/8/20 1:24 AM, Biibi R wrote:
"The ecomodernist argument is that that is in fact clear. Unlike the degrowth argument, it's supported by a great deal of evidence.”

Aren't you aware that this is Marxmail? If you want to refute degrowth arguments, it should be within the purview of Marxism. Please don't waste the list's time with stuff from Andrew McAfee, a firm believer in the capitalist system, or any other such schmuck.


Jim Dwyer, Pulitzer Prize-Winning Journalist, Dies at 63

Louis Proyect
 

Jim Dwyer, Pulitzer Prize-Winning Journalist, Dies at 63

Working for New York Newsday, The Daily News and The Times, he covered the human stories of New York in dramatic prose and crusaded against injustice.

Jim Dwyer in 2013. For nearly four decades, he
                  captured the human dramas of New York City as a
                  reporter, a columnist and the author or co-author of
                  six books.
Jim Dwyer in 2013. For nearly four decades, he captured the human dramas of New York City as a reporter, a columnist and the author or co-author of six books.Credit...Fred R. Conrad/The New York Times

    • 86

Jim Dwyer, a Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter, columnist and author whose stylish journalism captured the human dramas of New York City for readers of New York Newsday, The Daily News and The New York Times for nearly four decades, died on Thursday in Manhattan. He was 63.

His death, at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, was announced by Dean Baquet, the executive editor of The Times, and Clifford Levy, the paper’s metropolitan editor, in an email to the Times staff. The cause was complications of lung cancer.

In prose that might have leapt from best-selling novels, Mr. Dwyer portrayed the last minutes of thousands who perished in the collapse of the World Trade Center’s twin towers on Sept. 11, 2001; detailed the terrors of innocent Black youths pulled over and shot by racial-profiling state troopers on the New Jersey Turnpike; and told of the coronavirus besieging a New York City hospital.

Mr. Dwyer won the 1995 Pulitzer for commentary for columns in New York Newsday, and was part of a New York Newsday team that won the 1992 Pulitzer for spot news reporting for coverage of a subway derailment in Manhattan. Colleagues called him a fast, accurate and prolific writer who crusaded against injustice, worked for six metropolitan dailies and wrote or co-wrote six books.

ADVERTISEMENT

Continue reading the main story

In a kaleidoscopic career, Mr. Dwyer was drawn to tales of discrimination against racial and ethnic minorities, wrongly convicted prisoners and society’s mistreated outcasts. He wrote about subway straphangers and families struggling to make ends meet.

As a student at Fordham University, he had hoped to become a doctor, until he joined the student newspaper, The Fordham Ram, and one day wrote about a rough-looking man having an epileptic seizure on a Bronx sidewalk. Mr. Dwyer stopped to help.

“People passing by were muttering disapproval, ‘junkie,’ ‘scumbag,’ that sort of thing,” he wrote. “The seizure subsided, and those of us who had stayed with him learned he was a veteran and had been having seizures since coming back from Vietnam. A few minutes later, off he went. But that moment stayed with me.”

A 19-year-old cub reporter, he wrote a lead paragraph that set the tone for a career: “Charlie Martinez, whoever he was, lay on the cold sidewalk in front of Dick Gidron’s used Cadillac place on Fordham Road. He had picked a fine afternoon to go into convulsions: the sky was sharp and cool, a fall day that made even Fordham Road look good.”

Mr. Dwyer was hooked. In a 2020 interview for this obituary, he said: “I intended to be pre-med, but The Fordham Ram got in the way of that. It was a crusading student newspaper. I couldn’t resist it. It was a joy for me to discover how much I loved reporting and writing.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Continue reading the main story

He was an established columnist, having been one for six years at The Daily News and for nine of his 11 years at New York Newsday when The Times hired him to be a general assignment reporter in May 2001, four months before the terrorist attacks at the World Trade Center in Lower Manhattan.

He soon gravitated to tales of injustice: Anthony Faison and Charles Shepherd, innocent men, released after serving 14 years for murder; the city’s $8.75 million settlement with Abner Louima, four years after a police officer sodomized him with a broomstick in a Brooklyn station house; and freedom for Jose Morales after 13 years in prison for a killing he did not commit.

And the day two hijacked jetliners hit the twin towers of the trade center, Mr. Dwyer caught New York’s mood in the subdued phrases of a veteran columnist: “The city changed yesterday. No one, no matter how far from Lower Manhattan, could step on a New York sidewalk untouched by concussions.”

Later, he wrote about artifacts that figured in the 9/11 attack, including a window washer’s squeegee, which had been used to cut a hole in sheetrock to free six men trapped in an elevator on the 50th floor of the South Tower. They fled down stairways, emerging just as the North Tower fell in the distance.

In 2005, Mr. Dwyer and a Times colleague, Kevin Flynn, published “102 Minutes: The Untold Story of the Fight to Survive Inside the Twin Towers.” The book, based in part on a long investigative report published in The Times in 2002, and on survivors accounts and tapes of police and fire operations, chronicled the final minutes of many among the thousands who died in the collapsing towers.

Image
In their book about the 9/11
                        attack on the World Trade Center, Mr. Dwyer and
                        Kevin Flynn recounted the final minutes of many
                        among the thousands who died in the collapsing
                        towers.
In their book about the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center, Mr. Dwyer and Kevin Flynn recounted the final minutes of many among the thousands who died in the collapsing towers.

Since 2007, Mr. Dwyer had written The Times’s “About New York” column, succeeding a distinguished line of writers, including Meyer Berger, David Gonzalez and Dan Barry.

ADVERTISEMENT

Continue reading the main story

In a 2016 interview with The Columbia Journalism Review, Mr. Dwyer was asked if he had the best job in journalism. “I believe I do,” he said. “A big part of my job is to talk with brilliant scientists, great artists, the amazing people you meet just walking around the streets of New York. What could be more fun than that?”


Ragged-Trousered revelation | Michal Boncza | The Morning Star

Kevin Lindemann and Cathy Campo
 

https://morningstaronline.co.uk/article/c/ragged-trousered-revelation

Ragged-Trousered revelation

Sisters SCARLETT AND SOPHIA RICKARD talk to Michal Boncza about how they've gone about transforming one of ther great works of socialist literature into a compelling graphic novel

POLITICAL REALITY: A panel from The Ragged Trousered Phianthropists

Graphic novels are a uniquely successful medium for partnerships between writers and artists. Why do you think this is?

SOPHIE RICKARD (SO): It’s fun making things together! Some people are good at drawing, at writing, so combining them is where the magic can happen. We share the workload and the process can be more fruitful as we exchange ideas and respond to one another’s input.

SCARLET RICKARD (SC): It’s fun to be in a team. I’d send a finished page to Sophie and we’d have a chat and a laugh about it and discuss what to change or improve. If we were doing all that on our own it wouldn’t be as fun.

Which one of you picked Robert Tressell’s novel and why?

SC: It was me. When I read it, I was struck by how much description there is in the book — you could draw all that stuff and make it half the length.

A few years later, during the surge in socialism in the Labour Party, the book kept getting mentioned so I suggested it as a potential project. I can’t quite believe we did it now, it was so ridiculously ambitious.

SO: I could see how Scarlett knew it would make a good graphic novel. By using sequential art to tell the story we’ve been able to bring the detail to life and retain the essential character of the book.

What aspect of the novel appeals to you most?

SO: I love long tragic books and Tressell has this clever technique of explaining some aspect of political theory in a scene where the men discuss it, then showing you the reality of that same idea and the effect it has on the lives of the characters.

He depicts the whole life of a working family – not just men at work but women trying to make ends meet and children growing up in trying circumstances.

SC: I really enjoy drawing real lives — kitchen-sink drama — and it’s great to be able to immerse yourself in every aspect of their daily existence. The book’s hugely influential to thousands of people — it’s never been out of print since 1914 — and we’re really keen to bring it to a new audience.

I was aware that it had the potential to appeal to people who aren’t habitual graphic-novel readers, and felt it was important for the art to be as immersive as possible and not to distract from the storytelling too much.

You live 300 miles apart. How do you arrive at decisions?

SC: We talk pretty much every day. As sisters, we’re very close and rarely disagree and we very rarely do things without consultation. We’re all about collective responsibility, it’s a co-operative.

SO: We work closely together on each aspect of the creative process and it’s easy to defer to each other when a task is clearly in the writing or drawing department. We made a storyboard together, and more editing went on, even after Scarlett had drawn the pages.

Sophie, how difficult was the scriptwriting, given that the narrative is just speech throughout with no descriptive scene-setting?

SO: If you’re using the medium to its full potential, you shouldn’t need to resort to “voice-over” text. The pictures should tell you everything you need to know, so you won’t find “Meanwhile…” or “A week later…” in our work. It’s quite like writing for the telly — you can respect the reader enough to do some of the work themselves.

The dialogue was a separate challenge. It was important to retain the mood and tone of Tressell’s working-class voices but some of his depictions of regional accents are patronising and hard to understand. Some text is very close to the original and some has been made clearer for the modern reader.

Scarlett, your use of light in night-time scenes is breath-taking, and the composition, what you include in each panel and characterisation are exceptional. Was it hard to achieve?

SC: In 1910, you have to consider where the light’s coming from – you can’t just switch it on. You have to think about the characters – how well off are they? Are they candle-burners, or oil-lamp owners, or do they have an account with the Mugsborough Gas Company? Lighting can really affect the mood of a scene, so it’s about storytelling really.

I always wanted to be that person on Coronation Street who decides what ornaments Deirdre Barlow has on her shelves but this is loads more fun — you can have anything you want, as long as you can imagine it, without breaking the budget.

Making comic art is very like making film but we’re the directors, the casting agents, the props department, the actors. We deal with the costume, the camera angles and the locations.

Different angles really help to break things up and change the atmosphere for the reader — as do the panels you use. You can slow them down or speed them up, and change the level of peril! Body language is one of the things I love most — drawing people’s reactions to one another really helps to tell a story.

Who do you see reading this book today?

SO: Everyone. There’s such an appetite among the groundswell of young socialists, as well as people who swear The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists changed their life 50 years ago.

One clear benefit of the graphic novel is how it makes the story accessible to a new audience, including teenagers, people with dyslexia and ADHD, those who speak English as an additional language and people who might be put off by 250,000 dusty old Edwardian words.

Do you think the digital format could be made available to schools on subscription, given that most children do read online and might do so even more, given Covid-19 social restrictions?

SO: Reading the book digitally is a different experience to reading it in print. They’re both just as valid and different formats suit different people.

We agree that The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists should be available in schools and prisons and we’re contemplating a scheme where people could “donate” a copy to a sixth-form, college or prison library to help put the book into the hands of the people who might need it most.

If that’s something The Morning Star would like to get involved in, we’d love to work together on it.

What’s next on the agenda?

SC: We’ve always got several books on the boil. We’ve started working on an adaptation of No Surrender by Constance Maud about the women’s suffrage movement.

It’s another book with heightened modern relevance and we think it’ll be a great companion to The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists.

Published by SelfMadeHero, £14.99.




The FBI Team Sent to ‘Exploit’ Protesters’ Phones in Portland

Dennis Brasky
 


Re: Unprecedented closing of ranks of 'NEJM' and 'Science"

hari kumar
 


H-Net Review [H-Luso-Africa]: de Menezes Paredes on Cahen, '&quot;Não Somos Bandidos&quot;: A vida diária de uma guerrilha de direita; A Renamo na época do Acordo de Nkomati (1983-1985)'

Andrew Stewart
 



---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: H-Net Staff via H-REVIEW <h-review@...>
Date: Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 2:13 PM
Subject: H-Net Review [H-Luso-Africa]: de Menezes Paredes on Cahen, '&quot;Não Somos Bandidos&quot;: A vida diária de uma guerrilha de direita; A Renamo na época do Acordo de Nkomati (1983-1985)'
To: <h-review@...>
Cc: H-Net Staff <revhelp@...>


Michel Cahen.  &quot;Não Somos Bandidos&quot;: A vida diária de uma
guerrilha de direita; A Renamo na época do Acordo de Nkomati
(1983-1985).  Lisbon  ICS, 2019.  298 pp.  25.00 EUR (paper), ISBN
978-972-671-542-9.

Reviewed by Marçal de Menezes Paredes (Escola de Humanidades-PUCRS)
Published on H-Luso-Africa (October, 2020)
Commissioned by Philip J. Havik

Guerrilla War in Mozambique

The historiography of the Mozambican Civil War is experiencing a
profound turnaround. Commonly treated in a broad perspective as a
case of "a war-by-proxy," the Mozambican conflict has remained
largely unperceived in its particularities and idiosyncrasies. Worse,
African political or military agency has been overshadowed by the
notion of acting as a simple puppet played by the Cold War
superpowers. There are many consequences associated with this macro
approach. One of them is a massive bibliography biased by its
sympathy toward Frelimo's interpretation of the civil war. In this
strand, the reason of the war itself is closely tied to official
discourse about Renamo's rebels, commonly vilified as illegitimate
neocolonialists, that is, "armed banditry."

Fortunately, this one-sided perspective is being challenged by new
studies that put the social and political significance back in rural
African hands choosing micro frames rather than the macro scale.
Works like _The War Within: New Perspectives on the Civil War in
Mozambique 1976-1992_, edited by Eric Morier-Genoud, Michel Cahen,
and Domingos do Rosário (2018), or _The Battle for Mozambique: The
Frelimo-Renamo Struggle, 1977-1992_ by Stephen A. Emerson (2014),
just to mention two recent books, have relevant information that
allows us not to consider Renamo/MNR (Resistência Nacional
Moçambicana/Movement of National Resistance) as "armed banditry"
anymore.

Regarding its reasons and political objectives, the study of Renamo's
political thought and social connections gives a fresher outlook. Not
neglecting the evident (and proven) support Renamo received from
Rhodesia and South Africa, the Mozambican Civil War should be
understood by looking at it from the inside, incorporating local
meanings. This perspective highlights the proper contradictions of
the Mozambican political post-independence context, principally the
relationship between the state and the rural areas and their
respective cultures. Therefore, the force of internal evidence needs
to be acknowledged before analyzing the impact of international
pressures on the conflict.

This historiographical perspective has a starting point with
Christian Geffray and his _La Cause des Armes au Mozambique:
Anthropologie d'une Guerre Civile_ (1990). This strand was followed
by Cahen in his _Les bandits: Un historien au Mozambiqu_e (2002) and
_Os Outros: Um historiador em Moçambique _(2003). Now, with his last
work _"Não Somos Bandidos": A vida diária de uma guerrilha de
direita; A Renamo na época do Acordo de Nkomati 1983-1985_ ("We are
not bandits": Daily life of a right-wing guerilla; Renamo at the time
of the Nkomati Accord), he achieves and consolidates a powerful
historiographical shift treating Renamo not through Frelimo's prism
but on the basis of its peculiar local meanings.

Cahen is a senior scholar who has dedicated over thirty years of
academic research to Mozambican history. His prolific and exhaustive
academic production has made him an international reference. This
broad experience gives him the knowledge needed to interpret the
Gorongosa Papers, a rich source of insightful information written by
Renamo. This documentation was seized by Frelimo in August 1985 after
the Renamo's headquarters--the Banana House in the Gorongosa
mountains--was attacked by Frelimo military forces. They first came
to public knowledge through an official publication organized by the
SNASP (Frelimo's political police) in a carefully edited version
created to sustain the official discourse. The latter essentially
holds that Renamo was a mere regional armed ally of South Africa's
apartheid, which meant, at the time, that Renamo did not have any
legitimacy or political project, being no more than a bunch of
mercenaries. Rather than having his hands tied with this "filtered"
version, Cahen had the rare opportunity to access the entire
authentic Gorongosa Papers. The book's great significance stems
precisely from an accurate interpretation based on this tremendous
rich primary source: 3,401 messages (mostly manuscripts) written by
Renamo's local groups and officers to the general staff from 1983 to
1985.

The book is divided into seventeen chapters and contains an appendix
consecrated to Renamo's military and regional apparatus. It
consolidates a brand-new perspective on Renamo's political motives,
military organization, internal rules, and ethical concerns, and
shares details about how the guerrilla dealt with the rural
population, traditional chiefs, strategical information, food
supplies, health issues, traditional healers, education, internal and
external sexual relations, and soldiers' discipline. After reading
such a varied amount of information, the reader gets a rigorous and
in-depth picture of how Renamo's staff interpreted themselves,
Frelimo, and the war itself in the context of the Nkomati Accord.

The most crucial conclusion to be drawn from Cahen's new book is that
South Africa is rarely mentioned in the Gorongosa Papers. Rather than
a constellation of armed banditries, Renamo was an ultra-centralized
and highly bureaucratized commoner guerrilla movement with political
and military objectives. Renamo had strong social roots gathering a
multiplicity of marginalized social actors connected to the rural
rejection of the unity-party Frelimo's state's authoritarian
modernization process. They could include entire ethnic groups,
peasants entangled by Frelimo's communal villages, uneducated young
people from rural areas or urban peripheries, traditional chiefs, and
traditional healers puzzled by the new political and cultural
patterns the postcolonial state promoted.

Beyond these pivotal statements, the attentive devotion that Cahen's
analysis gives to Renamo's messages' social meaning should be
highlighted here. In a series of detailed footnotes, we are
introduced to a variety of actors and nouns that symbolize the
Mozambican guerrilla context's inner particularities. For example, we
could emphasize the importance of the _Mudjibas_ (the rural
informants), or the significance of the _Capricones_ (double agents
in the civil war), or even the difference in treatment between Renamo
soldiers with "their population" and the "population of the enemy."
Throughout, the messages from "Comandante Zacarias," the pseudonym
used by Afonso Dhlakama, a prominent Renamo leader, the guerrilla's
particular world is presented. 

More important than that is the explanation of Renamo's ethical norms
and Dhlakama's concerns to maintain good relationships with the rural
population. He did so by trying to ban the use of _nipa_ (a
handcrafted distilled liquor), lootings, rapes, and any lack of
discipline inside the military camps by threatening their troops to
be killed or to be _chamboqueados_ (physically punished). The
existence of those rules does not mean that those actions did not
occur but, instead, means that they did not occur as a_ planned
policy_. At the time of the negotiations for the Nkomati Accord, and
after that, having good relations with local communities was vital to
Renamo's intentions: they needed to prove "they were not bandits." 

Not by chance, "we are not bandits" is the title of Cahen's new book,
which represents a significant turnaround on the Mozambican Civil War
historiography. To anyone interested in the so-called Mozambican
Sixteen-Year War or in a perspective from within of the postcolonial
challenges in the southern African context, _"Não Somos Bandidos"
_is a mandatory reference.

Citation: Marçal de Menezes Paredes. Review of Cahen, Michel,
_&quot;Não Somos Bandidos&quot;: A vida diária de uma guerrilha de
direita; A Renamo na época do Acordo de Nkomati (1983-1985)_.
H-Luso-Africa, H-Net Reviews. October, 2020.
URL: https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=55769

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States
License.




--
Best regards,

Andrew Stewart


Marxism and the fight against white supremacy | Joel Wendland | Communist Party USA

Kevin Lindemann and Cathy Campo
 

https://www.cpusa.org/article/marxism-and-the-fight-against-white-supremacy/

Marxism and the fight against white supremacy

Marxism and the fight against white supremacy

Let’s face it. White people in the U.S. are committed to American capitalism, its brutality, its exploitation, its violence. Not all white people, mind you. And not all supporters of capitalism and its crimes are white. But probably the majority of the tens of millions who keep coming back every four years to vote for Trump, Romney, McCain, and Bush identify as white. They think “all lives matter” (but not really) and actively endorse, live, and work on behalf of the white supremacist status quo.

Why shouldn’t most white people support American capitalism? It is the same system that exploits them, denies them access to affordable healthcare, makes higher education outrageously debt-ridden, sends them to fight wars based on lies, and allows billionaires to pay zero taxes. It is the same system that could not handle the COVID-19 pandemic, allowing more than 211,000 people to die because it couldn’t function without forcing people back to work and into the marketplaces.

It is the same system that repeatedly justifies indiscriminate police killings of Black people, violates the sovereignty of Native peoples, poisons the environment and idly watches while climate change threatens human survival, mass incarcerates millions of working-class and poor people of color, brutalizes immigrants and refugees, especially those of color. It uses a “Constitutional” system to block meaningful democratic power to the people, while billionaires hob-nob with senators and TV reality stars, write laws, and collect fat handouts.

The capitalist class rules . . . through the buy-in of the majority of whites who favor this balance of power. 

These despicable, alarming facts are consequences of capitalist hegemony; they allow white supremacy to endure. The capitalist class rules not through force or false ideologies, but rather primarily through the buy-in of the majority of whites who favor this balance of power. Activists and scholars, like Angela DavisRobin D. G. KelleyGerald HorneCharisse Burden-StellyNikhil Pal Singh, and many others have called this reality “racial capitalism.”

In her book, Freedom Is a Constant Struggle, Angela Davis insightfully notes that “neoliberal ideology drives us to focus on individuals, ourselves, individual victims, individual perpetrators.” This insidious individualism cause whites to locate themselves alone in relation to power and exploitation in ways that displace the cause of their pain onto racialized and minoritized others. Racist scripts about imagined imminent dangers of terrorism, immigration, “Black” crime, and Chinese disease are welcomed as “more real” or “more imminent” than struggling to pay the rent each month, avoiding expensive medical care to pay for groceries, wondering if the second job is going to pay enough to cover daycare expenses.

The term “racial capitalism,” Burden-Stelly writes, is a frame for understanding how racism and capitalism recreate one another “on a global scale, in specific localities, in discrete historical moments, in the entrenchment of the carceral state, and in the era of neoliberalization and permanent war.” This means that when white people enact and enable anti-Blackness, they are reigniting a systemic process, like the firing of a spark plug in an engine, a class process that depends on the extra-exploitation of people of color.

recent report by Citigroup found that some $3 trillion in lost wages due to discrimination, as well as systemic disadvantages in education and housing values, targets racially oppressed peoples. What the report is dishonest about is where that money went. The report’s authors claim it was simply “erased from the GDP.” The truth, however, is that it sustains white-dominated capital accumulation. That is $3 trillion less than they would be paid if they shared equally in the advantages of typical white workers. This isn’t money that simply vanishes into thin air like Donald Trump’s solutions to a pandemic.

Capitalism needs racism to survive. 

That savings is accumulated as surplus value. Marx showed that surplus value is the basis of profit and capital accumulation. It is also the basis on which the declining rate of profit, one of the major sources of economic crisis, another central contradiction of capitalism, is alleviated. Thus, while the Citi report denies the truth of racial capitalism, capitalism needs racism to survive, indeed, will insist on the new variant forms of racism to survive — unless it is replaced with a system that does not rely on racism.

Singh notes that racism extends from the birth pangs of capitalism to return again and again as the “infrastructures of appropriation and dispossession that are indispensable to capitalism.” This metaphor of “infrastructure” is meaningful because it shows how capitalism was built on racist slavery, racially based imperialism, and settler-colonialism. Those material relations — defined and enabled by anti-Blackness — became its substance and marrow.

Think, for example, about Marx’s argument that capitalism became possible only through “the extirpation, enslavement, and entombment in mines of the aboriginal population, the beginning of the conquest and looting of the East Indies, the turning of Africa into a warren for the commercial hunting of black-skins.” In his research, Marx encountered a “slavery mentality” that continues to define capitalist exploitation as rooted in persistent anti-Blackness. It made capitalist exploitation structurally incapable of dispensing with racial differences because racism defined the political, cultural, as well as the economic features of capitalism.

Especially given the particular historical development of capitalism in the U.S., Marx discovered that “labor in the white skin can never free itself as long as labor in the black skin is branded.” He doesn’t mean that racism is a capitalist tool that tricks white workers into accepting class divisions.

The struggle against racism — the branding of labor in Black skin — is the essence of the class struggle itself.

Rather, he means that unless disrupted by a working class–led revolt, the racist fixture of capitalist development and capitalist structure of white supremacy would endure. But such a rebellion is impossible unless the white segment of the working class allowed itself to be especially conscious of capitalism’s racist fountainhead and of the need to fight, subvert, and transform the racist “infrastructures” of its condition of possibility. It has to recognize its own racialization as white, and grow to despise capitalism’s systemic refusal to value Black lives. In fact, if we read Marx correctly in this statement, we note that the struggle against racism — the branding of labor in Black skin — is the essence of the class struggle itself, the liberation of Black and white workers, and the beginning of a new process outside and beyond racial capitalism.

Seeing the problem of capitalism as a racist problem, a problem tied directly to the system of white supremacy, poses important challenges to the movements, parties, and allies of the working class.

In an interview with the People’s Forum this past summer, Gerald Horne noted that the facts of racial capitalism have sometimes had disastrous implications for how much the Left understands and enacts U.S. class politics. “If we understand this unresolved class question of slavery, it puts us on a faster track to understand this apparent mystery” of present-day racist police violence, racist discrimination, and the endurance of white supremacy.

White identity and supremacy developed out of shared interest in greasing the wheels of capitalism’s brutality.

However, white supremacy remains a “bedeviling” problem, Horne argues. It emerged and endures in a process of class collaboration among poor, working-class, petty bourgeois, and capitalist-class whites. In the U.S., white identity and supremacy developed out of shared interest in greasing the wheels of capitalism’s brutality: protecting slavery, gaining control over Native lands, imperial conquests.

Indeed, “class warriors” who today “turn up their noses at identity politics” may be caught in a modern and more “sophisticated” version of the class collaborationist trap initiated by white supremacy, Horne added. His point isn’t to favor identity politics, per se, or the reduction of complex multi-systemic analysis of reality to a single point of cultural identity (like race or ethnicity). Rather it is the need to recognize that U.S. capitalism is a white-supremacist project.

We should be prepared to engage, in theory and practice, the conditions and structures of capitalism that depend on white supremacy’s anti-Blackness — the hatred and oppression of Black people, of communities of color, of Native peoples — for its operation. Marxism that sees racism as wholly distinct from or subordinate to the class process, or merely as tools of the capitalist class to divide workers, must rethink.

Image:  Don Sniegowski (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0).




Not a Woman Judge, But a Lady Judge

Ron Jacobs
 


Re: Unprecedented closing of ranks of 'NEJM' and 'Science"

Michael Meeropol
 

Can these two pieces plus the roles of so many defense establishment people and a broad coalition of politicians and even business leaders against Trump be considered strong evidence that THE RULING CLASS (however narrowly or broadly defined) has made a (collective but probably not explicitly collaborative) decision that TRUMP (and TRUMPISM?) is a threat to capitalism as they see it?

Two responses from the left are possible:   1)  Trump and Trumpism might be the "Samson" that brings down the "temple" of American capitalism and thus we ought not oppose it [not my position].

2) the "new version" of fascism (my view) "Bonapartism" (others' view) is SO DESTRUCTIVE of life both here and on the planet -- both for people living today and for our grandchildren that THIS TIME, the left (such as it exists) must join in a coalition with even the right wingers who oppose Trump to "sustain" the current version of AMerican capitalism until Trumpism is defeated and we can return to trying to create the structural reforms that are essential for the survival of the planet ....(this is my position but I believe that's a minority view on this list)

(Mike Meeropol)



_._,_._,_


Kyrgyzstan: "October Revolution” Drives Out Authoritarian Government

RKOB
 

Kyrgyzstan: "October Revolution” Drives Out Authoritarian Government

https://www.thecommunists.net/worldwide/asia/kyrgyzstan-october-revolution-drives-out-authoritarian-government/

-- 
Revolutionär-Kommunistische Organisation BEFREIUNG
(Österreichische Sektion der RCIT, www.thecommunists.net)
www.rkob.net
aktiv@...
Tel./SMS/WhatsApp/Telegram: +43-650-4068314

Virenfrei. www.avast.com


Unprecedented closing of ranks of 'NEJM' and 'Science"

hari kumar
 

There are two recent 'establishment' editorials - one each - at these august journals which are worth reading. I attach the NEJM & the Science one.
Hari Kumar


Re: Bandiera Rosa - Avanti Popolo

Jeffrey Masko
 

I am familiar with how Immigrants have become white in the United States; I have a book review of Robert Carley’s book on Gramsci where he studies the southern question in depth. My comments were In no way taking away from the racial status of immigrants from Irish to Italian. I just wanted to point out that no objections were made when folks use terms like poor white trash. 


On Tuesday, October 6, 2020, John Obrien <causecollector@...> wrote:
Jeffrey Masko may I suggest you become more familiar with the history of discrimination against 
Southern and East European immigrant laborers, that was especially rampant in the USA.  Those 
of Italian ancestry were viewed as "lessers" (non-white) in the U. S. by the WASPS. 

Australia banned immigration of Chinese and Italian laborers up to recent times.

My parents were both Irish ancestry, but my Catholic godfather was a good Italian laborer
Tony Metro, who as my parents had voted for another Italian, by the name Vito Marcantonio,
a U. S. Congressman elected, as the American Labor Party candidate.    

Italian ancestry radicals and oppressed laborers in many of the most historic U. S. labor struggles. 
Joe Ettor & Arturo Giovanitti in the historic Lawrence MA and Patterson NJ textile strikes and the 
martyrs Anna LoPizzo  in Lawrence shot by the police, and Sacco & Vanzetti who were murdered 
by the state government - because of their being in part: Italian.    
  



 
On 10/6/20 10:59 AM, Jeffrey Masko wrote:
Ok, I got it.......... but.

None of this is acceptable. As I've said repeatedly, this is not social media. We need to aspire to a higher standard. As a rule of thumb, posts should be dispassionate and high-minded even when I fail to meet those standards myself.



--

J.A. Masko

"The challenge of modernity is to live without illusions and without becoming disillusioned."

           Antonio Gramsci.



How rock became white (part 2) – Tempest

Louis Proyect
 

In the second of a three-part series, Geoff Bailey, looks at the racial politics of rock and roll, their implications for our understanding of racism today, and how they inform a critique of the concept of cultural appropriation.

Part one looked at the early history of rock and roll. The final installment will look at the rise of "Classic Rock."

https://www.tempestmag.org/2020/10/how-rock-became-white-part-2/


Protests & Provocateurs: Infiltrators are Disrupting BLM ProtestsProtests

Louis Proyect
 


H-Net Review [H-War]: Schwartz on Taylor, 'Between Duty and Design: The Architect Soldier Sir J. J. Talbot Hobbs'

Andrew Stewart
 



---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: H-Net Staff via H-REVIEW <h-review@...>
Date: Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 8:32 AM
Subject: H-Net Review [H-War]: Schwartz on Taylor, 'Between Duty and Design: The Architect Soldier Sir J. J. Talbot Hobbs'
To: <h-review@...>
Cc: H-Net Staff <revhelp@...>


John J. Taylor.  Between Duty and Design: The Architect Soldier Sir
J. J. Talbot Hobbs.  Perth  University of Western Australia Press,
2014.  272 pp.  $59.99 (paper), ISBN 978-1-74258-620-5.

Reviewed by Stanley Schwartz (Temple University)
Published on H-War (October, 2020)
Commissioned by Margaret Sankey

Australian historians and popular authors entangled in a decades-old
debate over the legacy of World War I for the Australian nation often
apply military, political, social, and public history approaches to
make their case.[1] While a straightforward biography, John J.
Taylor's book, _Between Duty and Design: The Architect Soldier Sir J.
J. Talbot Hobbs_, contributes to this literature. Citizenship and
profession stand at the heart of the narrative. Taylor considers how
personal identity and vocational training shaped an immigrant English
architect who would become known as Western Australia's greatest
soldier. Portraying intently the modest canvas of Perth, the author
still traces the global travels of Hobbs and his family, focused
mainly from 1864 to 1938. The architectural study thus manages to
touch on themes of empire, nation, class, and public memory through
an engaging life story.   

Taylor argues that experiences as an architect and volunteer soldier
slowly transformed Hobbs from a British citizen of empire to a
leading representative of Australia generally and Western Australia
specifically. Born in London and only arriving in Perth as an adult
in 1887, Hobbs held a British identity and "reverence" for the royal
family that were common among his contemporaries. Hobbs carried over
to his new home the design habits and military activity he learned in
the metropole. Soon, Australia's climate and building materials
required him to adapt an architectural style different from his
English practices. The new Australian nation, federated in 1901, also
generated institutions, events, and conversations pulling Hobbs
toward a new citizenship. Family ties, membership in professional
organizations, and imperial military duties connected the successful
architect to the old country throughout his life, but his experience
during World War I cemented his commitment to Australia. A declining
opinion of British officers combined with prominence in Australian
business, diplomacy, and war memory to provide a newly national
identity in Hobbs's last decades of life.

The author uses standard organization and biographical method to
patiently trace the contours of his story. A strict chronology
characterizes the timeline of _Between Duty and Design_, narrowly
tailored to the life of Hobbs and his immediate descendants. While
the narrative connects to other historians' studies of Australian and
imperial life and development, Taylor avoids striking theoretical or
thematic departures from his subject's story. He does pay close
attention to the changing faces of Perth and Fremantle, Western
Australian cities where Hobbs did his work for decades. Urban and
environmental history themes of civic life, resource management, and
physical space are subtly woven throughout the book, joining Hobbs
closely to the expansion he helped design and lead.

Taylor's background as an architect contributes to a unique, if not
especially broad, set of sources for his biography of Hobbs. A
wonderful collection of photos and drawings of Hobbs's architectural
designs provides colorful and extensive setting through the physical
environment for his work and life. The author has also assembled an
impressive secondary literature relating to the architectural
profession, Perth, and Western Australia. Many of these sources come
from the early twentieth century, as a wave of Australian historians
newly assessed their nation's transition from an assembly of colonies
to a federation and imperial Dominion. Newspapers supplement Taylor's
materials well, but he presents insights from Hobbs's diaries and
letters sporadically, so that the architect-soldier's voice comes
through clearly in some chapters but is muted in others. Notably,
with a few exceptions, the author uses little of the secondary
literature on World War I, the British Empire, or Australian social
and cultural history.

Thus, Taylor's consistently tight vision of his topic keeps the
book's position within the historiography underdeveloped. Regarding
military history alone, several works could have provided more
perspective on Hobbs's experiences. Ian Beckett's _The Amateur
Military Tradition, 1558-1945_ (1991) features several arguments
about the middle-class conservative associations of volunteer
service.[2] Taylor does not connect Hobbs's youth in families
struggling to make ends meet with the adult Hobbs's pursuit of rising
status through volunteer military service, but the portrait supports
Beckett's work. For literature on World War I, Taylor's narrative
conflicts with Paul Fussell's _The Great War and Modern Memory_
(1975). On a narrow level, Fussell argued that proximity between the
ghastly world of the trenches and the "rich plush of London" made the
war "ridiculous" for soldiers.[3] Taylor, by contrast, portrays
Hobbs's regular visits from the front line back to England to see
family and recuperate as giving him the ability to endure the war.
While the author aimed at writing the history of an architect as much
as a soldier, making these simple linkages would have yielded a
richer historiographical contribution.

An excellent but limited history, _Between Duty and Design_
illustrates the value and limitations of biography. The writing does
not always grip the reader, nor does the author fully explore
potential links to other historical scholarship. The book remains
valuable for students of Australian architecture, Western Australian
history, and imperial movement. Several compiled tables of Australian
architects active during Hobbs's lifetime could prove to be lasting
referential resources for other historians as well. Taylor has
achieved a clear, restrained biography of Hobbs and persuasively
traces the evolution of his professional career and citizenship
identity.

Notes

[1]. Alistair Thomson, "Popular Gallipoli History and the
Representation of Australian Military Manhood," _History Australia_
16, no. 3 (2019): 518-25.

[2]. Ian Beckett, _The Amateur Military Tradition, 1558-1945_
(Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1991), 169-78, 182-84,
191-93.

[3]. Paul Fussell, _The Great War and Modern Memory_ (Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 1975), 69.

Citation: Stanley Schwartz. Review of Taylor, John J., _Between Duty
and Design: The Architect Soldier Sir J. J. Talbot Hobbs_. H-War,
H-Net Reviews. October, 2020.
URL: https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=55643

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States
License.




--
Best regards,

Andrew Stewart