Concerning the domain marxmail.org
Jim Farmelant
Longtime members of this list might recall that the original domain for this list was marxmail.org. Recently, it seems that an Indian gambling site has taken over that domain. It so happens that domain had a lot of information concerning Marxmail, including the archives for the list from 1998-1999. I'm wondering if Les Shaffer or the other moderators have any interest in doing something about that or not.
It's archived on the Internet Archive at: https://web.archive.org/web/20200711042944/http://www.marxmail.org/ -- Jim Farmelant Learn or Review Basic Math
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Concerning the domain marxmail.org
Jim Farmelant
Longtime members of this list might recall that the original domain for this list was marxmail.org. Recently, it seems that an Indian gambling site has taken over that domain. It so happens that domain had a lot of information concerning Marxmail, including the archives for the list from 1998-1999. I'm wondering if Les Shaffer or the other moderators have any interest in doing something about that or not.
It's archived on the Internet Archive at: https://web.archive.org/web/20200711042944/http://www.marxmail.org/ -- Jim Farmelant Learn or Review Basic Math
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States: The new banking crisis
Steven L. Robinson
https://www.greenleft.org.au/content/united-states-new-banking-crisis
United States: The new banking crisis
By Barry Sheppard/Green Left/ March 30, 2023
[Excerpts below]
San Francisco - As discussed by Marxist economist Sam Williams on his Critique of Crisis Theory blog, early in March, Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) in California, the “favorite bank of the area’s tech companies and associated venture capitalists”, announced it was selling its government bonds to raise cash. Fearful that their deposits were in danger, there was a run on the bank, forcing the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to shut the bank down.
*****
Extortion
This threat gives the capitalist class great extortion power, writes Williams, to “insist that the FDIC, the Federal Reserve System or the Treasury bail out large depositors”.
The Joseph Biden administration complied, and “wasted no time in claiming the taxpayer — unlike in 2008 — would not have to pay anything” for the bailout, “because the losses incurred by the FDIC would be paid with a special levy on the commercial banks”, writes Williams.
However, as Williams notes, “the levy would tend to contract bank credit. If this happens the world economies — including in the US — would sink into a deep recession, causing mass layoffs within a few months”.
“And there’s another danger if the capitalists become convinced their bank deposits are as good as the dollar bills issued by the Federal Reserve Banks,” writes Williams. “In that case, they may decide Federal Reserve Notes are no more secure than bank deposits without the FDIC, Federal Reserve, and government guarantees. This would trigger a run on the dollar and paper currencies linked to it under the dollar-centred international monetary system into gold, the money commodity … This danger is real, as shown by the movement of the dollar price of gold since the crisis began.”
This would lead to stagflation as occurred in the 1970s, and then to a severe recession.
Such a scenario could happen if the Federal Reserve eases up interest rates to contain the crisis by printing more money (known as quantitative easing) in a bid to “secure a soft landing from the COVID aftermath boom”, writes Williams.
“In the current crisis, the Federal Reserve is forced to prop up bank deposits as the currency system on one side while staving off the collapse of the [dollar-centred] international monetary system on the other. These are contradictory goals.”
*****
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re: A Trump tale with a twist
Michael Meeropol
NICE HOPEFUL SPECULATION ... (the "riot" in Selma changing public opinion is just like what happened on Bloody Sunday way back when ... so, it might actually happen --) On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 4:14 PM John Reimann <1999wildcat@...> wrote:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This week on nacla.org: the Left's new governments and views on Nicaragua
Dennis Brasky
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 2:05 PM NACLA <info@...> wrote:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A Trump tale with a twist
John Reimann
I hope readers enjoy my tale... 'Trump seemed positively enthusiastic about his being indicted by Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg. At home and alone with Melania (who in general avoided like the plague having to spend alone time with her husband), he was all smiles. Shouting and carrying on, “How could they dare? I’ve been doing what I want for 35 years and it’s only now that they decide to do something? This is persecution! They think they’re being smart. This is the best thing they could ever have done for my campaign. You can start calling me Mr. President again.” “Yes, dear. You certainly are right, dear. As always… Please excuse me. I have an urgent call,” she said as she made her way to the bathroom. But to no avail, Trump stood outside the bathroom door shouting and carrying on. https://oaklandsocialist.com/2023/03/31/a-trump-story-with-a-twist/ “Science and socialism go hand-in-hand.” Felicity Dowling Check out:https:http://oaklandsocialist.com also on Facebook |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re: Reform as the only game in town? (was "Why Ukraine may embrace China's peace plan"
Mark Baugher
On Mar 31, 2023, at 4:24 AM, Dayne Goodwin <daynegoodwin@...> wrote:I don't know you, Dayne, and don't think you're dogmatic based on your posts. The last sentence of my message was out of line and I apologize for it. To your point, Trotsky likely would not have been surprised by the regression to capitalist property relations in the "degenerated workers states" or the deformed ones that were established after his death. I read a lot of Trotsky for years to the exclusion of his valid critics. Today, his quotes grate on me. The blaming of the bureaucracy for the rise of Stalin ignores the fact that most governments have bureaucracies, but the government he and the Bolsheviks created had no popular control over it. Nor was there membership control of the parties that were modeled on the Bolsheviks, or at least the Comintern's image of the Bolsheviks. His favorite party in the US degenerated into a cult centered around a leader who controlled the organization for decades and apparently robbed it of $20M (at least, I've seen no evidence from that crowd disputing the documents that have been published). The poverty and scarcity of Soviet Russia were factors that Trotsky emphasized for its degeneration. And when it degenerated, it took the world revolutionary movement with it. Today, I'm more interested in discovering what went wrong rather than what predictions came true. Mark |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
“No evidence”: GWU investigation clears Dr. Lara Sheehi of antisemitism allegations
Dennis Brasky
The pro-Israel group StandWithUs accused GWU professor Lara Sheehi of antisemitism. A third-party investigation found the accusations were "inaccurate or taken out of context and misrepresented." |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Review: A People's Guide to Capitalism
Frederick Harris
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re: Reform as the only game in town? (was "Why Ukraine may embrace China's peace plan"
Chris Slee
The debate about the nature of the former Soviet Union: Who was right? (This is an article I wrote some years ago, looking at the ideas of Trotsky, Tony Cliff and Albert Szymanski):
Chris Slee
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re: Reform as the only game in town? (was "Why Ukraine may embrace China's peace plan"
Dayne Goodwin
You haven't commented on Trotsky's 1938 analysis, Mark. I initially brought it up in a discussion (before you changed the thread/subject line) where it was pertinent to show that there were contemporary observers who did not assume the Soviet Union as it was in 1938 would continue to exist into future generations. I did not refer to post-1938 developments, only you have. So your "dogma" insult is just a solipsistic wild pitch. Let's imagine that we were around in 1938 and we came across Trotsky's analysis of the Soviet Union as it was in 1938. I think it was a perceptive and valid analysis in 1938. Do you disagree? Dayne "The USSR thus embodies terrific
contradictions. But it still remains a degenerated workers’ state. Such
is the social diagnosis. The political prognosis has an alternative
character: either the bureaucracy, becoming ever more the organ of the
world bourgeoisie in the workers’ state, will overthrow the new forms of
property and plunge the country back to capitalism; or the working
class will crush the bureaucracy and open the way to socialism." Leon Trotsky, 1938 On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 2:32 PM Mark Baugher <mark@...> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 5:34 AM Dayne Goodwin via groups.io <daynegoodwin=gmail.com@groups.io> wrote:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re: Reform as the only game in town? (was "Why Ukraine may embrace China's peace plan"
Mark Baugher
On Mar 30, 2023, at 4:34 AM, Dayne Goodwin <daynegoodwin@...> wrote:I wonder if he would agree with those writings today? He was assassinated on the cusp of WWII, where the USSR saw great suffering followed by victory and occupied much of Europe so oppressively that they rebelled in Hungary, Poland, and other places until the collapse of that rule in 1989 before the dissolution of the USSR two years later. That was the "workers states" in the west. In the east, one of the "deformed workers states" battled the US to a north/south stalemate and the other defeated the US and reunited Vietnam before the biggest "deformed workers state," China, invaded it. Would he call it the "first Socialist War" or explain it as a border skirmish or attempt to affect foreign policy? The argument for a new, third international was issued by the second's left wing, Trotsky and others, in part because the social democrats voted to go to war with each other. That's parties, I don't know what to cal it when "socialist" states do it. I also wonder what Trotsky would say when the "bureaucracies" running these workers states turned themselves into state capitalists with ownership of large portions of private enterprises. Maybe he would note that these "workers states" had no participation from workers, let alone independent trade unions or any way for people to voice their opinions let allow exert control. And that might be part of the problem. We know know that planned economies failed to deliver goods desired by those workers, or caused famine, and often destroyed the earth in their domains? Maybe Trotsky would recall the the victorious Bolsheviks never allowed universal suffrage and regret that. Anyway, we don't know what he'd think about today's situation and reciting his words like dogma won't help us figure it out. Mark |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
patriarchy and power: how socialisation underpins abusive behavior
Duane Filan
"Men don't abuse women because society tells them it's OK. They do it because society tells them they are entitled to be in control." The Guardian, March 7, 2020 "Coersive control is a very particular kind of domestic violence. It isn't a "reaction" to stress. Nor is it triggered by alcohol or drugs. It's an ongoing system of control in which the abusive partner seeks to override their partner's autonomy and destroy their sense of self. The end game - whether the perpetrator knowingly sets out to achieve it - is to make their partner entirely subordinate." |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UAW
anthonyboynton@...
Those of you who follow the labor movement in the USA, and I imagine that's a lot of you, probably already know about recent internal elections in the UAW and other unions partially overturning control by corrupt bureaucratic machines. What kind of leadership can we expect from the insurgent union leaders? We may not be seeing a brand new day, yet. This is a very important issue in the short term with major auto contracts coming up, and with the UPs contract coming up for the IBT.
Here is an important post from PayDay Report regarding this issue. "Brancato isn’t the only UAW union democracy activist, who is skeptical of Fain’s victory. Will Lehamn ran against Fain and Curry in the first round, but lost badly, receiving only 4.6% of the vote. He cautions against seeing Fain’s victory as a revolt of the membership. Out of 1.1 million eligible active workers and UAW retirees, only 136,485 members voted. “The narrow result and low turnout show Fain and Curry struggled equally to win votes beyond their own bureaucratic networks and that neither bureaucrat has significant support among the rank and file,” said Lehman. “In the runoff, although many locals actually took measures to notify workers of the election (they did not in the first round), Fain and Curry each won votes from only about 5 percent of the rank-and-file membership”. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gershon Baskin - The opportunity for real change is upon us and the demand for a constitution is being expressed
abraham Weizfeld PhD
“There is a lot to do remembering that the people are the sovereign, and not the Knesset or the government. The people who took to the streets, and for the time being have forced the government to freeze the transition of Israel into a dictatorship, must continue to be on guard and prepared to turn up the pressure.“ The reform Israel needs is not part of Yariv Levin's plan - opinionThe opportunity for real change is upon us and the demand for a constitution is being expressed. It will take time, but the process has finally begun.
Published: MARCH 29, 2023 23:50
OUR CONSTITUTION should make the official languages of Israel – Hebrew and Arabic. Communities should no longer have the right to bar someone from a different community living in their midst, says the writer. (photo credit: YOSSI ZAMIR/FLASH90) Advertisement The struggle is not over, it’s not even in a “wait and see” mode. The fight must go on. Israel needs judicial reforms, very serious reforms. Our democracy is false for large sectors of our society. There are many Israelis who don’t enjoy equal rights and opportunities. Our judicial system fails to uphold true democracy. The reforms that we need are not at all what Yariv Levin and the Israeli government have been trying to pass. In fact, they are radically different. If the Israeli public has finally woken up to the faults in our challenged democracy, then I believe the time has come to launch the struggle for real democracy in Israel. I will try to spell out some of the changes I think we need in Israel. I will relate to the area known as the sovereign state of Israel and not to the territories occupied by Israel in 1967. What I propose is for all of those who live under Israeli sovereignty, including the 380,000 Palestinians in east Jerusalem. Top Articles Read More Teachers who opened racist WhatsApp group decide to leave school Nonetheless, it should be clear that a true democracy cannot allow for the governing over millions of people by military law and military government without even the most basic civil and human rights. It is not only non-democratic and in fact prevents Israel from being a true democracy, it is also immoral and unjust. But I will focus on the changes we need to make with regards to the more than nine million Israeli citizens and the Palestinian residents of east Jerusalem. If after five years from the adoption of a constitution based on equality, the Israeli occupation still continues, then the constitution should apply to all of those people living under Israeli control.
We need a constitution which sets forth the basic human and civil rights of all citizens and defines the relationship between the state (the government and governmental institutions) and the people. The first principle is equality. There is no real democracy without equality for all citizens, and that must be the backbone of any democratic constitution. This should have been done during Israel’s first Knesset which was in fact delegated with this mission. A constitutional law for equality should have been adopted within the law known as the Basic Law for Human Dignity and Freedom, but it was not. Now is the time to work hard to finally make it happen. The constitution should be negotiated and accepted by a special majority in the Knesset which could be something like 2/3 of the members of the Knesset or a simple majority of the ruling coalition and a simple majority of the opposition. Amending the constitution once it is approved should also require a special majority similar to what is required to pass it. The most important part of the constitution must be the bill of rights. In the US Constitution, the Bill of Rights is essentially the first ten amendments of the Constitution. The US Bill of Rights includes freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition. It forbids promoting one religion over others and also forbids restricting an individual’s religious practices. It guarantees freedom of expression by prohibiting or restricting the press or the rights of individuals to speak freely. It also guarantees the right of citizens to assemble peaceably and to petition their government. Like the practice in Israel, the US provides for civilian rule over the military, meaning essentially that the military is ruled over by the elected civilian powers and not a general or a group of generals. There is also the notion that “each person’s home is their castle,” secure from unreasonable searches and seizures of property by the government. It protects against arbitrary arrests, and is the basis of the law regarding search warrants, stop-and-frisk, safety inspections, wiretaps, and other forms of surveillance. IN THE US there is a requirement for “due process of law” and a provision which requires the government to compensate citizens when it takes private property for public use. The US Constitution also secures the separation of branches of government and what is urgently important for Israel, the system of checks and balances to ensure that one branch of government does not take over the other branches. We cannot simply copy and paste from the US Constitution or any other constitution. We need a constitution which is uniquely Israeli and relates to our specific circumstances. The first essential statement of our constitution must be the equality of all citizens regardless of race, religion, gender, ethnicity, etc. as stated in Israel’s Declaration of Independence. Every Israeli citizen must be equal under the law: Jews, Palestinian citizens, secular, religious, haredi, Mizrahi, Ashkenazi, Ethiopian, Muslims, Druze, Christians, all citizens. The constitution must guarantee the rights of all citizens which would automatically put an end to all kinds of non-democratic practices that exist today. For example, there could not be political parties that exclude the participation of women. Communities would no longer have the right to veto the possibility of someone from a different community living in their midst. Educational reformOur constitution should also (once again) make the official languages of Israel – Hebrew and Arabic. We should also guarantee the right of Israeli citizens to study in schools that teach in Hebrew or Arabic (or both would be best). All Israelis should be educated in the same basic core curricula which include science, mathematics, computers, English, their primary language (Hebrew or Arabic) and civics. Communities should be granted autonomy to determine additional subjects of learning, including religious learning, literature of their own culture and history and historic narratives of both sides of the conflict. Separation of religion and stateThe constitution must guarantee the freedom of religion but also the freedom from religion. In the best-case scenario, in my mind, there should be separation between religion and state and every citizen should be free to practice their religion as they see fit, but without imposing on others their religious beliefs. All religions in the state should have the equal right to celebrate their religions in private and in public and religious holidays should be marked as official holidays for those communities which decide to observe them. Within the framework of equality there should be provisions for equal service to the state and community for all citizens; whether this is military or community service, all citizens should be treated equally in this regard. Less controversy, more justiceOther reforms which are necessary in Israel in the immediate future and are far less controversial concern the way that our justice system works. First of all, we need at least 700 more judges in our system. Trials and legal proceedings in Israel simply take way too much time and involve the unnecessary suffering of too many citizens.
Regarding the Supreme Court, there is total justification that the court needs to be a lot more representative of the people of Israel. There must be more Justices from communities which are not represented or are underrepresented. The court should allow for more plurality in world views, but there should be no compromise on the quality of the court.
There is a lot to do remembering that the people are the sovereign, and not the Knesset or the government. The people who took to the streets, and for the time being have forced the government to freeze the transition of Israel into a dictatorship, must continue to be on guard and prepared to turn up the pressure.
The opportunity for real change is upon us and the demand for a constitution is being expressed. It will take time, but the process has finally begun. The writer is a political and social entrepreneur who has dedicated his life to the State of Israel and to peace between Israel and its neighbors. He is now directing The Holy Land Bond and is the Middle East director for ICO – International Communities Organization.
https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-735849
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
R E C O N C I L I A T I O N C O N F ER E N C E L I S T قائمة مؤتمر المصالحة since 1994 by the JPLO Jewish People’s Liberation Organization End Zionism & Judaeophobia abraham Weizfeld Phd moderator-founder SaaLaHa@... political declaration JPLO ( a Bundist chapter ) https://Jewish-Socialist-Bund.net/JPLO the books Sabra and Shatila (1984) 2009 https://www.academia.edu/44543523/SABRA_AND_SHATILA_Edition_2009 http://bookstore.authorhouse.com/Products/SKU-000255066/Sabra-and-Shatila.aspx The End of Zionism : and the liberation of the Jewish People 1989 http://www.academia.edu/11243333/THE_END_OF_ZIONISM_and_the_liberation_of_the_Jewish_People Nation, Society and the State : the reconciliation of Palestinian and Jewish Nationhood https://www.academia.edu/40349204/VOLUME_I_SECOND_EDITION_THESIS_NATION_SOCIETY_AND_THE_STATE https://www.academia.edu/40349264/VOLUME_TWO_SECOND_EDITION_THESIS_METHODOLOGY_OF_NATIONAL_IDENTITY
The Federation of Palestinian and Hebrew Nations https://www.academia.edu/38380122/The_Federation_of_Palestinian_and_Hebrew_Nations https://www.cambridgescholars.com/product/978-1-5275-1313-6 (Hbk)
The Federation of Palestinian and Hebrew Nations Second Edition
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re: Reform as the only game in town? (was "Why Ukraine may embrace China's peace plan"
Dayne Goodwin
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 11:01 PM Mark Baugher <mark@...> wrote: > This is off the top of my head, at the end of a long day. > > On Mar 29, 2023, at 3:50 AM, Dayne Goodwin <daynegoodwin@...> wrote: > > Take Leon Trotsky in 1938 . . . What was it Leon Trotsky wrote in 1938? Oh yes: "The Soviet Union emerged from the October Revolution as a workers’ state. State ownership of the means of production, a necessary prerequisite to socialist development, opened up the possibility of rapid growth of the productive forces. But the apparatus of the workers’ state underwent a complete degeneration at the same time: it was transformed from a weapon of the working class into a weapon of bureaucratic violence against the working class and more and more a weapon for the sabotage of the country’s economy. The bureaucratization of a backward and isolated workers’ state and the transformation of the bureaucracy into an all-powerful privileged caste constitute the most convincing refutation – not only theoretically, but this time, practically – of the theory of socialism in one country. "The USSR thus embodies terrific contradictions. But it still remains a degenerated workers’ state. Such is the social diagnosis. The political prognosis has an alternative character: either the bureaucracy, becoming ever more the organ of the world bourgeoisie in the workers’ state, will overthrow the new forms of property and plunge the country back to capitalism; or the working class will crush the bureaucracy and open the way to socialism." On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 11:01 PM Mark Baugher <mark@...> wrote: > > This is off the top of my head, at the end of a long day. > > > On Mar 29, 2023, at 3:50 AM, Dayne Goodwin <daynegoodwin@...> wrote: > > > > Take Leon Trotsky in 1938 > > Trotsky via the SWP is my pedigree as well. In my view, this tradition deserves reconsideration regarding the nature of post-revolutionary states, their levels of development, the pressures of the world capitalist system on them, the revolutionary party and other political formations in the post-revolutionary period, and the role of a variety of factors in addition to class such as caste, generational, and other historic-cultural factors. A couple of these points were made by Gil. Michael's observation about the impermanence of revolutionary transformation could be added to this list. > > But it's striking how China is on its third "emperor" since the twentieth century and Russia has its third czar despite the radical changes that took place in class relationships, productive and market relations, and industrial transformation. > |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
on Ukraine: glimmer of light in DSA
Dayne Goodwin
I learned about this article because John Reimann shared it on a
Ukraine solidarity network list yesterday morning. It is a glimmer of light in the darkness of ultraleft campist dominance on the u.s. "left", including in the DSA's 'International Committee'. What Can the Left Actually Do About Ukraine? by Kyle Shybunko and Alex Gendler Socialist Forum, Winter/Spring 2023 https://socialistforum.dsausa.org/issues/winter-spring-2023/what-can-the-left-actually-do-about-ukraine . . . Much of the Western left analysis of Ukraine begins with a simple premise: a pre-emptive hostility to US military policy, and a conviction that it’s of primary importance for socialists to be seen as opposing it. While this seems to be an obvious application of anti-imperialist principles, it can easily lead us astray. Firstly, it instills a motivated reasoning that undermines our own ability to accurately assess global events. Our discomfort with ending up “on the same side” as NATO or the Pentagon has led many to reach for the most palatable narratives rather than seeking the most accurate analysis of the situation, wherever that takes us. The result is that even outside of explicitly pro-Russia circles it is not uncommon to hear that the popular Maidan uprising was actually a “US-instigated fascist coup”; that the sniper killings that escalated the protests into a confrontation with the state were a “false flag” operation; that Ukraine has killed “14,000 ethnic Russians” in the Donbas region and banned the Russian language; that pro-Russian protesters were “massacred” in Odesa; or that the Minsk Accords failed solely because of Ukraine or the US rather and that the Russian side bears little or no responsibility – all repeated with absolute confidence despite much evidence to the contrary. . . . |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re: Means of payment
Engin Yılmaz
@EdGeorge @anthonyboynton
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re: Reform as the only game in town? (was "Why Ukraine may embrace China's peace plan"
Mark Baugher
This is off the top of my head, at the end of a long day.
On Mar 29, 2023, at 3:50 AM, Dayne Goodwin <daynegoodwin@...> wrote:Trotsky via the SWP is my pedigree as well. In my view, this tradition deserves reconsideration regarding the nature of post-revolutionary states, their levels of development, the pressures of the world capitalist system on them, the revolutionary party and other political formations in the post-revolutionary period, and the role of a variety of factors in addition to class such as caste, generational, and other historic-cultural factors. A couple of these points were made by Gil. Michael's observation about the impermanence of revolutionary transformation could be added to this list. But it's striking how China is on its third "emperor" since the twentieth century and Russia has its third czar despite the radical changes that took place in class relationships, productive and market relations, and industrial transformation. Mark |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re: Reform as the only game in town?
Mark Baugher
On Mar 28, 2023, at 10:50 PM, gilschaeffer82@... wrote:In general, I agree. It would be good to explore what those ways are. Michael previously stated something to the effect that we thought that with the five year plans and the USSR victory in WWII, that "detaching any nation from the world capitalist system was permanent and the path to a new society could be built." I think we have learned that there is more to it than that though we may not understand what it is. Mark |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|