Date   

A 7-Year-Old With Autism Was Handcuffed and Interrogated for Nearly 40 Minutes at School

Louis Proyect
 


'Look for Power in the Shadows': Watch Sheldon Whitehouse Shine Light on 'Dark Money Operation' Behind GOP Supreme Court Takeover | Common Dreams News

Louis Proyect
 

Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse used his 30 minutes of allotted time during Tuesday's Senate Judiciary Committee hearing not to ask questions of President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett—who repeatedly dodged the straightforward questions of other lawmakers—but to deliver a detailed presentation on the sprawling "dark money operation" fueling the right-wing takeover of the U.S. judicial system.

Displaying a number of visuals and flow charts, the senator from Rhode Island traced the dizzying array of special interests and advocacy groups—from the Koch network to the Federalist Society to the Judicial Crisis Network to the Pacific Legal Foundation—coordinating and pouring money into the effort to confirm Barrett and other far-right, corporate-friendly judges committed to rolling back reproductive rights, voting rights, climate regulations, and more.

https://www.commondreams.org/news/2020/10/14/look-power-shadows-watch-sheldon-whitehouse-shine-light-dark-money-operation-behind


The Great Unread: On William Deresiewicz’s “The Death of the Artist” - Los Angeles Review of Books

Louis Proyect
 

Artists have lost income because content has been “demonetized.” Putting so much music, text, and video online has rendered much of it worthless, due to piracy or sheer, superfluous abundance. Publishers, labels, and studios all face falling revenues, resulting in ever smaller advances and marketing budgets. Television, having resisted demonetization, is the one bright exception to the trend. Netflix, HBO, and other platforms support a thriving culture of middle-class creators — standing out, for Deresiewicz, as the exception that proves the rule.

https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/the-great-unread-on-william-deresiewiczs-the-death-of-the-artist/


Harvard historian examines how textbooks taught white supremacy – Harvard Gazette

Louis Proyect
 


Worse than Dead: A Critical Response to McKenzie Wark - COSMONAUT

Louis Proyect
 

Nearly a year has passed since the publication of McKenzie Wark’s short book Capital is Dead: Is This Something Worse? More than half of that time has been spent in the midst of an unprecedented global crisis which has impacted the course of history in ways that cannot yet be fully understood. Simultaneous mass uprisings against racism and police brutality have brought the brutality of the state into stark relief against the transparent unwillingness of the ruling class to deploy its financial resources to mitigate the effect of the pandemic on the public. The novelty of our present historical circumstances are worthy of radical investigation, and the hypothesis of Wark’s book certainly aspires to such radicalism. Caught between algorithmic policing and contact tracing, the time is ripe for rethinking what “information” really means to communists. Unfortunately, the rhetorical content of the book is a stubborn refusal to actually say anything radical. Capital is Dead spends its most of its pages trying to justify its own existence by attacking any dialectical method which might seek to venture onto Wark’s terra sancta, the realms of science and technology in the purely empirical sense which she chooses to conceive them. Seen in retrospect, Wark’s thesis (that we have actually been living through a new and brutal mode of post-capitalist production for quite some time) appears to have been dead on arrival. However, if we proceed from an immanent critique of Wark’s postivistic treatment of information theory, we can recover the critical Marxist insight that a radical understanding of the present can make the past itself seem brand new.

https://cosmonaut.blog/2020/10/12/worse-than-dead-a-critical-response-to-mckenzie-wark/


Why Globalise? 1989 in Eastern Europe and the Politics of History: Part III | Lefteast

Louis Proyect
 


A prize auction – Michael Roberts Blog

Louis Proyect
 

This year’s ‘Nobel’ (actually the Riksbank) prize for economics went to Stanford University economists, Paul Milgrom and Robert Wilson.  According to the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, they “have studied how auctions work. They have also used their insights to design new auction formats for goods and services that are difficult to sell in a traditional way, such as radio frequencies. Their discoveries have benefited sellers, buyers and taxpayers around the world.”

So in a world where inequality is at record levels, global warming and environmental degradation are threatening to destroy the planet and there is a world economic slump not seen since the 1930s, the prize givers recognise the work of two economists on how to make the auctions of commodities, land and services more efficient.

https://thenextrecession.wordpress.com/2020/10/13/a-prize-auction/


Re: PBS documentary: "Driving While Black: Space, Race and Mobility in America"

Roger Kulp
 


Re: The Arctic is in a death spiral. How much longer will it exist? | US news | The Guardian

Roger Kulp
 

The idea of wealthy a-holes indulging in "climate change tourism",in order to view an ice-free Arctic,is one of the most disgusting things I have seen in a long time.Disgusting,but not surprising.Once the Arctic completely thaws,we can no doubt expect to see a new capitalist land rush,and development boom,for whatever length of time the earth has left.

But this article is ignoring another possible factor in the loss of glaciers,and sea ice.That being a global loss of cloud cover.Not to mention what such a corresponding rainfall might mean for agriculture and animal life worldwide.

https://e360.yale.edu/features/why-clouds-are-the-key-to-new-troubling-projections-on-warming#:~:text=Recent%20climate%20models%20project%20that,energy%20to%20strike%20the%20planet.


Re: Why not Trump again?

Roger Kulp
 

This may be a satirical piece,but this is not.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bs9L15apy5c

It's hard to take an article seriously that says Trump ended the GWOT,when the US is still in Afghanistan,we have not closed any of our bases in the Middle East,to say nothing of Qasem Soleimani.

If Trump really wanted us to have universal health care he could do it with a stroke of a pen.Nothing would piss off the Democrats,and their benefactors in the insurance and private hospital,industries,more.The writer of this is piece correct about one thing.If climate change will be stopped,China,not the US,has a better chance of being a leader here.


Re: Fascism, Trumpism, and the left | Louis Proyect: The Unrepentant Marxist

Roger Kulp
 

I have.The rejection of a UK-styled parliamentary system is one of many reasons why third parties cannot gain a foothold in the US.A "two party" oligarchic duopoly was baked into the system from the start.


Re: Fascism, Trumpism, and the left | Louis Proyect: The Unrepentant Marxist

Dayne Goodwin
 

On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 10:33 AM Andrew Stewart <hasc.warrior.stew@...> wrote:
...Remember, (despite what Lars Lih claims) Lenin's key to success was outright rejection and repudiation of the received wisdom from the prior 50 years of Marxist theory combined with a novel restatement of principles. You need to make a similar jump into the void in order to understand the current situation.


Andrew, would you please list some of these major points of Marxist wisdom which Lenin 'outright rejected and repudiated'?


On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 10:33 AM Andrew Stewart <hasc.warrior.stew@...> wrote:
Your analysis is to pull out something about Germany from 85+ years ago as if that can be mechanically imposed upon the 21st century? Also, Germany was not a settler-colonial society and Weimar was a parliamentary system as opposed to a Federalist system. C'mon Louis, de omnibus dubitandum. Ford's class analysis is there, it is Marxist, and you just don't want to see it. Remember, (despite what Lars Lih claims) Lenin's key to success was outright rejection and repudiation of the received wisdom from the prior 50 years of Marxist theory combined with a novel restatement of principles. You need to make a similar jump into the void in order to understand the current situation.


Re: The fascist threat

Roger Kulp
 

It's become cliched to say this,but fascism in the USA,in the 21st Century,is not going to look like fascism in Europe in the 20th Century.


Review: China's Engine of Environmental Collapse (Green Left)

Chris Slee
 


Re: Fascism, Trumpism, and the left | Louis Proyect: The Unrepentant Marxist

Roger Kulp
 

A couple of comments on Michael Meeropol's response.

The DSA is a mixed bag of activists.There are those,in the DSA,who range from reformists to revolutionaries.In my opinion,they have become so disorganized,that they have no real agenda,or message.I believe since they are so identified with reformists,in Congress,like AOC,and Bernie,they are not seen as a threat,the way more organized groups from the 60s,like the Pathers,or even SNCC were,who did have a clear agenda,and more militant image.

Today people at demonstrations,be they media or protestors,stand a better chance of being killed,or seriously injured,either by police,or by roaming right wing vigilantes,whether they be lone wolves,like Kyle Rittenhouse,or if they belong to organized groups.And as we have seen,police can be very friendly to such individuals,even if they go around brandishing high powered rifles in public.Police may even belong to such white supremacist groups in their off-duty hours.


Mike Davis: 'I don't see any path for capitalism to resolve this crisis"

Dayne Goodwin
 

Mike Davis interview:
A Scholar of American Doom Doesn’t See How Capitalism Can Fix This Crisis
“The elements are there” for a radical transformation
by Jonny Coleman and Molly Lambert, Mother Jones, October 13
https://www.motherjones.com/media/2020/10/mike-davis-set-the-night-on-fire-interview/

Molly Lambert: Since the last time we saw you there was a pandemic and then the uprisings. Do you feel like this is comparable to any other moments in history?

Mike Davis: It’s a bit like the 1918 Spanish Flu combined with the Great Depression. I mean, Americans went to bed one night in early March and woke up the next day to find out they were living in 1933. The difference of course, is the policy has played a far greater role in this case than it did in 1918 even with the Great Depression... So there’s no comparison between Trump and Hoover. Trump has become the principal vector of coronavirus in this country, one might say even in the world, because of the way that others like Bolsonaro in Brazil, Duterte in the Philippines followed his example. . . .

Speaking as a historian, I don’t see any alternative path for capitalism to resolve this crisis. This isn’t a conjunctural crisis. It’s a crisis within a complex of crises: the failure of capitalism to generate jobs and sustainable incomes, making a large minority of the human race surplus and therefore disposable; . . .

And these policies all point in a very determined and clear direction, which is that there are probably a billion and a half people, maybe more, maybe 2 billion, in the informal working class who have simply been triaged already in advance. So the fate of a very large minority of humanity has been determined now. And that’s more important than almost anything else. Coronavirus is just part of the crisis. But there’s an overall crisis of human survival and sustainable urbanization. . . .

We need to face certain facts. It should be obvious—and I must say I was critical of Occupy Wall Street in this sense, right from the beginning, this idea of the 1 percent. In the elections, over the past hundred years where Democratic presidential candidates have had the largest margin of victory, still, the Republicans are able to count on 37 to 41 percent of the vote... Trump’s popularity ratings are still about 40 percent. But you need to ask yourself—why this constant percentage in American political history? What does it say, particularly about the upper middle class, the local country club elites? Today the hedge funds and private equity people are a very large base in this country for conservative politics.... So when we talk about bringing people together, we shouldn’t be talking about it in some vague populist sense, believing that there is this great basis of unity. It’s the 60 percent that we’re talking about and creating a class unity that is based on full recognition of structural racism and systemic discrimination. . . .

But the fact that it took the form of the Sanders campaign also brought with it a fundamental contradiction. The Sanders campaign said that we can both be inside and outside. Most important is the movement in the streets and the workplaces, and political work will be the expression of that, and we can maintain both these things. Well, we’ve seen since Bernie withdrew from the campaign that that wasn’t the case. Tens of thousands of activists were just left stranded while the progressive Democrats were negotiating with Biden in organizing for the election. This would have led to a tremendous sense of defeat and demoralization except for Black Lives Matter, which suddenly created a terrain and an impetus for young people who’d been active to return to the streets and return to activism. . . .

So this raises very difficult but at the same time very traditional issues. Has elected power ever strengthened mobilization and struggle at the level of the grassroots, at the union base, in the communities, and so on? And the answer that was outlined by the German Social Democrat, Robert Michels, 115 years ago after the German Social Democrats won a huge victory in the Reichstag—the answer he gave is no. And this is something that has always haunted the left whenever it’s trying to combine electoral strategy and class struggle in the workplace or mass movements for, for instance, racial equality. . . .

...we should not pretend that this crisis can be managed, because it’s a structural crisis of a different kind from all the postwar recessions or economic crises—it’s far more profound. And one thing that should be obvious is, we’re going to face increasing levels of social violence. And this is the main thing I think most people on the left are really not prepared for. Romantically maybe: If they’re going to start shooting we’ll start shooting back. It’s not going to be that way at all. Now the digital repressive powers are so much greater than in the past, but also because there is really an active neo-fascist movement.... So, in my mind, this means we have to move beyond the Debsian model of left mobilization and see the need to return to a more democratic version of Leninism: the importance of an organization, of organizers capable of making strategic and not just tactical decisions in interventions. ...
 . . .


Supreme court (in)justice

John Reimann
 

While socialists debate whether or not to vote for Biden, we are set to get a new supreme court (in)justice who:
*Will vote to deny women the right to make the most personal decisions about her body;
*Will vote to end health insurance for those with pre-existing conditions; 
*Won’t even say it is illegal to intimidate voters at the polls. 

WHERE ARE THE SYREET PROTESTS OVER THIS SERIOUS THREAT?
--
“Science and socialism go hand-in-hand.” Felicity Dowling
Check out:https:http://oaklandsocialist.com also on Facebook


Biden leads Trump by 17 points as election race enters final stage | US news | The Guardian

Louis Proyect
 


DuBois and the Encyclopedia Britannica

jenorem
 


Re: "There will be no coup"

Richard Modiano
 

I don't see a coup happening either, but I doubt that Trump will leave office with the standard submission of previous losers. During Trump's 4 years, Putin has been consolidating his personal hold on Russian financial assets and instruments. Trump's colossal debt spread over Russian oligarchs and Latvian strawmen is now controlled by Putin. If Trump moves out of the White House, he becomes just a rabid old main withdrawing to a run-down golf resort. The debts will be called, and the Trump-Kushner empire will implode.  

If Trump loses and contests the election, Barrett could well be the decider in a replay of Bush v. Gore — which would almost certainly mean four more years of Donald Trump.

https://truthout.org/articles/barrett-could-well-be-the-decider-in-a-2020-replay-of-bush-v-gore/