Date   

Re: L32Logsyn and L32Lookups Updates.

Ian Morrison
 

Thanks for looking. I get the same report from a friend running a similar system.

Oh well, I can live with it. It may be a local problem.

 

73, ve3ep

Ian

 

 

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

 

From: Rick Ellison
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2020 8:45 PM
To: hamlogger@groups.io
Subject: Re: [hamlogger] L32Logsyn and L32Lookups Updates.

 

Ian..

I spent some time today looking at what you report. All of my qso’s that are logged from JTDX (I’m not sure if I have the latest one or not.) but my eqsl send column in the database shows Y. I see no place in the log is an R placed in any of the columns.

 

73 Rick N2AMG

 

From: hamlogger@groups.io [mailto:hamlogger@groups.io] On Behalf Of Ian Morrison
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 11:02 AM
To: hamlogger@groups.io
Subject: Re: [hamlogger] L32Logsyn and L32Lookups Updates.

 

Hi Rick,

There is one small problem, that may be my problem. Once the upload to LOTW is complete it doesn’t write a “y” in the LOTW sent column of logger32. On the upload from JTDX to logger32 an ‘R’ is placed in that column and Logsync doesn’t overwrite it.

 

73, ve3ep

Ian

 

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

 

From: Paul Scarratt via groups.io
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 9:37 AM
To: hamlogger@groups.io
Subject: Re: [hamlogger] L32Logsyn and L32Lookups Updates.

 

Many Thanks Rick fine work as always.

OS Win10

Just for reference I was prompted to remove L32Logsyn but not L32Lookup, both working fine.

Paul G0WRE

 

 

Virus-free. www.avast.com

 


Re: Band plan error message help

Glen
 

To Bob and Rick Ellison…  I think it was Rick that said to try this.  Go to VIEW in Logger … go down to “enable out of band messages” make sure this is Unchecked.  That will fix this error message below.

 

73 Glen K0JGH

 

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

 

From: Bob
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2020 11:28 AM
To: hamlogger@groups.io
Subject: Re: [hamlogger] Band plan error message help

 

If your radio connection is new (you've never had it working before), my first SWAG is that you have setup the polling interval to be too small (polling too fast, and the reply message is garbled). try 100ms for starters, you can play with it once you've resolved the problem. Other than that, take a peek at the radio debug window, there may be some clues there. SeventyThree(s).

On February 14, 2020 at 12:08 PM Glen and Pam Kesselring <kesselring73@...> wrote:

 

Any info on correcting this error message?

 

 

 

Invalid operation

 

The BandPlan has no entries that match a frequency of 0.0001 MHx.

The Band and Mode have not been changed.

 

Rig is IC 7610  and Win 10

 

 

Thanks, Glen K0JGH

 

 

 

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

 

 

 


 

 


Re: L32Logsyn and L32Lookups Updates.

Rick Ellison
 

Ian..

I spent some time today looking at what you report. All of my qso’s that are logged from JTDX (I’m not sure if I have the latest one or not.) but my eqsl send column in the database shows Y. I see no place in the log is an R placed in any of the columns.

 

73 Rick N2AMG

 

From: hamlogger@groups.io [mailto:hamlogger@groups.io] On Behalf Of Ian Morrison
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 11:02 AM
To: hamlogger@groups.io
Subject: Re: [hamlogger] L32Logsyn and L32Lookups Updates.

 

Hi Rick,

There is one small problem, that may be my problem. Once the upload to LOTW is complete it doesn’t write a “y” in the LOTW sent column of logger32. On the upload from JTDX to logger32 an ‘R’ is placed in that column and Logsync doesn’t overwrite it.

 

73, ve3ep

Ian

 

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

 

From: Paul Scarratt via groups.io
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 9:37 AM
To: hamlogger@groups.io
Subject: Re: [hamlogger] L32Logsyn and L32Lookups Updates.

 

Many Thanks Rick fine work as always.

OS Win10

Just for reference I was prompted to remove L32Logsyn but not L32Lookup, both working fine.

Paul G0WRE

 


Virus-free. www.avast.com


Re: Always on Top UDP Band Plan

DamianM0BKV
 

The only thing about the UDP Band Plan always being on top of other Logger32 windows is that it isn't on top of the WSIT-x window. When it was then I used the UDP Band Plan window to click on a DX call sign and this immediately brought up Logger32 on top with the DX call in the Logging Window of Logger32. Now I click on 'Internet call up lookup' and get these details ready to be logged. I supose 'Enable Callsign Lookup when clicking on WSIT' would possibly achieve this although this doesn't work (not sure what its suppose to do)on my PC. The 'Start WSIT/JTDX as On Top window'. doesnt work on my PC either.
No big deal as I click on the Logger32 icon in the Desktop Tray but thought I ought to explain.
Damian


Re: Always on Top UDP Band Plan

Bob
 

The option has been removed. The UDP BandMap is shown on-top of other Logger32 Windows by default. SeventyThree(s).

On May 19, 2020 at 5:11 AM "Damian M0BKV via groups.io" <damianm0bkv@...> wrote:

Down loaded the Logger32 update but now can't find in the Configuration of UDP Band Plan 'Always on Top' Setting to tick? 

 


Re: Always on Top UDP Band Plan

Vilhjalmur Sigurjonsson
 

It still is a always in the UDP band map; click on Start and there choose Setup, at the bottom it is.

But …  I have experienced that the JTDX 64bit ver #150 does not always behave. On one of my computers I have to use the 32bit version to stay on top.

73 Villi
TF3VS

 

From: hamlogger@groups.io [mailto:hamlogger@groups.io] On Behalf Of Damian M0BKV via groups.io
Sent: þriðjudagur, 19. maí 2020 09:11
To: hamlogger@groups.io
Subject: [hamlogger] Always on Top UDP Band Plan

 

Down loaded the Logger32 update but now can't find in the Configuration of UDP Band Plan 'Always on Top' Setting to tick? 


Always on Top UDP Band Plan

Damian M0BKV
 

Down loaded the Logger32 update but now can't find in the Configuration of UDP Band Plan 'Always on Top' Setting to tick? 


Re: L32Logsyn and L32Lookups Updates.

Rick Ellison
 

I had not noticed this while I was testing but over the next few days I will look for it..

 

73 Rick N2AMG

 

From: hamlogger@groups.io [mailto:hamlogger@groups.io] On Behalf Of Ian Morrison
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 11:02 AM
To: hamlogger@groups.io
Subject: Re: [hamlogger] L32Logsyn and L32Lookups Updates.

 

Hi Rick,

There is one small problem, that may be my problem. Once the upload to LOTW is complete it doesn’t write a “y” in the LOTW sent column of logger32. On the upload from JTDX to logger32 an ‘R’ is placed in that column and Logsync doesn’t overwrite it.

 

73, ve3ep

Ian

 

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

 

From: Paul Scarratt via groups.io
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 9:37 AM
To: hamlogger@groups.io
Subject: Re: [hamlogger] L32Logsyn and L32Lookups Updates.

 

Many Thanks Rick fine work as always.

OS Win10

Just for reference I was prompted to remove L32Logsyn but not L32Lookup, both working fine.

Paul G0WRE

 


Virus-free. www.avast.com


Re: l32lookups certificate problem

Gary Hinson
 

Which lookups are you on about, Bud?

 

A screenshot would help.

 

The non-secure certificate thing hints at possibly a problem with SSL: are you using an old version of Windows?

 

73

Gary  ZL2iFB

 

 

 

From: hamlogger@groups.io <hamlogger@groups.io> On Behalf Of Bud - VE6CSX
Sent: 19 May 2020 10:20
To: hamlogger@groups.io
Subject: [hamlogger] l32lookups certificate problem

 

Finally got logger32 working again, except the lookups.  I either get a blank window (plus header) or a message saying the certificate is not secure. Suggestions?


l32lookups certificate problem

Bud - VE6CSX
 

Finally got logger32 working again, except the lookups.  I either get a blank window (plus header) or a message saying the certificate is not secure. Suggestions?


Re: L32Logsyn and L32Lookups Updates.

Paul Scarratt
 

Hi Ian,

All fine here in the new version.

de Paul G0WRE


Re: L32Logsyn and L32Lookups Updates.

Ian Morrison
 

Hi Rick,

There is one small problem, that may be my problem. Once the upload to LOTW is complete it doesn’t write a “y” in the LOTW sent column of logger32. On the upload from JTDX to logger32 an ‘R’ is placed in that column and Logsync doesn’t overwrite it.

 

73, ve3ep

Ian

 

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

 

From: Paul Scarratt via groups.io
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 9:37 AM
To: hamlogger@groups.io
Subject: Re: [hamlogger] L32Logsyn and L32Lookups Updates.

 

Many Thanks Rick fine work as always.

OS Win10

Just for reference I was prompted to remove L32Logsyn but not L32Lookup, both working fine.

Paul G0WRE

 


Re: L32Logsyn and L32Lookups Updates.

Paul Scarratt
 

Many Thanks Rick fine work as always.

OS Win10

Just for reference I was prompted to remove L32Logsyn but not L32Lookup, both working fine.

Paul G0WRE


Re: Question LOTW and two callsigns

Gary Hinson
 

Hi John.

 

The linking is purely about merging the DXCC accounts and records for two or more callsigns held by the same person or group.

 

My everyday and [personal] contest calls are linked, so that QSOs made and confirmed with either call can both count towards the same DXCC account. 

 

73
Gary  ZL2iFB aka ZM4G

 

From: hamlogger@groups.io <hamlogger@groups.io> On Behalf Of John GM0OPS via groups.io
Sent: 18 May 2020 11:13
To: hamlogger@groups.io
Subject: Re: [hamlogger] Question LOTW and two callsigns

 

Thanks Dave. Yeah the posting is fine. I just want to clarify the linking. I will ask in that group. I will post the answer here just so folk know.

Regards
John


Re: Windows Defender ...

Ken McVie <kenmc@...>
 

Ferrari have Kaspersky for an official sponsor, so it can't be that bad!!

73
Ken ZL4NR

On 18/05/2020 9:00 am, Bob wrote:
No Ken, not paranoia, just a fact of life in the on-line era. Just Google 'Harley Davidson' a couple of times, or stamp collecting, or something else that you have absolutely no interest in. You'll immediately notice targeted marketing ads, and spam mail, appearing on your screen that relate directly to what you searched for. I logged on to my 4th XYLs PC, and searched for 'Chippendales' 20 times, and logged off. That kept her out of my face for weeks. SeventyThree(s).
On May 17, 2020 at 4:32 PM Ken McVie <kenmc@...> wrote:

This sounds like USA paranoia!!!!


73

KeN ZL4NR

On 18 May 2020 at 06:55 Jim SIMON <jhsimon@...> wrote:

One caveat regarding Avast, from PCMag: “Avast is harvesting users' browser histories on the pretext that the data has been 'de-identified,' thus protecting your privacy. But the data, which is being sold to third parties, can be linked back to people's real identities, exposing every click and search they've made.”

 

And while we are on the subject, as for Kasperksky, given it’s ownership, I would be cautious with that one as well. Jmho.

 

73,

Jim  W1YY

 

From: hamlogger@groups.io <hamlogger@groups.io> On Behalf Of Nick
Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2020 11:47 AM
To: hamlogger@groups.io
Subject: Re: [hamlogger] Windows Defender ...

 

I concur. AGV Free disables Windows Defender. I have used it for many years and never had problems with it, or it with Logger32.

 



 


 


 


Re: Question LOTW and two callsigns

John GM0OPS
 

Thanks Dave. Yeah the posting is fine. I just want to clarify the linking. I will ask in that group. I will post the answer here just so folk know.

Regards
John


Re: Question LOTW and two callsigns

David Leckie
 

Hi

I have registered with LOTW

GM4NFI

EA7/GM4NFI

GM4NFI/P

GM4NFI/M

 

I also have GM4NFI/MM but note  /MM cannot have DXCC

 

Depending on which callsign I used at the time of the QSO I just upload to that callsign.

 

You could post the question on the LOTW group

https://groups.arrl.org/g/ARRL-LoTW/topics

 

 

73

Dave

GM4NFI

 

 

 

From: hamlogger@groups.io [mailto:hamlogger@groups.io] On Behalf Of John GM0OPS via groups.io
Sent: 17 May 2020 23:59
To: hamlogger@groups.io
Subject: [hamlogger] Question LOTW and two callsigns

 

Hi Folks

I have my main callsign and a contest callsign. I have it all setup on Logger32 and also Club Log, so thats working fine.

With LOTW I have both callsigns setup under the one main account so upload with TSQL and just select the callsign, so that all works.

The thing I want to do is LINK the accounts in LOTW as both callsigns are mine so the DXCC rules are clear that it will be fine but the question is that once I select the link options in LOTW then I can still upload in the way I am doing by selecting the relevant callsign?

Anyone else using two or more callsigns this way?

Regards
John GM0OPS


Question LOTW and two callsigns

John GM0OPS
 

Hi Folks

I have my main callsign and a contest callsign. I have it all setup on Logger32 and also Club Log, so thats working fine.

With LOTW I have both callsigns setup under the one main account so upload with TSQL and just select the callsign, so that all works.

The thing I want to do is LINK the accounts in LOTW as both callsigns are mine so the DXCC rules are clear that it will be fine but the question is that once I select the link options in LOTW then I can still upload in the way I am doing by selecting the relevant callsign?

Anyone else using two or more callsigns this way?

Regards
John GM0OPS


Re: Windows Defender ...

Bob
 

I've credited you with this one Mike, you're now three ahead of me :)

On May 17, 2020 at 5:44 PM Mike <n2tbp@...> wrote:

Bob, once again, a brilliant solution. J

 

From: hamlogger@groups.io [mailto:hamlogger@groups.io] On Behalf Of Bob
Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2020 5:01 PM
To: hamlogger@groups.io
Subject: Re: [hamlogger] Windows Defender ...

 

No Ken, not paranoia, just a fact of life in the on-line era. Just Google 'Harley Davidson' a couple of times, or stamp collecting, or something else that you have absolutely no interest in. You'll immediately notice targeted marketing ads, and spam mail, appearing on your screen that relate directly to what you searched for. I logged on to my 4th XYLs PC, and searched for 'Chippendales' 20 times, and logged off. That kept her out of my face for weeks. SeventyThree(s).

On May 17, 2020 at 4:32 PM Ken McVie <kenmc@...> wrote:

This sounds like USA paranoia!!!!

 

73

KeN ZL4NR

On 18 May 2020 at 06:55 Jim SIMON <jhsimon@...> wrote:

One caveat regarding Avast, from PCMag: “Avast is harvesting users' browser histories on the pretext that the data has been 'de-identified,' thus protecting your privacy. But the data, which is being sold to third parties, can be linked back to people's real identities, exposing every click and search they've made.”

 

And while we are on the subject, as for Kasperksky, given it’s ownership, I would be cautious with that one as well. Jmho.

 

73,

Jim  W1YY

 

From: hamlogger@groups.io <hamlogger@groups.io> On Behalf Of Nick
Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2020 11:47 AM
To: hamlogger@groups.io
Subject: Re: [hamlogger] Windows Defender ...

 

I concur. AGV Free disables Windows Defender. I have used it for many years and never had problems with it, or it with Logger32.

 

 


 


 


 

 



Virus-free. www.avast.com

 


Re: Windows Defender ...

Bob
 

See this:  https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52671381   Amazing what can be learned by careful analysis of ones Internat traffic. SeventyThree(s).

On May 17, 2020 at 4:32 PM Ken McVie <kenmc@...> wrote:

This sounds like USA paranoia!!!!


73

KeN ZL4NR

On 18 May 2020 at 06:55 Jim SIMON <jhsimon@...> wrote:

One caveat regarding Avast, from PCMag: “Avast is harvesting users' browser histories on the pretext that the data has been 'de-identified,' thus protecting your privacy. But the data, which is being sold to third parties, can be linked back to people's real identities, exposing every click and search they've made.”

 

And while we are on the subject, as for Kasperksky, given it’s ownership, I would be cautious with that one as well. Jmho.

 

73,

Jim  W1YY

 

From: hamlogger@groups.io <hamlogger@groups.io> On Behalf Of Nick
Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2020 11:47 AM
To: hamlogger@groups.io
Subject: Re: [hamlogger] Windows Defender ...

 

I concur. AGV Free disables Windows Defender. I have used it for many years and never had problems with it, or it with Logger32.