Date   

Re: A request ...

Paul F6EXV
 

Our administrations don't care about DXCC !

Le 23/09/2020 à 18:04, José L. Peña EA4AFP a écrit :
Hi Bob,

done for a EA user, and this is the output:

imagen.png

AM-AO, EA-EH is right. Existing calls should be removed. Not sure if this is what you are asking for.

After the latest change in the Spanish legislation, EA4AFP can be used from any location in Spain, including the DXCC entities of Ceuta&Melilla, Canary o Balearics. No need to add /9, /8, /6 or /7.
This was different before, I had to change from EA1AIB to EA4AFP when I moved from EA1-land to EA4-land.

73 jose  EA4AFP

El mié., 23 sept. 2020 a las 0:52, Bob (<k4cy@...>) escribió:
Hi, this is addressed primarily to Italian and Spanish users ... 
Please do this:

a) Click TOOLS | DATABASE MAINTENANCE | COUNTRY/PREFIX MAINTENANCE. Scroll down to select I or EA. Now click on the row.

b) Look at the list of alternative prefixes. To me, the Offset location is 4worthless/meaningless.

What I would like to see is a list of prefixes that makes sense to me, and all the other International users. So, here is what I'm requesting is that if someone/anyone is interested in improving the quality/usability/intelligibility of the list of prefixes, you collectively work together to develop a new list. If you can do this, I will write a program to update/convert the current database.

The databases in Logger32 are yours to modify. You are provided with working/functional examples only. Enjoy. SeventyThree(s).

PS. To any ZS users who might actually read this. Don't ask for me to change ZS6 from Transvaal to Gauteng. Not in my lifetime. But you are free to change it yourself if you must.





Avast logo

L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le logiciel antivirus Avast.
www.avast.com



Re: A request ...

José L. Peña EA4AFP
 

Hi Bob,

done for a EA user, and this is the output:

imagen.png

AM-AO, EA-EH is right. Existing calls should be removed. Not sure if this is what you are asking for.

After the latest change in the Spanish legislation, EA4AFP can be used from any location in Spain, including the DXCC entities of Ceuta&Melilla, Canary o Balearics. No need to add /9, /8, /6 or /7.
This was different before, I had to change from EA1AIB to EA4AFP when I moved from EA1-land to EA4-land.

73 jose  EA4AFP


El mié., 23 sept. 2020 a las 0:52, Bob (<k4cy@...>) escribió:
Hi, this is addressed primarily to Italian and Spanish users ... 
Please do this:

a) Click TOOLS | DATABASE MAINTENANCE | COUNTRY/PREFIX MAINTENANCE. Scroll down to select I or EA. Now click on the row.

b) Look at the list of alternative prefixes. To me, the Offset location is 4worthless/meaningless.

What I would like to see is a list of prefixes that makes sense to me, and all the other International users. So, here is what I'm requesting is that if someone/anyone is interested in improving the quality/usability/intelligibility of the list of prefixes, you collectively work together to develop a new list. If you can do this, I will write a program to update/convert the current database.

The databases in Logger32 are yours to modify. You are provided with working/functional examples only. Enjoy. SeventyThree(s).

PS. To any ZS users who might actually read this. Don't ask for me to change ZS6 from Transvaal to Gauteng. Not in my lifetime. But you are free to change it yourself if you must.


Re: 2 different calls

ja1nlx
 

Try :-)

73

On 2020/09/23 18:52, Paul F6EXV wrote:
Thanks for additionjal info.
For example, can I write jtdx.exe --F6EXV and the other one jtdx.exe --F4KMA
Or are the words --rig-name compulsory ?
Thanks + 73
Paul F6EXV

Le 23/09/2020 à 11:39, ja1nlx a écrit :
Make a another Logger32 short cut like

C:\Logger32\Logger32.exe Logger32_Contest

C:\Logger32\Logger32.exe Logger32_TS480  etc

Make another JTDX shortcut using unique rig name like

C:\JTDX64\bin\jtdx.exe --rig-name=K3

C:\JTDX64\bin\jtdx.exe --rig-name=TS480  etc

You can make another setup for each shortcut.

73

On 2020/09/23 18:29, Paul F6EXV wrote:
Hello and thanks for the link.
I am not a geek and I am unable to follow the instructions.
I already have my existing log, with its related instances of LogSync and JTDX (and its JTDX log)
It shows as "Configuration - Default"
I have created another shortcut but it does not show as a different choice.
What am I doing wrong ?
I am using Win10 and version 3.50.422
Thanks + 73
Paul F6EXV


Le 23/09/2020 à 11:10, ja1nlx a écrit :
Paul

Read "Setting up a Second Logger32 INI File" section in Logger32 Help.

73

On 2020/09/23 17:42, Paul F6EXV wrote:
Hi all
I have two different callsigns that I ue daily.
I want the logs to be totally separated, not together in one (with 2 different operators) because statistics would be wrong.
I also wish to set up 2 LogSync and 2 JTDX, so that when I launch L32, both LogSync and JTDX are attached to their respecitive callsigns .
I do not necessarily want these 2 groups of programs to be launched simultabneously.
How can I set 2 shortcuts so they direct to the proper instances ?

Thanks for your help and suggestions.
73
Paul F6EXV
--
73 de aki
JA1NLX


Re: 2 different calls

Paul F6EXV
 

I have created the following shortcuts :
jtdx.exe --rig-name=F6EXV and jtdx.exe --rig-name=F4KMA
but I gat a message saying that if I moduiify the extension, the program may not work.
When I want to set up the utilities, these shortcuts do not appear, so I cannot have the utility program aim at the proper JTDX instance...
73
Paul F6EXV

Le 23/09/2020 à 11:39, ja1nlx a écrit :
Make a another Logger32 short cut like

C:\Logger32\Logger32.exe Logger32_Contest

C:\Logger32\Logger32.exe Logger32_TS480  etc

Make another JTDX shortcut using unique rig name like

C:\JTDX64\bin\jtdx.exe --rig-name=K3

C:\JTDX64\bin\jtdx.exe --rig-name=TS480  etc

You can make another setup for each shortcut.

73

On 2020/09/23 18:29, Paul F6EXV wrote:
Hello and thanks for the link.
I am not a geek and I am unable to follow the instructions.
I already have my existing log, with its related instances of LogSync and JTDX (and its JTDX log)
It shows as "Configuration - Default"
I have created another shortcut but it does not show as a different choice.
What am I doing wrong ?
I am using Win10 and version 3.50.422
Thanks + 73
Paul F6EXV


Le 23/09/2020 à 11:10, ja1nlx a écrit :
Paul

Read "Setting up a Second Logger32 INI File" section in Logger32 Help.

73

On 2020/09/23 17:42, Paul F6EXV wrote:
Hi all
I have two different callsigns that I ue daily.
I want the logs to be totally separated, not together in one (with 2 different operators) because statistics would be wrong.
I also wish to set up 2 LogSync and 2 JTDX, so that when I launch L32, both LogSync and JTDX are attached to their respecitive callsigns .
I do not necessarily want these 2 groups of programs to be launched simultabneously.
How can I set 2 shortcuts so they direct to the proper instances ?

Thanks for your help and suggestions.
73
Paul F6EXV
--
L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le logiciel antivirus Avast.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


Re: 2 different calls

Paul F6EXV
 

Thanks for additionjal info.
For example, can I write jtdx.exe --F6EXV and the other one jtdx.exe --F4KMA
Or are the words --rig-name compulsory ?
Thanks + 73
Paul F6EXV

Le 23/09/2020 à 11:39, ja1nlx a écrit :
Make a another Logger32 short cut like

C:\Logger32\Logger32.exe Logger32_Contest

C:\Logger32\Logger32.exe Logger32_TS480  etc

Make another JTDX shortcut using unique rig name like

C:\JTDX64\bin\jtdx.exe --rig-name=K3

C:\JTDX64\bin\jtdx.exe --rig-name=TS480  etc

You can make another setup for each shortcut.

73

On 2020/09/23 18:29, Paul F6EXV wrote:
Hello and thanks for the link.
I am not a geek and I am unable to follow the instructions.
I already have my existing log, with its related instances of LogSync and JTDX (and its JTDX log)
It shows as "Configuration - Default"
I have created another shortcut but it does not show as a different choice.
What am I doing wrong ?
I am using Win10 and version 3.50.422
Thanks + 73
Paul F6EXV


Le 23/09/2020 à 11:10, ja1nlx a écrit :
Paul

Read "Setting up a Second Logger32 INI File" section in Logger32 Help.

73

On 2020/09/23 17:42, Paul F6EXV wrote:
Hi all
I have two different callsigns that I ue daily.
I want the logs to be totally separated, not together in one (with 2 different operators) because statistics would be wrong.
I also wish to set up 2 LogSync and 2 JTDX, so that when I launch L32, both LogSync and JTDX are attached to their respecitive callsigns .
I do not necessarily want these 2 groups of programs to be launched simultabneously.
How can I set 2 shortcuts so they direct to the proper instances ?

Thanks for your help and suggestions.
73
Paul F6EXV
--
L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le logiciel antivirus Avast.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


Re: 2 different calls

ja1nlx
 

Make a another Logger32 short cut like

C:\Logger32\Logger32.exe Logger32_Contest

C:\Logger32\Logger32.exe Logger32_TS480  etc

Make another JTDX shortcut using unique rig name like

C:\JTDX64\bin\jtdx.exe --rig-name=K3

C:\JTDX64\bin\jtdx.exe --rig-name=TS480  etc

You can make another setup for each shortcut.

73

On 2020/09/23 18:29, Paul F6EXV wrote:
Hello and thanks for the link.
I am not a geek and I am unable to follow the instructions.
I already have my existing log, with its related instances of LogSync and JTDX (and its JTDX log)
It shows as "Configuration - Default"
I have created another shortcut but it does not show as a different choice.
What am I doing wrong ?
I am using Win10 and version 3.50.422
Thanks + 73
Paul F6EXV


Le 23/09/2020 à 11:10, ja1nlx a écrit :
Paul

Read "Setting up a Second Logger32 INI File" section in Logger32 Help.

73

On 2020/09/23 17:42, Paul F6EXV wrote:
Hi all
I have two different callsigns that I ue daily.
I want the logs to be totally separated, not together in one (with 2 different operators) because statistics would be wrong.
I also wish to set up 2 LogSync and 2 JTDX, so that when I launch L32, both LogSync and JTDX are attached to their respecitive callsigns .
I do not necessarily want these 2 groups of programs to be launched simultabneously.
How can I set 2 shortcuts so they direct to the proper instances ?

Thanks for your help and suggestions.
73
Paul F6EXV
--
73 de aki
JA1NLX


Re: 2 different calls

F4FQH Olivier
 

 
Hi
 
I have 2 logger32 working at the same time somtimes.
They are installed in different directorys
The name of the .EXE of logger32 must be changed
A JTDX with a configuration for 2 instances (not in my setup)
 
And all is ok
 
73
Olivier
F4FQH
 

From: ja1nlx
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 11:10 AM
To: hamlogger@groups.io
Subject: Re: [hamlogger] 2 different calls
 
Paul

Read "Setting up a Second Logger32 INI File" section in Logger32 Help.

73

On 2020/09/23 17:42, Paul F6EXV wrote:
> Hi all
> I have two different callsigns that I ue daily.
> I want the logs to be totally separated, not together in one (with 2
> different operators) because statistics would be wrong.
> I also wish to set up 2 LogSync and 2 JTDX, so that when I launch L32,
> both LogSync and JTDX are attached to their respecitive callsigns .
> I do not necessarily want these 2 groups of programs to be launched
> simultabneously.
> How can I set 2 shortcuts so they direct to the proper instances ?
>
> Thanks for your help and suggestions.
> 73
> Paul F6EXV
>
--
73 de aki
JA1NLX





Re: 2 different calls

Paul F6EXV
 

Hello and thanks for the link.
I am not a geek and I am unable to follow the instructions.
I already have my existing log, with its related instances of LogSync and JTDX (and its JTDX log)
It shows as "Configuration - Default"
I have created another shortcut but it does not show as a different choice.
What am I doing wrong ?
I am using Win10 and version 3.50.422
Thanks + 73
Paul F6EXV

Le 23/09/2020 à 11:10, ja1nlx a écrit :
Paul

Read "Setting up a Second Logger32 INI File" section in Logger32 Help.

73

On 2020/09/23 17:42, Paul F6EXV wrote:
Hi all
I have two different callsigns that I ue daily.
I want the logs to be totally separated, not together in one (with 2 different operators) because statistics would be wrong.
I also wish to set up 2 LogSync and 2 JTDX, so that when I launch L32, both LogSync and JTDX are attached to their respecitive callsigns .
I do not necessarily want these 2 groups of programs to be launched simultabneously.
How can I set 2 shortcuts so they direct to the proper instances ?

Thanks for your help and suggestions.
73
Paul F6EXV
--
L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le logiciel antivirus Avast.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


Re: 2 different calls

ja1nlx
 

Paul

Read "Setting up a Second Logger32 INI File" section in Logger32 Help.

73

On 2020/09/23 17:42, Paul F6EXV wrote:
Hi all
I have two different callsigns that I ue daily.
I want the logs to be totally separated, not together in one (with 2 different operators) because statistics would be wrong.
I also wish to set up 2 LogSync and 2 JTDX, so that when I launch L32, both LogSync and JTDX are attached to their respecitive callsigns .
I do not necessarily want these 2 groups of programs to be launched simultabneously.
How can I set 2 shortcuts so they direct to the proper instances ?

Thanks for your help and suggestions.
73
Paul F6EXV
--
73 de aki
JA1NLX


2 different calls

Paul F6EXV
 

Hi all
I have two different callsigns that I ue daily.
I want the logs to be totally separated, not together in one (with 2 different operators) because statistics would be wrong.
I also wish to set up 2 LogSync and 2 JTDX, so that when I launch L32, both LogSync and JTDX are attached to their respecitive callsigns .
I do not necessarily want these 2 groups of programs to be launched simultabneously.
How can I set 2 shortcuts so they direct to the proper instances ?

Thanks for your help and suggestions.
73
Paul F6EXV

--
L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le logiciel antivirus Avast.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


Re: LoTW

Luis EA5L
 

Thanks Rick
I'll wait for the next update.
Congratulations on this great software.


A request ...

Bob
 

Hi, this is addressed primarily to Italian and Spanish users ... 
Please do this:

a) Click TOOLS | DATABASE MAINTENANCE | COUNTRY/PREFIX MAINTENANCE. Scroll down to select I or EA. Now click on the row.

b) Look at the list of alternative prefixes. To me, the Offset location is 4worthless/meaningless.

What I would like to see is a list of prefixes that makes sense to me, and all the other International users. So, here is what I'm requesting is that if someone/anyone is interested in improving the quality/usability/intelligibility of the list of prefixes, you collectively work together to develop a new list. If you can do this, I will write a program to update/convert the current database.

The databases in Logger32 are yours to modify. You are provided with working/functional examples only. Enjoy. SeventyThree(s).

PS. To any ZS users who might actually read this. Don't ask for me to change ZS6 from Transvaal to Gauteng. Not in my lifetime. But you are free to change it yourself if you must.


Re: Problem with cluster

F5SZY
 

Thank you very much Dusan for your help.
Best regards . F5SZY / Yves


Re: Problem with cluster

Dusan <ceha@...>
 

HI Yves,

Switch of Kaspersky Secure Connection, start Logger and cluster and then you can start Kaspersky and everything works fine.

73

Dusan YU1EA

 

 

From: hamlogger@groups.io <hamlogger@groups.io> On Behalf Of F5SZY via groups.io
Sent: 22. septembar 2020 11:26
To: hamlogger@groups.io
Subject: Re: [hamlogger] Problem with cluster

 

On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 09:10 PM, Dusan wrote:

TNX for your reply, in the mean I found the problem, when my Kaspersky Secure connection is on, I am having this problem.

Best regards,

Same problème for me also with Kaspersky Secure Connexion ( ON ). Is there a solution ?
I looked into the KSC setup settings but I dont't see or intervene.
Tnx, best regards F5SZY/Yves


Re: LoTW

Rick Ellison
 

Luis

This is correct. There is no means for me to modify the eQSL flags in Logger32 at the moment. Once I get all the bugs worked out of the LOTW upload then I will add the same to eQSL..

 

73 Rick N2AMG

 

From: hamlogger@groups.io [mailto:hamlogger@groups.io] On Behalf Of Luis EA5L via groups.io
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2020 3:26 AM
To: hamlogger@groups.io
Subject: Re: [hamlogger] LoTW

 

Hi Rick,

Logsync marks the qso of lotw as sent but does not mark the eqsl as sent, if it uploads them correctly to eqsl but does not mark them in the L32 logbook, however, if it does so with lotw.

I am doing something wrong?

Thank you

Luis

EA5L


Virus-free. www.avast.com


Re: Problem with cluster

F5SZY
 

On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 09:10 PM, Dusan wrote:

TNX for your reply, in the mean I found the problem, when my Kaspersky Secure connection is on, I am having this problem.

Best regards,

Same problème for me also with Kaspersky Secure Connexion ( ON ). Is there a solution ?
I looked into the KSC setup settings but I dont't see or intervene.
Tnx, best regards F5SZY/Yves


Re: LoTW

Luis EA5L
 
Edited

Hola Rick
Logsync marca el qso de lotw como enviado pero no marca el eqsl como enviado, si los carga correctamente a eqsl pero no los marca en el libro de registro L32, sin embargo, si lo hace con lotw.
Estoy haciendo algo mal?
Gracias
Luis
EA5L


Re: LoTW

Rick Ellison
 

The next time you do an upload turn Debug On. Then do the upload and after it is done turn Debug back Off. In the logsync directory you will find the DebugLog.txt file send that to me directly as an attachment..

73 Rick N2AMG

-----Original Message-----
From: hamlogger@groups.io [mailto:hamlogger@groups.io] On Behalf Of Paul F6EXV
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 10:59 AM
To: hamlogger@groups.io
Subject: Re: [hamlogger] LoTW

Hi Rick
Thanks for responding.
Actually, I do not know if the problem lies in L32 or in LogSynch...
The QSOs are indeed uploaded, but they do not show as such in L32.
Any idea ?
73
Paul F6EXV

Le 21/09/2020 à 16:56, Rick Ellison a écrit :
Paul..
Nothing has changed are you sure you are using the latest version?? I am working on a way to try and speed the process up but that version has not been released yet..In versions previous to the last one you had to tick the message box to mark them as sent but in the latest version you should not need to answer yes to that box and the flags will be changed when they are actually updated..

73 Rick N2AMG

-----Original Message-----
From: hamlogger@groups.io [mailto:hamlogger@groups.io] On Behalf Of Paul F6EXV
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 6:10 AM
To: hamlogger@groups.io
Subject: [hamlogger] LoTW

Hi all
When I upload a QSO through L32 LogSynch, it is not updated as sent on the log page, even though it really is sent.
This used to work flawlessly. I now have to manually tick off the "Send LoTW QSL", and tick on the "LoTW QSL sent".
I have re-installed L32 LogSynch, no change.
Both programs talk to each other.

Unless I am a sleep-walker, I have not changed anything in the configuration.
Any idea ?
Thanks + 73
Paul F6EXV

--
L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le logiciel antivirus Avast.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus







--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus






--
L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le logiciel antivirus Avast.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus







--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


Re: LoTW

Paul F6EXV
 

Hi Rick
Thanks for responding.
Actually, I do not know if the problem lies in L32 or in LogSynch...
The QSOs are indeed uploaded, but they do not show as such in L32.
Any idea ?
73
Paul F6EXV

Le 21/09/2020 à 16:56, Rick Ellison a écrit :
Paul..
Nothing has changed are you sure you are using the latest version?? I am working on a way to try and speed the process up but that version has not been released yet..In versions previous to the last one you had to tick the message box to mark them as sent but in the latest version you should not need to answer yes to that box and the flags will be changed when they are actually updated..

73 Rick N2AMG

-----Original Message-----
From: hamlogger@groups.io [mailto:hamlogger@groups.io] On Behalf Of Paul F6EXV
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 6:10 AM
To: hamlogger@groups.io
Subject: [hamlogger] LoTW

Hi all
When I upload a QSO through L32 LogSynch, it is not updated as sent on the log page, even though it really is sent.
This used to work flawlessly. I now have to manually tick off the "Send LoTW QSL", and tick on the "LoTW QSL sent".
I have re-installed L32 LogSynch, no change.
Both programs talk to each other.

Unless I am a sleep-walker, I have not changed anything in the configuration.
Any idea ?
Thanks + 73
Paul F6EXV

--
L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le logiciel antivirus Avast.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus







--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus




--
L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le logiciel antivirus Avast.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


Re: LoTW

Rick Ellison
 

Paul..
Nothing has changed are you sure you are using the latest version?? I am working on a way to try and speed the process up but that version has not been released yet..In versions previous to the last one you had to tick the message box to mark them as sent but in the latest version you should not need to answer yes to that box and the flags will be changed when they are actually updated..

73 Rick N2AMG

-----Original Message-----
From: hamlogger@groups.io [mailto:hamlogger@groups.io] On Behalf Of Paul F6EXV
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 6:10 AM
To: hamlogger@groups.io
Subject: [hamlogger] LoTW

Hi all
When I upload a QSO through L32 LogSynch, it is not updated as sent on the log page, even though it really is sent.
This used to work flawlessly. I now have to manually tick off the "Send LoTW QSL", and tick on the "LoTW QSL sent".
I have re-installed L32 LogSynch, no change.
Both programs talk to each other.

Unless I am a sleep-walker, I have not changed anything in the configuration.
Any idea ?
Thanks + 73
Paul F6EXV

--
L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le logiciel antivirus Avast.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus







--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

961 - 980 of 82114