|
Re: Call copy to "DX Call" from UDP bandmap?
Markku, the question was Why you need copy/paste callsign? How would copy/paste of the callsign from the UDPBandMap help the situation describe? What would you do after the copy/paste?
Markku, the question was Why you need copy/paste callsign? How would copy/paste of the callsign from the UDPBandMap help the situation describe? What would you do after the copy/paste?
|
By
Bob
·
#79920
·
|
|
Re: Call copy to "DX Call" from UDP bandmap?
Hi Aki,
Often times you don't copy all of what a DX sends and then it makes more sense to call even if you don't see the end of a QSO.
Secondly, many, MANY DX never send 73 or RR73, they only send
Hi Aki,
Often times you don't copy all of what a DX sends and then it makes more sense to call even if you don't see the end of a QSO.
Secondly, many, MANY DX never send 73 or RR73, they only send
|
By
Markku Oksanen
·
#79919
·
|
|
Re: Call copy to "DX Call" from UDP bandmap?
Markku
Just click any callsign you want to work. When he sends CQ/73/RR73 then
jtdx will call him automatically. Why you need copy/paste callsign ?
73
--
73 de
Markku
Just click any callsign you want to work. When he sends CQ/73/RR73 then
jtdx will call him automatically. Why you need copy/paste callsign ?
73
--
73 de
|
By
ja1nlx
·
#79918
·
|
|
Call copy to "DX Call" from UDP bandmap?
All,
Is there a way to copy a needed call from the UDP bandmap to the DX Call field of JTDX by clicking or something else on the call on the bandmap?
Thanks!
Markku
OH2RA
All,
Is there a way to copy a needed call from the UDP bandmap to the DX Call field of JTDX by clicking or something else on the call on the bandmap?
Thanks!
Markku
OH2RA
|
By
Markku Oksanen
·
#79917
·
|
|
Re: Worked/Confirmed window: SAT qso not showing up? - Workaround does not allow LOTW upload!!
There is also a second issue by using PROP_MODE = "sat" instead of "SAT". The statistics in Logger32 are no more OK. The QSO are NOT listed under DXCC_SAT but are included in standard DXCC_CW, SSB,
There is also a second issue by using PROP_MODE = "sat" instead of "SAT". The statistics in Logger32 are no more OK. The QSO are NOT listed under DXCC_SAT but are included in standard DXCC_CW, SSB,
|
By
Alessandro I2SVA
·
#79916
·
|
|
Re: Worked/Confirmed window: SAT qso not showing up? - Workaround does not allow LOTW upload!!
Hi Bob,
although the workaround works in LOGGER32, unfortunately ARRL LOTW refuse to load QSO with PRO_MODE = sat (lower letters). It seems only SAT in CAPITAL letters is accepted, the QSO cannot be
Hi Bob,
although the workaround works in LOGGER32, unfortunately ARRL LOTW refuse to load QSO with PRO_MODE = sat (lower letters). It seems only SAT in CAPITAL letters is accepted, the QSO cannot be
|
By
Alessandro I2SVA
·
#79915
·
|
|
Re: USB-D for FT8 on TS-890
Very true Jan.
My post was based on using the image I posted earlier of my own Band/Mode Plan as an example.
Just trying to make sure folk are aware of the different behaviour of the "Band/Mode
Very true Jan.
My post was based on using the image I posted earlier of my own Band/Mode Plan as an example.
Just trying to make sure folk are aware of the different behaviour of the "Band/Mode
|
By
John Munton - G7SSE
·
#79914
·
|
|
Re: USB-D for FT8 on TS-890
Hi John
When I put 14.074 in the callsign field here the radio (IC7300) switches to USB-D and the mode in Logger changes to FT8
When I put in 7.030 the radio changes to CW and
Hi John
When I put 14.074 in the callsign field here the radio (IC7300) switches to USB-D and the mode in Logger changes to FT8
When I put in 7.030 the radio changes to CW and
|
By
Jan
·
#79913
·
|
|
Re: USB-D for FT8 on TS-890
You're very welcome Raul.
If I might add, just in case anyone is not aware (and to cover my rear in case anyone starts logging their modes incorrectly)
The "Band/Mode Selection" options (shown in
You're very welcome Raul.
If I might add, just in case anyone is not aware (and to cover my rear in case anyone starts logging their modes incorrectly)
The "Band/Mode Selection" options (shown in
|
By
John Munton - G7SSE
·
#79912
·
|
|
Re: CW Machine & FTdx101D
Hi Phil;
Many thanks for your suggestion.
I am using the CW Machine built-in keyer, not an external keyer such as microHAM. It is direct PC keying (which works fine with N1MM+ with PC keying in
Hi Phil;
Many thanks for your suggestion.
I am using the CW Machine built-in keyer, not an external keyer such as microHAM. It is direct PC keying (which works fine with N1MM+ with PC keying in
|
By
Duncan Fisken
·
#79911
·
|
|
Re: CW Machine & FTdx101D
HI Duncan
My settings may help – it depends what you are using to provide the keying to the radio. Here is what I have set up working well with an FT101MP and Bob’s good ‘ole Logger 32 CW
HI Duncan
My settings may help – it depends what you are using to provide the keying to the radio. Here is what I have set up working well with an FT101MP and Bob’s good ‘ole Logger 32 CW
|
By
Philip (G4OBK) Catterall
·
#79910
·
|
|
Re: USB-D for FT8 on TS-890
So how do you folks doing frequency control from logger32 instead of jtdx do split within the FT8 3000 Hz?
Jim Altman
jaltman636@...
So how do you folks doing frequency control from logger32 instead of jtdx do split within the FT8 3000 Hz?
Jim Altman
jaltman636@...
|
By
Jim Altman
·
#79909
·
|
|
Re: USB-D for FT8 on TS-890
Thanks so much John, my IC-7300 work very well now!!!!
Also thank you Felipe for the Help.
Adding this pictures to the "Help on-line" will support for the ICOM users.
Thanks
Thanks so much John, my IC-7300 work very well now!!!!
Also thank you Felipe for the Help.
Adding this pictures to the "Help on-line" will support for the ICOM users.
Thanks
|
By
LU3VA
·
#79908
·
|
|
Re: CW Machine & FTdx101D
Hi Jan;
Those are the settings I am already using... Still no carrier transmitted.
73,
Duncan, G3WZD
Hi Jan;
Those are the settings I am already using... Still no carrier transmitted.
73,
Duncan, G3WZD
|
By
Duncan Fisken
·
#79907
·
|
|
Re: CW Machine & FTdx101D
Hi Jan;
Many thanks.. I will go check and see if this works!!
73,
Duncan, G3WZD
From: <hamlogger@groups.io> on behalf of Jan <hamlogger@...>
Reply to: "hamlogger@groups.io"
Hi Jan;
Many thanks.. I will go check and see if this works!!
73,
Duncan, G3WZD
From: <hamlogger@groups.io> on behalf of Jan <hamlogger@...>
Reply to: "hamlogger@groups.io"
|
By
Duncan Fisken
·
#79906
·
|
|
Re: CW Machine & FTdx101D
Hi Duncan
First let me tell you that I do not have the FTDX101D
But maybe my setup for the IC7300 will workt as well.
A have the CW machine set using the software (No
Hi Duncan
First let me tell you that I do not have the FTDX101D
But maybe my setup for the IC7300 will workt as well.
A have the CW machine set using the software (No
|
By
Jan
·
#79905
·
|
|
CW Machine & FTdx101D
Hi all;
I am looking for some assistance in getting CW Machine to work with the my 101. Logger 32, in every other respect, is working fine and so is communicating OK with the radio. I can use my
Hi all;
I am looking for some assistance in getting CW Machine to work with the my 101. Logger 32, in every other respect, is working fine and so is communicating OK with the radio. I can use my
|
By
Duncan Fisken
·
#79904
·
|
|
Re: USB-D for FT8 on TS-890
Bellow is where it should be updated. Also on page 419 and 975, USB-D1 should be added.
Bellow is where it should be updated. Also on page 419 and 975, USB-D1 should be added.
|
By
Filipe Lopes
·
#79903
·
|
|
Re: USB-D for FT8 on TS-890
Sure Filipe, go right ahead.
--
73, John - G7SSE
Sure Filipe, go right ahead.
--
73, John - G7SSE
|
By
John Munton - G7SSE
·
#79902
·
|
|
Re: USB-D for FT8 on TS-890
Filipe
Which section ? Kenwood General ?
Thanks
--
73 de aki
JA1NLX
Filipe
Which section ? Kenwood General ?
Thanks
--
73 de aki
JA1NLX
|
By
ja1nlx
·
#79901
·
|