Gary, Did you write this? de KB2SSE - Ken

… to support this new log file standard, Bob? 73 Gary ZL2iFB

There are plenty of opinions and rules but no overall consensus regarding what constitutes a QSO. And that's the point. Whatever we may think individually, we can't guarantee our QSO partners are

... all of the rhetoric and hyperbole notwithstanding, is it really A QSO 73 or RR73 or not? How far have we lowered the bar? Limbo dancing competitions have a lot to learn from Amateur Radio.

Hi Bob, I operate JTDX outside LOGGER32 using JTALERT. There is a small program called socat that works with JTALERT. If I make a contact and it is completed with a 73 or RR73, JtDX is set to

Hi, Example: DXped: CQ XXxXX UP VP8NO calls in pileup (my call only) DXped: VP8NO 59(9) VP8NO R 59(9) TU DXped: XXxXX UP Valid QSO? 80 to 100+ thousand stations logged think so. FT8 from the

Hello, Yes 73 means all the best. But for me here HR5/F2JD, any station without the (WSJT) 73 is without confirmation so.... NOT in the LOG 73 Gerard HR5/F2JD

Markku my 2 cents for you... Simply "Double click" any callsign in jtdx whenever you want to call him. It works even if it is in Cherry-picking/Manual calling mode of course.

73 is not a confirmation. A confirmation is QSL or cfm. 73 means all de best. 73 Jan PA4JJ Op 4-5-2020 om 21:43 schreef Ian Morrison: --

Ian, I'm not sure what you're asking for. I haven't checked, but I suspect WSJT always prompts the user to log the QSO (In Logger32 there is a user option which overrides the popup window if so

If a change is made, I request that the automatic logging of qso, not acknowledged, be user selectable. I do not want to log a qso unless it has bee confirmed by a 73. Ian Ve3ep Sent from

Hi Markku. First off, contrary to your assertion, I see VERY FEW (hardly any!) stations on FT8 ending QSOs without sending RR73 or 73. Sometimes those messages are late (they occasionally get

Markku, I'd be very interested in seeing how someone else has been able to do what you describe. SeventyThree(s).

Bob I simply want to call the station on the UDP bandmap in a way similar to any contest SW. No rules or conditions preventing this. BR Markku

Ian, Darl, I have done my fair share of contesting both CW and phone and I hear your you loud and clear. However there are sooooo many DX that just don't confirm QSOs and it is really not up to me to

Hi, You of course can log anyway you wish, BUT you will never work a contest since they don’t generally say 73. A contact is made when signal reports are given and acknowledged. Nothing more for

I may be a purist, but I believe if you do not receive a 73 the contact is invalid. I do not log it so the DX station will not get confirmation of the call. 73, Ian Ve3ep Sent from Mail for

Markku, the UDP messages between WSJT/JTDX and an external program (Logger32) are very limited. There three that relate to QSOs - 1) Tell WSJT/JTDX to turn off TxEnabled (not what you

So is anyone going to answer my inquiry? How do you do split doing it that way? Jim Altman jaltman636@...

Hi Bob, I am not sure if my email is clear enough. As things stand, ONLY if Logger32 detects the predetermined 73 or RR73 or CQ, the call is transferred to JTDX. I would like to simply click on the