Date   

Re: 5 questions

ja1nlx
 

Radhames


Regarding Question 4

If you are using ver1.08 and see problem, then send your logbook adi

in ZIP format directly to me.


73


On 2020/01/21 7:20, HI3B Radhames wrote:
Hi all L32 users:

An inexperienced ask these silly questions:

1. Why  L32 not able to always display the DX spots, despite being connected to VE6DXC? CAT works fine. Making a right-click over the VE6DXC at the bottom, shows that it is connected.

2. Is it possible to have other sources available for DX spots, other than VE6DXC?

3 For what reason  I only have comm port 3 available?

4. Why does the SUMMARYQSObyMode utility only show a few years through 1992 to 2009 (9,367 contacts) when I have many thousands QSOs logged from 1978? (16,704)

5. What to do to have other ports that could be used with L32 and other applications, simultaneously?

Sorry, but I haven't found the exact information in the Help manual in Spanish

Thanks in advance.

73,

Radhames, HI3B



--
HI3B
--
73 de aki
JA1NLX


5 questions

HI3B Radhames
 

Hi all L32 users:

An inexperienced ask these silly questions:

1. Why  L32 not able to always display the DX spots, despite being connected to VE6DXC? CAT works fine. Making a right-click over the VE6DXC at the bottom, shows that it is connected.

2. Is it possible to have other sources available for DX spots, other than VE6DXC?

3 For what reason  I only have comm port 3 available?

4. Why does the SUMMARYQSObyMode utility only show a few years through 1992 to 2009 (9,367 contacts) when I have many thousands QSOs logged from 1978? (16,704)

5. What to do to have other ports that could be used with L32 and other applications, simultaneously?

Sorry, but I haven't found the exact information in the Help manual in Spanish

Thanks in advance.

73,

Radhames, HI3B



--
HI3B


Re: Logbook...where is it?

David Perry <bumbledp@...>
 

It WAS  hidden.  Find lost windows sorted it.  Thank you

D


Re: Logbook...where is it?

Bob
 

Along the top of the main Window there is a row of buttons. Put the mouse over the 5th button from the left. The Tooltip should say LOGBOOK PAGE WINDOW. Click it. If the window does not appear, then maybe it's hidden behind another window. Click VIEw | FIND LOST WINDOWS. Look down the list of open windows for LOGBOOKPAGE ... Check the entry and click FIND. SeventyThree(s).

On January 20, 2020 at 4:36 PM David Perry <bumbledp@...> wrote:

Hi guys.

Today I started using L32 for the first time but I cant seem to find my logbook page.   I've made qso and entered then alright but I cant find the logbook page now.

What menu item.is it to view the log please?

David G4YVM 

 


Re: "As for WSJT files, if you load the QSOs in real-time using the UDP message interface, you can auto-look up the callsign and retrieve name and state."

Bob
 

... not quite ... First, on the UDP BandMap window, click CONFIG and check the ENABLE CALLSIGN LOOKUP WHEN CLICKING ON WJT/JTDX. Now, when you double click on a callsign on WSJT/JTDX Band Activity window, the Logbook Entry Window in Logger32 will be populated with the callsign. Then, automagically the Callsign lookup will complete and populate the Logbook Entry Window with additional information (if you're lucky). SeventyThree(s).

On January 20, 2020 at 4:30 PM Gary Wilson <k2gw@...> wrote:

I kind of have the same issue.  Please clarify this first step:

"When you type W5IDX in Logbook entry window, do you see auto lookup window ?

 

and Name, State etc are populated in Logbook entry window ?"

I do, but they only after I hit "return".  Is that what you mean? Or should they instantly fill in?

 


 


Logbook...where is it?

David Perry <bumbledp@...>
 

Hi guys.

Today I started using L32 for the first time but I cant seem to find my logbook page.   I've made qso and entered then alright but I cant find the logbook page now.

What menu item.is it to view the log please?

David G4YVM 


Re: One page with all information for one contact

Bob
 

Svein, OK now I understand what you're looking for. Sorry, no plans to add that functionality/capability. Thans for the suggestion. SeventyThree(s).

On January 20, 2020 at 3:31 PM Svein Henriksen <la3pu@...> wrote:

Bob,

 

I do know and use all of those windows and also the Edit XXXX modes.

The logbook window is naturally in spread sheet form.

When clicking on a registered QSO, I would like all the data for fields to be displayed in a form type display for this one contact.

I have this in some databases of my own implemented in ACCESS.

Like when you use the Add QSO function, but with all the fields populated or not.

This would be nice when looking at, editing and or reviewing a specific QSO.

I still tend to get a lot of QSL cards and I like to enter all the information on there; like for example IOTA, DOK, the Japanese Guns etc.....

It is easier to do updates of multiple fields in a form type presentation.

Since there are so many field it is now necessary to scroll sideways forth and back.

I can of course rearrange the columns in the logbook window to have the one I use the most in view on the screen.

 

It was just a thought. Not really important to me, but thanks for considering my request. J

 

73 de LA3PU

Svein

 

 

From: hamlogger@groups.io [mailto:hamlogger@groups.io] On Behalf Of Bob
Sent: 19. januar 2020 21:44
To: hamlogger@groups.io
Subject: Re: [hamlogger] One page with all information for one contact

 

I'm not sure exactly what you're asking for. See the picture ... Iclicked on the SM5AQD QSO in the Logbook Page Window. The Previous QSOs Window shows all QSOs with SM5AQD. The Callsign Lookup window opened with current SM5AQD information. If there was information I wanted/needed to add to the SM5AQD QSO, I can click the UPDATE QSO menu on the Callsign Lookup Window. SeventyThree(s).

 

On January 19, 2020 at 3:11 PM Svein Henriksen <la3pu@...> wrote:

Bob,

 

I wonder if you have considered or would consider introducing a function whereby clicking on one contact would bring up all information for this QSO in one window.

I personally think it is easier to edit and add information in this way instead of having one long line.

Of course there are the “Edit Notes” etc... but.....

No big deal, I was just wondering if this had been considered at all.

 

73 de LA3PU

Svein

 


 

 



 


Re: "As for WSJT files, if you load the QSOs in real-time using the UDP message interface, you can auto-look up the callsign and retrieve name and state."

Gary Wilson <k2gw@...>
 

I kind of have the same issue.  Please clarify this first step:

"When you type W5IDX in Logbook entry window, do you see auto lookup window ?

 

and Name, State etc are populated in Logbook entry window ?"

I do, but they only after I hit "return".  Is that what you mean? Or should they instantly fill in?

 


Re: One page with all information for one contact

Svein Henriksen
 

Bob,

 

I do know and use all of those windows and also the Edit XXXX modes.

The logbook window is naturally in spread sheet form.

When clicking on a registered QSO, I would like all the data for fields to be displayed in a form type display for this one contact.

I have this in some databases of my own implemented in ACCESS.

Like when you use the Add QSO function, but with all the fields populated or not.

This would be nice when looking at, editing and or reviewing a specific QSO.

I still tend to get a lot of QSL cards and I like to enter all the information on there; like for example IOTA, DOK, the Japanese Guns etc.....

It is easier to do updates of multiple fields in a form type presentation.

Since there are so many field it is now necessary to scroll sideways forth and back.

I can of course rearrange the columns in the logbook window to have the one I use the most in view on the screen.

 

It was just a thought. Not really important to me, but thanks for considering my request. J

 

73 de LA3PU

Svein

 

 

From: hamlogger@groups.io [mailto:hamlogger@groups.io] On Behalf Of Bob
Sent: 19. januar 2020 21:44
To: hamlogger@groups.io
Subject: Re: [hamlogger] One page with all information for one contact

 

I'm not sure exactly what you're asking for. See the picture ... Iclicked on the SM5AQD QSO in the Logbook Page Window. The Previous QSOs Window shows all QSOs with SM5AQD. The Callsign Lookup window opened with current SM5AQD information. If there was information I wanted/needed to add to the SM5AQD QSO, I can click the UPDATE QSO menu on the Callsign Lookup Window. SeventyThree(s).

 

On January 19, 2020 at 3:11 PM Svein Henriksen <la3pu@...> wrote:

Bob,

 

I wonder if you have considered or would consider introducing a function whereby clicking on one contact would bring up all information for this QSO in one window.

I personally think it is easier to edit and add information in this way instead of having one long line.

Of course there are the “Edit Notes” etc... but.....

No big deal, I was just wondering if this had been considered at all.

 

73 de LA3PU

Svein

 


 


Re: HAM & SWL

Giuseppe Giunta
 

Ciao a tutti,

grazie Bob & Pete!

And many thanks to the whole group of developers for this piece of "jewel software"! :-)

Giu, IT9VDQ


Il 20/01/2020 00:31, n5kd ha scritto:
You can have multiple .ini files for different page layouts.

73’ Pete, N5KD.

Sent from my mobile

On Jan 19, 2020, at 13:21, Bob <k4cy@...> wrote:

The IT9VDQ logbook, and any other logbook you create using the Logger32.INI will have the structure your have configured in the Logger32.INI.  The same applies to your IT969339 logbook, it's structure will be from the SWL.INI. SeventyThree(s).
On January 19, 2020 at 1:57 PM Giuseppe Giunta <it9vdq@...> wrote:

Ciao everybody,

I decided to resume my SWL activity as IT9-60339, started in far 1974, and to add it to the poor OM activity that I'm actually able to do ... I obviously need a suitable software. To do this, after reading the help of Logger32, I created on the desktop a second .INI shortcut to Logger32.exe, naming it "C:\Logger32\Logger32.exe SWL". Opening Logger32 by this link, I created a new database, named "IT960339".

Actually the database is empty, because I have not imported my +/- 300 HRDs yet, from another software/paper. However, my Logger32 configured years ago with the IT9VDQ callsign, would need some modifications to make it suitable for a SWL, namely: one field for "Station listened" and another for "Report listened". My idea is to use "User_1" and "User_2" to add these two additional new fields, which are needed to register a valid HRD (say Call-HRD Call-in-Qso RST-1 RST-2). My (probably stupid) question is: if I play the double activity as IT9VDQ and IT960339 as SWL, jumping from one log to the another, will the different structural settings of the maps of each individual log be kept?

Trying to better explain: when I go from IT9VDQ (Date Call RSTs RSTr etc) to IT960339 (Date Call-HRD Call-in-Qso RST-1 RST-2 etc), will each of the two different structures be maintained?

Grazie, 73 de Giu, IT9VDQ



 


Re: HAM & SWL

n5kd
 

You can have multiple .ini files for different page layouts.

73’ Pete, N5KD.

Sent from my mobile

On Jan 19, 2020, at 13:21, Bob <k4cy@...> wrote:

The IT9VDQ logbook, and any other logbook you create using the Logger32.INI will have the structure your have configured in the Logger32.INI.  The same applies to your IT969339 logbook, it's structure will be from the SWL.INI. SeventyThree(s).
On January 19, 2020 at 1:57 PM Giuseppe Giunta <it9vdq@...> wrote:

Ciao everybody,

I decided to resume my SWL activity as IT9-60339, started in far 1974, and to add it to the poor OM activity that I'm actually able to do ... I obviously need a suitable software. To do this, after reading the help of Logger32, I created on the desktop a second .INI shortcut to Logger32.exe, naming it "C:\Logger32\Logger32.exe SWL". Opening Logger32 by this link, I created a new database, named "IT960339".

Actually the database is empty, because I have not imported my +/- 300 HRDs yet, from another software/paper. However, my Logger32 configured years ago with the IT9VDQ callsign, would need some modifications to make it suitable for a SWL, namely: one field for "Station listened" and another for "Report listened". My idea is to use "User_1" and "User_2" to add these two additional new fields, which are needed to register a valid HRD (say Call-HRD Call-in-Qso RST-1 RST-2). My (probably stupid) question is: if I play the double activity as IT9VDQ and IT960339 as SWL, jumping from one log to the another, will the different structural settings of the maps of each individual log be kept?

Trying to better explain: when I go from IT9VDQ (Date Call RSTs RSTr etc) to IT960339 (Date Call-HRD Call-in-Qso RST-1 RST-2 etc), will each of the two different structures be maintained?

Grazie, 73 de Giu, IT9VDQ



 


Re: Best way to change eQSL received

keith hotchkiss
 

Cancel last I have uploaded a backup which has sorted the issue.


Re: One page with all information for one contact

Bob
 

I'm not sure exactly what you're asking for. See the picture ... Iclicked on the SM5AQD QSO in the Logbook Page Window. The Previous QSOs Window shows all QSOs with SM5AQD. The Callsign Lookup window opened with current SM5AQD information. If there was information I wanted/needed to add to the SM5AQD QSO, I can click the UPDATE QSO menu on the Callsign Lookup Window. SeventyThree(s).


On January 19, 2020 at 3:11 PM Svein Henriksen <la3pu@...> wrote:

Bob,

 

I wonder if you have considered or would consider introducing a function whereby clicking on one contact would bring up all information for this QSO in one window.

I personally think it is easier to edit and add information in this way instead of having one long line.

Of course there are the “Edit Notes” etc... but.....

No big deal, I was just wondering if this had been considered at all.

 

73 de LA3PU

Svein

 


 


Best way to change eQSL received

keith hotchkiss
 

A recent download of my eQSL received was uploaded to my logger32. It has marked all of my QSOs as receiving a eQSL which isn't the case. Anyone direct me towards the easiest way of changing all eQSL results from Yes to No so I can try again., I really dont want to go through every QSO and untick the eQSO received tab.


One page with all information for one contact

Svein Henriksen
 

Bob,

 

I wonder if you have considered or would consider introducing a function whereby clicking on one contact would bring up all information for this QSO in one window.

I personally think it is easier to edit and add information in this way instead of having one long line.

Of course there are the “Edit Notes” etc... but.....

No big deal, I was just wondering if this had been considered at all.

 

73 de LA3PU

Svein

 


Re: HAM & SWL

Bob
 

The IT9VDQ logbook, and any other logbook you create using the Logger32.INI will have the structure your have configured in the Logger32.INI.  The same applies to your IT969339 logbook, it's structure will be from the SWL.INI. SeventyThree(s).

On January 19, 2020 at 1:57 PM Giuseppe Giunta <it9vdq@...> wrote:

Ciao everybody,

I decided to resume my SWL activity as IT9-60339, started in far 1974, and to add it to the poor OM activity that I'm actually able to do ... I obviously need a suitable software. To do this, after reading the help of Logger32, I created on the desktop a second .INI shortcut to Logger32.exe, naming it "C:\Logger32\Logger32.exe SWL". Opening Logger32 by this link, I created a new database, named "IT960339".

Actually the database is empty, because I have not imported my +/- 300 HRDs yet, from another software/paper. However, my Logger32 configured years ago with the IT9VDQ callsign, would need some modifications to make it suitable for a SWL, namely: one field for "Station listened" and another for "Report listened". My idea is to use "User_1" and "User_2" to add these two additional new fields, which are needed to register a valid HRD (say Call-HRD Call-in-Qso RST-1 RST-2). My (probably stupid) question is: if I play the double activity as IT9VDQ and IT960339 as SWL, jumping from one log to the another, will the different structural settings of the maps of each individual log be kept?

Trying to better explain: when I go from IT9VDQ (Date Call RSTs RSTr etc) to IT960339 (Date Call-HRD Call-in-Qso RST-1 RST-2 etc), will each of the two different structures be maintained?

Grazie, 73 de Giu, IT9VDQ



 


HAM & SWL

Giuseppe Giunta
 

Ciao everybody,

I decided to resume my SWL activity as IT9-60339, started in far 1974, and to add it to the poor OM activity that I'm actually able to do ... I obviously need a suitable software. To do this, after reading the help of Logger32, I created on the desktop a second .INI shortcut to Logger32.exe, naming it "C:\Logger32\Logger32.exe SWL". Opening Logger32 by this link, I created a new database, named "IT960339".

Actually the database is empty, because I have not imported my +/- 300 HRDs yet, from another software/paper. However, my Logger32 configured years ago with the IT9VDQ callsign, would need some modifications to make it suitable for a SWL, namely: one field for "Station listened" and another for "Report listened". My idea is to use "User_1" and "User_2" to add these two additional new fields, which are needed to register a valid HRD (say Call-HRD Call-in-Qso RST-1 RST-2). My (probably stupid) question is: if I play the double activity as IT9VDQ and IT960339 as SWL, jumping from one log to the another, will the different structural settings of the maps of each individual log be kept?

Trying to better explain: when I go from IT9VDQ (Date Call RSTs RSTr etc) to IT960339 (Date Call-HRD Call-in-Qso RST-1 RST-2 etc), will each of the two different structures be maintained?

Grazie, 73 de Giu, IT9VDQ



Re: How to switch off GoList Lookup

Tibor OM2GM
 

Many thanks, it was simple....


Re: Logger 32 'Grid' disappeared

John Munton - G7SSE
 

Ok Bob, thanks.

73(s) John - G7SSE

------ Original Message ------
From: "Bob" <k4cy@...>
Sent: 18/01/2020 11:35:38
Subject: Re: [hamlogger] Logger 32 'Grid' disappeared

John, in the case you refer to, turns out no entries in the BandPlan were set to show stats. And that's what was shown. SeventyThree(s).
On January 18, 2020 at 6:27 AM John Munton - G7SSE <johng7sse@...> wrote:

https://www.eham.net/forum/view?id=topic%2C128235.0.html

Came across the above. Not sure if Jim is a member of this group and I'll suggest he joins but can anyone can offer any help to resolve his problem?

"If anyone has experience with Logger 32, I would appreciate any help.   Yesterday, after an upgrade, my grid of data just disappeared.   Only a grey screen and top bar remains.  All of the files remain...  I tried to download the latest version 3.50.405 I believe. But no luck. still only a grey block and nothing inside it.   Any Thoughts?    73 All, Jim - KD1I"

John - G7SSE

 


Re: Logger 32 'Grid' disappeared

Bob
 

John, in the case you refer to, turns out no entries in the BandPlan were set to show stats. And that's what was shown. SeventyThree(s).

On January 18, 2020 at 6:27 AM John Munton - G7SSE <johng7sse@...> wrote:

https://www.eham.net/forum/view?id=topic%2C128235.0.html

Came across the above. Not sure if Jim is a member of this group and I'll suggest he joins but can anyone can offer any help to resolve his problem?

"If anyone has experience with Logger 32, I would appreciate any help.   Yesterday, after an upgrade, my grid of data just disappeared.   Only a grey screen and top bar remains.  All of the files remain...  I tried to download the latest version 3.50.405 I believe. But no luck. still only a grey block and nothing inside it.   Any Thoughts?    73 All, Jim - KD1I"

John - G7SSE

 

6021 - 6040 of 84644