Date   

Re: 3.50.386 auto-update ...

Ken McVie <kenmc@...>
 

Agree!!!

73
Ken ZL4NR

On 19/05/2019 5:55 PM, Gary Hinson wrote:

😊

 

Thanks, Bob, for second-guessing the ADIF-meisters …. and, well, for everything really.

 

I wonder how many L32 users appreciate just how much painstaking work goes on behind the scenes to maintain and enhance the software, fix bugs, tweak stuff and all for free. 

 

You’re “awesome” as we Kiwis say.

73

Gary  ZL2iFB

 

 

From: hamlogger@groups.io <hamlogger@groups.io> On Behalf Of Bob
Sent: 19 May 2019 14:17
To: hamlogger@groups.io
Subject: [hamlogger] 3.50.386 auto-update ...

 

 

Johann was a wise man. In todays wired world, he may well have said "Life is too short to drink bad wine, or wait for ADIF to make public their decision as to what exactly FT4 is - a mode or submode". My buddy Julian Assange tells me it has been decreed that FT4 is a submode of MFSK. A closely held secret apparently. Pure speculation on my part, but I suggest they are reluctant to make any public proclamation as it would be a tacit acknowledgement that they screwed up big time when FT8 was given the much coveted mode status ... but wait, the subterfuge has just begun ... how will they undo all the other incorrectly assigned modes/submodes and maintain even a modicum of credibility? ... the spin doctors will be out in force ...

 

Based on the information provided by Julian (he hasn't let me down yet), I will preempt any formal announcement by ADIF, and release Logger32 v3.50.386 on Monday. SeventyThree(s).



Re: 3.50.386 auto-update ...

Barry GM4GIF
 

Gary/Bob
We certainly do appreciate it, however we grownups leave the amusing comments to the ‘Chattering Classes’ hi
Keep quaffing the Grouse Bob, helps my pension pot !!!

73
Barry / gm4gif


On Sun, 19 May 2019 at 06:55, Gary Hinson <Gary@...> wrote:

😊

 

Thanks, Bob, for second-guessing the ADIF-meisters …. and, well, for everything really.

 

I wonder how many L32 users appreciate just how much painstaking work goes on behind the scenes to maintain and enhance the software, fix bugs, tweak stuff and all for free. 

 

You’re “awesome” as we Kiwis say.

73

Gary  ZL2iFB

 

 

From: hamlogger@groups.io <hamlogger@groups.io> On Behalf Of Bob
Sent: 19 May 2019 14:17
To: hamlogger@groups.io
Subject: [hamlogger] 3.50.386 auto-update ...

 

 

Johann was a wise man. In todays wired world, he may well have said "Life is too short to drink bad wine, or wait for ADIF to make public their decision as to what exactly FT4 is - a mode or submode". My buddy Julian Assange tells me it has been decreed that FT4 is a submode of MFSK. A closely held secret apparently. Pure speculation on my part, but I suggest they are reluctant to make any public proclamation as it would be a tacit acknowledgement that they screwed up big time when FT8 was given the much coveted mode status ... but wait, the subterfuge has just begun ... how will they undo all the other incorrectly assigned modes/submodes and maintain even a modicum of credibility? ... the spin doctors will be out in force ...

 

Based on the information provided by Julian (he hasn't let me down yet), I will preempt any formal announcement by ADIF, and release Logger32 v3.50.386 on Monday. SeventyThree(s).

--
Air 2


Re: Worked/Confirmed window: SAT qso not showing up?

Alessandro I2SVA
 

Correct Bob
This was also my understanding. When a QSO is marked SAT in prop mode it is excluded from country wkd/cfmd window BUT it is included in SAT DXCC stats and window. It looks a nonsense to me as I would expect the QSO being included also in Country wkd/cfmd window since:
- it is a real qso
- country wkd/cfmd does not shows any kind of filter
So why exclude the qso from this window?

Thanks 73



Alessandro Salvatico i2sva

Inviato da iPhone


Re: 3.50.386 auto-update ...

Gary Hinson
 

😊

 

Thanks, Bob, for second-guessing the ADIF-meisters …. and, well, for everything really.

 

I wonder how many L32 users appreciate just how much painstaking work goes on behind the scenes to maintain and enhance the software, fix bugs, tweak stuff and all for free. 

 

You’re “awesome” as we Kiwis say.

73

Gary  ZL2iFB

 

 

From: hamlogger@groups.io <hamlogger@groups.io> On Behalf Of Bob
Sent: 19 May 2019 14:17
To: hamlogger@groups.io
Subject: [hamlogger] 3.50.386 auto-update ...

 

 

Johann was a wise man. In todays wired world, he may well have said "Life is too short to drink bad wine, or wait for ADIF to make public their decision as to what exactly FT4 is - a mode or submode". My buddy Julian Assange tells me it has been decreed that FT4 is a submode of MFSK. A closely held secret apparently. Pure speculation on my part, but I suggest they are reluctant to make any public proclamation as it would be a tacit acknowledgement that they screwed up big time when FT8 was given the much coveted mode status ... but wait, the subterfuge has just begun ... how will they undo all the other incorrectly assigned modes/submodes and maintain even a modicum of credibility? ... the spin doctors will be out in force ...

 

Based on the information provided by Julian (he hasn't let me down yet), I will preempt any formal announcement by ADIF, and release Logger32 v3.50.386 on Monday. SeventyThree(s).


3.50.386 auto-update ...

Bob
 



Johann was a wise man. In todays wired world, he may well have said "Life is too short to drink bad wine, or wait for ADIF to make public their decision as to what exactly FT4 is - a mode or submode". My buddy Julian Assange tells me it has been decreed that FT4 is a submode of MFSK. A closely held secret apparently. Pure speculation on my part, but I suggest they are reluctant to make any public proclamation as it would be a tacit acknowledgement that they screwed up big time when FT8 was given the much coveted mode status ... but wait, the subterfuge has just begun ... how will they undo all the other incorrectly assigned modes/submodes and maintain even a modicum of credibility? ... the spin doctors will be out in force ...


Based on the information provided by Julian (he hasn't let me down yet), I will preempt any formal announcement by ADIF, and release Logger32 v3.50.386 on Monday. SeventyThree(s).


Re: Worked/Confirmed window: SAT qso not showing up?

on6ab
 

Hi Alessandro,

You're not doing anything wrong.
The confirmed/Worked window simply is not able to produce stats for Satellite QSO's only.

73,

Bruno


Re: Worked/Confirmed window: SAT qso not showing up?

Bob
 

... but the Worked Confirmed Window only has two axis - Band & Mode. SeventyThree(s).

On May 17, 2019 at 10:29 AM Guntram Summer <summer.guntram@...> wrote:

I think he means this:

B.13 Propagation Mode Enumeration

EnumerationDescription
ASAircraft Scatter
AUEAurora-E
AURAurora
BSBack scatter
ECHEchoLink
EMEEarth-Moon-Earth
ESSporadic E
F2F2 Reflection
FAIField Aligned Irregularities
INTERNETInternet-assisted
IONIonoscatter
IRLIRLP
MSMeteor scatter
RPTTerrestrial or atmospheric repeater or transponder
RSRain scatter
SATSatellite
TEPTrans-equatorial
TRTropospheric ducting


73, Guntram oe9dgv


Bob < k4cy@...> schrieb am Fr., 17. Mai 2019, 16:18:

Alessandro, apologies but I do not understand. The Worked/Confirmed Window has columns that show MODE (like: CW, SSB, DIGital, PHOne, etc.) and the rows are BAND (like: 20M, 30M, 40M, etc.). Is SAT a mode? See: http://www.adif.org/309/ADIF_309.htm#Mode_Enumeration for a list of ADIF modes.


SeventyThree(s).

On May 17, 2019 at 9:56 AM Alessandro I2SVA < i2sva@...> wrote:

Hi all, can anyone help with my issue, perhaps a missing configuration?
Using Logger 32 version 3.50.385 on Windows 10; all working well.
I have recently defined the 13 cm band for QO-100 satellite and I am now logging Satellite QSO without any problem; stats are enabled and I can see DXCC stats. The only issue is the Confirmed/Worked window that does not show any information is Prop mode is set to SAT. Why? How can I change this behavior?

Thanks, 73
Alessandro, I2SVA

 

 


Re: Worked/Confirmed window: SAT qso not showing up?

Guntram oe9dgv
 

I think he means this:

B.13 Propagation Mode Enumeration

EnumerationDescription
ASAircraft Scatter
AUEAurora-E
AURAurora
BSBack scatter
ECHEchoLink
EMEEarth-Moon-Earth
ESSporadic E
F2F2 Reflection
FAIField Aligned Irregularities
INTERNETInternet-assisted
IONIonoscatter
IRLIRLP
MSMeteor scatter
RPTTerrestrial or atmospheric repeater or transponder
RSRain scatter
SATSatellite
TEPTrans-equatorial
TRTropospheric ducting


73, Guntram oe9dgv


Bob <k4cy@...> schrieb am Fr., 17. Mai 2019, 16:18:

Alessandro, apologies but I do not understand. The Worked/Confirmed Window has columns that show MODE (like: CW, SSB, DIGital, PHOne, etc.) and the rows are BAND (like: 20M, 30M, 40M, etc.). Is SAT a mode? See: http://www.adif.org/309/ADIF_309.htm#Mode_Enumeration for a list of ADIF modes.


SeventyThree(s).

On May 17, 2019 at 9:56 AM Alessandro I2SVA <i2sva@...> wrote:

Hi all, can anyone help with my issue, perhaps a missing configuration?
Using Logger 32 version 3.50.385 on Windows 10; all working well.
I have recently defined the 13 cm band for QO-100 satellite and I am now logging Satellite QSO without any problem; stats are enabled and I can see DXCC stats. The only issue is the Confirmed/Worked window that does not show any information is Prop mode is set to SAT. Why? How can I change this behavior?

Thanks, 73
Alessandro, I2SVA


Re: Worked/Confirmed window: SAT qso not showing up?

Bob
 

Alessandro, apologies but I do not understand. The Worked/Confirmed Window has columns that show MODE (like: CW, SSB, DIGital, PHOne, etc.) and the rows are BAND (like: 20M, 30M, 40M, etc.). Is SAT a mode? See: http://www.adif.org/309/ADIF_309.htm#Mode_Enumeration for a list of ADIF modes.


SeventyThree(s).

On May 17, 2019 at 9:56 AM Alessandro I2SVA <i2sva@...> wrote:

Hi all, can anyone help with my issue, perhaps a missing configuration?
Using Logger 32 version 3.50.385 on Windows 10; all working well.
I have recently defined the 13 cm band for QO-100 satellite and I am now logging Satellite QSO without any problem; stats are enabled and I can see DXCC stats. The only issue is the Confirmed/Worked window that does not show any information is Prop mode is set to SAT. Why? How can I change this behavior?

Thanks, 73
Alessandro, I2SVA


Re: Worked/Confirmed window: SAT qso not showing up?

Vilhjalmur Sigurjonsson
 

Just a wilde guess DR Alessandro;

Did you remember to put Y in the stats column in „Tools | Setup Bands & Modes“ for the frequency?

73 Villi
TF3VS

 

From: hamlogger@groups.io [mailto:hamlogger@groups.io] On Behalf Of Alessandro I2SVA
Sent: föstudagur, 17. maí 2019 13:57
To: hamlogger@groups.io
Subject: [hamlogger] Worked/Confirmed window: SAT qso not showing up?

 

Hi all, can anyone help with my issue, perhaps a missing configuration?
Using Logger 32 version 3.50.385 on Windows 10; all working well.
I have recently defined the 13 cm band for QO-100 satellite and I am now logging Satellite QSO without any problem; stats are enabled and I can see DXCC stats. The only issue is the Confirmed/Worked window that does not show any information is Prop mode is set to SAT. Why? How can I change this behavior?

Thanks, 73
Alessandro, I2SVA


Worked/Confirmed window: SAT qso not showing up?

Alessandro I2SVA
 

Hi all, can anyone help with my issue, perhaps a missing configuration?
Using Logger 32 version 3.50.385 on Windows 10; all working well.
I have recently defined the 13 cm band for QO-100 satellite and I am now logging Satellite QSO without any problem; stats are enabled and I can see DXCC stats. The only issue is the Confirmed/Worked window that does not show any information is Prop mode is set to SAT. Why? How can I change this behavior?

Thanks, 73
Alessandro, I2SVA


Re: Unable to install logger32

Gerald Boutin
 

Since you have a new install of Windows 10, even though you haven't installed any updates or other software, Windows 10 is surely trying to download and install updates. Let it finish it's downloading and rebooting.

After that is sorted out, add exceptions for Windows Defender (Windows 10 built-in antivirus software) and Controlled Folder Access (aka Ransomeware protection). You might be able to get away with temporarily disabling those programs while installing L32.

--
Gerald, VE1DT


Re: Unable to install logger32

uniflite58
 

Yep,  Thats exactly what I did.  I'm stumped too. Really wanted to use the program.  Thanks for trying Bob.  I appreciate it.

73  KF7ESM


Re: Unable to install logger32

Bob
 

That should do the trick. UAC is off, no antivirus software, then what's blocking the install? Sorry, I have no idea. There's no shortage of logging programs around, I'm sure you'll find on that installs right out of the box.  Not sure how you're trying to do the install, but all I can suggest is make a desktop folder. Keep it's default name New Folder. Unzip the Logger32 full install zip file into the New Folder. Open the folder. Right click on setup.exe icon and run as administrator. After that,, you're on your own. SeventyThree(s).

On May 15, 2019 at 10:32 PM uniflite58 <posprovisions@...> wrote:

I am right clicking the .exe file and selecting "run as administrator"   I dont have any extra firewall or antivirus installed.  Not sure what changes I would make to the windows security settings.  Thank you for your reply Bob.


Re: Unable to install logger32

uniflite58
 

I am right clicking the .exe file and selecting "run as administrator"   I dont have any extra firewall or antivirus installed.  Not sure what changes I would make to the windows security settings.  Thank you for your reply Bob.


Re: Unable to install logger32

Bob
 

I said: check your firewall/security settings ... change that to anti-virus/security settings. SeventyThree(s).

On May 15, 2019 at 10:27 PM Bob <k4cy@...> wrote:

You said: I tried running the setup file as administrator ... Good thinking ... Do you mean you are signed in to Windows as an administrator, or do you mean the compatibility settings of setup.exe are set to run the program as an administrator? Try the green option. If it still won't install, then check your firewall/security settings. SeventyThree(s).

On May 15, 2019 at 10:19 PM uniflite58 <posprovisions@...> wrote:

I have a freshly formatted drive with a new install of windows 10.  I haven't installed any updates or other software. 

Upon trying to install logger 32 I get the following messages.     Invalid Property Value   An unexpected error has occurred.

 

Then I get: Runtime error "5" Invalid procedure call or argument.

I have UAC turned off. I tried running the setup file as administrator and am using the full install not the upgrade.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Dave   KF7ESM


 


Re: Unable to install logger32

Bob
 

You said: I tried running the setup file as administrator ... Good thinking ... Do you mean you are signed in to Windows as an administrator, or do you mean the compatibility settings of setup.exe are set to run the program as an administrator? Try the green option. If it still won't install, then check your firewall/security settings. SeventyThree(s).

On May 15, 2019 at 10:19 PM uniflite58 <posprovisions@...> wrote:

I have a freshly formatted drive with a new install of windows 10.  I haven't installed any updates or other software. 

Upon trying to install logger 32 I get the following messages.     Invalid Property Value   An unexpected error has occurred.

 

Then I get: Runtime error "5" Invalid procedure call or argument.

I have UAC turned off. I tried running the setup file as administrator and am using the full install not the upgrade.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Dave   KF7ESM


Unable to install logger32

uniflite58
 

I have a freshly formatted drive with a new install of windows 10.  I haven't installed any updates or other software. 

Upon trying to install logger 32 I get the following messages.     Invalid Property Value   An unexpected error has occurred.

 

Then I get: Runtime error "5" Invalid procedure call or argument.

I have UAC turned off. I tried running the setup file as administrator and am using the full install not the upgrade.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Dave   KF7ESM


Re: LoTW users

Michael Harris
 

Thank you.

Regards,

Mike VP8NO

On 15/05/2019 17:25, Bob wrote:
This bug is fixed, I hope, in the next auto-update. It's packaged and ready to go, I'm just waiting for the ADIF folks to promulgate the mode/submode status of/for FT4. SeventyThree(s).

On May 15, 2019 at 4:10 PM "Michael Harris via Groups.Io" <mike.harris=horizon.co.fk@groups.io> wrote:


Hi,

L32 v3.50.384 Win7/64 Pro

Just updated the LoTW users from Club Log. I am set up to display only
users who have uploaded in the last two months. I was surprised to see
on the bandmap no indications of LoTW users, the green square.

When I opened this up to three months users started to be indicated.

I bookmarked my own call and it indicated that I had uploaded 81 days
ago. In fact my last logger QSO was uploaded and matched early this
month, May.

Checking all the other bandmap indicated LoTW users gave days since last
upload of 70-83 days.

Anyone else seeing this?

Regards,

Mike VP8NO




Re: LoTW users

Bob
 

This bug is fixed, I hope, in the next auto-update. It's packaged and ready to go, I'm just waiting for the ADIF folks to promulgate the mode/submode status of/for FT4. SeventyThree(s).

On May 15, 2019 at 4:10 PM "Michael Harris via Groups.Io" <mike.harris=horizon.co.fk@groups.io> wrote:


Hi,

L32 v3.50.384 Win7/64 Pro

Just updated the LoTW users from Club Log. I am set up to display only
users who have uploaded in the last two months. I was surprised to see
on the bandmap no indications of LoTW users, the green square.

When I opened this up to three months users started to be indicated.

I bookmarked my own call and it indicated that I had uploaded 81 days
ago. In fact my last logger QSO was uploaded and matched early this
month, May.

Checking all the other bandmap indicated LoTW users gave days since last
upload of 70-83 days.

Anyone else seeing this?

Regards,

Mike VP8NO



8701 - 8720 of 85161