Re: FT8 in worked/confirmed
I used the term RTTY, since, once upon a time, that was the ARRL's alternative for all digital modes. Things have changed, and I found, after much hunting, this document page:
It includes many new digital modes, but FT-8 and FT-4 are not among them. Can you suggest what mode I should use?
BTW, I, too, regret the demise of PSK, which I think was the next best thing to Pactor. I did use Pactor (-1), and liked it, especially its accuracy. I understand the new versions (2, 3, 4) are much better, but the price tag of thousands to multi thousands for a TNC would scar my cheapskate soul. Couldn't they have put some of the old versions into the public domain? I mean, did you realize that there are people who write full-fledged logging plus radio-control programs, maintain them, and still give them away? Of course those people must be socialists or hippies.
Jan, KX2A (now 76)