Re: To answer an SWL-paper card

Peter Eckersberger

Hi Jim,

Thank you for the quick answer. You hit the nail. I had a seperate SWL-label BUT made a wrong ADIF-allocation in the first ADIF-field (Field 1). Changed it now to "CALL" and everything is OK.

73 de Pez, OE3EPW

Am 27.09.2013 17:20, schrieb Jim Hargrave:


What program are you using for printing the labels?
You need to configure a different setup for SWL cards which does not have
the QSL_VIA field included.

I use Logprint for printing QSL cards and have a separate setup for printing
SWL cards.

73s de Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: hamlogger@... [mailto:hamlogger@...]On
Behalf Of Peter Eckersberger
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 9:03 AM
To: YAHOO / Hamlogger Forum
Subject: [hamlogger] To answer an SWL-paper card


I tried to confirm the receive of a paper SWL-card by following the
procedure in the "Help"-section of "Logger32". The "Logger32" version is

Here the story ... "SP-0142-JG" sent a paper card and requested
confirmation of a QSO which I had last year with the Polish DXpedition
"5T0SP". The QSL-manager of that DXpedition was "SP6FXY".

Everything went fine except the fact that the DXpeditions QSL-manager was
also taken over onto the label which I like to send to the SWL. At the upper
right edge of the label it says ... via: SP6FXY

Well, provided that it wasn't me by doing something wrong or
misunderstanding the system IMO that manager should not be written onto the
label/QSL-card I send to the SWL. In that case the DXpeditions manager has
no function at all. My confirmation card should be addressed and go straight
to the SWL.

73 de Pez, OE3EPW

Join to automatically receive all group messages.