Unwanted doubling up in focus window?
Louis Naturani
Hi Folks,
Since importing my data from TMG a few years ago, I come across the occasional individual who appears twice in the focus window. Once with a spouse with or without offspring, then again underneath on their own. I would like to delete the second iteration without upsetting things. Would someone have any ideas please? Ta Louis Melbourne, Australia |
|
colevalleygirl@colevalleygirl.co.uk
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: family-historian@groups.io <family-historian@groups.io> On Behalf Of Louis Naturani
Sent: 21 November 2022 07:55 To: family-historian@groups.io Subject: [family-historian] Unwanted doubling up in focus window?
Hi Folks, |
|
If the ‘duplicate’ Individual records have the same [ Record Id ] then the important thing to understand is it is almost certainly caused by unwanted Family records, which FH often hides.
|
|
Louis Naturani
Hi Thank you for your suggestion, however it does not quite address my situation. See below for what I meant. All duplicates have the same I.D. Louis
--
Louis Naturani |
|
Richard Scantlebury
Louis I’ve had this quite a few times and what I do is unlink the bottom Person and if it’s a couple duplicated unlink both. You’ll still have the single entry for the person.
Best wishes and Kind regards Rich Scantlebury In global pursuit of Scantleburys & Skentelberys for a one name study - 3209 http://scantlebury.one-name.net/ https://www.flickr.com/photos/richscats/
From: family-historian@groups.io <family-historian@groups.io> On Behalf Of Louis Naturani
Sent: Wednesday, 23 November 2022 08:45 To: family-historian@groups.io Subject: Re: [family-historian] Unwanted doubling up in focus window?
Hi Thank you for your suggestion, however it does not quite address my situation. See below for what I meant. All duplicates have the same I.D.
Louis
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 7:02 PM colevalleygirl@... <colevalleygirl@...> wrote:
-- Louis Naturani
|
|
colevalleygirl@colevalleygirl.co.uk
Louis,
What that screenshot tells us is that William Rivett had children with two women – Mary Ayton (3 children, Richard, George and Elizabeth) and an unknow woman (1 child, Robert). Before we start modifying your data, is that what you understand to be true? Or was Robert another child of Mary Ayton (the dates make that look likely).
Helen
From: family-historian@groups.io <family-historian@groups.io> On Behalf Of Louis Naturani
Sent: 23 November 2022 08:45 To: family-historian@groups.io Subject: Re: [family-historian] Unwanted doubling up in focus window?
Hi Thank you for your suggestion, however it does not quite address my situation. See below for what I meant. All duplicates have the same I.D.
Louis |
|
I’d be a little concerned as well, that William Rivett was married aged 10 and had had three children before he was 15 years old and a fourth by his 18th birthday. BobH
From: family-historian@groups.io <family-historian@groups.io> On Behalf Of Louis Naturani
Sent: 23 November 2022 08:45 To: family-historian@groups.io Subject: Re: [family-historian] Unwanted doubling up in focus window?
Hi Thank you for your suggestion, however it does not quite address my situation. See below for what I meant. All duplicates have the same I.D.
Louis
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 7:02 PM colevalleygirl@... <colevalleygirl@...> wrote:
-- Louis Naturani
|
|
John Hanson
Louis Because the image is embedded rather than attached makes it a lot more difficult to read. However, from what I can read it needs to be two entries The bottom one shows no spouses name So is not the same family as the first
The property box on the right shows the same thing The first marriage shows Mary (I think) and the second says “no spouse”
Unless you can be certain that they are the same mother to all the children then what is displayed is correct Regards John Hanson FSG
From: family-historian@groups.io <family-historian@groups.io> On Behalf Of Louis Naturani
Sent: 23 November 2022 08:45 To: family-historian@groups.io Subject: Re: [family-historian] Unwanted doubling up in focus window?
Hi Thank you for your suggestion, however it does not quite address my situation. See below for what I meant. All duplicates have the same I.D.
Louis
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 7:02 PM colevalleygirl@... <colevalleygirl@...> wrote:
-- Louis Naturani
|
|
Even more concerning is Mary AYTON was only about 10 when Richard RIVETT was born and not much older for the other children!
Assuming they are all meant to be one family then it is a Family Record problem that needs Robert RIVETT to be unlinked and relinked to the original family.
From: family-historian@groups.io <family-historian@groups.io> On Behalf Of Bob Hunter
Sent: 23 November 2022 09:21 To: family-historian@groups.io Subject: Re: [family-historian] Unwanted doubling up in focus window?
I’d be a little concerned as well, that William Rivett was married aged 10 and had had three children before he was 15 years old and a fourth by his 18th birthday. BobH |
|
Victor Markham
I have come across someone elses tree which listed my 14 x great
grandfather, aged 38, marrying a 10 year old gilr in 1765. She had
a child when she was 11. I have not had time to verify this but my
own thought are the other person made a typo error and put her
birth date 10 years out making her 20. She went on to have 3
children. She became a widow aged 26 (or should tgis have been
36?) One day I will get round to verifying this Victor On 23/11/2022 11:02, Mike Tate wrote:
|
|
John Hanson
It is interesting that the age at which people could legally get married was not change till the Marriage Act of 1929 when
The age for girls was increased from 12 to 16 The age for boys was increased from 14 to 16 But still required parents consent
Regards John Hanson FSG Researching the Halstead/Holstead/Alstead names Researcher, the Halsted Trust - https://www.halsted.org.uk Research website - https://www.halstedresearch.org.uk And my own study of FOSKER
From: family-historian@groups.io <family-historian@groups.io> On Behalf Of Victor Markham via groups.io
Sent: 23 November 2022 22:33 To: family-historian@groups.io Subject: Re: [family-historian] Unwanted doubling up in focus window?
I have come across someone elses tree which listed my 14 x great grandfather, aged 38, marrying a 10 year old gilr in 1765. She had a child when she was 11. I have not had time to verify this but my own thought are the other person made a typo error and put her birth date 10 years out making her 20. She went on to have 3 children. She became a widow aged 26 (or should tgis have been 36?) One day I will get round to verifying this Victor On 23/11/2022 11:02, Mike Tate wrote:
|
|
Louis Naturani
Thanks Richard, Your suggestion to unlink the person below worked a treat. Now to address those birth dates. Louis On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 8:08 PM Richard Scantlebury via groups.io <richard.scantlebury=talktalk.net@groups.io> wrote:
--
Louis Naturani |
|
Richard Scantlebury
No problem Louis You’ll find a lot of tidying up/house keeping to do in FH Regards Rich
From: family-historian@groups.io <family-historian@groups.io> On Behalf Of Louis Naturani
Sent: Thursday, 24 November 2022 06:57 To: family-historian@groups.io Subject: Re: [family-historian] Unwanted doubling up in focus window?
Thanks Richard, Your suggestion to unlink the person below worked a treat. Now to address those birth dates.
Louis
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 8:08 PM Richard Scantlebury via groups.io <richard.scantlebury=talktalk.net@groups.io> wrote:
-- Louis Naturani |
|
colevalleygirl@colevalleygirl.co.uk
Have you also relinked the child of the person you’ve unlinked?
From: family-historian@groups.io <family-historian@groups.io> On Behalf Of Louis Naturani
Sent: 24 November 2022 06:57 To: family-historian@groups.io Subject: Re: [family-historian] Unwanted doubling up in focus window?
Thanks Richard, Your suggestion to unlink the person below worked a treat. Now to address those birth dates.
Louis
|
|
Richard Scantlebury
Helen I think your suggestion/comment says a lot about this group, I think it’s great and should applauded. Regards Rich
From: family-historian@groups.io <family-historian@groups.io> On Behalf Of colevalleygirl@...
Sent: Thursday, 24 November 2022 09:04 To: family-historian@groups.io Subject: Re: [family-historian] Unwanted doubling up in focus window?
Have you also relinked the child of the person you’ve unlinked?
From: family-historian@groups.io <family-historian@groups.io> On Behalf Of Louis Naturani
Thanks Richard, Your suggestion to unlink the person below worked a treat. Now to address those birth dates.
Louis
|
|
Louis Naturani
Hi Helen, Yes I did re-link that child. Thank you.
|
|