Legacy versus FH


Vyger
 

Typo, NOT should have been NOW

 

Watch for my upcoming video

 

 

From: family-historian@groups.io [mailto:family-historian@groups.io] On Behalf Of Lorna Craig via groups.io
Sent: 08 October 2022 14:49
To: family-historian@groups.io
Subject: Re: [family-historian] Legacy versus FH

 

Vyger,  Why do you say "renaming is not part of FH 7.0.15"?  Perhaps you have just not found it. 

Open the main Media window,  select the media record, click the Media icon in the toolbar at the very top (not the colourful toolbar on the next row) and choose Rename Media File...   This will rename the file on the hard disk and maintain the link with the Media record in FH.

On 08/10/2022 13:56, Vyger wrote:

.... Some months back I discovered FTM 2017 allowed for the renaming of media files in program whilst maintaining the media link, I know from cross platform the renaming of those non-descript Ancestry style has been long wished for by many who strive to build a meaningful media collection and renaming is not part of FH 7.0.15, win win.

 


Lorna Craig
 

Ah yes, he meant "renaming is now part of FH..."    Thanks.

On 08/10/2022 15:03, colevalleygirl@... wrote:

Lorna, typo: not for now.

 

From: family-historian@groups.io <family-historian@groups.io> On Behalf Of Lorna Craig via groups.io
Sent: 08 October 2022 14:49
To: family-historian@groups.io
Subject: Re: [family-historian] Legacy versus FH

 

Vyger,  Why do you say "renaming is not part of FH 7.0.15"?  Perhaps you have just not found it. 

Open the main Media window,  select the media record, click the Media icon in the toolbar at the very top (not the colourful toolbar on the next row) and choose Rename Media File...   This will rename the file on the hard disk and maintain the link with the Media record in FH.

On 08/10/2022 13:56, Vyger wrote:

.... Some months back I discovered FTM 2017 allowed for the renaming of media files in program whilst maintaining the media link, I know from cross platform the renaming of those non-descript Ancestry style has been long wished for by many who strive to build a meaningful media collection and renaming is not part of FH 7.0.15, win win.

_._,_._,_

_


colevalleygirl@colevalleygirl.co.uk
 

Lorna, typo: not for now.

 

From: family-historian@groups.io <family-historian@groups.io> On Behalf Of Lorna Craig via groups.io
Sent: 08 October 2022 14:49
To: family-historian@groups.io
Subject: Re: [family-historian] Legacy versus FH

 

Vyger,  Why do you say "renaming is not part of FH 7.0.15"?  Perhaps you have just not found it. 

Open the main Media window,  select the media record, click the Media icon in the toolbar at the very top (not the colourful toolbar on the next row) and choose Rename Media File...   This will rename the file on the hard disk and maintain the link with the Media record in FH.

On 08/10/2022 13:56, Vyger wrote:

.... Some months back I discovered FTM 2017 allowed for the renaming of media files in program whilst maintaining the media link, I know from cross platform the renaming of those non-descript Ancestry style has been long wished for by many who strive to build a meaningful media collection and renaming is not part of FH 7.0.15, win win.

_._,_._,_


Lorna Craig
 

Vyger,  Why do you say "renaming is not part of FH 7.0.15"?  Perhaps you have just not found it. 

Open the main Media window,  select the media record, click the Media icon in the toolbar at the very top (not the colourful toolbar on the next row) and choose Rename Media File...   This will rename the file on the hard disk and maintain the link with the Media record in FH.

On 08/10/2022 13:56, Vyger wrote:

.... Some months back I discovered FTM 2017 allowed for the renaming of media files in program whilst maintaining the media link, I know from cross platform the renaming of those non-descript Ancestry style has been long wished for by many who strive to build a meaningful media collection and renaming is not part of FH 7.0.15, win win.



Vyger
 

I saw a similar user backlash to other program discussions on the Rootsmagic groups.io forum, the answer there was to create a sub group for migrants or other software comparisons, I believe that is probably necessary here.

Users not interested in making comparisons can simply stay with the main group and no longer be annoyed by such migrant discussions and those who are interested in broadening their knowledge scope and trying to help possible migrants can subscribe to the sub group.

Comparing software is often the best way for any package to evolve so Family Historian and its users should benefit, it's not a matter of changing one package to a copy of another. Some months back I discovered FTM 2017 allowed for the renaming of media files in program whilst maintaining the media link, I know from cross platform the renaming of those non-descript Ancestry style has been long wished for by many who strive to build a meaningful media collection and renaming is not part of FH 7.0.15, win win.

Personally I believe all packages have some desirable features and really we should want one package to have all. I am not a long term user of FH so also scratching the surface but I will say FH could benefit greatly from improvements to the intuitive nature of the UI and listening to the difficulties of migrants really highlights such difficulties so keep them coming in my opinion.


trevithick
 

Colin,

I can appreciate your point about this topic dragging on far too long, and perhaps the topic should have had a better name.

Others, and I have made comparisons because we do NOT yet understand how to do things in Family Historian that we used/still do in Legacy while hoping to move to Family Historian.

I'm ready to throw in the towel.

Mark Trevithick


Derek Heritage
 

As Colevalleygirl said I am not posting any more in  this topic.
Derek


Jane JAMES
 

I have never used Legacy but have found these discussions useful. I think FH is a very powerful program which I know I am not using to its full potential. In fact I am at the basic user end of the scale but would love to develop my knowledge. Keep posting! Thanks. Jane 


Neil Grantham
 

I agree.

Whilst not everyone needs these emails they are very relevant to anyone who migrates or considering it as they have habits in other programs.

Just mute the topic if it's not for you.


Best Wishes

Neil

Sent via BT Email App


From: colevalleygirl@...
Sent: Sep 24, 2022 at 10:29 AM
To: family-historian@groups.io
Subject: Re: [family-historian] Legacy versus FH

Colin,

 

You’re re-hashing discussions already held in this thread.

 

Questions about how to do things in FH which a user could previously do in Legacy (or any other programme) definitely have a place here to help users migrating to FH.  And to answer those, we need to understand what was done in the other programme.

 

If you don’t want to see such threads, use the ‘Mute this topic’ link at the bottom of every email you receive.

 

This thread is probably winding up anyway, but only because there will be new questions about migrating from Legacy started as new topics.

 

 

 

From: family-historian@groups.io <family-historian@groups.io> On Behalf Of Colin_McCullough
Sent: 24 September 2022 10:17
To: family-historian@groups.io
Subject: [family-historian] Legacy versus FH

 

I think this post has gone on too long Every day there is something compared or whatever 
When in Legacy do Legacy questions
If you use FH then use FH user group 
I use both so do not see the point in continuously comparing each program in Legacy all the time 
How about terminating this thread and move on



--
Neil Grantham
-------------------
Using FH 7 & AS 7
Researching Grantham, Skuce, Barrow, Birchall.


colevalleygirl@colevalleygirl.co.uk
 

Colin,

 

You’re re-hashing discussions already held in this thread.

 

Questions about how to do things in FH which a user could previously do in Legacy (or any other programme) definitely have a place here to help users migrating to FH.  And to answer those, we need to understand what was done in the other programme.

 

If you don’t want to see such threads, use the ‘Mute this topic’ link at the bottom of every email you receive.

 

This thread is probably winding up anyway, but only because there will be new questions about migrating from Legacy started as new topics.

 

 

 

From: family-historian@groups.io <family-historian@groups.io> On Behalf Of Colin_McCullough
Sent: 24 September 2022 10:17
To: family-historian@groups.io
Subject: [family-historian] Legacy versus FH

 

I think this post has gone on too long Every day there is something compared or whatever 
When in Legacy do Legacy questions
If you use FH then use FH user group 
I use both so do not see the point in continuously comparing each program in Legacy all the time 
How about terminating this thread and move on


Colin_McCullough
 

I think this post has gone on too long Every day there is something compared or whatever 
When in Legacy do Legacy questions
If you use FH then use FH user group 
I use both so do not see the point in continuously comparing each program in Legacy all the time 
How about terminating this thread and move on