Date   

Problems with OneDrive replication

john@...
 

A few months ago I decided to move the Family Historian Project files on my desktop PC (A Chillblast running Windows 10)  to OneDrive so that I could also see and work on them on my laptop (Windows 10). I elected to also keep a copy of the files on both the PC and laptop so that I could use them even if the internet was down. The move appeared to go well but the replication seemed to come to a halt although we have a reasonably fast internet connection (30 Mbps). When I looked at the files, the problem may have to do with the creation by OneDrive of multiple copies of the Projects (accompanied by a message like, "We couldn't update/replicate your file so we have made a new copy of it"). Also there seem to be many copies of the FindMyPast and MyHeritage Hints as well as many copies of Snapshots whatever they are.
The following five snips of the file structure on my desktop illustrate the problem.

A) The Projects File.  The "copy Feb 2020" is a copy I made to update my Guild of One-name Studies website.


B) The Bradburn One-name Study File, showing the two extra copies created by OneDrive; -Chillblast and -Chillblast-2.


C) The One-name Study.fh_data file showing again the two extra complete copies which were automatically created.



D1) The cache data showing multiple copies of the FMP and MyHeritage hints. These hints presumably change each day and confuse the replication process.


D2) The Snapshot data which has now grown to 17 files each of 5MB.



Can anyone tell me how I can stop the production by OneDrive of more duplicates (especially the duplicates of the main GEDCOM file)  and then which of the many files is it safe to delete?

Thanks for any help, John Bradburn.


Re: Problems with OneDrive replication

Jane Taubman
 

I don't use one drive,  but I suspect it's similar to Dropbox.

Conflict files are created when you save the file back to the disk on both computers with out replicating.

The first thing to ensure that you NEVER leave Family Historian open in a Project when working on the other computer and if you have been working away on your laptop that you ensure it and your Desktop has finished replicating BEFORE opening the file on the either computer.

Remember Family Historian stores the data in memory when working and saves it back to the disk either via Autosave or when you save manually.  Cache files are constantly updated.

If you are not sure if there are any changes you have missed you can always merge compare the conflict files, before deleting them.

 



Re: Problems with OneDrive replication

Mike Tate
 

John,

Firstly, you don’t need a separate PC copy of those OneDrive files.

The files in the OneDrive folder are local to your PC and available when no Internet connection.

(There are ways to only keep files in the OneDrive cloud, but I don’t think you are using that mode.)

 

Snapshot files are explained in the FH Help and are auto-backup copies of the GEDCOM file.

There should typically be 8 of them dating back over the last few days or weeks.

 

Only the files with a -Chillblast… suffix are duplicates.

I think they arise when the original file is in use by another program when OneDrive wants to synchronise changes.

So the question is what other program might be using and thus locking your files.

Maybe an anti-virus package or a scheduled backup program.

 

As a matter of interest how do you manage the copying of your FH PC files to and from the OneDrive folder?

 

Regards, Mike Tate

 

From: family-historian@groups.io <family-historian@groups.io> On Behalf Of john@...
Sent: 19 February 2020 17:22
To: family-historian@groups.io
Subject: [family-historian] Problems with OneDrive replication

 

A few months ago I decided to move the Family Historian Project files on my desktop PC (A Chillblast running Windows 10)  to OneDrive so that I could also see and work on them on my laptop (Windows 10). I elected to also keep a copy of the files on both the PC and laptop so that I could use them even if the internet was down. The move appeared to go well but the replication seemed to come to a halt although we have a reasonably fast internet connection (30 Mbps). When I looked at the files, the problem may have to do with the creation by OneDrive of multiple copies of the Projects (accompanied by a message like, "We couldn't update/replicate your file so we have made a new copy of it"). Also there seem to be many copies of the FindMyPast and MyHeritage Hints as well as many copies of Snapshots whatever they are.
The following five snips of the file structure on my desktop illustrate the problem.

A) The Projects File.  The "copy Feb 2020" is a copy I made to update my Guild of One-name Studies website.
,

B) The Bradburn One-name Study File, showing the two extra copies created by OneDrive; -Chillblast and -Chillblast-2.


C) The One-name Study.fh_data file showing again the two extra complete copies which were automatically created.



D1) The cache data showing multiple copies of the FMP and MyHeritage hints. These hints presumably change each day and confuse the replication process.


D2) The Snapshot data which has now grown to 17 files each of 5MB.



Can anyone tell me how I can stop the production by OneDrive of more duplicates (especially the duplicates of the main GEDCOM file)  and then which of the many files is it safe to delete?

Thanks for any help, John Bradburn.


Re: Problems with OneDrive replication

john@...
 

Thank you Jane for your input and I will always try to have disciplined housekeeping on FH6 between my desktop and my laptop. I would have said that I never have FH6 open on both computers at once, but perhaps I did break this rule on 19/01 and 10/02 when the two extra copies were created.I will remember in future.
Mike, I have looked at the Microsoft article, "What do the OneDrive icons mean?" and I am not sure that I understand their descriptions of the two types of green ticks. The blue cloud icon is clear in that it means the file is only available online. The green tick in a white circle icon says, " When you open an online-only file, it downloads to your device and becomes a locally available file" From what you say, this seems to mean that from the first time you open a "green tick in white circle" file it downloads and stays downloaded from then on. The white tick in a green circle, which I have used, seems to leave a copy on the device from the start, even if the file isn't opened.  There doesn't seem to be much difference between these two states so I will stick to the white tick in a green circle version. I have long wished that Microsoft had published a users manual for OneDrive as I have had lots of what-if questions which I couldn't find answers to.
 I have checked the FH settings for snapshots and they are as suggested (5 fast and 3 slow) which should give 8 current snapshots, so why do I have 17 snapshots?  If they continue to pile up, can I safely delete snapshot files earlier than say the last 8, as FH doesn't seem to be doing this?
As I said earlier, I may have accidentally run FH on both computers at the same time on 19/01 and 10/02 when the Chillblast - duplicates were created. Can and should I delete these duplicates and if so at what level in the file structure should I do it so that I don't delete anything used by the original file? Should I delete them in File > Project window, where they all appear?
I do use Carbonite cloud backup, but when I moved the Project files from Documents to OneDrive, I didn't add their new One Drive location to the Carbonite backup list so that shouldn't be interfering. I have left the original Project files in Documents, but they are no longer connected to FH via File>Project Window so also shouldn't be interfering.
My anti-virus is Symantec Norton but I have not read of any OneDrive problems arising from Norton.
I am trying to remember how I copied my FH Project Files from Documents to the OneDrive folder and I think I used a drag and drop although I often use copy and paste. I had to also set up FH on my laptop and I used the FHUG Knowledge Base to be sure I did that correctly. I can't remember whether I transferred the Project Files to my laptop before moving the project files to OneDrive on both computers or whether I let the laptop populate its project files from OneDrive. Probably the former. I have since changed one of my custom queries on the desktop and these changes have not come through to the laptop so I will have to investigate what to do about this. The file these customisations  are in is apparently not being replicated via OneDrive. I only moved the FH Projects folder to OneDrive and not any of the other FH files.
If you can answer my query on safely removing the duplicates I will be very grateful.
Regards, John.


Re: Problems with OneDrive replication

Mike Tate
 

I was not sure exactly how you used the PC copies of the FH Project files, but it is now clear they are redundant leftovers from moving to OneDrive.

I thought you may have been regularly copying files between those PC copies and the OneDrive copies.

It is probably best to delete them to avoid any future confusion, and instead create regular FH Full Project Backups from your live Project on OneDrive.

 

As you have correctly identified, those OneDrive files are permanently on both your PC disk drives as well as in the OneDrive cloud.

 

Yes, you can safely delete any out-of-date Snapshot files. Another FH user has experienced similar issues with too many Snapshots.

 

It looks like all the live files (without the -Chillblast… suffix) have the latest ‘Date modified’ so are presumably your working data set.

There is virtually no risk in deleting all the -Chillblast… or -DESKTOP… suffixed files, but let them go to the Recycle Bin where they can be recovered for a while in case you discover any significant missing data.

The two GEDCOM files may be worth backing up outside OneDrive separately just in case as they hold the most critical data.

 

It appears that the synchronisation problems arose on more than just 19/01 and 10/02 because there are many more ‘Date modified’ values ranging from 17/11 to 17/02 for the Cache files.

You need to take care that only one application on one PC is accessing those FH files at the same time.

 

Most customisation settings (such as Queries) are NOT held within Projects, and some are even held in the Windows Registry.

They must be transferred separately and there is advice in the FHUG Knowledge Base on how to do that, and the simplest method employs my Plugin.

Maybe you originally followed the Family Historian V5 & V6 Migration Guide or alternatively the Utility ~ Microsoft OneDrive (SkyDrive) advice.

They both identify my Backup and Restore Family Historian Settings Plugin.

If you need any help with using it then do ask.

 

Regards, Mike Tate

 

From: family-historian@groups.io <family-historian@groups.io> On Behalf Of john@...
Sent: 20 February 2020 14:45
To: family-historian@groups.io
Subject: Re: [family-historian] Problems with OneDrive replication

 

Thank you Jane for your input and I will always try to have disciplined housekeeping on FH6 between my desktop and my laptop. I would have said that I never have FH6 open on both computers at once, but perhaps I did break this rule on 19/01 and 10/02 when the two extra copies were created.I will remember in future.
Mike, I have looked at the Microsoft article, "What do the OneDrive icons mean?" and I am not sure that I understand their descriptions of the two types of green ticks. The blue cloud icon is clear in that it means the file is only available online. The green tick in a white circle icon says, " When you open an online-only file, it downloads to your device and becomes a locally available file" From what you say, this seems to mean that from the first time you open a "green tick in white circle" file it downloads and stays downloaded from then on. The white tick in a green circle, which I have used, seems to leave a copy on the device from the start, even if the file isn't opened.  There doesn't seem to be much difference between these two states so I will stick to the white tick in a green circle version. I have long wished that Microsoft had published a users manual for OneDrive as I have had lots of what-if questions which I couldn't find answers to.
 I have checked the FH settings for snapshots and they are as suggested (5 fast and 3 slow) which should give 8 current snapshots, so why do I have 17 snapshots?  If they continue to pile up, can I safely delete snapshot files earlier than say the last 8, as FH doesn't seem to be doing this?
As I said earlier, I may have accidentally run FH on both computers at the same time on 19/01 and 10/02 when the Chillblast - duplicates were created. Can and should I delete these duplicates and if so at what level in the file structure should I do it so that I don't delete anything used by the original file? Should I delete them in File > Project window, where they all appear?
I do use Carbonite cloud backup, but when I moved the Project files from Documents to OneDrive, I didn't add their new One Drive location to the Carbonite backup list so that shouldn't be interfering. I have left the original Project files in Documents, but they are no longer connected to FH via File>Project Window so also shouldn't be interfering.
My anti-virus is Symantec Norton but I have not read of any OneDrive problems arising from Norton.
I am trying to remember how I copied my FH Project Files from Documents to the OneDrive folder and I think I used a drag and drop although I often use copy and paste. I had to also set up FH on my laptop and I used the FHUG Knowledge Base to be sure I did that correctly. I can't remember whether I transferred the Project Files to my laptop before moving the project files to OneDrive on both computers or whether I let the laptop populate its project files from OneDrive. Probably the former. I have since changed one of my custom queries on the desktop and these changes have not come through to the laptop so I will have to investigate what to do about this. The file these customisations  are in is apparently not being replicated via OneDrive. I only moved the FH Projects folder to OneDrive and not any of the other FH files.
If you can answer my query on safely removing the duplicates I will be very grateful.
Regards, John.


Re: Problems with OneDrive replication

Mike Tate
 

John, thinking about your scenario, I may not have given a complete picture about how to use FH with OneDrive.

That may be especially significant if you have an unreliable Internet connection.

 

So the general rule is that not only must you run FH &/or AS on one PC at a time, but also allow OneDrive to synchronise over the Internet in between.

 

So here is an example.

Say you take your laptop out and about where there is no Internet/WiFi and perform some updates using FH &/or AS.

The laptop is then switched off and taken home. Now those updates only exist on the laptop disk drive in its OneDrive folder.

It is imperative that at home you switch on both laptop and desktop to allow OneDrive to synchronise over the Internet.

Only then is it safe to run FH &/or AS on the desktop PC.

 

If you don’t synchronise OneDrive first, and run FH &/or AS on the desktop, then the two PC OneDrive folders are out of synch.

Even worse, if that desktop has no Internet connection, you now have three versions of OneDrive data.

One version on the laptop disk, one on the desktop disk, and one in the OneDrive cloud store.

OneDrive will probably not successfully synchronise those three, so your Project data is at risk.

 

So bear that in mind, and think about where the updated OneDrive data exists before using FH or AS.

 

Regards, Mike Tate

 

From: family-historian@groups.io <family-historian@groups.io> On Behalf Of Mike Tate
Sent: 20 February 2020 16:00
To: family-historian@groups.io
Subject: Re: [family-historian] Problems with OneDrive replication

 

I was not sure exactly how you used the PC copies of the FH Project files, but it is now clear they are redundant leftovers from moving to OneDrive.

I thought you may have been regularly copying files between those PC copies and the OneDrive copies.

It is probably best to delete them to avoid any future confusion, and instead create regular FH Full Project Backups from your live Project on OneDrive.

 

As you have correctly identified, those OneDrive files are permanently on both your PC disk drives as well as in the OneDrive cloud.

 

Yes, you can safely delete any out-of-date Snapshot files. Another FH user has experienced similar issues with too many Snapshots.

 

It looks like all the live files (without the -Chillblast… suffix) have the latest ‘Date modified’ so are presumably your working data set.

There is virtually no risk in deleting all the -Chillblast… or -DESKTOP… suffixed files, but let them go to the Recycle Bin where they can be recovered for a while in case you discover any significant missing data.

The two GEDCOM files may be worth backing up outside OneDrive separately just in case as they hold the most critical data.

 

It appears that the synchronisation problems arose on more than just 19/01 and 10/02 because there are many more ‘Date modified’ values ranging from 17/11 to 17/02 for the Cache files.

You need to take care that only one application on one PC is accessing those FH files at the same time.

 

Most customisation settings (such as Queries) are NOT held within Projects, and some are even held in the Windows Registry.

They must be transferred separately and there is advice in the FHUG Knowledge Base on how to do that, and the simplest method employs my Plugin.

Maybe you originally followed the Family Historian V5 & V6 Migration Guide or alternatively the Utility ~ Microsoft OneDrive (SkyDrive) advice.

They both identify my Backup and Restore Family Historian Settings Plugin.

If you need any help with using it then do ask.

 

Regards, Mike Tate

 

From: family-historian@groups.io <family-historian@groups.io> On Behalf Of john@...
Sent: 20 February 2020 14:45
To: family-historian@groups.io
Subject: Re: [family-historian] Problems with OneDrive replication

 

Thank you Jane for your input and I will always try to have disciplined housekeeping on FH6 between my desktop and my laptop. I would have said that I never have FH6 open on both computers at once, but perhaps I did break this rule on 19/01 and 10/02 when the two extra copies were created.I will remember in future.
Mike, I have looked at the Microsoft article, "What do the OneDrive icons mean?" and I am not sure that I understand their descriptions of the two types of green ticks. The blue cloud icon is clear in that it means the file is only available online. The green tick in a white circle icon says, " When you open an online-only file, it downloads to your device and becomes a locally available file" From what you say, this seems to mean that from the first time you open a "green tick in white circle" file it downloads and stays downloaded from then on. The white tick in a green circle, which I have used, seems to leave a copy on the device from the start, even if the file isn't opened.  There doesn't seem to be much difference between these two states so I will stick to the white tick in a green circle version. I have long wished that Microsoft had published a users manual for OneDrive as I have had lots of what-if questions which I couldn't find answers to.
 I have checked the FH settings for snapshots and they are as suggested (5 fast and 3 slow) which should give 8 current snapshots, so why do I have 17 snapshots?  If they continue to pile up, can I safely delete snapshot files earlier than say the last 8, as FH doesn't seem to be doing this?
As I said earlier, I may have accidentally run FH on both computers at the same time on 19/01 and 10/02 when the Chillblast - duplicates were created. Can and should I delete these duplicates and if so at what level in the file structure should I do it so that I don't delete anything used by the original file? Should I delete them in File > Project window, where they all appear?
I do use Carbonite cloud backup, but when I moved the Project files from Documents to OneDrive, I didn't add their new One Drive location to the Carbonite backup list so that shouldn't be interfering. I have left the original Project files in Documents, but they are no longer connected to FH via File>Project Window so also shouldn't be interfering.
My anti-virus is Symantec Norton but I have not read of any OneDrive problems arising from Norton.
I am trying to remember how I copied my FH Project Files from Documents to the OneDrive folder and I think I used a drag and drop although I often use copy and paste. I had to also set up FH on my laptop and I used the FHUG Knowledge Base to be sure I did that correctly. I can't remember whether I transferred the Project Files to my laptop before moving the project files to OneDrive on both computers or whether I let the laptop populate its project files from OneDrive. Probably the former. I have since changed one of my custom queries on the desktop and these changes have not come through to the laptop so I will have to investigate what to do about this. The file these customisations  are in is apparently not being replicated via OneDrive. I only moved the FH Projects folder to OneDrive and not any of the other FH files.
If you can answer my query on safely removing the duplicates I will be very grateful.
Regards, John.


Re: Problems with OneDrive replication

John Morrison
 

Going from what you have said, it also sounds like you copied your project folder to One Drive on BOTH computers. The wil have caused duplication of every file in all your projects.
Only copy one computers files to One Drive (Or drop box etc), they will automatically replicate on all your other devices as White circle or cloud until you actually use them..
Regards
John


Re: Problems with OneDrive replication

john@...
 

John,
Thanks for the sound advice which I wish I had known about before I set up FH on my laptop and moved it onto OneDrive.
Regards, John.


Diagram > Boxes > Conditions

David Potter
 

Hi Forum. Is there a way to set multiple Box Colour conditions for Flag values?

Eg, if individuals have flag 1841 Census AND 1851 census AND 1861 census then Box is green?

Many thanks
David Potter


Re: Diagram > Boxes > Conditions

Mike Tate
 

Well you could, but you can have a Boxes tab Condition that tests for 1841 Census Event and 1851 Census Event and 1861 Census Event that sets Box Colour green.

That way you don’t have to keep setting Flags to show you have the associated Census Event, because the Condition looks directly at the facts.

See the FHUG Knowledge Base FH Using Flags and Icons and Expressions:

https://www.fhug.org.uk/wiki/doku.php?id=how_to:using_flags_and_icons_and_expressions

 

Regards, Mike Tate

 

From: family-historian@groups.io <family-historian@groups.io> On Behalf Of David Potter via Groups.Io
Sent: 21 February 2020 16:55
To: family-historian@groups.io
Subject: [family-historian] Diagram > Boxes > Conditions

 

Hi Forum. Is there a way to set multiple Box Colour conditions for Flag values?

 

Eg, if individuals have flag 1841 Census AND 1851 census AND 1861 census then Box is green?

 

Many thanks

David Potter


Re: Diagram > Boxes > Conditions

David Potter
 

Hi Mike. Wow that's a much better solution. Thank you I'll take a look at that link.

Br

David Potter 

On Fri, 21 Feb 2020, 17:08 Mike Tate, <post@...> wrote:

Well you could, but you can have a Boxes tab Condition that tests for 1841 Census Event and 1851 Census Event and 1861 Census Event that sets Box Colour green.

That way you don’t have to keep setting Flags to show you have the associated Census Event, because the Condition looks directly at the facts.

See the FHUG Knowledge Base FH Using Flags and Icons and Expressions:

https://www.fhug.org.uk/wiki/doku.php?id=how_to:using_flags_and_icons_and_expressions

 

Regards, Mike Tate

 

From: family-historian@groups.io <family-historian@groups.io> On Behalf Of David Potter via Groups.Io
Sent: 21 February 2020 16:55
To: family-historian@groups.io
Subject: [family-historian] Diagram > Boxes > Conditions

 

Hi Forum. Is there a way to set multiple Box Colour conditions for Flag values?

 

Eg, if individuals have flag 1841 Census AND 1851 census AND 1861 census then Box is green?

 

Many thanks

David Potter


Re: Add GRO Source

SDCann
 

I'm fairly new to all this, but I created Sources for GRO Births, marriages and deaths, separately. I the create a citation using the relevant source and quote the index data in the citation.

Is this a Good way to do it?

Thanks,

Steve.


Re: Add GRO Source

Sheila Bryant
 

Steve, I do hope so - it's what I do!!!

Cheers

On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 at 22:23, SDCann <sdcann@...> wrote:
I'm fairly new to all this, but I created Sources for GRO Births, marriages and deaths, separately. I the create a citation using the relevant source and quote the index data in the citation.

Is this a Good way to do it?

Thanks,

Steve.



--
Sheila


Re: Add GRO Source

Mike Tate
 

Hi Steve,

Yes, that sounds good. Presumably you are adding the Citations to the Birth, Marriage & Death events respectively.

There is also a Plugin that helps with that process.

 

However, if you order the BMD Certificates then a slightly different method is often better.

 

There was a recent discussion thread in the FHUG Forums on exactly this topic of Sources and Citations and the Add GRO Source plugin:

https://www.fhug.org.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=17444

https://www.fhug.org.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=42&t=16641

You can join up for free.

 

Regards, Mike Tate

 

From: family-historian@groups.io <family-historian@groups.io> On Behalf Of SDCann
Sent: 21 February 2020 22:14
To: family-historian@groups.io
Subject: Re: [family-historian] Add GRO Source

 

I'm fairly new to all this, but I created Sources for GRO Births, marriages and deaths, separately. I the create a citation using the relevant source and quote the index data in the citation.

Is this a Good way to do it?

Thanks,

Steve.


Unable to open file and file not found FH6.2

leelegs <pauline.mitchell88@...>
 

I have used FH6.2 for quite some time, although not in recent months. When I came to access the database recently I could access, if required the Sample Project, but if I wished to access my used database what comes to screen is a square box and on the left-hand side of this box is a red roundel with a X in it. The first line of information in the box says 'Unable to open file' and then there are two more lines of information which I recognise as being the paths via which I ought to be able to access the database, but then the last line says 'File not found'.

In other directories not connected with FH6.2 I do have a couple of versions of my database which I can access. I also have an external back-up facility, but I don't know at what date the last back-up was done - something I must give serious thought to. Is it possible, using either the external back-up facility or one of the versions in my other directories to get the information transported to FH6.2?

I'm not thick, but I am not computer literate as far as the inner workings of paths etc are concerned. I am also 78 years of age - so be gentle with me.

leelegs


Re: Add GRO Source

Trevor Rix
 

As I don't use traditional sources and citations, I use this method to record entries from GRO indexes. For example, "Q3 1869" for the date; and "Sudbury registration district" for the place. That information can only come from the GRO indexes. That's it -- plain and simple.


Re: Add GRO Source

Victor Markham
 

Not quite.

Information comes from local registration offices which sends the details to GRO. Not all details arrive some are missing. The marriages of my mother's two sisters are not in the GRO index. They were married in the 1930's. Fortunately I guessed which church they married in and found the details at the local history centre which has the parish records

Having a copy from the local registration centre is a copy of the full certificate albeit in black and white.

If you visit https://www.ukbmd.org.uk/ you will get details of where the marriage took place..register office or name of church in addition to the local register office reference number which is different from the GRO number

Victor

On 23/02/2020 4:29 pm, Trevor Rix wrote:
As I don't use traditional sources and citations, I use this method to record entries from GRO indexes. For example, "Q3 1869" for the date; and "Sudbury registration district" for the place. That information can only come from the GRO indexes. That's it -- plain and simple.


Re: Add GRO Source

John Hanson
 

Victor
UKBMD does not have all of the counties – mainly in the north of England and depends on whether the local family history society can find the volunteers and whether the Registrar will agree

 

Regards
John Hanson - researching the Halstead/Holstead/Alstead names
Researcher, the Halsted Trust - https://www.halsted.org.uk
Research website - https://www.halstedresearch.org.uk

2021 Family History Conference - https://www.elizabethanancestors.org.uk

 

 

 

 

From: family-historian@groups.io <family-historian@groups.io> On Behalf Of Victor Markham
Sent: 23 February 2020 17:45
To: family-historian@groups.io
Subject: Re: [family-historian] Add GRO Source

 

Not quite.

Information comes from local registration offices which sends the details to GRO. Not all details arrive some are missing. The marriages of my mother's two sisters are not in the GRO index. They were married in the 1930's. Fortunately I guessed which church they married in and found the details at the local history centre which has the parish records

Having a copy from the local registration centre is a copy of the full certificate albeit in black and white.

If you visit https://www.ukbmd.org.uk/ you will get details of where the marriage took place..register office or name of church in addition to the local register office reference number which is different from the GRO number

Victor

On 23/02/2020 4:29 pm, Trevor Rix wrote:

As I don't use traditional sources and citations, I use this method to record entries from GRO indexes. For example, "Q3 1869" for the date; and "Sudbury registration district" for the place. That information can only come from the GRO indexes. That's it -- plain and simple.


Re: Add GRO Source

Victor Markham
 

Yes that is correct. It is increasing and more local register offices are agreeing.

Just because all counties are not covered doesn't mean one should not check

One can check what is available on https://www.ukbmd.org.uk/local_bmd

UKBMD also has a Facebook group

Victor

On 23/02/2020 5:52 pm, John Hanson wrote:

Victor
UKBMD does not have all of the counties – mainly in the north of England and depends on whether the local family history society can find the volunteers and whether the Registrar will agree

 

Regards
John Hanson - researching the Halstead/Holstead/Alstead names
Researcher, the Halsted Trust - https://www.halsted.org.uk
Research website - https://www.halstedresearch.org.uk

2021 Family History Conference - https://www.elizabethanancestors.org.uk

 

 

 

 

From: family-historian@groups.io <family-historian@groups.io> On Behalf Of Victor Markham
Sent: 23 February 2020 17:45
To: family-historian@groups.io
Subject: Re: [family-historian] Add GRO Source

 

Not quite.

Information comes from local registration offices which sends the details to GRO. Not all details arrive some are missing. The marriages of my mother's two sisters are not in the GRO index. They were married in the 1930's. Fortunately I guessed which church they married in and found the details at the local history centre which has the parish records

Having a copy from the local registration centre is a copy of the full certificate albeit in black and white.

If you visit https://www.ukbmd.org.uk/ you will get details of where the marriage took place..register office or name of church in addition to the local register office reference number which is different from the GRO number

Victor

On 23/02/2020 4:29 pm, Trevor Rix wrote:

As I don't use traditional sources and citations, I use this method to record entries from GRO indexes. For example, "Q3 1869" for the date; and "Sudbury registration district" for the place. That information can only come from the GRO indexes. That's it -- plain and simple.


Re: About pre-1850 U.S. Census Entries

Mike Tate
 

That is the same question as Joel asked in the FHUG Forum:

https://www.fhug.org.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=17485

 

 

From: family-historian@groups.io <family-historian@groups.io> On Behalf Of joel@...
Sent: 23 February 2020 13:39
To: family-historian@groups.io
Subject: [family-historian] About pre-1850 U.S. Census Entries

 

Starting with the U.S. 1850 Census, each family member or lodger in a household was listed by name, starting with the Head of Household and then in descending order by age. Prior to that, the U.S. census only names the Head of Household, and provides head counts for gender & age categories (Male, under 5, Female, 5-10, etc.).

One can make assumptions about who those headcounts are, but they are not literally named in those censuses. I normally try to make a reasonable conclusion that a certain spouse and/or children are the likely head-counts indicated in these census entries. Sometimes, you have enough info to do this, sometimes not.

My question is about best practices for entering these pre-1850 censuses in AS. With 1850 and beyond, it is clear that you add each named person to the census data entry in AS. Is it AS intention that only the HoH be added to pre-1850 census or is it okay to make assumptions about who those head counts are, add them to the interface as well, and indicate the category count in their row?

  1. Enter only the HoH and the head counts in the grid as documented in the census.
  2. Enter the HoH and each individual believed ot be represented by the head counts (potentially incorrect and/or incomplete)
  3. Do #1 above and add the census event manually to those individuals who are believed to be represented. This allows a separate note re: the assumption and logic behind it and allows individual changes if other new data confirms/overturns the assumptions.

I can see pros and cons to all of these, but I'm wondering how other AS users might deal with this?

 

161 - 180 of 3246