Hi--was out of town so just getting back to this. These are great! Thanks so much. -- Genie

At this point, I would prefer to no longer receive emails as I've figured out my problems and don't plan to do anything further with my family history. Can you please let me know how I go about

I've been away for a few days so just getting back to this. Thanks very much. This seems to get things on one page although a little hard to read! Hopefully the young generation can decipher!!

Click the Unsubscribe link at the bottom of any email you get from the list. -- Jane. Jane Taubman | www.rjt.org.uk | www.taubman.org.uk | www.fhug.org.uk

I have been an FH user for many years, but have just returned to it after a two year break, owing to other commitments. In that time I have forgotten a lot and I suspect that a few marbles have also

Hi Bob, Yes, Media images can be linked in various positions and different users have different guidelines, but the following are popular criteria: Pictures of people are linked to the Individual

Bob, You asked in what circumstances an image would be linked to a Fact. Mike has given the examples of pictures of a marriage or graduation linked to the corresponding events, or a

And to tweak what Lorna said - if I run off reports, I seldom print the images linked to the source records - my reports are long enough as it is. But the one type of image (in my files) that gets

Hi As I understand it, copyright varies according to the nature of the object and the national laws in place. For Australia details on pretty much all copyright matters can be found here:

David many thanks. It worked. The Reason why I needed to make 'private' my 'living' relatives was because when creating a website I discovered that individual summary reports made reference to living

James, There are other ways of achieving that if you are interested, by ‘sanitising’ the living person details. That involves making Names anonymous and hiding BMD details, etc. The Clean

Shane, it isn't only copyright that's an issue (although it can be). It is also the Terms of Service of various websites. If you download an image from (say) Findmypast, you probably do not have the

Trevor, not that unusual. I can provide a laundry-list of facts that depend on records for which images are not available -- both here in the UK and in the US and Canada, I am envious of anyone who

I rarely comment, but sources & citations are one reason that caused me to take a holiday from FH. The example described by colevalleygirl isn’t that unusual and certainly I have some in my

@colevalleygirl Helen Agreed, there are extraordinary quantities of records that are not on the internet. I spent cumulative months/years of my life consulting some of those records around the

and Absolutely - I seem to end up squeezing more and more text into the publication part of the Source Record - and also into the Author part. Thus a will in a book of copy-wills is recorded as Author

Adrian, Presumably, the "image-only collection" can be viewed on-screen, so why not take a screenshot, or is that forbidden? Or is it that that image can only be viewed by visiting the organisation in

Generally speaking, Mike, you may say that, I couldn't possibly comment! More to the point, while it's possible to screenshot baptisms etc, it sure ain't feasible to screen shot a multipage will

Could one not print the pages to a PDF file. I use CUTEPDF writer.

No - the problem is that you can't see the whole of the page without shrinking the document down too small for legibility of the text. A PDF print just shows what visible on your screen - it can't