Date   

Re: Help in comparing FH Gedcom with Ancestry Gedcom

Mike Tate
 

The first step is to create a new FH Project from the Ancestry GEDCOM.

That needs to be reviewed and corrected to remove the usual Ancestry UDF and correct known transcription mistakes, etc.

You could also delete Individual records and associated records that are very distant relatives of the 500 new records.

 

Then you will have to bite the bullet and use File > Merge/Compare File to import the new records to your master Project.

BUT do review EVERY TAB in the Merge dialogue.

 

The FHUG Knowledge Base has advice on importing from Ancestry and using Merge/Compare File.

 

Mike Tate

 

From: family-historian@groups.io <family-historian@groups.io> On Behalf Of John Clarke via groups.io
Sent: 09 February 2021 09:22
To: family-historian@groups.io
Subject: [family-historian] Help in comparing FH Gedcom with Ancestry Gedcom

 

Hi all

I have got myself into a bit of a mess. I have been using Ancestry for my family tree in conjunction with FH. I use Ancestry as I and my family have done DNA tests, so it has been very useful to discover new relatives. However, my discipline of trying to dual maintain both databases has fallen down and now I have about 500 more records on Ancestery than in my FH project.

I have downloaded the Ancestry gedcom and made a comparison to the FH gedcom, but in reality I just don’t know where to start in trying to construct the missing relatives into the FH tree.

I don't want to press merge - I have made back-ups, because i do want to validate each record to ensure that it is attaching to the right person. Also I know there are some errors in Ancestry due to transcription mistakes, that I have researched and corrected in FH.

What approach would you recommend please?

Apologies for the conundrum. Will spend more time and effort in the future in dual maintaining the two databases.

John Clarke


Re: Do you record "negative result" certificates

Sheila Bryant
 

I too make a note in FH for the relevant person along the lines of NOT ......... I always intend to try to offer the certificates up to the community, but they usually languish together at the back of the folder with certificates I know to be correct

Kind regards
--
Sheila

Virus-free. www.avg.com


Re: Do you record "negative result" certificates

Mike Tate
 

You may also want to look the new FH V7 Fact Flags such as Private, Tentative and Rejected.

Even standard Facts could be created with Citations of the ‘wrong’ document and flagged as Private and Rejected with explanatory Notes.

Thus it is clear the cited document has been Rejected and the Private flag hides the fact in Diagrams and Reports.

 

Mike Tate


Help in comparing FH Gedcom with Ancestry Gedcom

John Clarke
 

Hi all

I have got myself into a bit of a mess. I have been using Ancestry for my family tree in conjunction with FH. I use Ancestry as I and my family have done DNA tests, so it has been very useful to discover new relatives. However, my discipline of trying to dual maintain both databases has fallen down and now I have about 500 more records on Ancestery than in my FH project.

I have downloaded the Ancestry gedcom and made a comparison to the FH gedcom, but in reality I just don’t know where to start in trying to construct the missing relatives into the FH tree.

I don't want to press merge - I have made back-ups, because i do want to validate each record to ensure that it is attaching to the right person. Also I know there are some errors in Ancestry due to transcription mistakes, that I have researched and corrected in FH.

What approach would you recommend please?

Apologies for the conundrum. Will spend more time and effort in the future in dual maintaining the two databases.

John Clarke


Re: Do you record "negative result" certificates

David Nicoll <david_nicoll@...>
 

Excellent idea! I for one will be adopting

 

From: family-historian@groups.io <family-historian@groups.io> On Behalf Of Geoffrey Knott
Sent: 09 February 2021 09:49
To: family-historian@groups.io
Subject: Re: [family-historian] Do you record "negative result" certificates

 

John,

I've found a number of instances where for a while I've been following the wrong individual, only for further research to get me back on track. (This can happen if you follow online trees, eg on Ancestry, where the tree owner has not followed up properly on research.) My solution is I've created a FH custom fact 'not be confused', with a sentence reading '{individual} should {label} with a person of the same name, {value}, {note}' with a reference to the unrelated individual I've created, under whose entry I can store the confusing facts and documents. Then, if I later return to the related individual, I won't make the same mistake twice.

Worth consideration?

Geoff K

On 08/02/2021 17:31, johnfirr via groups.io wrote:

This is a bit of a random query but i,m just interested to know what others do in this situation.

I try to avoid ordering certificates unless I am very sure that they represent someone in my database ( costs rack up quickly!), but occasionally it is necessary to order certificates to work out if you are dealing with the correct person.

This happened just recently which has resulted in my holding two certificates of individuals I now know are neither ancestors or relatives. Whilst on the face of it these are therefore negative results they do have value in that recording them properly will mean I can avoid going that way again.

Just wondering what others do? Do you discard them, record them offline somewhere and keep the paper or do you create an unrelated individual on FH so you can record the event and put a note that this was a research channel that yielded a none relative.?

Just interested on how those who are more experienced approach this.

thanks
John Firr


Re: Do you record "negative result" certificates

Geoffrey Knott
 

John,

I've found a number of instances where for a while I've been following the wrong individual, only for further research to get me back on track. (This can happen if you follow online trees, eg on Ancestry, where the tree owner has not followed up properly on research.) My solution is I've created a FH custom fact 'not be confused', with a sentence reading '{individual} should {label} with a person of the same name, {value}, {note}' with a reference to the unrelated individual I've created, under whose entry I can store the confusing facts and documents. Then, if I later return to the related individual, I won't make the same mistake twice.

Worth consideration?

Geoff K

On 08/02/2021 17:31, johnfirr via groups.io wrote:
This is a bit of a random query but i,m just interested to know what others do in this situation.

I try to avoid ordering certificates unless I am very sure that they represent someone in my database ( costs rack up quickly!), but occasionally it is necessary to order certificates to work out if you are dealing with the correct person.

This happened just recently which has resulted in my holding two certificates of individuals I now know are neither ancestors or relatives. Whilst on the face of it these are therefore negative results they do have value in that recording them properly will mean I can avoid going that way again.

Just wondering what others do? Do you discard them, record them offline somewhere and keep the paper or do you create an unrelated individual on FH so you can record the event and put a note that this was a research channel that yielded a none relative.?

Just interested on how those who are more experienced approach this.

thanks
John Firr


Re: Do you record "negative result" certificates

F97Russell
 

What works for me is to make a note for the person in FH to the effect that "Their Birth/Marriage/Death isn't  XYZ..." which can be deleted when I've finally got the right one.


Re: Do you record "negative result" certificates

Victor Markham
 

That is not how I would do this.

At the persons name I open the plug in for GRO and fill in the refernce details. Those details will be added to the persons name whether it is birth, marriage or death. If at a later date you can confirm th details are correct then order the certificate. If you find then wrong then delete it. All this is on the persons FH information so no need for a file. If the details are correct order the certificate then scan it ito a folder with the persons name. The input the image to the line where the GRO ref is

Victor

On 08/02/2021 8:52 pm, stephen.challis@... wrote:

Assuming that you have an electronic record (eg a download or a scan), I would put them in a folder on my computer labelled, for example, ‘non-relatives’. Give the downloaded or scanned file the name of the person in the format surname, first name(s). Don’t forget to refer to it before you order any more certificates!

 

Kind regards

 

Stephen

 

 

Stephen Challis

Please reply to Stephen.Challis@...

 

From: family-historian@groups.io [mailto:family-historian@groups.io] On Behalf Of johnfirr via groups.io
Sent: 08 February 2021 17:31
To: family-historian@groups.io
Subject: [family-historian] Do you record "negative result" certificates

 

This is a bit of a random query but i,m just interested to know what others do in this situation.

I try to avoid ordering certificates unless I am very sure that they represent someone in my database ( costs rack up quickly!), but occasionally it is necessary to order certificates to work out if you are dealing with the correct person.

This happened just recently which has resulted in my holding two certificates of individuals I now know are neither ancestors or relatives. Whilst on the face of it these are therefore negative results they do have value in that recording them properly will mean I can avoid going that way again.

Just wondering what others do? Do you discard them, record them offline somewhere and keep the paper or do you create an unrelated individual on FH so you can record the event and put a note that this was a research channel that yielded a none relative.?

Just interested on how those who are more experienced approach this.

thanks
John Firr


Re: Do you record "negative result" certificates

stephen.challis@...
 

Assuming that you have an electronic record (eg a download or a scan), I would put them in a folder on my computer labelled, for example, ‘non-relatives’. Give the downloaded or scanned file the name of the person in the format surname, first name(s). Don’t forget to refer to it before you order any more certificates!

 

Kind regards

 

Stephen

 

 

Stephen Challis

Please reply to Stephen.Challis@...

 

From: family-historian@groups.io [mailto:family-historian@groups.io] On Behalf Of johnfirr via groups.io
Sent: 08 February 2021 17:31
To: family-historian@groups.io
Subject: [family-historian] Do you record "negative result" certificates

 

This is a bit of a random query but i,m just interested to know what others do in this situation.

I try to avoid ordering certificates unless I am very sure that they represent someone in my database ( costs rack up quickly!), but occasionally it is necessary to order certificates to work out if you are dealing with the correct person.

This happened just recently which has resulted in my holding two certificates of individuals I now know are neither ancestors or relatives. Whilst on the face of it these are therefore negative results they do have value in that recording them properly will mean I can avoid going that way again.

Just wondering what others do? Do you discard them, record them offline somewhere and keep the paper or do you create an unrelated individual on FH so you can record the event and put a note that this was a research channel that yielded a none relative.?

Just interested on how those who are more experienced approach this.

thanks
John Firr


Do you record "negative result" certificates

johnfirr@...
 

This is a bit of a random query but i,m just interested to know what others do in this situation.

I try to avoid ordering certificates unless I am very sure that they represent someone in my database ( costs rack up quickly!), but occasionally it is necessary to order certificates to work out if you are dealing with the correct person.

This happened just recently which has resulted in my holding two certificates of individuals I now know are neither ancestors or relatives. Whilst on the face of it these are therefore negative results they do have value in that recording them properly will mean I can avoid going that way again.

Just wondering what others do? Do you discard them, record them offline somewhere and keep the paper or do you create an unrelated individual on FH so you can record the event and put a note that this was a research channel that yielded a none relative.?

Just interested on how those who are more experienced approach this.

thanks
John Firr


locked Re: Ancestry subscription discount

Victor Markham
 

£89 for worldwide subs. Mine is due for renewal next month at £179.99! Better cancel then renew!

Victor

On 08/02/2021 4:48 pm, Sue Herrington wrote:

I’ve used the link for at least the last 3/4 years without any problem. As long as your subscription has ended, so that you can no longer view records. £89 will give you Worldwide membership for 12 months.

 

Sue

 

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

 

From: James Pam
Sent: 08 February 2021 15:44
To: family-historian@groups.io
Subject: [family-historian] Ancestry subscription discount

 

Much to my surprise this Ancestry link first posted by Trevor Rix in 2017 still offers a 50% discount on subscription. I was  a lapsed Ancestry member so don't know whether  £59 for 12 months is limited to lapsed members.

https://www.fhug.org.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=15275&p=80914#p80914

 


locked Re: Ancestry subscription discount

Sue Herrington
 

I’ve used the link for at least the last 3/4 years without any problem. As long as your subscription has ended, so that you can no longer view records. £89 will give you Worldwide membership for 12 months.

 

Sue

 

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

 

From: James Pam
Sent: 08 February 2021 15:44
To: family-historian@groups.io
Subject: [family-historian] Ancestry subscription discount

 

Much to my surprise this Ancestry link first posted by Trevor Rix in 2017 still offers a 50% discount on subscription. I was  a lapsed Ancestry member so don't know whether  £59 for 12 months is limited to lapsed members.

https://www.fhug.org.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=15275&p=80914#p80914

 


locked Re: Ancestry subscription discount

liz_graydon
 

The 50% discount is still available as long as members cancel their subscription, let it expire and then resubscribe.  I have found you need only wait for about an hour after you show as only having a guest account for it to work



On Monday, 8 February 2021, 15:44:24 GMT, James Pam <jamespam1@...> wrote:


Much to my surprise this Ancestry link first posted by Trevor Rix in 2017 still offers a 50% discount on subscription. I was  a lapsed Ancestry member so don't know whether  £59 for 12 months is limited to lapsed members.

https://www.fhug.org.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=15275&p=80914#p80914


locked Re: Ancestry subscription discount

Fiona Hall
 

You didn’t have to be brand new to Ancestry to use it – just not a current subscriber
 
Fiona
 

From: James Pam
Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 3:25 PM
To: family-historian@groups.io
Subject: [family-historian] Ancestry subscription discount
 
Much to my surprise this Ancestry link first posted by Trevor Rix in 2017 still offers a 50% discount on subscription. I was  a lapsed Ancestry member so don't know whether  £59 for 12 months is limited to lapsed members.

https://www.fhug.org.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=15275&p=80914#p80914


locked Ancestry subscription discount

James Pam
 

Much to my surprise this Ancestry link first posted by Trevor Rix in 2017 still offers a 50% discount on subscription. I was  a lapsed Ancestry member so don't know whether  £59 for 12 months is limited to lapsed members.

https://www.fhug.org.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=15275&p=80914#p80914


Re: Revoked will

Julia Vokes
 

One thing that comes out loud and clear to me is the importance of making a Will and then keeping it up to date!! This is so relevant these days when people often marry more than once or not at all and might have children and step children from different relationships. Also worth remembering is that a divorce does not make a Will invalid, unlike a marriage, unless the Will was made with the marriage specifically mentioned.

A friend recently came unstuck badly, and expensively, when her common law husband died. She was the second partner and he had made his Will when married to the first wife and never updated it!!

Julia

On 6 Feb 2021, at 12:35, David Dewick <david.dewick@...> wrote:

Intestacy rules are even more complicated (or vindictive) if you are adopted and one of your adopted parents re-marry . ☹️
On 6 Feb 2021, at 12:30, Adrian Bruce <abruce6155@...> wrote:

On Sat, 6 Feb 2021 at 12:19, Lorna Craig via groups.io
<l.m.craig@...> wrote:
Adrian, that’s interesting but I recall learning something slightly different. It was my understanding that if two people died more or less simultaneously (as in the case of a bombing incident) and there was no way of knowing exactly who died first, the older person was presumed to have died first.
Doh! Your understanding is pretty much what I meant, only it says it
more generally.

For titles (which was all I was talking about) of course there is only
one heir so your objection of two heirs doesn't apply. However, in the
more general case, your statement makes sense and is more useful than
my formula.

Thanks
Adrian








Re: Revoked will

David Dewick
 

Intestacy rules are even more complicated (or vindictive) if you are adopted and one of your adopted parents re-marry . ☹️

On 6 Feb 2021, at 12:30, Adrian Bruce <abruce6155@...> wrote:

On Sat, 6 Feb 2021 at 12:19, Lorna Craig via groups.io
<l.m.craig@...> wrote:
Adrian, that’s interesting but I recall learning something slightly different. It was my understanding that if two people died more or less simultaneously (as in the case of a bombing incident) and there was no way of knowing exactly who died first, the older person was presumed to have died first.
Doh! Your understanding is pretty much what I meant, only it says it
more generally.

For titles (which was all I was talking about) of course there is only
one heir so your objection of two heirs doesn't apply. However, in the
more general case, your statement makes sense and is more useful than
my formula.

Thanks
Adrian





Re: Revoked will

Adrian Bruce
 

On Sat, 6 Feb 2021 at 12:19, Lorna Craig via groups.io
<l.m.craig@...> wrote:
Adrian, that’s interesting but I recall learning something slightly different. It was my understanding that if two people died more or less simultaneously (as in the case of a bombing incident) and there was no way of knowing exactly who died first, the older person was presumed to have died first.
Doh! Your understanding is pretty much what I meant, only it says it
more generally.

For titles (which was all I was talking about) of course there is only
one heir so your objection of two heirs doesn't apply. However, in the
more general case, your statement makes sense and is more useful than
my formula.

Thanks
Adrian


Re: Revoked will

Lorna Craig
 

Adrian, that’s interesting but I recall learning something slightly different.  It was my understanding that if two people died more or less simultaneously (as in the case of a bombing incident) and there was no way of knowing exactly who died first, the older person was presumed to have died first. 

 

If it was just a case of assuming that the ‘heir’ survives longer, how would you resolve a case where the two people concerned had made each other their heirs?

 

Don't know about inheritance under intestacy, but there are rules about how titles are inherited if the holder and their heir die at the same time. IIRC, the heir is deemed to survive the holder for enough seconds to inherit the title. After that, it goes to the next heir - if any. (I learnt this from a railway history book!)

 


Re: Revoked will

Adrian Bruce
 

Don't know about inheritance under intestacy, but there are rules about how titles are inherited if the holder and their heir die at the same time. IIRC, the heir is deemed to survive the holder for enough seconds to inherit the title. After that, it goes to the next heir - if any. (I learnt this from a railway history book!)

Whether a similar rule exists to determine who gets what in a case of intestacy, as here, I have no idea, but it's worth bearing in mind as a possible explanation for who might get what.


2401 - 2420 of 5311