Use Tools > Work with Data > Places, select the Place from the list and then click Where Used on the right. The Results Set will display all the uses of that place. If you click on a

I am sure this is a very simple question and has probably been answered before. I am trying to find out which individuals reference a particular place to go back and correct the entry. At some point I

Mike Tate, Yes it will, thanks. The request to keep media and notes on the same page was passed on to the developer… sort of. I am in the process of clarifying my request. What specifically was

It’s not impossible to create Templated Source with multiple citations to that source (even a Birth Certificate Source created used the Essentials template will usually have multiple citations

Hi Yasmin, You are not alone in coping with the task of migration from RM to FH. There is much discussion and useful Plugins available in the FHUG Forums at https://www.fhug.org.uk/forum/index.php

If you add a generic source, say GRO Birth records, you can have multiple citations to that source. I have kept away from the Templated sources mechanism for that very reason. Paul TT

In the 'Family Historian Sample Project' there is an example of using Will, Death & Probate events for Ian Scot MUNRO. Both the Will and Probate events have a Fact Witness for the Role of Executor and

Good Morning, I am testing V7 and Rootsmagic I have a query around sources. In Rooysmagic I seem to be able to set a master source as Birth Certificate and then add each persons certificate as a

Hi Chris, I use Wills a lot. The way I handle them is to use the standard Will and Probate facts on the record for the testator. All the individuals named in the Will are recorded as Witnesses in

An alternative is to create a more general 'Alive at' fact. This can be used when you have any kind of evidence that someone was still alive at a certain date, for example if they were a

Hi, I have several old wills from the 16th/17th century which have proved useful in discovering children and daughter’s married names. They also show if a spouse / child is still alive having

Mike - Thank you VERY much for this last advice.  I will probably still print and keep your instructions, but will think long and hard before attempting to do it.  And may never bother.  It is, as

Karin, The first step of changing Name: 1850 Federal Census to Name: Census 1850 will probably NOT improve its order on the Fast Add Menu. It will probably make it worse by moving it last. However,

Mike - Thank you again for all your help. Yes - I would like to change the Name: 1850 Federal Census to Name: Census 1850. At this time that is the only Fact on my Fast Add Menu that is out of an

For genealogy research resources, see the FHUG KB https://fhug.org.uk/kb/. Start at Links > Services & Utilities and then Research Resources will get you

Mike Tate, I like “lateral thinking”. We called them “work arounds” which suggests a weakness in the programming. Lateral thinking suggests the user needs to be flexible, which they\I do.

Mickey, It is true that sometimes a degree of lateral thinking is required with the customisations to achieve a specific effect. In previous versions of FH the Report > Options > Format tab ‘Hdg

Hi Mike, Thank you for the welcome. I tried FHUG forums and the knowledge base on multiple occasions knowing full well I was asking the wrong question or using the wrong terminology. More likely

Welcome to the FH world Mickey. First I should point out that there is also the FHUG online Forums and Knowledge Base at: https://www.fhug.org.uk/forum/index.php and https://fhug.org.uk/kb/ They

OK Karen, there are several issues involved there. The Name: 'Census 1880' or '1850 Federal Census' defines the fundamental GEDCOM coding for those facts, which is why the Name field cannot be