On Sun, 31 Jul 2022 at 19:11, uhkh3tsccmz9@... <uhkh3tsccmz9@...> wrote: ... If you make enough of those pieces public others will be able to identify the father by jig-saw identification...

Thank you all for your advice. It is interesting to see different approaches. I changed my Expression to: =SourceLinks(["Source"],%INDI%) Which I took from the Query Bev mentioned. It does ask me to

It sounds as if you have identified the father by "jig-saw" identification (putting together the pieces). If you make enough of those pieces public others will be able to identify the father by

Thanks for sticking with me. I downloaded the Plugin, ran it and changed the custom birth tag to Birth, and saw 156 changes as expected. The changes appear in the Facts tab. I'm missing something

Bev, That is good advice, when I started many of my queries were adaptions of built in queries, no point in reinventing the wheel. Once I go

I completed a DNA test through Ancestry. One match was with an IVF donor concieved family member who I have now made contact with. Her father wants his details to remain private. From information

Steve - I'm also brand new to Family Historian so take my advice for what it's worth. There is a query that came with the version I downloaded called "Individuals Linked to Source..." That returns a

You need to add more rows, testing for subsequent sources linked to a birth event, increasing the index each time.  So in the next row the expression will be %INDI.BIRT[1].SOUR[2]>TITL%,  the next

I have created a query to list all individuals where the Rows expression: Expression: %INDI.BIRT[1].SOUR[1]>TITL% Operator: begins with Value: Index of Births (GRO) It displays the results, only if

You obtained a trial licence for FH V7 so you are fully licenced for 30 days and definitely can download Plugins. The restriction applied to earlier FH trial versions that were not formally licenced.

Thanks for the welcome and suggestions. Changing the custom Birth tag GEDCOM to BIRT did not work. I read both the FH website guidance and the webpages about Importing to Family Historian advice. It

Many thanks to everyone for your feedback, Dave Simpson

Victor, may I respectfully suggest you wait until you can test your theory at your computer before posting ideas that might confuse less experienced users? I think you will find it is impossible to

Welcome Wendy. There are two methods you can use. 1) In the TMG Tools > Master Tag Type List you will see that Birth uses GEDCOM : BIRT which is the standard Birth tag. For your custom Birth tag

I also use the “hidden text” feature where I have same addresses in different places, and I don’t know postcode or any other detail to distinguish them apart. For instance: 8 High Street

This is my first post to the list. After downloading the FH trial and reading the guidance for TMG users, I transferred a database. The standard birth tag transferred successfully. My custom birth tag

I was not at my computer and was thinking out of the box. How about this possibility. Save a map of the area. The go to the address of the person in question and prompt the nedi box then

That is the problem Victor. How do you attach a Media image to an Address field?

How about finding an old street map of Salford and take a scan of the area then add it to the old address Get BlueMail for Android On 29 Jul 2022, at 19:45, "uhkh3tsccmz9@..." <uhkh3tsccmz9@...>

Arguably the comment belongs not to the address but to an area in Salford. So do you attach a note on "Redevelopment in Salford" which lists groups of places that disappeared, when they disappeared