Marion, welcome to the Family Historian community. You talk about Reports, but then describe boxes, so I wonder if you mean Diagrams. You don’t say whether they look OK on screen, and only a

I have recently downloaded the evaluation program as it says that I can print reports etc from the program, however when I try to print I either only get the boxes or sometimes the boxes with what

Hi Maureen, I assume you mean you want to change the Title of the Source. Any changes you make to one Source will not affect any others. However if you have cited that source more than once all the

Paddy, what you have described make no sense to me. The statistics will always be perfect. Whether you prefer to work in the Focus Window or the Records Window makes no difference to the File

Knowing the quantities can help assess performance. Large numbers of records on a low power PC can impact run time, especially Media Records where images must be processed, particularly in Diagrams

I need to standardise my 'sources' as, over time, they have lost some consistency. I can't seem to find the answer in the FHUG knowledge base. I THINK I can change them this way (but I do have

Can I ask please what is the benefit of knowing how many? It's far more important to me to know that I've got a particular one. The overall numbers seem irrelevant. Am I missing something?

Thank you Mike. My preference is to work in the Focus window rather than the Records window. I have already installed both those Plugins that you recommend (and others). I can now report that after

In the Records Window open the Media tab and that should list those 207 Media records. Some may not be linked to a File and some may link to the same File. Where are you counting those 19 Media

It’s counting Media Records within the Gedcom, not media files.

Because it's reporting the number of Media RECORDS, not physical files. You may well have multiple RECORDS pointing to the same physical file. John Virus-free. www.avast.com

How can File Statistics report that I have 207 Media files in one of my trees when in fact there are only 19 Media files?

I have been at genealogy for 40 or so years. It started out with me making many trips to local sites for vital records and local history sources. I have been using software for genealogy since mid

Yes indeed, to both those bits that I clipped. One of the really frustrating things is those who've taken an Ancestry test and done nothing for their tree. I *assume* that they've just done it for

I am not particularly concerned with photos being copied. Those that do copy will need to decide if it was really a member of their family. If it was not then their tree is wrong and it is

I've been working my way through this conversation all day, deleting the posts as they arrived when I was at the computer and keeping out of it. But the last couple I read decided me to stick my oar

I'm sure that it does happen. But frankly Lorna, I can't hold myself responsible for tracking down every moron and idiot who doesn't understand elementary details of checking. As is stated above, most

I don’t have a problem sharing my research online, once I’ve removed all details of living people and people born less than 100 years ago that I don’t know to be dead. (I won’t rely on the

Yes, as long as they are attached to the right people! Sometimes the photos are copied and attached to the wrong people. I've seen it happen. Lorna

I got a bit uptight the first time that I saw my photos of my GG-GPs in someone else's tree. And then I thought that, after my death, there's every chance that the originals will be destroyed. So