Date   

Re: Does Calico Pie ever discount fh?

Julia Vokes
 

I’ve been using FH since v3.0 and never seen a discount.  I suspect that if a discount was offered some of the fantastic support might disappear and along with the free minor upgrades.  I still think it’s the best value family history program available.

Regards
Julia 


On 2 Dec 2021, at 10:57, Tom H <ve3meo@...> wrote:

Curious if fh is ever discounted as is often the case with other family tree software? Heredis 2022 was US$20 for Black Friday (I upgraded for $10). RootsMagic often has a seasonal sale around this time although there is not one currently, probably because of the RM8 release. I think last year one could get RM7 along with a couple of other products and the promise of a registration key for RM8 when it came out for $30, 25% off the current list price for RM8 alone.

Maybe CP does not because they want only the more serious and committed customers. A heavy discount might attract a group requiring a higher per capita load on support.

Just wondering because my trial period is running out and I've not been able to give it the workout I would like so I will be buying it (but I always like a sale!).


Re: Does Calico Pie ever discount fh?

colevalleygirl@colevalleygirl.co.uk
 

I've been using the product for nearly 19 years, and have never seen a discount offered.


Does Calico Pie ever discount fh?

Tom H
 

Curious if fh is ever discounted as is often the case with other family tree software? Heredis 2022 was US$20 for Black Friday (I upgraded for $10). RootsMagic often has a seasonal sale around this time although there is not one currently, probably because of the RM8 release. I think last year one could get RM7 along with a couple of other products and the promise of a registration key for RM8 when it came out for $30, 25% off the current list price for RM8 alone.

Maybe CP does not because they want only the more serious and committed customers. A heavy discount might attract a group requiring a higher per capita load on support.

Just wondering because my trial period is running out and I've not been able to give it the workout I would like so I will be buying it (but I always like a sale!).


Re: Family Historian Help

John Hanson
 

I could not run my large Halstead one-name study in FH with using this feature

With over 35,000 people in the database and over 800 “pools” is invaluable

Lots will say “oh I have no oddments” only to find that they do
One quick tip when teaching FH (back in the days of face to face meetings) was to get people to run the query, Hold down the ALT key and click the right mouse button (sorts into reverse order)

 

If it says 1 again you are doing better than most!

 

But just don’t go deleting the oddments check fist

 

Regards
John Hanson - researching the Halstead/Holstead/Alstead names
Researcher, the Halsted Trust - https://www.halsted.org.uk
Research website - https://www.halstedresearch.org.uk

 

From: family-historian@groups.io <family-historian@groups.io> On Behalf Of colevalleygirl@...
Sent: 30 November 2021 14:13
To: family-historian@groups.io
Subject: Re: [family-historian] Family Historian Help

 

Have a look at the standard Search for Orphans query:

"This query is designed to make it easy to locate individuals who have no relatives.  However, it also makes it easy to locate small groups of individuals who are all related to one another, but not to anyone else.

 

It works by introducing the idea of a 'pool'.  A pool is a group of individuals who are directly or indirectly related to one another (you are "indirectly related" to X, if you are directly related to someone who is directly related to X - or if you are directly related to someone who is indirectly related to X, for that matter).

 

Family Historian works out how many pools there are, and arbitrarily assigns numbers to them.  By sorting on pool number, it is easy to see both how many pools there are, and how many people belong to each of them.

 

If you have a small tree file in which everyone is directly or indirectly related to everyone else, there will be only one pool, numbered 1."

P.S. I've redacted the personal information in your post -- unwise to include it when you don't know who'll be seeing it.


Re: Family Historian Help

colevalleygirl@colevalleygirl.co.uk
 

Have a look at the standard Search for Orphans query:

"This query is designed to make it easy to locate individuals who have no relatives.  However, it also makes it easy to locate small groups of individuals who are all related to one another, but not to anyone else.
 
It works by introducing the idea of a 'pool'.  A pool is a group of individuals who are directly or indirectly related to one another (you are "indirectly related" to X, if you are directly related to someone who is directly related to X - or if you are directly related to someone who is indirectly related to X, for that matter).
 
Family Historian works out how many pools there are, and arbitrarily assigns numbers to them.  By sorting on pool number, it is easy to see both how many pools there are, and how many people belong to each of them.
 
If you have a small tree file in which everyone is directly or indirectly related to everyone else, there will be only one pool, numbered 1."

P.S. I've redacted the personal information in your post -- unwise to include it when you don't know who'll be seeing it.


Family Historian Help

Derek Rogers
 
Edited

 

I have quite an extensive tree logged to date.

 

Part of my early investigations were around trying to trace an unmarried mother's partner, and I suspect that I followed a couple of trails which proved to be incorrect.   As a result, I suspect that I have a number of individuals listed but where there is no valid link to my true tree.

 

 

Is there any way that I can identify any such individuals where there is no real link into my tree, such that I can just clean them out of my data.

 

 

Appreciate any assistance here.    Using V5.

 

Regards

 

Derek Rogers

 

 


Re: family history problem

Lorna Craig
 

This mailing list is provided by Calico Pie, the developers of Family Historian.  But FHUG (fhug.org.uk)  is a user group, run by and for users.   The two are independent of each other and it is entirely Calico Pie's choice to operate the mailing list.

Because many of the people who answer questions belong to both groups they find it easier to refer people to FHUG.  It contains an extensive Knowledge Base as well as the forums, so it is quicker to point someone to information there instead of repeating it here.  Also, has been said, any discussion involving images is much faster in the user group because there is no delay waiting for moderation.

On 29/11/2021 23:08, Ron Chapman wrote:

Just a comment about the group. What is the point in having this group if queries are always being transferred to the fhug.org.uk forums. Why not just use the forum all the time. It just seems to be a duplication of effort and it might cut back on the aggravation!


Re: family history problem

Trevor Rix
 

Because some people find this group/portal/social media first. The same applies to the Family Historian group on Facebook. Not much of a problem in my opinion. Better that people find some support rather than none.


Re: family history problem

Neil Grantham
 

Ron


It is only suggested when images need to be shown to demonstrate a problem. Images in this group are moderated and can take some time to appear. That isn't so on FHUG

The majority of issues discussed on this platform are text only though.


Best Wishes

Neil

Sent via BT Email App


From: Ron Chapman
Sent: Nov 29, 2021 at 11:08 PM
To: family-historian@groups.io
Subject: Re: [family-historian] family history problem

Just a comment about the group. What is the point in having this group if queries are always being transferred to the fhug.org.uk forums. Why not just use the forum all the time. It just seems to be a duplication of effort and it might cut back on the aggravation!

On 26/11/2021 19:18, colevalleygirl@... wrote:

Rick, try Windows Snip and Sketch (Windows key-shift-S) to take a snapshot of the problem areas of the diagram.

 

It might be easier if you move the discussion over to the fhug.org.uk forums, if you’re willing to register for an account there. It’s much easier to attach files over there, so we can see what’s going wrong.

 



Virus-free. www.avg.com


--
Neil Grantham
-------------------
Using FH 7 & AS 7
Researching Grantham, Skuce, Barrow, Birchall.


Re: family history problem

Ron Chapman
 

Just a comment about the group. What is the point in having this group if queries are always being transferred to the fhug.org.uk forums. Why not just use the forum all the time. It just seems to be a duplication of effort and it might cut back on the aggravation!

On 26/11/2021 19:18, colevalleygirl@... wrote:

Rick, try Windows Snip and Sketch (Windows key-shift-S) to take a snapshot of the problem areas of the diagram.

 

It might be easier if you move the discussion over to the fhug.org.uk forums, if you’re willing to register for an account there. It’s much easier to attach files over there, so we can see what’s going wrong.

 



Virus-free. www.avg.com


Re: Printing

Mike Tate
 

Yes, all that gets saved to the CSV spreadsheet is the data and not the formatting.

So fonts and columns widths and row height are all dependent on the Excel settings.

 

It looks like your data has only five columns.

However, in the spreadsheet screenshot, only four columns are visible.

So the fifth column must be way off to the right and all the columns are clearly much wider.

Therefore Excel cannot fit so much on one A4 page and spreads it over multiple pages.

The number of rows in the spreadsheet is the same as the FH Result Set but the spacing looks larger.

If you reduce the column widths, font size, and row spacing to match the FH Result Set then the number of pages will go down.

In Excel, you can also scale the output and get the same number of pages as with FH.

Page numbering will need further customisation in Excel.

As I said, only the data is saved to CSV and everything else depends on Excel settings, which must be adjusted to match FH to get the same printout.

 


Re: Printing

Neil Grantham
 

Victor,

I have to say I noticed from the screenshots, there were more lines of information on the non Excel version, so probably the Font in Excel is larger and thus the row heights larger to compensate.

This will all compound to make many more pages than the non Excel version


Best Wishes


Neil.





------ Original Message ------
From: "Victor Markham via groups.io" <victor@...>
To: family-historian@groups.io
Sent: Monday, 29 Nov, 2021 At 21:51
Subject: Re: [family-historian] Printing

Sorry for the omission of the detail I saved the file in. It was CSV I subsequently saved it as excel file with the same result.

I have just tested the PDF version and it, as you say, similar the FH internal version.

Saving on CSV I adjust the spreadsheet settings and it doesn't give the same result as FH internal version. I have checked all settings there was nothing I could do to make it like FH or PDF

In future I will think twice about saving things as CSV

On 29/11/2021 5:18 pm, Mike Tate wrote:

I agree with Helen. It would have been much simpler to use the FHUG Forum.

You omitted an important detail ~ what type of file did you save to: PDF, CSV, Text?

Depending on the application program that handles those file types the printout can vary dramatically.

When I tried PDF, the saved file was virtually identical to the FH internal printed version with the same numbered pages, headings, etc.

Save to a CSV spreadsheet file and the printout format will depend on the spreadsheet program’s settings, page orientation, etc.

Save to a Text file which is plain text with no formatting and you lose tidy columns and page numbering.

I’m not sure what else you could have expected with those file types.


--
Neil Grantham
-------------------
Using FH 7 & AS 7
Researching Grantham, Skuce, Barrow, Birchall.


Re: Printing

Victor Markham
 

Sorry for the omission of the detail I saved the file in. It was CSV I subsequently saved it as excel file with the same result.

I have just tested the PDF version and it, as you say, similar the FH internal version.

Saving on CSV I adjust the spreadsheet settings and it doesn't give the same result as FH internal version. I have checked all settings there was nothing I could do to make it like FH or PDF

In future I will think twice about saving things as CSV

On 29/11/2021 5:18 pm, Mike Tate wrote:

I agree with Helen. It would have been much simpler to use the FHUG Forum.

 

You omitted an important detail ~ what type of file did you save to: PDF, CSV, Text?

Depending on the application program that handles those file types the printout can vary dramatically.

 

When I tried PDF, the saved file was virtually identical to the FH internal printed version with the same numbered pages, headings, etc.

 

Save to a CSV spreadsheet file and the printout format will depend on the spreadsheet program’s settings, page orientation, etc.

 

Save to a Text file which is plain text with no formatting and you lose tidy columns and page numbering.

 

I’m not sure what else you could have expected with those file types.

 


Re: Printing

Mike Hall
 

Thanks for the info as I only signed up earlier.

I have been searching in desperation  as the last Widows 10 has lost a dll file so Family Historian has failed to load.  I have limited computer knowledge and approaching 80 !
I have a support ticket in but I will see if I can find on your site
Mike Hall


On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 17:16, colevalleygirl@... <colevalleygirl@...> wrote:
Mike H, as you're subscribed to the family-historian mailing list, you'll receive all emails sent to the group whether they're of interest to you or not. (and everyone will see your replies).  If a topic isn't of interest to you, visit groups.io/family-historian/topics, select the topic concerned and then 'Mute this topic'.


Re: Printing

Mike Tate
 

Or click the ‘Mute This Topic’ link at the bottom of the Email message.

 

From: family-historian@groups.io <family-historian@groups.io> On Behalf Of colevalleygirl@...
Sent: 29 November 2021 17:16
To: family-historian@groups.io
Subject: Re: [family-historian] Printing

 

Mike H, as you're subscribed to the family-historian mailing list, you'll receive all emails sent to the group whether they're of interest to you or not. (and everyone will see your replies).  If a topic isn't of interest to you, visit groups.io/family-historian/topics, select the topic concerned and then 'Mute this topic'.


Re: Printing

Mike Tate
 

I agree with Helen. It would have been much simpler to use the FHUG Forum.

 

You omitted an important detail ~ what type of file did you save to: PDF, CSV, Text?

Depending on the application program that handles those file types the printout can vary dramatically.

 

When I tried PDF, the saved file was virtually identical to the FH internal printed version with the same numbered pages, headings, etc.

 

Save to a CSV spreadsheet file and the printout format will depend on the spreadsheet program’s settings, page orientation, etc.

 

Save to a Text file which is plain text with no formatting and you lose tidy columns and page numbering.

 

I’m not sure what else you could have expected with those file types.

 


Re: Printing

colevalleygirl@colevalleygirl.co.uk
 

Mike H, as you're subscribed to the family-historian mailing list, you'll receive all emails sent to the group whether they're of interest to you or not. (and everyone will see your replies).  If a topic isn't of interest to you, visit groups.io/family-historian/topics, select the topic concerned and then 'Mute this topic'.


Re: Printing

Mike Hall
 

Sorry both

I think I have received the emails in error - I haven't a clue about this
Mike Hall


On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 15:56, colevalleygirl@... <colevalleygirl@...> wrote:
Victor,

It would be much easier for everyone concerned it you had posted your question on FHUG (where i kniw you have an account). At the very least, your attachments would not need a moderator to approve them there, and you would be accessing the same experts...


Re: Printing

colevalleygirl@colevalleygirl.co.uk
 

Victor,

It would be much easier for everyone concerned it you had posted your question on FHUG (where i kniw you have an account). At the very least, your attachments would not need a moderator to approve them there, and you would be accessing the same experts...


Re: Printing

Victor Markham
 

Mike

sorry for the brevity of my message. This is something I have never done before

I will try to be more specific

On ther FH sofware I prompt View which opens a menu to Query then Relations and Relationship thern relation and nearest relations.

This opens a list

To print this I use the arrow show direct to printer

This results in the following page


When I save the details to file I prompt the save, as shown above and the print version ffrom the save imge is

Two different images from the same origins. The last image does not give any page numbers and is a geat deal more than the first one

Hope this clears things a bit

Victor

On 29/11/2021 11:37 am, Mike Tate wrote:
Sorry Victor but you have lost me.
How are you printing a 99 page spreadsheet directly from FH?
Are you talking about a Query Result Set that can be printed in FH and also saved as a spreadsheet?
A little more clarification of exactly what commands you are using would help me understand.

Mike Tate







761 - 780 of 5088