Re: 1939 National Register

John James

Thanks all,

"You’re missing the fact that Ancestry (...) [isn't] very good at referencing documents correctly. " 

Missing the blindingly obvious, in other words :¬D

It wasn't the "tna_" part, but rather the ..."R39_..." I was querying.   I've not come across such a significantly incorrect reference on Ancestry before - perhaps I've just been very lucky.

Thanks again,


Join to automatically receive all group messages.