Re: 1939 National Register


colevalleygirl@colevalleygirl.co.uk
 

You’re missing the fact that Ancestry (and most of the other information providers) aren’t very good at referencing documents correctly.

 

From: family-historian@groups.io <family-historian@groups.io> On Behalf Of John James
Sent: 14 January 2021 10:56
To: family-historian@groups.io
Subject: [family-historian] 1939 National Register

 

Forgive me if this is the wrong place to ask, but ...

... why are images from the 1939 Register downloaded from Ancestry given a filename prefix of "tna_R39_..." when the Register is in the series "RG 101"?
For example, to find the TNA catalogue entry for St Just in Penwith, it's RG 101/6706 on TNA.
What am I missing here?

Join family-historian@groups.io to automatically receive all group messages.