Note: groups.io will be down for maintenance on Wednesday, October 5th, starting at 9AM Pacific Time (4PM Wednesday October 5, 2022 UTC), for approximately one hour.
On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 at 13:24, johnfirr via groups.io
... the requirements of genealogical referencing do at times conflict with the academic advice. ...I once saw a rather interesting take on that.
Academics, though perhaps not so much biographers, tend to deal in
bulk and therefore have no interest in citing a specific marriage in a
parish register or a specific schedule in a census. They therefore
have no need to cite at the same level of specificity as family
historians and if they try - well, perhaps they're actually not always
as precise as they might be!!
Even biographers might content themselves with citing a high level
source - if they feel the need to cite Winston Churchill's birth in
1874, I suspect they'd content themselves with citing FreeBMD and not
bother with "Woodstock v.3a p.695" - surely you can find it, they'd
say? Which a number of our fellow list-members will probably agree
with as well! Of course, if you're citing the birth of someone named
John Smith, it's a different matter.
So I wouldn't call it a *conflict* with academic practices - it's a
*difference* that might, just might, not always be to our detriment!