Date   
Re: D4D mods

Adam Rong
 

Modification is not necessary if you want to get it work first. After you have time, you can consider these two modifications:
1. Replace C5 by a 105 monolithic cap (tolerance < 20%) to improve IMD at the cost of half RF power at the same audio input.
2. Add a diode per KD1JV to improve carrier leakage.

If your sound card output is too low to drive VOX, consider KD1JV improvement to add a 150k resistor. This mod will not become standard as it is related with transistor parameter and power supply voltage. You make your call to modify it or buy a USB sound card along.

Thanks,
Adam

On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 12:29 AM Bryan Brauer <bryan@...> wrote:
I just received my d4d kit this week, and wish to incorporate all recommended mods.  Will there be a file that lists all mods, or an update to the instructions that includes all?

Bryan B. Brauer, PE
Consulting Engineer


On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 8:21 AM Adam Rong <rongxh@...> wrote:
Steve,

Thanks for reminding. We studied the spec while we apply the 4.3V power supply. The main impact parameters are:
Conversion gain, Noise figure, and IP3i

I believe the major impact is IP3i which will cause worse BCI.

With your modificaiton, I think it is okay not to add BH4DCL diode mod to avoid the impact to the receiver performance. The carrier leakage is now about 10 dB under USB and LSB signals even I applied 10 dB attenuation to the audio input.

Thanks,
Adam



--
Thanks,
Adam Rong

Re: D4D mods

Bryan Brauer
 

I just received my d4d kit this week, and wish to incorporate all recommended mods.  Will there be a file that lists all mods, or an update to the instructions that includes all?

Bryan B. Brauer, PE
Consulting Engineer


On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 8:21 AM Adam Rong <rongxh@...> wrote:
Steve,

Thanks for reminding. We studied the spec while we apply the 4.3V power supply. The main impact parameters are:
Conversion gain, Noise figure, and IP3i

I believe the major impact is IP3i which will cause worse BCI.

With your modificaiton, I think it is okay not to add BH4DCL diode mod to avoid the impact to the receiver performance. The carrier leakage is now about 10 dB under USB and LSB signals even I applied 10 dB attenuation to the audio input.

Thanks,
Adam

Re: D4D mods

Adam Rong
 

Steve,

Thanks for reminding. We studied the spec while we apply the 4.3V power supply. The main impact parameters are:
Conversion gain, Noise figure, and IP3i

I believe the major impact is IP3i which will cause worse BCI.

With your modificaiton, I think it is okay not to add BH4DCL diode mod to avoid the impact to the receiver performance. The carrier leakage is now about 10 dB under USB and LSB signals even I applied 10 dB attenuation to the audio input.

Thanks,
Adam

Re: D4D mods

Steven Weber
 

I would remove the diode in series with the 5V to the SA602. The minimum operating voltage for the SA602 is 4.5V and performance degrades quickly below 4.5V.

 

 

Thank you, Steve. Your diode mod is effective. In my test, the carrier leakage improved by about 5 dB, as a side effect, both USB and LSB signals increased about 1 dB which is a surprise to me. I also applied the BH4DCL diode mod, and it improved the carrier leakage further for another 3 dB, and there was no noticeable difference on the USB and LSB signal level.

I did try to change the emitter resistor from 1.5k to half and it won't help too much, so I will not change it.

So, my recommendation is that we apply both diode mods, hihi.

 

Thanks,

Adam

 

On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 4:36 AM Steven Weber <steve.kd1jv@...> wrote:

Yes, Q1’s collector should stay above 5V when 12_V is applied.

Steve

 

 

From: Adam Rong
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 10:33 AM
To: crkits@groups.io
Subject: Re: [crkits] D4D mod

 

Hi Steve,

Thanks for your sharing. I will test them. One thing to confirm: If we add a diode between +5V and the collector of Q1, when 12V_R is present, the diode will be reverse biased? If not, I suppose it will mute the audio output.

Thanks,
Adam

 



--

Thanks,

Adam Rong

 

Re: D4D mods

Adam Rong
 

And the photo follows. The left side is the KD1JV diode mod, and the right side is the BH4DCL diode mod.
微信图片_20190804230531.jpg


On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 10:59 PM Adam Rong via Groups.Io <rongxh=gmail.com@groups.io> wrote:
Thank you, Steve. Your diode mod is effective. In my test, the carrier leakage improved by about 5 dB, as a side effect, both USB and LSB signals increased about 1 dB which is a surprise to me. I also applied the BH4DCL diode mod, and it improved the carrier leakage further for another 3 dB, and there was no noticeable difference on the USB and LSB signal level.

I did try to change the emitter resistor from 1.5k to half and it won't help too much, so I will not change it.

So, my recommendation is that we apply both diode mods, hihi.

Thanks,
Adam

On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 4:36 AM Steven Weber <steve.kd1jv@...> wrote:

Yes, Q1’s collector should stay above 5V when 12_V is applied.

Steve

 

 

From: Adam Rong
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 10:33 AM
To: crkits@groups.io
Subject: Re: [crkits] D4D mods

 

Hi Steve,

Thanks for your sharing. I will test them. One thing to confirm: If we add a diode between +5V and the collector of Q1, when 12V_R is present, the diode will be reverse biased? If not, I suppose it will mute the audio output.

Thanks,
Adam

 



--
Thanks,
Adam Rong



--
Thanks,
Adam Rong

Re: D4D mods

Adam Rong
 

Thank you, Steve. Your diode mod is effective. In my test, the carrier leakage improved by about 5 dB, as a side effect, both USB and LSB signals increased about 1 dB which is a surprise to me. I also applied the BH4DCL diode mod, and it improved the carrier leakage further for another 3 dB, and there was no noticeable difference on the USB and LSB signal level.

I did try to change the emitter resistor from 1.5k to half and it won't help too much, so I will not change it.

So, my recommendation is that we apply both diode mods, hihi.

Thanks,
Adam

On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 4:36 AM Steven Weber <steve.kd1jv@...> wrote:

Yes, Q1’s collector should stay above 5V when 12_V is applied.

Steve

 

 

From: Adam Rong
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 10:33 AM
To: crkits@groups.io
Subject: Re: [crkits] D4D mods

 

Hi Steve,

Thanks for your sharing. I will test them. One thing to confirm: If we add a diode between +5V and the collector of Q1, when 12V_R is present, the diode will be reverse biased? If not, I suppose it will mute the audio output.

Thanks,
Adam

 



--
Thanks,
Adam Rong

dB level and TX timings

conchobhair.ofearghail@...
 

Hi all,

I built the D4D kit a couple of days ago and it worked well. I didn't make any QSOs just yet, but the band conditions are not good so this isn't a problem.

Yesterday, however, I powered up the transceiver and I noticed some issues. You will see in my screenshot that the received power level is at 54dB. Previously it was at about 23dB, and I was able to receive a lot of FT8 transmissions.

Secondly, you will see that the transmission times start one second later than they are supposed to. Previously they were transmitting at :00, :15, etc. without any problems. This happens in both versions 2.0 and 2.1 of WSJT-X. I also noticed that the transmission duration seems shorter than it previously was, maybe lasting about 11 seconds.

Both of these problems began yesterday. At one point I turned on the power to the transceiver and it did not power up: neither the RX or TX lights went on. After a couple of attempts, the device powered up. Occassionally, WSJT-X throws an error about input audio not being found.

Has anyone else every had any of these problems, or know how I might be able to troubleshoot?

Regards,
Conor EI6GSB

Japan Ham Fair 2019

Adam Rong
 

Folks,

I have decided to join Japan Ham Fair 2019 this year. It will be a fast in fast out trip but I should be able to stay at QRP village booth for about 1 day from August 31 noon to September 1 noon. I have also registered for the QRPer beer party on August 31. I wish to make an eyeball QSO with you guys if you are also going to Tokyo.

Thanks,
Adam

Vacation August 6-11

Adam Rong
 

Folks,

I will be on vacation from August 6 to 11. I will reserve something at my shipping agent, but likely will not be able to cover all your need. The next shipping will be August 19. I still take orders.

Thanks,
Adam

Re: Great Kit

yves delaforge
 

Many thanks for your information. good luck yves


Le sam. 3 août 2019 à 09:25, Adam Rong <rongxh@...> a écrit :
samir,

Nice job on the building and QSO made. You are welcome to join the contest this quarter.

Thanks,
Adam

Re: Great Kit

Adam Rong
 

samir,

Nice job on the building and QSO made. You are welcome to join the contest this quarter.

Thanks,
Adam

Re: Great Kit

 

just a heads up the oven resistor needs to touch the crystal case.

Great Kit

samir@...
 

Hello,
I would like to share with you photos and information about the kit that I posted on www.Laselki.net , I made hundreds of QSOs so far with the D4D.
http://www.laselki.net/vb/showthread.php?t=12157

Best 73,
Samir
OD5SK , HZ1SK

Re: D4D mods

Adam Rong
 

Sounds good. I will modify the emitter resistor from 1.5k to 680 ohm and give it a try later this week.

Just FYI: After applying the diode modification to reduce NE602 power supply voltage from 5V to 4.3V suggested by BH4DCL, the carrier leakage is greatly reduced. Maybe your modification will help further.

Thanks,
Adam


On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 4:36 AM Steven Weber <steve.kd1jv@...> wrote:

Yes, Q1’s collector should stay above 5V when 12_V is applied.

Steve

 

 

From: Adam Rong
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 10:33 AM
To: crkits@groups.io
Subject: Re: [crkits] D4D mods

 

Hi Steve,

Thanks for your sharing. I will test them. One thing to confirm: If we add a diode between +5V and the collector of Q1, when 12V_R is present, the diode will be reverse biased? If not, I suppose it will mute the audio output.

Thanks,
Adam

 



--
Thanks,
Adam Rong

Re: D4D mods

Steven Weber
 

Yes, Q1’s collector should stay above 5V when 12_V is applied.

Steve

 

 

From: Adam Rong
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 10:33 AM
To: crkits@groups.io
Subject: Re: [crkits] D4D mods

 

Hi Steve,

Thanks for your sharing. I will test them. One thing to confirm: If we add a diode between +5V and the collector of Q1, when 12V_R is present, the diode will be reverse biased? If not, I suppose it will mute the audio output.

Thanks,
Adam

 

Re: D4D mods

Adam Rong
 

Hi Steve,

Thanks for your sharing. I will test them. One thing to confirm: If we add a diode between +5V and the collector of Q1, when 12V_R is present, the diode will be reverse biased? If not, I suppose it will mute the audio output.

Thanks,
Adam

Re: D4D mods

Trent Trent
 

Have u done the mods yet Steve?
Btw have u got a AM BCB filter on yours and is it my mixer or is urs also seem a bit deaf on RX?

On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 at 08:22, Steven Weber <steve.kd1jv@...> wrote:
The SA602 only requires a 50 mV p-p signal to fully unbalance it. Larger signals create all kinds of unwanted mixer products. Since the VOX requires a 1200 mV p-p signal to trigger it, there needs to be a lot of attenuation between the audio input and the mixer, of about a 25:1 ratio. A 22K/1K divider would be close enough.  

The apparent reduction of power is the result of a cleaner, linear output and the fact that a watt meter reads the average power of the DSB signal.  If nothing else PLEASE MAKE THIS MOD!

The best way to go would be to add a trimmer resistor to the mixer input. Adjust the sound card output level until the board trips into transmit, then turn up the audio level to the mixer with the trimmer until the power output no longer increases. Now back down the level until the power drops off by a little more then 1/2. You are now operating the mixer in it's linear mode and not "flat topping". If you can monitor the output signal with a Scope, this is obvious. 

You can make the VOX more sensitive by adding a resistor from the base of Q5 to ground. A 150K resistor would make the VOX much more sensitive. The idea is to pre-bias the base just below the point at which it starts to turn on, with a little margin for supply voltage and temperature variations. If you do this, then the attenuation to the mixer can be reduced. 

Unequal loads on the outputs of the SA602 will unbalance the mixer and allow carrier to leak through. This happens when Q1 is turned off during transmit. All of a sudden all the current needed for Q1's emitter load is being supplied by the mixer output. To fix this, add a diode between the +5 supply and the collector of Q1 (cathode to Q1). It would probably also help to make R2 and R3 the same value to further balance the mixer output loads, but just adding the diode should be enough. This will significantly reduce or eliminate the carrier.  

You can test if your transmitting a lot of carrier by manually switching the board into transmit by grounding the relay at Q7with no audio input. 

73, Steve KD1JV 

D4D mods

Steven Weber
 

The SA602 only requires a 50 mV p-p signal to fully unbalance it. Larger signals create all kinds of unwanted mixer products. Since the VOX requires a 1200 mV p-p signal to trigger it, there needs to be a lot of attenuation between the audio input and the mixer, of about a 25:1 ratio. A 22K/1K divider would be close enough.  

The apparent reduction of power is the result of a cleaner, linear output and the fact that a watt meter reads the average power of the DSB signal.  If nothing else PLEASE MAKE THIS MOD!

The best way to go would be to add a trimmer resistor to the mixer input. Adjust the sound card output level until the board trips into transmit, then turn up the audio level to the mixer with the trimmer until the power output no longer increases. Now back down the level until the power drops off by a little more then 1/2. You are now operating the mixer in it's linear mode and not "flat topping". If you can monitor the output signal with a Scope, this is obvious. 

You can make the VOX more sensitive by adding a resistor from the base of Q5 to ground. A 150K resistor would make the VOX much more sensitive. The idea is to pre-bias the base just below the point at which it starts to turn on, with a little margin for supply voltage and temperature variations. If you do this, then the attenuation to the mixer can be reduced. 

Unequal loads on the outputs of the SA602 will unbalance the mixer and allow carrier to leak through. This happens when Q1 is turned off during transmit. All of a sudden all the current needed for Q1's emitter load is being supplied by the mixer output. To fix this, add a diode between the +5 supply and the collector of Q1 (cathode to Q1). It would probably also help to make R2 and R3 the same value to further balance the mixer output loads, but just adding the diode should be enough. This will significantly reduce or eliminate the carrier.  

You can test if your transmitting a lot of carrier by manually switching the board into transmit by grounding the relay at Q7with no audio input. 

73, Steve KD1JV 

Re: Preliminary Specifications of 6-60m 100W Coil Dipole Antenna

Charlie Vest
 

I bought this antenna when Adam first announced that it was available . Since I have to depend on my grandson to do my antenna work for me , due to my physical limitations and he was able to easily figure it out and get it in place temporarily , it still isn't where it will end up . It covers just the right bands that I was in need of another antenna for.

I must say the service was very fast and it is a quality product from start to finish !! It is 100 % complete down to a nice bag to carry it in if you plan on using it portable.

VERY well built and I am looking forward to getting it up to its higher permanent location .

Charlie , W5COV

On July 25, 2019 at 10:11 AM Adam Rong <rongxh@...> wrote:

Robert,

You can order now from the drop down menu of D4D order and choose 6-60m Coil Dipole Antenna.

Thanks,
Adam

On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 10:09 PM Robert KF6FOD < rgp415@...> wrote:
Where and when can I order this antenna ?



--
Thanks,
Adam Rong

 

Re: New Record: D4D QSO Distance

Adam Rong
 

BG7IKK did it again! Now with N0FW with distance of 12821km.

Thanks,
Adam

在 2019年7月18日,下午8:13,Adam Rong <rongxh@...> 写道:

Folks,

Still remember the quarterly contest? Last time the 1st place was BG7IKK. He made a QSO from Guangzhou China to Italy with distance over 9000km. Today he refreshed by a QSO with W4UAT with distance of 11233km. He got report of -19dB!

His rig is our D4D 20m and the antenna is an EFHW.

You still have chance to win the contest before the deadline of the end of September. Show us your QSO!

Thanks,
Adam