Dan, I certainly would understand if you decided that running this site no longer interests you. This is not your hobby and it takes a lot of time and effort to run this type of learning site. That sa

From: Robert Baldassano <robsbchat@...> Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2020 2:46 PM To: colortheory@groups.io Subject: Re: Group future Dan, I am happily surprised by your decision. While I can't su

From: Robert Baldassano <robsbchat@...> Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2020 4:19 PM To: colortheory@groups.io Subject: Re: A unique color-testing opportunity Dan I have my cataract surgery done ab

Dan thanks for the link. I took the test and scored a 10.

Count me in. Robert S BAldassano

Until the Renaissance, the English language had no word for yellow-red. Before orange (the fruit, that is) stormed Europe, yellow-red was called simply that: yellow-red, or even just red. While both r

From: Robert Baldassano <robsbchat@...> Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2021 12:53 PM To: colortheory@groups.io Subject: Re: Case Study Announcement: Hotel Lobby I double checked my entry already subm

Sent from Mail for Windows 10 Mine was #118 and overlaying PAR I can see that there were a few areas I could have done better, primarily in making the white marble a bit more so and making the greens

Paco thanks for the detail on how you used the red channel mask. That is very helpful. Robert S Baldassano Get Outlook for Android

Dan, thanks so much for the detailed critiques, they are very helpful to hobbyists like me. Mine was 118, and when I initially compaed to par I could see where I could have done better. I was not read

Mine was 236 and I must admit that I am puzzled by the results shown. I for some reason did not pick up on the blue cast. When I first started I carefully looked at the black and white set points, Whi

Dan thanks for the inputs. I did as you suggested and sure enough the blue cast is gone. Here is the update. I also tried blurring the A & B channels after this version but did not like how it turned

Mine was 317 and the PAR is way better than mine. It is brighter overall, I like the stage lighting much better and the sand color is way better than mine. Of course the water is also better. I do not

Mine was 420 and in looking at the rest of the images, I erred on the side of making mine too flat and I did nothing to correct the noise. I compared mine with par and though at first I found par a bi

#case-study-results

My entry was 501. As a series these exercises have been a humbling experience. I used to think I was pretty good using PPW, at least on the images I created, but when I moved from San Jose CA to Napa

#case-study-results

Sent from Mail for Windows 10 My entry was 619. Compared to PAR 636, it appears my colors were close to par but the differed in L with par being much brighter. While I can see that my version could be

Dan thanks for the comments. I think I have been using the auto comparison wrong. I have been creating an auto version from the initial image. And have used that to compare with the final. Should I be

Mine was 705 and comparing it to the PAR version, I found mine was a bit more blue and darker. So after trying color and luminosity blends with PAR I found that I liked a version where PAR luminosity

Edward, I think your students are very lucky to have you for a teacher. You are clearly exposing them to powerful knowledge. I am a dinosaur of the film days. I never had a formal photography class in

Dan, I think I understand why you go into great detail in comments on some of the images, as they are great teaching moments. In my submissions your comments are generally terse as in Choir you stated