If you are on a Mac you can use Applescript to have Photoshop run Actions. It should be fairly easy to set up a loop to perform an action x number of times. I haven't actually tried any scripting of

How do I make an action in Photoshop repeat automatically? Is it possible? Thanks Dave --

One of these days I'm going to get the hang of sending mail to the group instead of just hitting reply: "Ripka, Herb" wrote: I don't know where Bruce got this idea but it's not true. Basically

on 21/6/01 10:58 PM, J Walton at j.walton@... wrote: Teaching granny to suck eggs?.... :-) Bruce is my hero...if he says he ALWAYS uses Curves adjustment layers (except in 16bit/channel

Not if you pile adjustment layer on top of adjustment layer. 10 adjustment layers, or 10 curves applied in the same order would, in my view have the same effect. I have not tested this out, of

I read this on http://www.creativepro.com/story/feature/13486-2.html Out of Gamut: Color-Correcting Photographs in Photoshop by Bruce Fraser "Photoshop offers many different ways to fix this

Andrew Rodney <andrew@...> writes: ugly I just saw a preview of the new Nikon D1X, and it now gives you a choice of sRGB or Adobe RGB for images processed in the camera (as opposed to RAW

Lee Varis writes, effect. If the image has a fair amount of red tones in it I find that they tend to render over saturated and kind of orange but certain images perk up quite nicely. The advantage of

Bob Smith wrote: I definitely think this is the way to go. In fact, I use something very similar - I use a workspace that is basically ColorMatch with a gamma of 2.2, 5500k white - it's a real plain

on 6/20/01 6:05 AM, Bob Smith at rmsmith@... wrote: IF one can push and pull the RGB from such a camera into a definition of a custom working space (which is a rather simple description that

Dan Margulis wrote: must have been one of those other Bob Smiths... this one hasn't experienced a digicam who's images go directly into Adobe RGB well. Most I've worked with fit better into one of

Chris Murphy wrote: With this particular camera, the Oly E-10, it uses on-board software to locate and sample the brightest highlight (which may or may not be a specular highlight). The raw files

You might need seven differet profiles - actually you might find it's just not doable at all. Manual is better because it allows you to "perfectly" adapt the camera to the specific conditions,

If there are profiles for the camera already you would go to Image:Mode:Assign Profile and select profiles until you find the preview on screen sufficient. The preview will change with each

Stephen writes, have been able to spot a 'trend' in this new form of input. Whitepoints, blacks and tones which one would presume to be neutral/near neutral agree 'by the numbers'. Whites are

John Denniston writes, we purchased one Nikon D1 and have found that unlike the NC2000's 95% of the pictures from this camera can go into the paper with little colour correction. We have never

Andrew Rodney <andrew@...> writes: Actually some cameras can give you this data, but it's in a proprietary format, so you have to use their software to do the transformation to RGB (which

Hi all, Without getting into another discussion about the benefits of input profiles for digicams there are some practical corrections you can try for poor skin tones. Skin tones can be a major

look like crap. We have been totally digital with Kodak NC2000's for 6 years. Last year we purchased one Nikon D1 and have found that unlike the NC2000's 95% of the pictures from this camera can go

on 6/19/01 10:28 AM, Ron Bean at rbean@... wrote: So is the ColorChecker you process to run to the CMS software to create the profile. Some cameras allow raw RGB to be captured (Linear, raw