I submitted for the first time but how do I know which is my version? My submitted file had the file name plus my initials, but the initials are not to be seen in the result numbering. Toodle pip

This image demonstrates the variety of personal preferences for how much color and contrast should be "forced" into the image! I prefer my own version (828) over just about every other version—I

I think to find the best colour is the most difficult. In my version – 819 – saturation has been overdone and it all became yellower than many of the others. Also, I think, as this is in stark

This exercise is similar to the Cinque Terre image as it may again evoke discussions about "how colorful (or how contrasty) should it be". I myself find the par version too much of both, but this is

I will stick my neck out. I like 812, 824, and 829 the best. I think that 812 is better than the par version. I also like my version. I am not saying what number it is yet. James Gray

While discussion continues of Monument Valley, we move on to our final four studies. I’ve posted the next, again due Monday. Find it in our Photos section, labeled Case Study: A Toast to Greece.

I’ve posted the results of our Monument study. Reviewing: This is from the MIT study of 5,000 images and represents one of the most iconic scenes of the American west. The MIT study employed five

Hi Jeanne, this is how to download the image. On the menu left, click Photos. Open the group called "Case Study: Monument Valley". You'll see two representations of the same image: one the original,

I've been lurking here for quite awhile and meant to try this case study for starters. I tried to download it and got only a solid black image? Please direct me to your instructions for adding to

A reminder that entries are due in this case study in 48 hours, at 06:00 eastern time Monday/1100Z/12:00 ora italiana. Two entries have already come in in the wrong colorspace. Please make sure you

Very interesting. I was very pleasantly surprised by how well it worked. Based on my experience, DeNoise AI seems optimized for use on digital files straight out of a digital camera. On scans of my

We had more trouble with pattern reduction in this exercise than might be hoped for. Part of the reason was that many people were using the Dust & Scratches filter for this purpose, but their notes

Dan - Thanks for taking the time to comment on all the entries. Mine is #706, and your reminder to double-check everything with a quick Auto Tone is valuable. Auto Tone is a nice

To the Color Theorists, A couple of months ago I noticed the thread here about the classic and out-of-print Agfa "Postscript Process Color Guide." Well, in doing some unpacking after a recent move

Here are my notes on this set. Where names are used, the person has already identified himself in a post to the list. 701 The yellowish feeling is deliberate on the part of Gerald Bakker, who calls

Applied Color Theory list https://groups.io/g/colortheory General Description and Rules (This document is posted monthly) THE MOVE TO GROUPS.IO In November 2019, this list moved from yahoogroups to

Regarding the pattern suppression approach, re-running the process (FFT then dust and scratches filter) I see that the second step adds more softness than the first. So if some noise is acceptable

My entry is 710. Interesting that quite a few of us used the Pattern suppression/FFT filter yet ended up with a wide variety of results. I too used the Pattern suppression V2 macro. My earlier efforts

Thanks for the instructive and direct evaluation of my image. It is amazing that the obvious is not so obvious when you are immersed in a problem. Normally, I have problems with too much magenta or

I tried to grab a copy of #726 and do the Luminosity thing but it didn't work for my #719. So, I did a little of #726 improvement and came up with this: